Well, since I read both sides, I know what everyone is being fed. If you believe everything everybody says you certainly have justification for feeling anyway you like. And if you think that I am not capable of being objective, that is your right.
There are people who believe the January 6 was an actual insurrection. I honestly don't know what to say to that ...
Reading both sides, while commendable, doesn't mean your objective at all on its own. But its strange that you would pick this hill to die on......maybe its a difference our views of what a dictator is or what they would do. BTW I didn't say you weren't capable of being objective, just that you were not in this case and I stand by that. And I have no interest in getting in the insurrection debate that has been beaten to death, I saw what happened. Lets first restate the basic issue we have here:
You said: "Well Jimbo, we obviously don't agree on this and I'm not gonna argue with you, say that Trump had an opportunity to be a dictator during his last term,
and there was no evidence that he tried to, at history is usually the best indicator in my opinion ..."
I said: "I don't know what he will do this time,
but there is plenty of evidence and reasons for them to be concerned."
You said:
Do you wanna share some of that evidence with us?
I said: "You can argue the democrats are wrong about how they feel about Trump, no problem with that POV. But
asserting they don't have any justification for feeling like they do reflects a complete and total lack of objectivity."
Evidence - OK here is one of the stronger pieces (although there are many):
Trump's own Vice president saying that Trump pressured him to reject the electoral college votes or send them back to the state when Pence new
the constitution makes it clear that the vice presidents role is purely ceremonial. Remember Trump lying to his followers when he tweeted "Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our country and our Constitution"?. So a guy who was as loyal as a dog for 4 years, a hard core Bible thumping Conservative, tells us Trump pressured him to violate the constitution in an effort to keep him in power. I would say that's a pretty damn strong piece of evidence right there.....considering it involves no democrats and is the word of the guy who stood by Trump's side and fully backed him up for 4 years. Isn't this the kind of thing a dictator would do?
A direct quote from Pence:
“For four years, we had a close working relationship. It did not end well,” Pence writes, summing up their time in the White House. Still, he adds, “we parted amicably when our service to the nation drew to a close. In the months that followed, we spoke from time to time, b
ut when the president returned to the rhetoric that he was using before that tragic day and began to publicly criticize those of us who defended the Constitution, I decided it would be best to go our separate ways.”
That's all I have time for right now. But it supports my point. The democrats have evidence to support the way they feel about Trump. You can disagree with their conclusion, that's fine, but acting like they don't have a leg to stand on is simply not accurate. And this is just one of many examples (consider here that there are some 30 - 40 ex Trump executives/Gov higher ups that Trump picked to serve for him who now speak out against him - plenty of quotes).