But yet when anyone wants to engage in a rational conversation about several aspects of this situation, you just keep steam roll'n with your anti-FSU, thug mantra.
1. No one (outside of the schools recruiting Cook) new of his Juvenile criminal past. So, the question is, should he have been recruited and if so, what bearing should his past have had on his college career? One strike you'r out? Discuss.
2. Should players be dismissed upon accusation, charges, or conviction?
3. What if Cook actually didn't do this? Is it too late because the media dug up his past and now he's viewed as a player who should have never even been recruited?
It seems for you guys it's automatic guilt by association (guilty because he plays for FSU).
You also give zero credit for the fact every single Nole agrees with the suspension and dismissal of Johnson and agrees with the suspension of Cook until more can be determined about the situation (Cook maintains his innocents). You seem to forget he's NOT guilty for hitting a woman because he chained up puppies. He would be guilty if he actually hit a woman.
Now, is your contention he should have been dismissed for last summer's citation? If so, we can discuss that as well.