Barr on Hunter and Trump.
- Thread starter kalimgoodman
- Start date
It is a weird dynamic. I think he always explains himself well. Even when I don't agree, he explains it throughly.
The case would go before a Trump-appointed judge.
If it gets past her, it goes to the 11th Circuit.
Your pal Clarence Thomas oversees the 11th circuit.
BTW, how's the Bragg indictment going? The Georgia indictment?
You goobs never learn.
Trump should have just turned over the documents. He was asked again, and again, and again. It's his profound ego and arrogance, of he is dangerously pushing this country to the brink - perhaps which was his intention.
On Alvin Bragg, that is a Soros D.A. using the power of the state and a very favorable jurisdiction to politically target an enemy.
On Hunter, that too should been prosecuted by now.
Multiple things can be true at once.
Regardless of what Trump did or did not do, all of this prosecution paints a third world country picture.
If Trump turned over all of the documents, and this happened, then completely agree. He did not though - and that is the problem.
Trump did not and the documents were incredibly (it appears) sensitive information.
We will see where this goes...
Believe nothing that you hear and only half of what you see imo.
But to be clear, none of this is the issue. The main issue is that we don't indict our chief political rivals leading up to an election in this country. I can assure you that this wasn't the first opportunity where the party in power had the opportunity to do so...but it is the first time they've ever exercised it. That's probably meaningful.
Next, and a very distant 2nd to my first issue, is that others have not been charged with the first 31 counts in this indictment when those others were also clearly guilty of the same behavior.
This is without doubt some banana republic BS. Anything short of that statement is bluster imho.
Last edited:
You main issue is indeed quite important.
He is going to trial - in Miami, not a clearly anti-Trump jurisdiction such as NYC.
Now, had he turned over the documents when asked initially, and THEN, he was indicted, I would completely agree with you.
We will see. He is innocent and until proven guilty.
This charge isn't about political parties. They tried their hardest to get the documents back, and Trump tried his hardest not to give them back. He ignored the subpoena and lied again. This case is all about Trump ego, as you elegantly stated.
I'm so confused as to what you expect the DOJ to do. You can't say the law should be equal, then you just let him go because of politics. To me that's a banana republic. I'll never understand people that is willing to accept different justice systems for Trump.
His supporters are basically saying that he can do whatever he wants because he's their guy. Very odd to me, very cult like.
He was also indicted by the people of FL, the state where woke goes to die 😄.
Don't forget the Republican party, is the law and order party or as I was told.
Black people always took that as law and order party when it comes to minorities. It changes when it comes time to charge white people, especially rich white people. Guess we are right again! 🤷🏽♂️
What do we know about grand juries and ham sandwiches? The defense rests.
Well the evidence is 90/10 in one direction.
It feels more like the evidence needs to sit on your face for you to pay attention…unless it’s about Ivanka’s trademark applications and then you’re BiG MAD.
You should apply for a job at the FBI. You’d be perfect.
On Hunter or on Joe?
Because what Hunter did has very little to do with Hunter.
I had to think about this one for a minute. That's very profound. How else does a drug addled pervert get appointed to so many board of directors jobs in so many fields where one has zero skills?
Well, his dads only qualifications are two years as a lifeguard and one year as a lawyer.I had to think about this one for a minute. That's very profound. How else does a drug addled pervert get appointed to so many board of directors jobs in so many fields where one has zero skills?
His dad was the product they were selling.I had to think about this one for a minute. That's very profound. How else does a drug addled pervert get appointed to so many board of directors jobs in so many fields where one has zero skills?
Hunter was a conduit, not even the salesman.
He literally leveraged his crackhead son to generate revenue selling policy decisions and influence.
When @kalimgoodman says he doesn't want to talk about Hunter...he means he doesn't want to talk about Joe.
I think "BAGMAN" is the most appropriate term for the situation.
Joe Biden Talking About Kids Touching His Hairy Legs in a Swimming Pool Is Not Great Viewing. 😂
Evidence against Hunter. Even Comer said they need Evidence to actually link Joe. You saw evidence that he didn't see?
I have no clue what you're talking about and neither do you. Please provide a link to Comer saying he "has no evidence".
I'm sure it's just happenstance that millions of dollars from China ended up being sent to Biden-owned LLC's. The bank records themselves are evidence, and so far Comer has found less than half of what's out there. He'll get it all.
What was the good or service provided by the Bidens? You've never been able to answer that. I think you're "best" answer was "name" which makes zero sense. You don't just hand money over because someone has a famous name, you have to get something from them.
Meanwhile fists shake at clouds over trademark applications, and you don't even know what a trademark is.
Someone else thinks there's enough evidence to investigate...I thought you said there was "no evidence"?
You find that clip of Comer yet? I'm getting impatient.
Dershowitz: 'Of Course' There Is Enough Evidence for Impeachment Inquiry of Biden for Bribery
Alan Dershowitz said "of course" there is enough evidence for House Republicans to start an impeachment inquiry into Biden for bribery.
www.breitbart.com
This is 100% the continued FBI, DOJ, CIA, NSA & Legacy Media colluding to “get Trump”. Anyone that can’t see that is stupid.
It is driven by Obama Term 3.0. No country can survive the lack of honesty of its federal institutions…. They are not trustworthy!
This current narrative aligns to “Hunter’s Laptop is Russian disinformation” or “Trump colluded w Ukraine or Russia”. The Globalist Deep State fears us Americans. THAT IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT - 100%!
It is driven by Obama Term 3.0. No country can survive the lack of honesty of its federal institutions…. They are not trustworthy!
This current narrative aligns to “Hunter’s Laptop is Russian disinformation” or “Trump colluded w Ukraine or Russia”. The Globalist Deep State fears us Americans. THAT IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT - 100%!
Like I said, I can easily, but whatever. Comer was interviewing with Watters
You are misrepresenting his words...shocking.Someone else thinks there's enough evidence to investigate...I thought you said there was "no evidence"?
You find that clip of Comer yet? I'm getting impatient.
Dershowitz: 'Of Course' There Is Enough Evidence for Impeachment Inquiry of Biden for Bribery
Alan Dershowitz said "of course" there is enough evidence for House Republicans to start an impeachment inquiry into Biden for bribery.
“Of course,” Dershowitz replied. “And there is enough to investigate. There’s a big gulf between ‘enough to investigate’ [and] enough to establish probable cause, enough to indict — we’re not even close to [the latter], but enough to investigate? Of course. I mean, the FBI statement by the so-called reliable informant, if they believe it to be true, gives them enough to investigate.
He said that there is enough to investigate and with a Republican led house they can impeach, to be tit for tat. An investigation is already occurring and have been for 4 years. It started under Trump (which should bother the crowd of don't investigate your political rival).
What did I misrepresent?
You're so horny for a "gotcha" that you aren't even reading.
How's that Comer clip coming along? The one where he said there was "no evidence".
Are you telling us there’s a first time for everything?
It's not a gotcha at all. You tried to make it seem like there is plenty of evidence for more. Alan D only said that there is enough to investigate, which is already happening.
What did I say in my post?
Let's start there.
You're aware the steps of an impeachment I assume?
That is a political procedure.
"shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
Was he convicted of any of this?
You're getting things out of order.
You have to have a congressional investigation, then impeachment proceedings review the findings of that investigation.
So how could he be convicted if we're still in the investigatory phase?
Did you happen to eat lead paint chips as a kid?
So is it safe to assume that the dems have officially given up on the Bragg indictment? @gatorspeed and ray ray in particular got especially horny over it. And the Bragg indictment was a sign that the Mar Lago raid didn't work.
What about the Georgia indictment? That was supposed to be the fallback on the Bragg indictment not working?
Yall seeing a pattern here?
Yet the same posters keep lining up to kick any football Lucy puts in front of them...
What about the Georgia indictment? That was supposed to be the fallback on the Bragg indictment not working?
Yall seeing a pattern here?
Yet the same posters keep lining up to kick any football Lucy puts in front of them...
Similar threads
