ADVERTISEMENT

Trump indicted!!! Again!!!!

Well Nav I know your heart broken but your wrong, he had no business taking them, he probably would’ve been ok but he went straight dumb and tried to hold onto them, he just doesn’t use brain smarts, I’ll say this again, Trump is too damn old to be in jail contrary to what Ghost pops off about me wanting him there but Trump falls under the rule of law period just like me and you, at this point man it’s old hat with him, just redundant stupid crap no need to argue the point anymore, nothing will change the outcome of what happens going forward with DJT, we can as Bama says, crack on each other and kee kee about it, but it’s gonna be what it’s gonna be. And geez have to edit this…what’s even worse he’s on audio admitting he stole secret military intel, boy just ain’t a smart crook
And the ones Pedo Peter took?
 
  • Angry
Reactions: fatman76
Why do people think the President can pardon himself?
Is it possible for a court to convict a sitting President? I don't know. I do think he can pardon himself of federal charges. The Senate can convict of impeachment but not sure this has precedence. Also, this is why Bragg is hell bent to get state charges against Trump, weak sauce that his case is.
 
Interest Reaction GIF
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gatorspeed
Is it possible for a court to convict a sitting President? I don't know. I do think he can pardon himself of federal charges. The Senate can convict of impeachment but not sure this has precedence. Also, this is why Bragg is hell bent to get state charges against Trump, weak sauce that his case is.
I’ll say this Nav ole Trump didn’t need a magazine when dropping a dump ole boy had plenty of reading material 😂
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: emekz1 and DGlockUF
It says he can't. Congress can pardon him or he can have the vice president be acting president and pardon him.
 
It says he can't. Congress can pardon him or he can have the vice president be acting president and pardon him.
You skip over this part?

“The Supreme Court has made clear that, subject to the exception for impeachment, the president’s power to grant pardons is “unlimited,” with virtually no oversight or limiting role for Congress”

It gave cases for both. The part you are referencing was quoting an AG from 50 years ago.

The whole point here is it would end up in the Supreme court. You were acting like it’s not possible, but a quick internet search would show you cases for both arguments to be made.

I do find it odd that the article gave you about 4 or 5 examples of court cases that would lean towards a presidents authority to pardon himself, and gave 1 example of an ACTING Assistant AG, that said no….and that’s what you went with.
 
You skip over this part?

“The Supreme Court has made clear that, subject to the exception for impeachment, the president’s power to grant pardons is “unlimited,” with virtually no oversight or limiting role for Congress”

It gave cases for both. The part you are referencing was quoting an AG from 50 years ago.

The whole point here is it would end up in the Supreme court. You were acting like it’s not possible, but a quick internet search would show you cases for both arguments to be made.

I do find it odd that the article gave you about 4 or 5 examples of court cases that would lean towards a presidents authority to pardon himself, and gave 1 example of an ACTING Assistant AG, that said no….and that’s what you went with.
That's wishful thinking. There is no way in hell that's happening.

Blame Nixon, not me.
 
That's wishful thinking. There is no way in hell that's happening.

Blame Nixon, not me.
Ummm. In case you haven’t noticed, the powers that be are doing much worse things today than Nixon ever did. We aren’t in Kansas anymore Toto.

Again, if Trump went this route, it would end up in the Supreme court.

Just like everything else with the courts, both sides of the argument can be made. Sorry you don’t like that.
 
Ummm. In case you haven’t noticed, the powers that be are doing much worse things today than Nixon ever did. We aren’t in Kansas anymore Toto.

Again, if Trump went this route, it would end up in the Supreme court.

Just like everything else with the courts, both sides of the argument can be made. Sorry you don’t like that.
So the party that stole two elections, weaponized the FBI and literally has a different set of laws for themselves doesn't know definitively whether the President can pardon himself before they try this shit?


To what end sir?

The trial can't conclude before the election. I don't think it can start before the election.

As your favorite inbred points out, we haven't secured the election so this doesn't keep him out so he doesn't become president because they cheat again.

So right now this banana republic bullshit has the base fired up and even libertarian slackers like me are annoyed. My 80 year old lifelong democrat mother finds this suspicious.

If they're trying to keep him from running EVER, then if he wins somehow he pardons himself before the trial even starts. And what does he do? Retaliate. Because he gets down like that.

That makes no sense. I would live to believe that I just don't like the answer. In actuality they have an ace in the hole or they know something we don't.

I'm not saying it's impossible or it won't go all the way to scotus but let's just not only is the glass half full, but the liquid in the glass is piss.
 
You cant preemptively pardon someone. You can pardon them anytime after they've been indicted before or after criminal proceedings.
Bro. We agree most of the time but read this.

President Gerald Ford believed he did the right thing when in 1974 he pardoned his predecessor, Richard Nixon, of any criminality connected to the cover-up of the Watergate scandal that had forced Nixon to be the first (and to date, only) president to resign from office.
Like many Americans at the time, I was furious at Ford for preempting what surely would have been an indictment for obstruction of justice and related crimes, and I was convinced there had been some secret deal to let Nixon get away with crimes that sent others in his administration to prison. Nixon should have been prosecuted, not pardoned.

This was my first Google stab. Nixon was never indicted or charged.
 
Bro. We agree most of the time but read this.

President Gerald Ford believed he did the right thing when in 1974 he pardoned his predecessor, Richard Nixon, of any criminality connected to the cover-up of the Watergate scandal that had forced Nixon to be the first (and to date, only) president to resign from office.
Like many Americans at the time, I was furious at Ford for preempting what surely would have been an indictment for obstruction of justice and related crimes, and I was convinced there had been some secret deal to let Nixon get away with crimes that sent others in his administration to prison. Nixon should have been prosecuted, not pardoned.

This was my first Google stab. Nixon was never indicted or charged.

Yep it sounds like its settled that a POTUS can give a pardon for any possible federal crime already commited prior to the pardon. I dont think a self pardon of a POTUS has ever been legally tested. Biden is probably a good candidate for that to be tested.
 
Bro. We agree most of the time but read this.

President Gerald Ford believed he did the right thing when in 1974 he pardoned his predecessor, Richard Nixon, of any criminality connected to the cover-up of the Watergate scandal that had forced Nixon to be the first (and to date, only) president to resign from office.
Like many Americans at the time, I was furious at Ford for preempting what surely would have been an indictment for obstruction of justice and related crimes, and I was convinced there had been some secret deal to let Nixon get away with crimes that sent others in his administration to prison. Nixon should have been prosecuted, not pardoned.

This was my first Google stab. Nixon was never indicted or charged.
"In Ex parte Garland, which involved President Andrew Johnson’s pardon of a lawyer who had served in the legislature of the Confederacy, the court indicated that the president’s pardon power covers all federal offenses. The president can issue a pardon at any point after a crime is committed and before, during or after criminal proceedings have taken place. The president cannot, however, pardon someone for future crimes. A pardon covers both the offender’s conviction for the crime and the sentence for that crime."

Conflicting info. Now I gotta read that case.
 
The more I hear about what they pulled here and the track record of this special counsel with abuses slapped down by the courts I doubt Trump has anything to worry about at the end with this case. The NY case is probably the only one they have any chance with and that is only with a compliant Judge assisting the prosecution with their attempt to get get an all hard core lefty Trump hating jury.
 
What get's me is that there are a select few on here that still look at it as getting that mean man Trump. They haven't a clue why the attack is so intense. They choose to continue to play this tit-for-tat game of orange man bad and laugh every time something is brought up against him. They fail to realize the Communistic attack on our country is being hindered by the orange man. It's so obvious, yet perhaps they know what is going on and actually want our nation to become Communistic. We're almost there fellas. Fingers crossed. Keep hoping that Trump goes to jail, then your wish will come true.
He wrecked the USA wake up Jesus.
 
As far as case law I think the Supreme Court has made it clear the POTUS can declassify anything as the executive branch so no matter what trap they think they set up Trump is right about that and some markings on some papers dont limit that ability. I think Clarence Thomas covers FL also so maybe this case gets tossed down the road before any trial.
Looks like @DGlockUF is playing with a pistol without a magazine. Welcome back! :rolleyes: 😂
 
The enemy of my enemies, is who I am voting for.

I really think these dumbasses think if they keep indicting Trump and forcing him to go to court that eventually America will believe he's really a criminal.

Every indictment boosts his approval rating another 10%. I suspect the dems will figure this out around Jan 2024 and realize they better shift focus to suspending the election.
 
I really think these dumbasses think if they keep indicting Trump and forcing him to go to court that eventually America will believe he's really a criminal.

Why not. That's been in the playbook for years, repeat the lie til it's accepted as the truth.

Every indictment boosts his approval rating another 10%. I suspect the dems will figure this out around Jan 2024 and realize they better shift focus to suspending the election.
Let's hope they don't. And they're not suspending the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT