Long-time posters on this board know I have a great deal of respect for Andy McCarthy who writes for National Review. In his latest essay (linked below), he makes a convincing case that the alleged violation(s) of illegal classified information storage were simply a pretext to conduct a fishing expedition for evidence of other, more serious (and politically appealing, from the radical Left's point of view) crime.
Here's an interesting excerpt from his essay.
"
Search-warrant applications are filed with the court and remain sealed unless and until charges are ultimately filed.
Usually, if you could read the warrant application the prosecutor wrote, you would know what possible crimes were under investigation.
Usually, but not
always." [
Emphasis Added]
This search was almost certainly about much more than classified documents.
www.nationalreview.com