Dershowitz predicts trump win with Supreme Court in PA

[jfegaly]

Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump SCOTUS Win in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

townhall.com

 

[nail1988]

SHOCKING EXCLUSIVE: WE CAUGHT THEM! Pennsylvania Results Show a Statistically Impossible Pattern Behind Biden’s Steal! WE CAUGHT THEM!

Join the Premier Global Free Speech App | Parler

People are on Parler. Join Parler to connect with others you may know. Parler is where free speech thrives.

parler.com

 

[nail1988]

Dershowitz: Trump will win PA case. Yes, if the Court does Its job it’s a no-brainer.

Hillary Clinton Supporter Alan Dershowitz: 'Trump Will Win the Pennsylvania Lawsuit'

Hillary Clinton Supporter Alan Dershowitz: 'Trump Will Win the Pennsylvania Lawsuit'

redstate.com

 

[gatordad3]

Dershowitz: Trump will win PA case. Yes, if the Court does Its job it’s a no-brainer.

Hillary Clinton Supporter Alan Dershowitz: 'Trump Will Win the Pennsylvania Lawsuit'

View embedded media

Hillary Clinton Supporter Alan Dershowitz: 'Trump Will Win the Pennsylvania Lawsuit'

redstate.com

Anybody else wonder why your girl, The Whoremala, hasn't resigned her position as Kalifornia Senator?

 

[nail1988]

Anybody else wonder why your girl, The Whoremala, hasn't resigned her position as Kalifornia Senator?

My girl 😭😭

Good question? 🤔

 

[gatordad3]

My girl 😭😭

Good question? 🤔

Yeah, I know. The fat ass Stacy just happens to mine.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Anybody else wonder why your girl, The Whoremala, hasn't resigned her position as Kalifornia Senator?

Hmmmmm....maybe that's why the dems left, to find the answer?

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Just checked, she still has Senator listed on her Twitter profile.

Sheep hoodwinked again...

 

[fatman76]

Anybody else wonder why your girl, The Whoremala, hasn't resigned her position as Kalifornia Senator?

Cause they’re gonna need her vote in the Senate starting in early Jan?

 

[fatman76]

My girl 😭😭

Good question? 🤔

Don’t act like you wouldn’t let her brown your willie.

 

[LizardGrad89]

SHOCKING EXCLUSIVE: WE CAUGHT THEM! Pennsylvania Results Show a Statistically Impossible Pattern Behind Biden’s Steal! WE CAUGHT THEM!

Join the Premier Global Free Speech App | Parler

People are on Parler. Join Parler to connect with others you may know. Parler is where free speech thrives.

parler.com

Proof the Gateway pundit also does not understand statistics.

Here's a reality about statistics that may be news to some of you: If every single item gets counted, then there are no statistics. Statistics is, at its most basic, trying to estimate a large group from a small count. But that isn't happening here. The entire large group is being counted. So there is no estimate, there is no small sample population of the total population, only the total count of the entire population. So statistics? Not in the discussion.

No fraud. The reason there were more votes on election day for Trump is because Democrats voted by mail and Republicans didn't. It's becoming a broken record, but I still hope some of you have a couple of working brain cells left to digest this reality. If Biden has more votes in Pennsylvania, but his voters don't get counted until later, then the early results will be skewed, but by the end, we have the truth, and the truth is that Biden won the state.

I also think it's hilarious that anybody thinks that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania will rule against ITSELF a month after making a ruling, one that would effectively disenfranchise voters who followed the rules as stated to have a legal ballot.

NEVER. GONNA. HAPPEN.

 

[jfegaly]

Proof the Gateway pundit also does not understand statistics.

Here's a reality about statistics that may be news to some of you: If every single item gets counted, then there are no statistics. Statistics is, at its most basic, trying to estimate a large group from a small count. But that isn't happening here. The entire large group is being counted. So there is no estimate, there is no small sample population of the total population, only the total count of the entire population. So statistics? Not in the discussion.

No fraud. The reason there were more votes on election day for Trump is because Democrats voted by mail and Republicans didn't. It's becoming a broken record, but I still hope some of you have a couple of working brain cells left to digest this reality. If Biden has more votes in Pennsylvania, but his voters don't get counted until later, then the early results will be skewed, but by the end, we have the truth, and the truth is that Biden won the state.

I also think it's hilarious that anybody thinks that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania will rule against ITSELF a month after making a ruling, one that would effectively disenfranchise voters who followed the rules as stated to have a legal ballot.

NEVER. GONNA. HAPPEN.

derp

 

[LizardGrad89]

derp

I suspect that's your answer fairly often.

 

[jfegaly]

I suspect that's your answer fairly often.

To derpy posts indeed it is.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I suspect that's your answer fairly often.

Honestly the smartest thing to reply to your posts. I honestly shook my head and facepalmed when I read that.

Here's some statistics for you: It is statistically impossible to count 21k votes in a row, and have them all be for the same candidate.

It's impossible.

It proves voter fraud.

Buckle up, buttercup.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Just checked, she still has Senator listed on her Twitter profile.

Sheep hoodwinked again...

And so it all begins to unravel....

 

[LizardGrad89]

To derpy posts indeed it is.

Maybe if you read it again, more slowly, you will begin to understand it.

I TRY to write to a level comprehensible to Republicans, but I see I didn't dumb it down far enough. I'll try to do better next time.

 

[LizardGrad89]

Anybody else wonder why your girl, The Whoremala, hasn't resigned her position as Kalifornia Senator?

Um, because there is still business in the senate? So if she resigned the state would have to replace her?

Or maybe even its as simple as she's still getting paid as a Senator, whereby if she resigns she's unemployed for a couple of months.

BTW, if you are looking for whores, there are a pair in the White House right now. The nude model and the pussy grabber. Take your pick.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Um, because there is still business in the senate? So if she resigned the state would have to replace her?

Or maybe even its as simple as she's still getting paid as a Senator, whereby if she resigns she's unemployed for a couple of months.

So she's only doing this for the money?

You finally slipped up and told the truth.

 

[gatordad3]

Um, because there is still business in the senate? So if she resigned the state would have to replace her?

Or maybe even its as simple as she's still getting paid as a Senator, whereby if she resigns she's unemployed for a couple of months.

BTW, if you are looking for whores, there are a pair in the White House right now. The nude model and the pussy grabber. Take your pick.

Typical libtard logic.

We do see a child groper who loves minors and a whore who used the most powerful man in Kalifornia to get appointed positions. Even Willie Brown confirmed it. Ooh! Someone is very triggered, well, when someone here doesn't post anything nice about The Whoremala.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Maybe if you read it again, more slowly, you will begin to understand it.

I TRY to write to a level comprehensible to Republicans, but I see I didn't dumb it down far enough. I'll try to do better next time.

Imagine if you were actually as smart as you like to pretend.

You're incredibly biased and closed minded and that, in and of itself, retards you.

 

[gatordad3]

@GADAWGinIraq @jfegaly @nail1988

 

[gatordad3]