For the third time, why are you trying to twist this into a SEC/ACC thing? You claimed that FSU played a "Charmin soft schedule" and then failed to provide any facts that supported that claim.
How could it not be a ACC/SEC analysis? If we are to claim that FSU plays a Charmin Soft Schedule, then we must provide some context.We must provide some facts. What better context than comparing the strongest football conference with one of the weakest? So why not compare the conference that FSU chose to join, the ACC, with the conference that FSU turned away from, the SEC. After all, THAT was part of the original point.
To review, the original point was me complimenting FSU on seeing the need to beef up what is usually a pretty pathetic schedule most years. That ANY ACC program that want to be taken seriously on a national stage has to do that, if they want some kind of benefit of the doubt when it comes to the playoff selection committee.
FSU was undefeated last year. Yet they were only seeded third. Behind at least one team with one loss. That is the context.
The point then morphed into a discussion of how FSU benefited from a Charmin Soft Schedule even when they were consistently good. A point that their own coach made not once, but twice.
SKNole, danoleman, hardliner and other FSU sychophants have to try and pretend that FSU has a legitimate schedule, past and present. But their analysis falls short.
Every objective measure of conference rankings usually has ACC down anywhere from 3rd best to 7th best. Every final top ten ranking, poast and present rarely includes more than one ACC program. These are the facts. These are the objective points.
FSU plays in the ACC. Of the top five football conferences, the ACC is one of the weakest. Hell, even the less sycophantic fans admit that.
