ADVERTISEMENT

We got one shot folks!

Show me the link..I am 25 times smarter than you and I never saw it. It would be like me saying....what about DMF and all of the trannies he sleeps with?
I honestly have no idea why any of you still respond to bsc's burner troll account. That was the easiest block I've ever made here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
They will decide to stay at home, that's the point.

Moderates want centrist candidates. They won't have any to choose from in 2024 and likely won't for a long, long time.

So they will stay on the porch, and they will stay irrelevant. If we get back to a time where one or both parties are nominating centrist candidates, then moderates will have more say in the political process.

But right now, they have almost none.
Even if you don’t count the votes you think were fake in 2020, we had more people vote than ever before, so not sure your point makes much sense Other than a prediction your making without much to back it up. Even the moderates will pick one issue they care most about and vote based on that. unfortunately Trump will probably motivate more moderates to vote for the other side, but I guess we will see.
 
Even if you don’t count the votes you think were fake in 2020, we had more people vote than ever before, so not sure your point makes much sense Other than a prediction your making without much to back it up. Even the moderates will pick one issue they care most about and vote based on that. unfortunately Trump will probably motivate more moderates to vote for the other side, but I guess we will see.
TruMp currently has an 18 point lead over Biden amongst independents,

As for the other stuff, I was alive election night. I watched this country stop counting in a select few states (at the same time).

I also watched every politician and member of the media tell me this was “the most secure election in history.”

One question, how was that determined?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
TruMp currently has an 18 point lead over Biden amongst independents,

As for the other stuff, I was alive election night. I watched this country stop counting in a select few states (at the same time).

I also watched every politician and member of the media tell me this was “the most secure election in history.”

One question, how was that determined?
Which poll?
 
Part of that job is to lead the nation....the whole nation. Trump was more divisive than freakin' Obama.....and that's hard to do.
You need your man card checked bro. This country thrived like no other when Trump was President. It took a global plandemic and fraudulent election to oust him from office, Wow!! :oops:
 
Even if you don’t count the votes you think were fake in 2020, we had more people vote than ever before, so not sure your point makes much sense Other than a prediction your making without much to back it up.
What's your source for your claims that we had more people vote in 2020 than ever before?

The media?

Here's an exercise for you: Google what percentage of people voted in the 2020 election.

You will be told that roughly 66% of the population voted in 2020. And you will see that almost every single source will cite the same number. 66%.

Don't take my word for it: Google it for yourself and see what you find.

But when you google it, notice that every source claims that the 66% of the population claim is 66% of 'voting age population'.

What? What is that?

Prior to 2020, we all knew that when we said that X percent of the population voted, that we were talking about REGISTERED VOTERS.

But that changed for 2020. Suddenly, all sources go by 'voting age population'.

Why do you think that change was made?

Do you know what percentage of REGISTERED VOTERS voted in the 2020 election.

95%.

That means that if you take 20 registered voters at random, 19 out of them voted.

That number is impossibly high. That's why they changed the way they track how many people voted by using 'voting age population' instead of 'registered voters'.

Because 'voting age population' drops the number down to a more believable 66%.

If we tell the truth, then the numbers show that 95% of registered voters voted in 2020.

That number is impossibly high. That numbers proves the fraud.

So they changed the way they counted the numbers. 95% became 66%.

We are living out 1984 in real time.
 
Extremely. He never talks about heeling the country. He don't even think Democrats and Republicans should work together, based on his speech.
But you correctly recognize that Obama was very divisive too, right.

Trump was the response to Obama.
 
So, we agree that:

1. Obama was very divisive.

2. Trump was very divisive.
I don’t. I agree that Obama was divisive

And the media talked you into believing Trump was divisive.

The media is damn good at what they do.

Here is the cool part. Folks are waking up and realizing what the media and establishment has been doing for 7 years. I have hope for you as well. Even a leftist can be healed.
 
I don’t. I agree that Obama was divisive

And the media talked you into believing Trump was divisive.

The media is damn good at what they do.

Here is the cool part. Folks are waking up and realizing what the media and establishment has been doing for 7 years. I have hope for you as well. Even a leftist can be healed.
Seriously, if you don’t see that Trump was intentionally divisive, you’ve been brainwashed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kalimgoodman
Extremely. He never talks about heeling the country.
I'm sorry, what? Healing the country is ALL Trump talks about.

In his inaugural address, he noted that every 4 years the country observes the peaceful transfer of power from one administration to another. But today, we are observing the transfer of power from Washington DC to YOU. THE PEOPLE.

That right there is the most healing statement issued by any president since the Civil War.
 
I don’t. I agree that Obama was divisive

And the media talked you into believing Trump was divisive.
Obama was good at dividing Americans.

Trump is good at pointing out that DC is divided against America.

But if anyone can look at Trump's platform, and view that as being 'divisive' to Americans, then I really wonder what has happened to them. Trump's platform is literally what almost all Americans have been begging to see from politicians for decades. It's exactly the opposite of divisive.

But the media says otherwise, and as you noted, some emotional people get hoodwinked.
 
So, we agree that:

1. Obama was very divisive.

2. Trump was very divisive.

Obama is divisive based on race and social status. Trump is divisive based on the choices people make.

You may not agree but I see a huge difference here that heavily favors Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT