The poor pay taxes as well. The poor help pay for the rich's school with their taxes.Like school? The rich and others give them school through taxes
The poor pay taxes as well. The poor help pay for the rich's school with their taxes.Like school? The rich and others give them school through taxes
I had to laugh when you said budgets have to get balanced. Since when? We haven't had a balanced budget in this country in almost 30 years when Clinton and Gingrich were in power. The spending is simply out of control to a debt of over 30 trillion with absolutely no urgency to control it. And with outrageous spending comes outrageous tax proposals.Stuff has to get paid for and budgets have to get balanced. You can’t get blood from a turnip (Poor people). Poor peeps don’t make enough to balance the budget. The only way to make it work, is to have a sliding scale. All money from 0-30k is taxed at x. And it tiers up from there. Shit ain’t fair, but neither are salaries around the country. CEOs get paid, let’s say, 5-30 million a year and golden parachutes when they are fired. And a construction worker busts his ass every day of the week for peanuts. And When he gets fired, he struggles to feed his kids.
How are we so worried about “punishing” a guy making over 2 million a year. This guy has no money concerns. How many folks do you know making 2 million a year?
What tax system is ideal to you?
Sounds like this is a typical dem that thinks the answer to our problems is to punish the rich for being rich.I had to laugh when you said budgets have to get balanced. Since when? We haven't had a balanced budget in this country in almost 30 years when Clinton and Gingrich were in power. The spending is simply out of control to a debt of over 30 trillion with absolutely no urgency to control it. And with outrageous spending comes outrageous tax proposals.
If you've never made $2M a year than you can't comment on what it's like for people that do.
Is that really confusing you?
Sounds like this is a typical dem that thinks the answer to our problems is to punish the rich for being rich.
The rest of us can see that the solution is to elevate the poor out of poverty. And that the rich should be applauded for their success, not demonized because of it.
I had to laugh when you said budgets have to get balanced. Since when? We haven't had a balanced budget in this country in almost 30 years when Clinton and Gingrich were in power. The spending is simply out of control to a debt of over 30 trillion with absolutely no urgency to control it. And with outrageous spending comes outrageous tax proposals.
You say you agree the solution is to elevate the poor out of poverty but that it takes time and money. Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty in 1965 and since then, 23 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs. How much time beyond almost 60 years and money beyond 23 trillion do you have in mind? We stay somewhere between 11 and 15 percent poverty level. Time and money not the answer.I agree, but that takes money and time. What do we do in the meantime while the country is bleeding money?
BTW, that LBJ War On Poverty didn't really help out either. It simply made the poor back then MORE dependent upon government, thus enabling Dems to garner their votes in droves. FYIYou say you agree the solution is to elevate the poor out of poverty but that it takes time and money. Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty in 1965 and since then, 23 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs. How much time beyond almost 60 years and money beyond 23 trillion do you have in mind? We stay somewhere between 11 and 15 percent poverty level. Time and money not the answer.
You say you agree the solution is to elevate the poor out of poverty but that it takes time and money. Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty in 1965 and since then, 23 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs. How much time beyond almost 60 years and money beyond 23 trillion do you have in mind? We stay somewhere between 11 and 15 percent poverty level. Time and money not the answer.
We undo the damage that the current administration has done. We get the supply chain up and running again. We reopen pipelines and restore our energy independence.I agree, but that takes money and time. What do we do in the meantime while the country is bleeding money?
The left views 'poverty programs' as a way to buy votes.You say you agree the solution is to elevate the poor out of poverty but that it takes time and money. Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty in 1965 and since then, 23 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs. How much time beyond almost 60 years and money beyond 23 trillion do you have in mind? We stay somewhere between 11 and 15 percent poverty level. Time and money not the answer.
So while I agree with what you have here...the MAIN thing that people forget is WHO's money it is. It is NOT the governments money. It is the persons money who made the money...so it is up to themHere is a question. WHAT is their FAIR SHARE? How do you determine what is fair? The top 10% of tax payers already PAY something like 80% of all the tax that is collected. Seems like they are already paying their fair share. Say, I make $100,000 and pay $24,000 in taxes, 24%. You make $1,000,000 and pay $380,000, $38%. Why should you pay a higher % than I do just because you make more $ then I do. Is that fair?? Maybe, but what they need to do is get rid of all the loop wholes and make sure everyone is actually paying their taxes. If that were to happen, you would stop hearing DEMS spout off about Tax the Rich.
LOLOLOLOLTime and money was in reference to educating the poor. It takes time educate them and it takes money to teach them.
I’m no dem or repub, I’m a centrist. The only extreme I have is developing renewable energy in the us and A
There is no right to another person’s livelihood (doctors, nurses, pharma employees, medical equipment workers, hospital admins, etc)You are spot on. But they go to their old stand by of "say something enough times...even though it is a lie, and most will believe it is true. Their #1 use of that theory is this saying "Universal healthcare is an American right". That statement is 100% a lie. Someone show me in our Constitution(bill of rights) where that is true
How is it blatantly untrue? We can’t even agree that most people making 2 million don’t have any money problems. Taking home 145,000 a month is hard to spend. Doable, but hard to spend.
Either way, 145,000 a month is about what 12 dentists bring home in a year. I think if you do the math 145,000 is hard to spend.
Let’s say, this person owns a 2 million dollar house and another 2 million dollar vacation house with 3 million in mortgages. 3 million in mortgage payments will run roughly 15,000 a month, plus taxes, insurance, landscaping and power bills and the guy is at say 20,000 a month.
-he has a family of 5 and the grocery bill is high and runs 100 a day. 3000 a month
-he wines and dines each day for 300 a day. 9000 a month
-his wife shops Dailey at 500 a day. 15,000 a month
-2 country club bills run 1000a month each. 2000 a month
-he paid cash for his cars
-12 one week family Vacay to nice resort. 10,000 a month.
-new furniture each year. 1,000 a month
-updating kitchen every year at 120,000. 10,000 a month.
-3 kids in private school at 3,000 a month
-Weekly maid at 250 a pop for 1000 a month
-Kids sports and misc cost 2000 a month
All this is only 76,000 a month. He’s still gotta spend 79,000 more that month. So, he still lives like a king on the tax plan I suggested and he puts away 79,000 a month or close to (940,000)a million a year.