Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is a liar. This will be EASILY proven wrong by the prosecution. He is so F'n STUPID like most every lefty about firearms...he does not understand that unless that gun is broken(which it was not or we would have known already) it is IMPOSSIBLE for it to fire unless the trigger is pulled tightGee, but Alec said he didn't pull the trigger.
You could knock me over with a feather, thought they would pin it on the armorer.
If his finger was resting on the trigger and then he cocked the hammer, boom.Also you can't fire a single action without cocking the hammer first.
If his finger was resting on the trigger and then he cocked the hammer, boom.
He should also be charged with reckless endangerment. And especially aggravated assault on the the guy that was injured. I don't want to hear some plea deal where he's on probation with no prison time.Gee, but Alec said he didn't pull the trigger.
"Something about BScuck". 😂
So if this was a gun newer than about the 50's, they have a safety mechanism that the trigger has to be fully pulled, or the firing pin will not hit the ammo round. My Dad showed me this when I was about 5 yrs old by putting a pencil down the barrel eraser first, and pulled the hammer back and taped the trigger to make the hammer go forward...the pencil did not move, even though the eraser was up against the firing pin. Then he did the same while depressing the trigger fully..and the pencil jumped a few inches. Libs have NO CLUE about this...and is exactly why Baldim lied. Little does he know, this will be proven in court that the trigger HAD to be fully depressed for the gun to fire. This was demonstrated on a S&W chief special .38 caiber revolver...about a late 50's early 60's modelIf his finger was resting on the trigger and then he cocked the hammer, boom.
There will be a demonstration in court like I mention above...it will be the nail in the coffinLet's settle this, the FBI firearms expert says this particular gun could only be fired if the trigger was pulled and Baldwin made a statement that he cocked the hammer. Which means his dumbass pulled the trigger.
It's most likely an 1850s design but the new single action army style guns have a transfer bar. The original versiOns were so touchy gunfighters kept them hammer down on an empty chamber.There will be a demonstration in court like I mention above...it will be the nail in the coffin
Not only did he lie about the incident he lied about being ignorant of handling firearms. He knew full well you never point a firearm at anyone unless you intend to use it in self-defense.So if this was a gun newer than about the 50's, they have a safety mechanism that the trigger has to be fully pulled, or the firing pin will not hit the ammo round. My Dad showed me this when I was about 5 yrs old by putting a pencil down the barrel eraser first, and pulled the hammer back and taped the trigger to make the hammer go forward...the pencil did not move, even though the eraser was up against the firing pin. Then he did the same while depressing the trigger fully..and the pencil jumped a few inches. Libs have NO CLUE about this...and is exactly why Baldim lied. Little does he know, this will be proven in court that the trigger HAD to be fully depressed for the gun to fire. This was demonstrated on a S&W chief special .38 caiber revolver...about a late 50's early 60's model
This is just BS...by this reasoning, a prosecutor can only work on half the cases, seeing the Country is composed of Democrats and Republicans. ("moderates" are counted as democrats by their actions for all examples here)Alec Baldwin wants 'Rust' prosecutor dismissed as she's a Republican lawmaker: 'Unconstitutional'
A legal expert weighs in on whether this is a good move by Baldwin.www.yahoo.com
I wonder what will happen here. I wouldn't be that surprised if the courts ruled that person couldn't be a special prosecutor since they are a state legislator looking at that statute but I would like to see rulings in other states with similar statutes and if any make exceptions for a special prosecutor assigned to a case. If there was a chance of this happening you think they would have researched this enough not to make a mistake like that.
This is just BS...by this reasoning, a prosecutor can only work on half the cases, seeing the Country is composed of Democrats and Republicans. ("moderates" are counted as democrats by their actions for all examples here)
He can appeal this to the cows come home, he's not getting his way this time. Just another stall tactic.Alec Baldwin wants 'Rust' prosecutor dismissed as she's a Republican lawmaker: 'Unconstitutional'
A legal expert weighs in on whether this is a good move by Baldwin.www.yahoo.com
I wonder what will happen here. I wouldn't be that surprised if the courts ruled that person couldn't be a special prosecutor since they are a state legislator looking at that statute but I would like to see rulings in other states with similar statutes and if any make exceptions for a special prosecutor assigned to a case. If there was a chance of this happening you think they would have researched this enough not to make a mistake like that.
He can appeal this to the cows come home, he's not getting his way this time. Just another stall tactic.
Interesting you brought this up. I quit using a pump shotgun because sometimes I would eject the shell with my finger still on the trigger. Not only pissed me off but scared the TF out of me when the next round went off.If his finger was resting on the trigger and then he cocked the hammer, boom.
Damn son how old is that shogun? That's a slam fire and allegedly they don't do that anymore.Interesting you brought this up. I quit using a pump shotgun because sometimes I would eject the shell with my finger still on the trigger. Not only pissed me off but scared the TF out of me when the next round went off.
It was an Ithaca 20 gauge pump, circa 1972 or so. I traded it in on a Browning auto 12 (which got stolen when my home got burglarized when I was at work).Damn son how old is that shogun? That's a slam fire and allegedly they don't do that anymore.
Damn son how old is that shogun? That's a slam fire and allegedly they don't do that anymore.
Interesting you brought this up. I quit using a pump shotgun because sometimes I would eject the shell with my finger still on the trigger. Not only pissed me off but scared the TF out of me when the next round went off.
And more range time. 😂You are correct...they don't...or aren't supposed to.
Trigger discipline is still your friend of course.
It seems like everyone that can is trying to help get him off. He is 100% guilty of negligent homicide. Imagine if this was one of us...we would be in jail right now. Tired of the lefty double standard
Yes, his negligence resulted in someone dying no different result than if he murdered her. I hope they also sue him for every nickel he has in civil court. The man is a piece of trash.It seems like everyone that can is trying to help get him off. He is 100% guilty of negligent homicide. Imagine if this was one of us...we would be in jail right now. Tired of the lefty double standard
What? That's ridiculous. Yes, live ammo should never have been in the weapon but it's not like a grown man playing around with a loaded weapon is the same as a child finding a weapon lying on the table.I agree he was an idiot but that armorer is the most at fault here imo. We know from the past these actors rely on them 100% almost to assure the gun is safe to use for the scene. I guess this case will change things finally though as I don't remember an actor being charged in past cases but maybe I am forgetting a case. Some claim him saving money led to this but that is no excuse for the armorer not even doing the bare basics to confirm the ammo etc. What a jury does here is hard to say since the charge is limited to 18 months since New Mexicos previous 3 year add on for firearms wouldnt apply here either. I think a jury nails the armorer for sure but it will be 50/50 on him once they put all those people on the stand saying how these movie scenes were going down in reality. I think if it was a more serious charge he would have at least got a hung jury for sure.
What? That's ridiculous. Yes, live ammo should never have been in the weapon but it's not like a grown man playing around with a loaded weapon is the same as a child finding a weapon lying on the table.