He‘s old and barely cognative. He says some really stupid stuff.
You realize that you are siding with a crazy person, don’t you?
Biden doesn’t know what the US is going to do in Ukraine because he’s not the one making those decisions.
Damn straight. Joe don’t mess around.
LOL. You’ve gone full tin foil.
Is this the same guy that shit himself when the Pope entered the room?
To be fair, Trump was the only president since Reagan that has. That's why all of DC was united in getting rid of him.
Well put from a member who can define intelligence quotient class room scoring order from the board's bottom five.
I have zero clue, none of what you list. I don't know much about any of them except Soros, and I think his influence is more grassroots than top down.
Like all presidents (except Trump), he holds daily intelligence briefings with the cabinet and Joint Chiefs. He listens to his advisors but ultimately it’s his call. So if you want to criticize him for getting advise from others, have at it. But that’s the way it’s always been done.
I have a feeling you Biden haters will soon be pivoting from Feckless to Warmonger. So dishonest.
Stick around...I will go find an article that you snowflakes never read that will make your post look ignorant. I will come post it back here shortly. I will give you an advance notice on it. It will describe the US military killing HUNDREDS of Russian military in Syria when they crossed in to where they were warned not to go. I always laugh when little snowflakes try to talk firearms, and military...when in reality they should stick to "proper display of "man" buns, and things they actually KNOW about. Back shortly with a link. BTW, I knew a few days after this happened. I live in quite the large military community...and 75% of them LOVE Trump.
www.reuters.com
Should we say..................compromised? If Brandon treats the Ukraine like he did Americans in Afghanistan, the shit will hit the fan..........and expose him globally for the grifter that he is.
Nobody wants to or believes Brandon will do dick about Russia. But he has to do "something". Not because we want him to, but because Ukraine has a dump truck full of fill dirt available to dump on Biden personally. Both they and China own him.
So you’re still going with the “feckless” response?
All of the Rats claimed that Trump would get us into wars with his incompetence.
Because little sissy libs do not know war. They are appeasers. When the nut job in N Korea tried to flex his little muscles, Trump told him we would come down in him like he could never imagine. Biden’s message was we will even leave Americans behind enemy lines to avoid confrontation. And because of this weakness, we have Ukraine, and soon China will move in Taiwan .
This is a joke. Biden and his family are paid by Putin, and China.
freebeacon.com
Biden Under Fire for Failing to Nominate Ukraine Ambassador as Russia Invasion Looms
President Joe Biden's failure to nominate an ambassador to Ukraine more than a year into his presidency is raising concerns among U.S. officials and regional experts as Russia moves closer to launching a full-scale invasion.
Beijing Brandon's perfect candidate for Ambassador to the Ukraine would be,,,, wait for it,,,, crack slut Hunter....Biden Under Fire for Failing to Nominate Ukraine Ambassador as Russia Invasion Looms
President Joe Biden's failure to nominate an ambassador to Ukraine more than a year into his presidency is raising concerns among U.S. officials and regional experts as Russia moves closer to launching a full-scale invasion.
greenwald.substack.com
Well, at least on here, it seems like it’s the Righties who want Joe to go all badass at the drop of a hat.The Neocons' Primary War Tactic: Branding Opponents of U.S. Intervention as Traitors
By rehabilitating neocons and elevating them as thought leaders, liberals live in their framework. Thus are opponents of U.S. involvement in Ukraine deemed treasonous.
From the linked article:
That is now, by far, the favorite attack against anyone who believes that Ukrainian borders are not important enough to U.S. interests to involve the U.S. in a war. The most vocal media opponent of U.S. involvement in Ukraine has been Fox News’ Tucker Carlson (though, as usual these days, war skepticism is also found on many Fox shows, including Laura Ingraham's, where I recently appeared to make that case, but almost never on CNN or MSNBC). Carlson, on an almost nightly basis, has posed the question few others in corporate media are willing to ask: why is Ukraine a sufficiently vital interest to the U.S. to risk lives, resources and potentially war with Russia in defense of it?
As punishment for arguing against the neocons’ latest plan to involve the U.S. in a new war, Carlson has been widely vilified as a Kremlin asset or, at best, a mouthpiece. “You're going to hear a lot of lying about Putin's War from Putin apologists on the Carlson right and the Greenwald left,” warned Frum, adding: “Putin apologists in US, UK, Germany, etc. should not be allowed to get away with hanging Putin's War on any other neck.”
[Emphasis Added]
I'll just say that suddenly military intervention is in vogue again with much of the left. Stop listening to neocon (neoliberal?) propaganda.
Sunny continues to be right. You are the slowest of the slow. Reading comprehension truly isn't your thing. We prefer Brandon to protect our border. Zero effs to give about what happens in Ukraine.
The majority of the board knows scoring order of NavigatorII and his opponent in the intelligence quotient class room. How do we know? Both shout it to us with virtually every post they author.
The Neocons' Primary War Tactic: Branding Opponents of U.S. Intervention as Traitors
By rehabilitating neocons and elevating them as thought leaders, liberals live in their framework. Thus are opponents of U.S. involvement in Ukraine deemed treasonous.
From the linked article:
That is now, by far, the favorite attack against anyone who believes that Ukrainian borders are not important enough to U.S. interests to involve the U.S. in a war. The most vocal media opponent of U.S. involvement in Ukraine has been Fox News’ Tucker Carlson (though, as usual these days, war skepticism is also found on many Fox shows, including Laura Ingraham's, where I recently appeared to make that case, but almost never on CNN or MSNBC). Carlson, on an almost nightly basis, has posed the question few others in corporate media are willing to ask: why is Ukraine a sufficiently vital interest to the U.S. to risk lives, resources and potentially war with Russia in defense of it?
As punishment for arguing against the neocons’ latest plan to involve the U.S. in a new war, Carlson has been widely vilified as a Kremlin asset or, at best, a mouthpiece. “You're going to hear a lot of lying about Putin's War from Putin apologists on the Carlson right and the Greenwald left,” warned Frum, adding: “Putin apologists in US, UK, Germany, etc. should not be allowed to get away with hanging Putin's War on any other neck.”
[Emphasis Added]
I'll just say that suddenly military intervention is in vogue again with much of the left. Stop listening to neocon (neoliberal?) propaganda.
