You realize that just parroting “conspiracy theory” over and over isn’t a good faith fact-based debate, it’s what someone who is brainwashed says.
Why don’t you refute these claims with f
At the risk of saying this all wrong, here goes. My contention is that all of the facts mentioned and brought up over and over, and subsequently kicked out are part of a conspiracy hatched out months ago by Trump and ultra rich Rep. when Trump recognized he might might get beaten by Biden, due to the fact that he had lost some of his popularity due to his performance on the job, and attitude he was the Republican party and could do no wrong
When in fact it became obvious that was evidently happening, the conspiracy was activated. figures and affidavits were marched out and declared to have no merits, by different judges and courts, and were thrown out. Finally the Supreme Court became involved and again nothing. This theory of a conspiracy to discredit Joe Biden makes just as much or more sense as the conspiracy by the Rep. to actually have the ba--s to try it.
My facts are your facts, they were refuted in various courts and by elected or appointed election officials. This is a Theory of a Conspiracy, and the very fact it has taken place gives some credence to it.
