That I never made. Again, this is why I don't waste my time arguing with emotional liberals.
Could The Democrats Actually Take The White House In 2020?
- Thread starter danmoore
- Start date
That I never made. Again, this is why I don't waste my time arguing with emotional liberals.
By your logic, every President has been "removed from office". Wait, did I say logic? That is not a word that applies to you.
By the way, how does any of that apply to the statement I refuted, where you said a 200 year old party, with nearly 45 MILLION members, and nearly as many laws guaranteeing its' continuation, was about to vanish? Still waiting to hear your logic on that.
Think Carefully? Keep Watching? My God, I think we have found Shime/Bucanole/LakerGator's most clever pseudonym.
Money has kinda been a thing for thousands of years, thinking it will be a hard habit to break.
Now, if somehow a neighbor skirmish like Iran and Iraq somehow gets the world to launch all it's nukes (which I give about a 0% chance of happening), some kind of issue with money is going to be the least of our concerns.
I think it should be noted that Iran does not have nuclear missals. Well, ok, they might have one or two that they built in secret. However, they would not be ICBM's, which is what they would need to reach the US. They would also be pretty small, comparatively. Probably a lot smaller than what we dropped on Hiroshima. At best they would be tipped onto mobile launchers and able to reach, well, Iraq. And they must know that to launch a nuke would bring the wrath of the world down on them. They may be dumb, but they are not that dumb.
You made statements. They are on record. They had inherent implications.
As to emotions, I have two. Astonishment that you are so nuts, and frustration that you are so obtuse.
But see, I'm not looking for an argument. You have made statements that are completely insane, and I would love to hear the rationale that brought you to these beliefs. Because, as I have shown, you can type any kind of insanity and then put "Keep Watching" afterward.
For the record, my statement that Tuesday is going to cease being a day of the week is exactly equal in likelihood of occurring as is the end of the national debt and the end of the Democratic party, which are your claims. Keep Watching.
For all to see. Which made you claiming I said something else even more amusing.
But emotional liberals do this all the time. It's why I don't waste my time trying to get them to think rationally and critically.
Oh and I can say 'Keep watching' because I've been right about everything posted here for the last two, almost three years. I delight in seeing breaking news and reminding @BSC911 that I told him this was coming a year or two ago.
This is also why I beg you liberals to stop listening to shit sources and to do your OWN RESEARCH into what is happening. A few here have started doing this, and as a result they know what's coming.
The rest rely on CNN and the NYT to tell them how to think. That's why they stay mad and emotional.
This is also why I beg you liberals to stop listening to shit sources and to do your OWN RESEARCH into what is happening. A few here have started doing this, and as a result they know what's coming.
The rest rely on CNN and the NYT to tell them how to think. That's why they stay mad and emotional.
And did you hear that his campaign workers support gulags for their opponents?
Kid still has a job, too. Sanders doesn't care.
According to the article, her criticism of the Fed is aimed at its role in setting monetary policy and she previously advocated pegging the dollar to Gold. Now she backs accommodative monetary policy (i.e money printing), presumably because Trump just nominated her. So, you think we’re going to print our way out of debt?
Last edited:
Brought to us by the Democratic Administration of 2025?
Keep watching!
Missals? What is this, Mass?
As for dumb, they fanatically adhere to a "religion" founded by a pedophile who wrote instructions on how to beat wives. And they believe boys are for fun, women are for impregnating. Sound like some dummies to me...
Amazing how the left apologizes for a terrorist regime while attacking the American president daily who is actually IMPROVING THEIR LIVES one hundred fold.
This is what it looks like when you are brainwashed. Or simply a moron.
You think that would help us eliminate the public debt? You’ve got a few things backward, bud.
In any event, the article is clear that she has reversed herself 180 on that and now advocated money printing, which is why Trump nominated her.
LOL You always listen to sources that are intentionally trying to mislead you, and always ignore the sources that are trying to educate you.
Oh well, can only lead the jackass to the water.
87 percent of Goldman Sachs investors today see a Trump win. 5 percent see a recession before November. One year ago these investors forecast a close call. Most economists see no recession in 2020. Bad news for the socialists and communists.
Pocohontas, arguably the Dimm's leading liar, says it's bad to have a liar in the White House.
Pocohontas, arguably the Dimm's leading liar, says it's bad to have a liar in the White House.
Tough to argue with logic... ScaredofGhosts doesn't use much of that around here.
Nice, Lizard! You should post more often and keep dunking on Our Idiocracy up in here.
Conservative for black FMs is not the same as conservative for white folks.
The man was asked on multiple times if he was a democrat, he replied in the negative. I don't care what Trump said. Trump annoyed The General enough that he left, which I regard as one of the stupider th]ngs he's done to date.
Well he's still surrounded by great military minds that love working with him. Guess it was more a Mad Dog problem than a Trump problem.
Trump cannot be a fun person to work with he thinks he knows better than everyone.
After Mattis left, he got himself a replacement with a couple of years in the Naval reserve. A yes man.
And nobody calls him Mad Dog but the press. His call sign is Chaos.
He actually has a reputation for listening to everyone and considering everyone's opinions before making a decision. That's the type of manager people love working for.
Hold that thought, I'm going to post an article to the contrary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...dbb8a6-387e-11ea-bb7b-265f4554af6d_story.html
Dude don't even bring a WaPo link up in here.
Look, you are a Mad Dog fanboy and think he's infallible. I get it. You see that Mad Dog left and are working backwards to try to spin a reason why it was Trump's fault and not his.
I go on Trump's track record: He's made far more good decisions than bad.
Is Mad Dog a smart guy? Sure. Is he a dem at heart? Trump thinks he is.
I'll go with Trump since he's right far more often than he's wrong.
I'm starting to see why you annoy Lizardgrad.
When it comes to combat, there are no fanboys. If a General with combat experience thinks you lack understanding of warfare and have gaping holes in your knowledge of history, that is something that requires working on. You do not replace a guy like MattiS with a Naval Reservist. That's a straight up Obama move.
You should consider reading the article.
When it comes to combat, there are no fanboys. If a General with combat experience thinks you lack understanding of warfare and have gaping holes in your knowledge of history, that is something that requires working on. You do not replace a guy like MattiS with a Naval Reservist. That's a straight up Obama move.
You should consider reading the article.
And maybe you should consider that if Trump is really a moron when it comes to the military and a horrible manager, that ALL of them would be quitting, not just Mattis.
Unless you want us to believe that Mattis is the only one smart enough to see it and the others are just dumb yes men. Which is something silly that a fanboy would say.
There's a third option: Maybe Mattis and Trump are both smart guys that just didn't get along, for whatever reason. It happens.
You may fetch me the post where I called the President a moron. Go ahead on, I'll wait.
It's not just Mattis. Admiral Snodgrass and General Ryan. Look up resignations and dismissals in the Trump administration if you want to see a revolving door of personnel. Stuff like a petty officer 2nd class being made SecNav.
Three in 3 years is a revolving door? Again, how is it that he keeps hiring military minds?
When it's supposed to be a 4 year position? Yes. That's like if NASJAX had three CO in two years.
And they are all military minds, they're from the military. And it's not like he's replacing Mattis with a Bob Gray or a Charles Krulak. He's firing people til he gets ones that agree with his America first vision.
Last edited:
Trump is 100% different in elected office than anyone who has ever been POTUS. Think about it. He has never worked in a building that did not have his name on it. He ran it, he owned it, he answered to no one. At his age, he thinks it's worked okay thus far, and you ain't gonna change him now. That is actually a double edged sword in terms of how it's gone thus far in his Administration. He sees inbred BS in "the swamp" and has zero patience for it. He's changed what he can just by calling people on it, and to be on his team, lead, follow, or get out of the way. Generals and Admirals today have gotten where they are on a mix of know how, yes, but also by being good at inside baseball/politics. Don't kid yourself.
He treats all of Washington like this. Heck he treats world leaders like this. Most of us like it.
Right. And yet Trump keeps hiring them and putting them in positions not normally given to military minds.
When there's a steady stream of military people quitting on Trump and telling people that Trump is a moron that doesn't get military strategy, then I'll believe it.
No one is saying that. Not even Mad Dog.
Similar threads
