SEC Champion (assuming one loss or undefeated)
Big 10 Champion (assuming one loss or undefeated)
Pac 10 Champion (see above assumption)
Big 12 Champion (undefeated) OR ACC Champion (undefeated)
BIG 12 Champion (one loss with a one loss ACC Champion)
How do you have Stanford in the top 4 with 1 loss?1. OSU
2. TCU
3. Clemson
4. Stanford
How do you have Stanford in the top 4 with 1 loss?
1. Baylor
2. OSU
3. Clemson
4. TCU
LSU sitting right at 5
1) Ohio State
2) LSU
3) Clemson
4) TCU
The thread was about who are the top 4 teams tonight. Not what we think the top 4 will be at the end of the season. If Stanford wins out they have a good shot but they won't be in the top 4 tonightI don't think they're a top 4 team, I just think all the other contenders will knock each other off by the time we have to name 4. I could see LSU losing two more games, Bama losing one more, and I don't think we win out which means the SEC champ will likely have 2 losses. If you look at it like that, and assuming Stanford wins out, who else will have a better resume than Stanford for that fourth spot?
They will have beaten:
USC (probable 8-4 finish)
UCLA (probable 10-2 finish)
Arizona (solid 7-5 ish team)
Oregon (decent 8-4, 9-3 ish club)
Notre Dame (seems almost a lock for 11-1)
I think that would be enough to lock up #4 for them. Especially if they beat a 10-2 UCLA ball club again in their championship game. That's 5-6 quality wins.
That last statememt may have been true earlier in the season, but Spurrier is no longer at USCe.First top 4 list revealed tonight!
Who is in on the first slate?
I've got:
1. Ohio State
2. LSU
3. Baylor
4. Clemson
No idea what the last list will look like with each of those teams facing significant November challenges.
lmao, you should be banned just for this idiocy
The thread was about who are the top 4 teams tonight. Not what we think the top 4 will be at the end of the season. If Stanford wins out they have a good shot but they won't be in the top 4 tonight
You were damn closeIf the committee is adamant that last year's results have no bearing on this year's rankings, the top 4 IMO should be:
1. Clemson
2. LSU
3. Ohio State
4. Michigan State
Clemson and LSU have the 2 best wins of the year so far. Hard to buy TCU or Baylor until they get into the meat of their schedule. LSU will be a clear #1 if they win Saturday.
So, watching the ESPN program for the unveiling, I am damn glad Florida is in the conversation for the first time in a long time. Yes, I realize this is only the second year of the 4 game playoff, but in terms of the national title debate, the Mighty Gators are in the conversation. First time in five years.
That is great.
I'm thinking it will be OSU, LSU, Clemson & Mich St. I think they penalize the B12 teams as they haven't played anyone (yet).
Iowa-Memphis should be a tv ratings bonanza.
I failed to factor in the love for Bama.
About like that fsu-N Illinois bowl game a few years ago.
Yea Bama being 4 is ridiculous. I love how they argued for Bama by citing victories over Wisconsin, UGA, and A&M with a 'tough loss' to Ole Miss. Meanwhile UF has also beaten UGA, blew out the Ole Miss team Bama lost too, and our 'tough loss' to LSU is also more impressive and we sit at 10. Now I don't think we're a top 4 team at all, but the inconsistent logic is what pisses me off.
Brad Edwards said it best though, the committee didn't learn from their mistakes last year at all. TCU won games and dropped in the rankings and the face the same possibility again this year. Bama could win out and still not win their division if Ole Miss also wins out. So at that point how do you keep a team at #4 who didn't even win their division much less the conference? They'd have to drop Bama in that scenario and then people will be all 'how do you drop a team who has done nothing but won games?' This is all so stupid. There doesn't need to be a committee. Get a formula everyone can agree on that takes into account SOS, etc and let UNBIASED computers decide. Still makes no damn sense to me how people complained about bias in the last system and their solution was to add even MORE of the human element which just brings more bias.
I see the initial rankings as flawed. I don't worry though as things will play out, always do.
But I am willing to credit the committee with one thing: since its inception they have clearly stated that quality wins would be the BIGGEST factor in their decisions and #1 and #2 both have wins over other top ten teams.
Yep. But Bama will drop faster than a recovered Simon Bishop should they lose this weekend.There is no 'SEC bias' but there is a Bama bias, and I'm sick of it. Kinda like UNC, UK, and Duke in basketball, it's kinda ridiculous.
Seriously...you guys know the decision to put Bama at 4 is highly based upon their matchup with LSU this weekend.
They can hype the hell out of it.
Again, in the next 5 weeks it will all balance out and become clearer.
Florida just needs to focus on getting to Atlanta at 11-1. Do that and win the SEC? We're in. Regardless.