ADVERTISEMENT

It's a sad day for America - and my farewell

First off, I've never claimed that I could please a man with my mouth. I have a horrible gag reflex.

I've also never said that we're going to war, meaning an actual war, with "wimpy Dems." So no...that's not all you get from my man pleaser...assuming that you're referring to my nice smile (see above).

Relax FFS...you literally challenged a guy to a gun fight and that guy (me) has no flipping idea why.
Navi was the one spouting off this time, but I've heard the same from most of you. All talk.

As for thinking I was talking about you personally, well, it's not my fault that English doesn't have a second person plural. Gotta read for context in these cases.

Edit: I did say "you jackwagons" so it was obviously plural. I can't help it if you are so delicate you take everything so personally.
 
Last edited:
Seriously man, what the hell are you really going to do if someone “brings it”? This is nothing more than internet tough guy talk and all it does is makes you look retarded.

Sit down sally
Someone? No buddy, I'm talking about the full 74 million that Navi promised. So much smoke, but no fire.
 
Why do I have to keep repeating myself? Rebellion? Succession? Civil war? These are the things you keep promising, but still waiting. Bring it or shut up about it,
Are you ready for all of the above? How would you protect yourself if any of the three occurred? Do you have food storage in case you can’t get a soy latte?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gatordad3
Lol. Snowflake! I’ve given u butthurt safe spacers plenty of opportunities. Just like u they all chickened out. You're no different. Lol So go take ur viagra and beat urself off to sleep! Lol
I think you guys should meet up at the parking lot of your bank that @BSC911 failed to show up at.

@bradleygator, would that be “bringing it”? Just looking for some clarification.
 
Its what you vote for.... Or are you a hypocrite with that as well??
More garbage from you. When have you ever seen a movement from Democrats to eliminate the 2nd amendment?

I feel I must point out that having waiting periods and background checks does not make guns illegal, because I doubt you are bright enough to understand the distinction.
 
More garbage from you. When have you ever seen a movement from Democrats to eliminate the 2nd amendment?

I feel I must point out that having waiting periods and background checks does not make guns illegal, because I doubt you are bright enough to understand the distinction.

Every year? Im assuming you think they dont want to abolish police or prisons either. Tons of dems dont want citizens to have guns. Do you not pay attention? To stupid to understand?
 
Is he 74 million people seceding from the union? Or deciding to go to war with Democrats (who tend to be younger and more fit, just saying)?

You need to read for context.
So just to confirm, you think that Democrats are more younger and fit and that if the conservatives “brought it”, they would lose?
 
So just to confirm, you think that Democrats are more younger and fit and that if the conservatives “brought it”, they would lose?
Pretty much. That's why your side is all talk. 60 year olds think they are 20, but they really aren't, and about 10 minutes after taking to the streets, they would all be wheezing and sitting on the curb. So, bring it. See what happens.
 
Navi was the one spouting off this time, but I've heard the same from most of you. All talk.

Not from me. You responded to me. Silly me, I assumed that meant you were responding to me. You see why, right?

...because, again, and just to be clear, you responded to me.
As for thinking I was talking about you personally, well, it's not my fault that English doesn't have a second person plural. Gotta read for context in these cases.

Sure...blame the English language...and me for being able to interpret the English language. But one way to clarify is to respond to the F'n poster that you're speaking to.


Edit: I did say "you jackwagons" so it was obviously plural. I can't help it if you are so delicate you take everything so personally.

Blank freaking stare...again, "jackwagons" would include me, the dude you responded to, when I've said no such thing.

I don't mind in the way you're assuming...I'm just pointing out that you're FOS and in this case entirely off base and inaccurate.
 
Pretty much. That's why your side is all talk. 60 year olds think they are 20, but they really aren't, and about 10 minutes after taking to the streets, they would all be wheezing and sitting on the curb. So, bring it. See what happens.
This is the funniest shit I’ve read in a long time. Are you really going with that rationale? Do you really think that if conservatives “brought it” that they’d be chasing you democrats around?

Let’s be honest bud, if you were in a crowded place and you heard gun shots, your ass is running the other way. You are not the type to run to danger. You are not the type to engage in a gun fight. Your ass, like 99.9% of Democrats are running away and days later need to sit down with a trauma counselor and talk about your experience. You are the type that cowers behind the people with the guns because you can’t protect yourself. You admire the people that run into danger to save lives, you call them heroes. You sir are no hero.

Take my advice, sit down sally, this isn’t your type of fight. Your fight is with a calculator and a balance sheet. Stick to what you know and not what you feel.
 
More garbage from you. When have you ever seen a movement from Democrats to eliminate the 2nd amendment?

I feel I must point out that having waiting periods and background checks does not make guns illegal, because I doubt you are bright enough to understand the distinction.

What about when they try to ban an entire class of guns...and yet sometimes the sponsors of those bills cannot even accurately define the very class of gun that their bill hopes to ban?

AR's, which they believe stands for Assault Rifles, are, according to these geniuses, machine guns.

Same thing for semiautomatic...which is freaking awesome because the name semiautomatic literally defines the gun as NOT fully automatic. 🤣
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BillCutting4585
This is the funniest shit I’ve read in a long time. Are you really going with that rationale? Do you really think that if conservatives “brought it” that they’d be chasing you democrats around?

Let’s be honest bud, if you were in a crowded place and you heard gun shots, your ass is running the other way. You are not the type to run to danger. You are not the type to engage in a gun fight. Your ass, like 99.9% of Democrats are running away and days later need to sit down with a trauma counselor and talk about your experience. You are the type that cowers behind the people with the guns because you can’t protect yourself. You admire the people that run into danger to save lives, you call them heroes. You sir are no hero.

Take my advice, sit down sally, this isn’t your type of fight. Your fight is with a calculator and a balance sheet. Stick to what you know and not what you feel.
Well, if you old, half blind Republicans are just going to open fire in public places, then a) you'll kill as many Republicans as Democrats, and b) do it enough and you just might get Amendment 2 overturned after all. So good luck with that.
 
Pretty much. That's why your side is all talk. 60 year olds think they are 20, but they really aren't, and about 10 minutes after taking to the streets, they would all be wheezing and sitting on the curb. So, bring it. See what happens.

Oh good Lord.
 
What about when they try to ban an entire class of guns...and yet sometimes the sponsors of those bills cannot even accurately define the very class of gun that their bill hopes to ban?

AR's, which they believe stands for Assault Rifles, are, according to these geniuses, machine guns.

Same thing for semiautomatic...which is freaking awesome because the name semiautomatic literally defines the gun as NOT fully automatic. 🤣
Did you know that there are religions that have been officially designated as cults, and so not afforded Amendment 1 protections? Yes, it seems you can disavow one type of something while not making the entire group illegal. Crazy.
 
Did you know that there are religions that have been officially designated as cults, and so not afforded Amendment 1 protections? Yes, it seems you can disavow one type of something while not making the entire group illegal. Crazy.

Probably at least a good idea to be able to define one from another first though, right?

Also it might be a good idea to have a handle on what your goal is. If the tens of thousands of gun deaths are your issue, banning guns that kill hundreds a year probably isn't your sweetspot.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT