Definitely in now. Excellent 2nd half. Even when the shots weren't falling, the guys continued playing hard. Thought poor free throw shooting might do us in and that Naz Reid guy is great. But the good guys prevailed. I have to admit, the team surprised me the last month. Just hope Locke can get healthy enough to contribute in the tourney. We need his outside shooting badly and you could tell he's been laboring. Shooting only about 20% from the 3 throw arc the last 7-8 games. Anyway, great win.
UF 76 - 73 LSU SEC-C
Incompetent Mike White is 2-1 vs LSU with 3 of his post players...
Finally making some good biscuits and gravy.
Props to you sir.I’ll give White credit in that game. He made some adjustments.
I’d say we are in now.
NIT Quarterfinals
put up the banner
Are you f'ing kidding me, such an obvious f'ing foul there! BS!
His arms were being ripped off.....shocking he even got the ball to go forward.Obvious easy foul call, should have shot 3 FT's
Hayes is a sweet dude. Appreciate him
But he’s tragically bad and Hudson is literally a walking turnover
This freshman class (healthy Gak/Stokes) plus Mann and Lewis = final 4 contender
I agree totally. 20-4 turnover differential is what I just read. And that was the key statistic. We outrebounded them 30-15 and was 23-37 from the field. But they took 20 more shots and were 25-57 from the field. We were 6-14 from 3, they were 13-30. Hayes played really hard and scored a lot for him, plus added 12 rebounds, but he had several turnovers, whether they charged them to him or not. Just weak hands and a couple of times when Nembhard made a nice pass to him under the basket and he wasn't paying attention and the ball just bounced away. Hudson just dribbled the ball away several times and the team as a whole was just very sloppy with the ball, especially the 2nd half.Turnovers was the difference in the ball game. Simple as that. It was like 19 to 3.
Yes Agreed. I think fatigue may have set in. We haven’t been getting much from the bench lately.I agree totally. 20-4 turnover differential is what I just read. And that was the key statistic. We outrebounded them 30-15 and was 23-37 from the field. But they took 20 more shots and were 25-57 from the field. We were 6-14 from 3, they were 13-30. Hayes played really hard and scored a lot for him, plus added 12 rebounds, but he had several turnovers, whether they charged them to him or not. Just weak hands and a couple of times when Nembhard made a nice pass to him under the basket and he wasn't paying attention and the ball just bounced away. Hudson just dribbled the ball away several times and the team as a whole was just very sloppy with the ball, especially the 2nd half.
Auburn took 20 more shots. That is why Florida had many more rebounds.I agree totally. 20-4 turnover differential is what I just read. And that was the key statistic. We outrebounded them 30-15 and was 23-37 from the field. But they took 20 more shots and were 25-57 from the field. We were 6-14 from 3, they were 13-30. Hayes played really hard and scored a lot for him, plus added 12 rebounds, but he had several turnovers, whether they charged them to him or not. Just weak hands and a couple of times when Nembhard made a nice pass to him under the basket and he wasn't paying attention and the ball just bounced away. Hudson just dribbled the ball away several times and the team as a whole was just very sloppy with the ball, especially the 2nd half.
Auburn took 20 more shots. That is why Florida had many more rebounds.
It was also a foul at the end of the game. I would just argue it was before the shot. Bruce Pearl admitted after the game that Auburn wanted to foul at the end of the game, but they wanted to foul before Florida shot. I would argue at least one Auburn player first made contact while he was still dribbling
Florida should have shot one and one free throws at the end...not three free throws like the announcer said
SEC refs do look bad in that situation when Bruce Pearl says Auburn was intentionally trying to foul Florida before they shot, yet no foul of any kind was called
Really? Nevada was ranked top 10 much of the season and is veteran, savvy and has tourney experience. They only had 4 losses all season, they should be a 4 seed.Good draw for us
We are gonna beat Nevada
Let’s see who shows up
For the Michigan game!
ashenesey is a troll...just sayin’...Really?