ADVERTISEMENT

Asking again. When are we impeaching Kamala?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry , not sorry. Prove me wrong. You guys cannot have it both ways. You want Harris to be inciting, but Trump's was without doubt exponentially more damming. Tell me honestly, you see no difference between her words on protests, and Trump assembling a crowd, encouraging to fight harder, and take back their country, and directing them to the Capitol. Go ahead . Prove me wrong.

Prove you wrong? We can't force you to think critically and objectively.

When someone sets up a bail fund, they are HELPING the people that are being jailed.

This isn't hard. Or at least it shouldn't be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
Exactly. Why dispute the facts when you can say "ding, fries are done"-----> that's good for a laugh and not at all inane 5 million times later HAHAHAHA

Always amuses me when posters here get upset that their troll attempts aren't earning serious responses. We have one/two poster here that seems to really be irritated by this. Almost as much as when you address what he's doing, without replying to him directly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
When pigs fly.

It sounds like Clyburn et al. are going to impeach him, then use the first 100 days to establish Biden's policies/plans, and then send the impeachment over for a senate trial. At that point, if it is passed in the senate, then it is my understanding that he will be barred from holding public office again. Which is a real shame in my opinion, would have loved to see him get beat by Biden one more time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JIMBO1313
Always amuses me when posters here get upset that their troll attempts aren't earning serious responses. We have one/two poster here that seems to really be irritated by this. Almost as much as when you address what he's doing, without replying to him directly.
What I find amusing are some of the idiots out there that think the Senate can impeach (convict of) a private citizen. Impeach from what office? Let's say they somehow manufacture some unconstitutional argument to do so. Ain't no way in hell the Senate convicts with a 2/3rds vote. I don't know if they are just stupid or smoking some potent stuff.
 
Prove you wrong? We can't force you to think critically and objectively.

When someone sets up a bail fund, they are HELPING the people that are being jailed.

This isn't hard. Or at least it shouldn't be.

This is illegal in your country? It is not in the USA. Nor would it be impeachable. Just try to think... somehow. LOL
 
What I find amusing are some of the idiots out there that think the Senate can impeach (convict of) a private citizen. Impeach from what office? Let's say they somehow manufacture some unconstitutional argument to do so. Ain't no way in hell the Senate convicts with a 2/3rds vote. I don't know if they are just stupid or smoking some potent stuff.

So you suggest they hurry and get it done in the next 8 days. ;)
 
It sounds like Clyburn et al. are going to impeach him, then use the first 100 days to establish Biden's policies/plans, and then send the impeachment over for a senate trial. At that point, if it is passed in the senate, then it is my understanding that he will be barred from holding public office again. Which is a real shame in my opinion, would have loved to see him get beat by Biden one more time.

stay on topic. We are discussing kamalas impeachment in here. Should begin immediately
 
If they have a prayer in the world of doing it, then yes. As to before he leaves office, good luck with that. I heard you took OSU and the points. :p

I don't see it happening, they could get censure thought for whatever worth that may be. I seldom wager , had to give 8 but was certain . Dang that wr was superman.
 
What I find amusing are some of the idiots out there that think the Senate can impeach (convict of) a private citizen. Impeach from what office? Let's say they somehow manufacture some unconstitutional argument to do so. Ain't no way in hell the Senate convicts with a 2/3rds vote. I don't know if they are just stupid or smoking some potent stuff.
They just stole an election and have been gas lighting the whole country. Social media is on their side along with national media. They think they can get away with anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
Cmon man Trump only backed off his stance after rioters were in the capitol bldg.

kamala didn’t back down from hers. She doubled down.

trump asked them to peacefully make sure their voices were heard prior to the protests and asked them to stop once they turned into riots. Kommieala on the other hand. “They won’t stop and they shouldn’t”. Surely you see which one of those two are inciting

If we were to take away the names and survey 100 people. You can bet your ass it would be 100 percent of the survey saying kommieala was the one guilty of inciting. You’re just party blind
 
At this point impeachment might be the only way to get kamala out of the Senate.

Still no Hiden parade. I'm sure nothing's wrong.
 
If i recall correctly, he also told them that he loved them and that they were special......

Comment A: they won’t stop, and shouldn’t stop. Comment B: Go home. Both these things were said by people in leadership positions during riots.

which one is inciting riots

A or B?
 
Comment A: they won’t stop, and shouldn’t stop. Comment B: Go home. Both these things were said by people in leadership positions during riots.

which one is inciting riots

A or B?


Comment A : made to Americans in multiple states protesting social injustice. Comment B: made specifically to rioters immediately after committing Federal crimes at the Capitol, having been sent there by the person in a leadership position. Slight difference. So I'll go B
 
Comment A : made to Americans in multiple states protesting social injustice. Comment B: made specifically to rioters immediately after committing Federal crimes at the Capitol, having been sent there by the person in a leadership position. Slight difference. So I'll go B

hahaha. You have kept your record for never being correct intact.
 
You people have incorrect ideas as to inciting violence. Funding/paying bail is not inciting. SMH

But Trump wanting people to protest the election is inciting.

You are so stubborn and twisted up even you cannot tell if you're coming or going.

Harris supported the protests...and some became violent.

Trump supported a protest...and some became violent.

But Trump should be impeached while Harris should be celebrated. You are ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsumc
Sorry , not sorry. Prove me wrong. You guys cannot have it both ways. You want Harris to be inciting, but Trump's was without doubt exponentially more damming. Tell me honestly, you see no difference between her words on protests, and Trump assembling a crowd, encouraging to fight harder, and take back their country, and directing them to the Capitol. Go ahead . Prove me wrong.

I do see a difference.

Harris helped bail people out of jail AFTER they committed some act of violence or destruction of property so that they could then repeat that behavior.

Trump asked people to protest the election and then told people to GTFO after some were stupid.

You are not a reasonable person. I've proven you wrong around a dozen times on this subject. Your thick headed-ness is not a reflection on me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsumc
He is a billionaire that cannot afford 9.99 (like the rest of us). An independent (uhuh), and has folks on fake ignore. Just sayin

Is he really a billionaire though? He sure seems to declare bankruptcy an awful lot. And he tried really hard for 4 years to keep his hotels full of government workers. But then, he did donate his salary to charity, so that's evidence in his favor. Too bad he never came forth about his personal finances, then we would know for sure. Personally, while I don't think he's a billionaire, I don't think he's a pauper either. At least, until Melania divorces him. :p
 
81 millions Americans agreed that he was inferior to Joe Biden. Do they all have TDS I wonder?? In 8 days or less, it won't matter anyway. He will revert to the inconsequential racist, incompetent, toxic troll that he was and is.

The Trump is racist thing is actually the dumbest thing that you guys say.

I'm not sure about 81 million having TDS but I can tell you about one for sure.
 
What I find amusing are some of the idiots out there that think the Senate can impeach (convict of) a private citizen. Impeach from what office? Let's say they somehow manufacture some unconstitutional argument to do so. Ain't no way in hell the Senate convicts with a 2/3rds vote. I don't know if they are just stupid or smoking some potent stuff.

Twice before people have been barred from holding office. Never a President, but two federal judges. Still, it is a legal process that this country has gone through before. And in both those cases, a simple majority was all that was needed. Just an FYI.
 
Is he really a billionaire though? He sure seems to declare bankruptcy an awful lot. And he tried really hard for 4 years to keep his hotels full of government workers. But then, he did donate his salary to charity, so that's evidence in his favor. Too bad he never came forth about his personal finances, then we would know for sure. Personally, while I don't think he's a billionaire, I don't think he's a pauper either. At least, until Melania divorces him. :p
Again reading comp escapes you. Go back, and slow down. You’re so filled with TDS that you think we are discussing trump. Your strength (supposedly) is numbers. Maybe theres a good math board for you
 
Perhaps Trump supporters that were involved in an insurrection. Remind me of the names of Democrat supporters of riots... not of protests. I'll be glad to censure them.

Kamala Harris...first she helped bail people out of jail who were burning cities, looting property and assaulting law enforcement who were there to protect the public. After that she said, "they will not stop, they should not stop."

If that's not supporting riotous behavior, nothing is. Sure as hell that would mean that Trump isn't guilty of inciting.

This isn't difficult to understand if you have any desire to understand it...which you clearly do not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsumc and jfegaly
Twice before people have been barred from holding office. Never a President, but two federal judges. Still, it is a legal process that this country has gone through before. And in both those cases, a simple majority was all that was needed. Just an FYI.

2nd impeachment doesn't make Trump ineligible. We beg you to stop getting your info from shit sources.
 
Which is EXACTLY when he should have backed off.

Now if Harris had backed off bailing out anarchists after they started burning down cities...
He should never have put himself in the position of having to say anything. Trying to impeach him now is darn near useless. The only ones that will go along with it are the Dems. in the house.
 
He should never have put himself in the position of having to say anything. Trying to impeach him now is darn near useless. The only ones that will go along with it are the Dems. in the house.
I agree. Kamala should have never incited riots nor put herself in that position. Good to see you aren’t going to be a hypocrite, and are a stand up person for admitting what kamala did was much worse
 
I agree. Kamala should have never incited riots nor put herself in that position. Good to see you aren’t going to be a hypocrite, and are a stand up person for admitting what kamala did was much worse
I did not admit anything about K. Don't put words in my mouth.
 
He should never have put himself in the position of having to say anything. Trying to impeach him now is darn near useless. The only ones that will go along with it are the Dems. in the house.

So you're saying @BSC911 is darn near useless. Agreed and I'm sure he'll be banned soon as he can't follow the rules. But let's stay focused, when are we impeaching kamala for inciting violence and death across the nation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT