He's now a cool 12-39. Looks like he just surpassed David Shula has having the worst record for any coach with 50+ games as head coach.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's now a cool 12-39. Looks like he just surpassed David Shula has having the worst record for any coach with 50+ games as head coach.
It's all by design. The goal of both nfl and organization is lose fan support so that team will have excuse to move team to England. I believe the nfl realized they made mistake by starting franchise I jax
It's all by design. The goal of both nfl and organization is lose fan support so that team will have excuse to move team to England. I believe the nfl realized they made mistake by starting franchise I jax
Why they ever put an NFL team in a place like Jacksonville is beyond me.
Can someone explain why Jax is a bad place for a franchise? It's bigger than Nashville, New Orleans and maybe Charlotte. Is it because there's too many other things to do?
It's NOT a bad place for a franchise.
It's a bad location.
Florida already has two NFL franchises. Not to mention that the south has always paid more attention to college ball as opposed to the NFL. So there's not a lot of sure fan base to pull from.
The population there has never been a reliable fan base for the team, even in some of its better years.
And the argument could be made that it's kind of lame town. Charlotte is too, but they've put out a pretty good product throughout most of their history.
This is a GREAT area for the NFL. In some cities the stadium would be a ghost town with this much concentrated suckage. But the Bucs and Jags still pull a lot of fans.
The population there has never been a reliable fan base for the team, even in some of its better years.
That my point. Someone earlier said they couldn't understand why a franchise was put there.
Before they changed the rule, weren't almost all of your home games getting blacked out due to lack of attendance?
If you don't have any fact, just make some up.
So I was incorrect about the blackouts?
I couldn't care less if Jacksonville has a team or not, but you're obviously rather defensive about it.
Yes.
Just a stickler for people arguing with facts, not BS. I am not sure where you get your information, but most of what you have posted in this thread is not based in fact.
Interesting because I remember several Jags fans here several years ago complaining about it.
Actually Jax sold out several games in a row during the first 8 years or so. It wasn't until the team started losing, and losing big, that attendance dropped off, but surprisingly still was better than about half the league despite being the 2nd smallest TV market. Jax is a great town. Every time I go back I am amazed at how much it continues to grow. Two years ago we spent some time out at the beach and had a blast,,,,it was free of yankee snowbirds and has some nice local restaurants.So I was incorrect about the blackouts?
I couldn't care less if Jacksonville has a team or not, but you're obviously rather defensive about it.
Not sure about lame, I live in DC now and would go back to Jax in a second. I've been fortunate enough, or unfortunate enough, to live in Jax, Orlando, Miami, Tampa, ATL, Nashville, briefly in Charlotte, briefly in Bham, and now DC for the past 9 years....I would happily take Jax over any of the others, but each to his own...It's a bad location.
Florida already has two NFL franchises. Not to mention that the south has always paid more attention to college ball as opposed to the NFL. So there's not a lot of sure fan base to pull from.
The population there has never been a reliable fan base for the team, even in some of its better years.
And the argument could be made that it's kind of lame town. Charlotte is too, but they've put out a pretty good product throughout most of their history.
Not sure about lame, I live in DC now and would go back to Jax in a second. I've been fortunate enough, or unfortunate enough, to live in Jax, Orlando, Miami, Tampa, ATL, Nashville, briefly in Charlotte, briefly in Bham, and now DC for the past 9 years....I would happily take Jax over any of the others, but each to his own...
Can someone explain why Jax is a bad place for a franchise? It's bigger than Nashville, New Orleans and maybe Charlotte. Is it because there's too many other things to do?
If that's where you're drafted and where a paycheck gets signed that's a destination.
Yes...and after your rookie contract is up, you can leave if you're any good...and when do free agents (decent ones) join in for the Jags?
I'm surprised at the vitriol.
Detroit's nice.....seriously, with all the things mentioned above, size of the market, competing teams near by, it is impressive the Jags average about 92% capacity, around 63k fans. Bradley is in year 4, the roster has been upgraded, and yet nothing to show.There are plenty of teams in cities where NFL players don't want to hang out. Unless you think players are lining up to live in Buffalo, Nashville, Kansas City, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Minneapolis.
as far as the blackouts, they were a problem one year, but that was primarily because the stadium was at 85,000 seats, which put it in the top 5 largest in the league and too big for a city Jacksonville's size. Really it's impressive that the fans kept it filled for as long as they did. They covered seats to bring it down to about 65,000, which is about NFL average, and fixed the blackouts.
I just heard that of 170 NFL coaches who have coached 50 games, Bradley ranks 169th in win percentage. Clock is definitely ticking.
Yes...and after your rookie contract is up, you can leave if you're any good...and when do free agents (decent ones) join in for the Jags?
I'm surprised at the vitriol.
I wouldn't call it vitriol - but I'm interested in learning why anyone would want to leave any city in Florida (okay, Mayo or Cross City) for a place like Buffalo or Indianapolis.
Maybe not the best exams since the Bill's have been to the playoffs once since 2004 and there's been talk off and on about moving to Toronto.
Indy has a dome and a front office that has more or less sustained a high quality organization for the better part of 20 years. If you want to win, you've got to think you'd have w better chance there than in Jacksonville.
Again, my main point is that there's several factors that go into Jacksonville's football problems.
One of them, frankly, (at the lower end of things) is their hideous uniform colors and designs.
Indy lucked into drafting franchise quarterbacks, back to back. They barely got Manning one Super Bowl and they're on their way to driving Luck into early retirement. Their owner is an acknowledged pill head. And anyone who would rather watch a game inside in Indianapolis, rather than outdoors, riverside, in Florida, should reevaluate their life direction.
I think Jax has some players (except for TJ Yeldon) and could be pretty good with the right hbc.
I don't didagree with any of that.
You don't agree their owner is an admitted pill head? Or that they've done a crappy job supporting Luck?
I didn't realize that the autocorrect on my phone changed it to "didagree" instead of "disagree."
So where's the problem?