ADVERTISEMENT

Well, well, well. Amazon mail in voting

We must keep in mind the U. S. average IQ is a paltry 98.

A reminder: What one says and especially how one says it defines one. A golden rule for the administrator about to administer intelligence quotient testing. Each of us provide a gold mine of information for the administrator with our every post. After brief interviews with the principals, the administrator generally knows the scoring order in the class room before pencils are sharpened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavigatorII
I believe a universal voter ID card is a great idea, as long as they are free and set up in such a way that even the poor and yes, even the homeless, are capable of getting one without hurdles. Hurdles such as proof of residency, which is pretty tough for the homeless.

In return, I want to see a much greater effort made to provide access to voting for those for whom voting is a hurdle. It's easy for you or me, with our homes, and our cars, to drive to the DMV, show 3 forms of proof of residency, get an ID, then later drive to the precinct and vote. But for those without transportation, or a legal address, it is extremely difficult to accomplish those things.

So let's make one concerted, bipartisan effort, to make it practically impossible for illegal votes to be cast while at the same time making it extremely easy for legal votes to be cast. Anybody else on board?
Totally. Which is why I’m sure you were outraged when states like GA and PA did away with signature verification for this election. And later, when there were question, would not do a full signature audit.
 
5 states set aside state election laws. Does John Roberts have a fear of the BLM and Antifa arms of the Democrat Party?
I'm not sure the leaked conversation where he reportedly shouted down the more Jr. justices was true or not...I heard conflicting reports from sources I trust.

But your larger point is spot on - I don't think any court wants to be seen as steering election results, and I think they hid behind Art 2 putting the onus on the state legislatures to handle their own elections. The sad part is there were 3 co-equal branches of gov't created for good reason...when one chickens out it shifts too much power.

Same thing as a few days ago when Chuck Schumer publically asked for Biden to declare the Climate a national emergency - that would give him power to circumvent the legislative branch (where Schumer's power resides) which is extremely dangerous.

They are using the "threat" of MAGA, white nationalists and their own corruption to challenge the founding father's awesome design on a near daily basis.
 
Brennon would like nothing more than to have the CIA declare war on citizens of the USA under the auspices of domestic terrorism. That kind of evil needs to be behind bars or sent into exile.
 
Totally. Which is why I’m sure you were outraged when states like GA and PA did away with signature verification for this election. And later, when there were question, would not do a full signature audit.

Apples and oranges.
 
Apples and oranges.
You said "So let's make one concerted, bipartisan effort, to make it practically impossible for illegal votes to be cast"

And now checking signatures, which is the only possible way to validate a ballot with no chain of custody, doesn't apply?

I'm serious, you have to be some kind of mentally ill for that to make sense. It's not even partisanship.
 
You said "So let's make one concerted, bipartisan effort, to make it practically impossible for illegal votes to be cast"

And now checking signatures, which is the only possible way to validate a ballot with no chain of custody, doesn't apply?

I'm serious, you have to be some kind of mentally ill for that to make sense. It's not even partisanship.
Keep in mind, he also flipped a while ago and said it would be impossible to verify 160 million signatures. I guess scanning ballots and matching signatures on file isn’t possible 😂😂😂
 
Keep in mind, he also flipped a while ago and said it would be impossible to verify 160 million signatures. I guess scanning ballots and matching signatures on file isn’t possible 😂😂😂
Every state that has established mail in voting has machine scanning signature verification.

Those settings were not used in the states in question.
 
You said "So let's make one concerted, bipartisan effort, to make it practically impossible for illegal votes to be cast"

And now checking signatures, which is the only possible way to validate a ballot with no chain of custody, doesn't apply?

I'm serious, you have to be some kind of mentally ill for that to make sense. It's not even partisanship.

The one involves a quick check at the precinct, a scan of the card and off you go to vote. This would be for everyone equally, and in my version, every voter would have help getting the card and also lots of access to voting opportunities.

The other involves a situation where one party only wants to check the ballots of the other party, and only in the hotly contested states, because they are POOR LOSERS.

Apples. And. Oranges.
 
Keep in mind, he also flipped a while ago and said it would be impossible to verify 160 million signatures. I guess scanning ballots and matching signatures on file isn’t possible 😂😂😂

Not really, no. Is your every signature identical? The machines would kick out huge numbers that had to be verified by hand. So now we have an election that is going to take months to resolve. Not because there is anything wrong with the ballots, but because one side is a bunch of POOR LOSERS who are trying to steal the election.

You are like the manager who's team loses on an umpire's decision that he didn't like and decides to protest the game to the league president in order to overturn a hard fought contest. You know, that's EXACTLY Donald Trump and his gang. That may be the most perfect analogy I've come up with yet.
 
Not really, no. Is your every signature identical? The machines would kick out huge numbers that had to be verified by hand. So now we have an election that is going to take months to resolve. Not because there is anything wrong with the ballots, but because one side is a bunch of POOR LOSERS who are trying to steal the election.

You are like the manager who's team loses on an umpire's decision that he didn't like and decides to protest the game to the league president in order to overturn a hard fought contest. You know, that's EXACTLY Donald Trump and his gang. That may be the most perfect analogy I've come up with yet.
Back to square one. Show your stinking filthy ass up to the polling booth WITH your ID. This ain't complicated. It's how it was done for a century(s). End of story. No more fraud. But that's not your end game now is it?
 
Back to square one. Show your stinking filthy ass up to the polling booth WITH your ID. This ain't complicated. It's how it was done for a century(s). End of story. No more fraud. But that's not your end game now is it?

My end game ended.

But you, you need to stop picking at the wound, or it'll never heal.
 
Not really, no. Is your every signature identical? The machines would kick out huge numbers that had to be verified by hand. So now we have an election that is going to take months to resolve. Not because there is anything wrong with the ballots, but because one side is a bunch of POOR LOSERS who are trying to steal the election.

You are like the manager who's team loses on an umpire's decision that he didn't like and decides to protest the game to the league president in order to overturn a hard fought contest. You know, that's EXACTLY Donald Trump and his gang. That may be the most perfect analogy I've come up with yet.
You really are a dumb ass, less than five seconds to find the answer.

 
  • Like
Reactions: martycat1
The one involves a quick check at the precinct, a scan of the card and off you go to vote. This would be for everyone equally, and in my version, every voter would have help getting the card and also lots of access to voting opportunities.

The other involves a situation where one party only wants to check the ballots of the other party, and only in the hotly contested states, because they are POOR LOSERS.

Apples. And. Oranges.
You do know that mail in vote states have electronic signature verification of every ballot don’t you? I’m not even at the audit phase, I’m talking about making sure the ballot signature matches the signature on file when it is counted.

The states that picked up all mail in just for this election either set the dpi at half the recommended resolution or turned off signature verification altogether. And when there were challenges refused to conduct signature audits.

I cannot wrap my head around how anyone thinks this is ok.
 
Not really, no. Is your every signature identical? The machines would kick out huge numbers that had to be verified by hand. So now we have an election that is going to take months to resolve. Not because there is anything wrong with the ballots, but because one side is a bunch of POOR LOSERS who are trying to steal the election.

You are like the manager who's team loses on an umpire's decision that he didn't like and decides to protest the game to the league president in order to overturn a hard fought contest. You know, that's EXACTLY Donald Trump and his gang. That may be the most perfect analogy I've come up with yet.
Are you aware that the vote counting machines sent 94% of the ballots they scanned for adjudication in Fulton Co GA (as an example)?

That means that a poll worker had to hand count 94% of the ballots scanned and determine voter intent.

Did it take months?

Did you know Canada hand counts every ballot and still announces the winner the night of the election? I know, crazy.

The process we saw this cycle let ballots come in days later and were counted in some states with no postmark. We went weeks before we knew the outcome. So if you’re arguing for quick and clean elections what you want is in person voting, absentee for those who can’t make it to the polls and not accepting any absentee ballots after Election Day.

Which is exactly what the Republicans want...

One last point - do you know a majority of European countries’ stance on mail in voting? I’ll take my answer off the air....
 
You do know that mail in vote states have electronic signature verification of every ballot don’t you? I’m not even at the audit phase, I’m talking about making sure the ballot signature matches the signature on file when it is counted.

The states that picked up all mail in just for this election either set the dpi at half the recommended resolution or turned off signature verification altogether. And when there were challenges refused to conduct signature audits.

I cannot wrap my head around how anyone thinks this is ok.
Lizard isn’t a serious person because serious people take the 5 seconds to look up a process. Instead, he has run off once again after being called on his BS.

The other part of this equation is the fact that in Lizard’s mind, it didn’t matter if there was fraud because the end result justified the means as long as corn pop was going to win. Hence his famous slogan, COUNT EVERY VOTE.

Here is his and others biggest issue who let emotions rule their judgement, due to the extreme hate for one man, they are simply ok with how this all turned out and the radical policies and executive orders that are being ushered in because anybody but Trump. Now, if Trump was the one bringing in the same policies then you better believe Lizard would be in meltdown mode. This is what you’d call a hypocrite.
 
Lizard isn’t a serious person because serious people take the 5 seconds to look up a process. Instead, he has run off once again after being called on his BS.

The other part of this equation is the fact that in Lizard’s mind, it didn’t matter if there was fraud because the end result justified the means as long as corn pop was going to win. Hence his famous slogan, COUNT EVERY VOTE.

Here is his and others biggest issue who let emotions rule their judgement, due to the extreme hate for one man, they are simply ok with how this all turned out and the radical policies and executive orders that are being ushered in because anybody but Trump. Now, if Trump was the one bringing in the same policies then you better believe Lizard would be in meltdown mode. This is what you’d call a hypocrite.

You called me a hypocrite because of how you THINK I would react in a hypothetical situation of your devising? Idiot.
 
You called me a hypocrite because of how you THINK I would react in a hypothetical situation of your devising? Idiot.
Oh stop you big baby, I linked a Google search page to easily prove you’re full of shit. It’s not my fault you thought it was impossible to verify that many signatures. Seriously, try and research topics for a change, you might learn something bean counter.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gatordad3
Florida and Texas counted all votes on Election Day with Republican and Democrat teams. Hispanics and blacks voted in higher percentages for Trump than in 2016. We don't know minority percentages in Democrat controlled vote counts in VA, NV, NM, AZ, MI, MN, PA WI, NC and GA. I'm surprised Trump hung onto NC. I guess Dimms didn't want to make it look too obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
Florida and Texas counted all votes on Election Day with Republican and Democrat teams. Hispanics and blacks voted in higher percentages for Trump than in 2016. We don't know minority percentages in Democrat controlled vote counts in VA, NV, NM, AZ, MI, MN, PA WI, NC and GA. I'm surprised Trump hung onto NC. I guess Dimms didn't want to make it look too obvious.
The same fraudulent voting infrastructure was in place in NC that was in GA. Just goes to show you even mail fraud and software algorithms couldn't pull off the steal there. That's how strong the Trump base was. I sometimes wonder if Trump didn't actually win with 330 electoral votes.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT