ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Disapproval at 52%

No...no it is not. Good grief.




Where did I repeat anything Trump said, "word for word."




I know jack-shit about Q...so you're lying. Stop lying...especially if you're going to say things like you're "embarrassed for me."
Yes. Yes it is. Much better than OAN or Gateway Pundit. They reference their sources.

if you use the words, fake, news, MSM, Deep State, or Obama spied on me, you are repeating Trump.

You never dispute Ghosts posts, so I’m assuming you are all in.

PS. You jumped into the middle of a conversation with a different poster. Feel free to link a better source if you have one.
 
And as you explain how unfit our guy is for office, your candidate remains Biden. He cannot read a freaking teleprompter FFS. No one, not even the Der Stürmer media, is denying his refusal for a legit question and answer session with people asking unscripted questions. EVERYONE knows that he's half the man he used to be and the original man wasn't that great to begin with.

Before you attempt to lecture us on our vote, consider your own. It's beyond absurd that you will actually vote for that Democratic shill. He's a freaking placeholder that you've been duped into voting for and the left will absolutely pull the rug out from underneath you, steal your vote and then replace him with an entirely unelectable candidate. How can you be so willing to silence yourself and the American electorate? Talk about ridiculous.

I don't blame you for dodging this part btw. I mean I do...because you're voting for a wildcard and that means your vote counts for nothing other than empowering an un-electable to become POTUS...but given that you're ok with that...I understand your reluctance to address your ridiculous candidate.
 
I don't blame you for dodging this part btw. I mean I do...because you're voting for a wildcard and that means your vote counts for nothing other than empowering an un-electable to become POTUS...but given that you're ok with that...I understand your reluctance to address your ridiculous candidate.
Yeah, I’m OK with voting for a moderate politician who is not a narcissistic, lying POS.

How about you?
 
Yes. Yes it is. Much better than OAN or Gateway Pundit. They reference their sources.

You can repeat that ridiculous BS forever but it won't make it true. Try sourcing Wikipedia in academia and see how that works out for you.

Wikipedia is a better source than OAN? You are officially the most ridiculous person on the internet.




if you use the words, fake, news, MSM, Deep State, or Obama spied on me, you are repeating Trump.

LMAO, hey dumbass...I didn't use any of those words. But to your (failed) point, are you denying media bias? Both ways? If not, wtf is your point?


You never dispute Ghosts posts, so I’m assuming you are all in.

How is your assumption a me problem? Assume whatever you like...being wrong AF is your God-given right.

Have you ever noticed that Ghost has NEVER responded to a single post of mine on this board? Not a single like or reply? That seem odd to you? Haha, you have no idea what you're talking about with this BS attempt at trying to tell ME what I think. Haha, that's gold Jerry.

I'll clue you in on something...ghost dislikes me more than he dislikes you.
 
You can repeat that ridiculous BS forever but it won't make it true. Try sourcing Wikipedia in academia and see how that works out for you.

Wikipedia is a better source than OAN? You are officially the most ridiculous person on the internet.






LMAO, hey dumbass...I didn't use any of those words. But to your (failed) point, are you denying media bias? Both ways? If not, wtf is your point?




How is your assumption a me problem? Assume whatever you like...being wrong AF is your God-given right.

Have you ever noticed that Ghost has NEVER responded to a single post of mine on this board? Not a single like or reply? That seem odd to you? Haha, you have no idea what you're talking about with this BS attempt at trying to tell ME what I think. Haha, that's gold Jerry.

I'll clue you in on something...ghost dislikes me more than he dislikes you.
Yes. Yes it is. Try sourcing OAN in Academia or anywhere Other than message boards. That’s the dumbest thing you’ve ever said.

Yes, you’ve used those words in the past. I’m sure of it.

You and Ghost are on the same side. That’s all I need to know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Yes. Yes it is. Try sourcing OAN in Academia or anywhere Other than message boards. That’s the dumbest thing you’ve ever said.

Yes, you’ve used those words in the past. I’m sure of it.

You and Ghost are on the same side. That’s all I need to know.

Try sourcing WaPo to intelligent people anywhere and you'll get mocked. But you know that.

And since you are too scared to respond to me directly, I don't use Gateway Pundit as a source. Mainly because it's just some activist with a website.

Same reason why I don't use WaPo. The difference between us is I am smart enough to see they are two sides of the same coin, you are not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Yeah, I’m OK with voting for a moderate politician who is not a narcissistic, lying POS.

How about you?

Even if he's out of his freaking head? 🤣

Wait...you called him moderate? 😆 Is moderate code for senile?

No...no i am not ok with that. I'd sort of like someone who knows who he is, where he is, why he's there and that he is not his own husband. Those things are deal breakers for me.
 
Even if he's out of his freaking head? 🤣

No...no i am not ok with that. I'd sort of like someone who knows who he is, where he is, why he's there and that he is not his own husband. Those things are deal breakers for me.
Well, me neither. Which is why I support Biden. He’s at least as coherent as Trump. Without the baggage.
 
BS-C911 can't discredit OANN, but he has no trouble at all in discrediting himself here on a constant basis. 😏
OANN discredits itself. I don’t need to.

Are you a part owner or something? You seem oddly attached to a network.
 
Yes. Yes it is. Try sourcing OAN in Academia or anywhere Other than message boards. That’s the dumbest thing you’ve ever said.

Yes, you’ve used those words in the past. I’m sure of it.

You and Ghost are on the same side. That’s all I need to know.

An OAN source would go down better for you than Wikipedia dumbass. Even with a lib professor. You aren't this dumb so why are you pretending to be? Own your gaffe...you used Wikipedia as a source. You'll look like a better man if you do.

Ahhh...ive used those words in the past? Haha...so have you now, genius. Stop being so lazy and intellectually dishonest.

Ask Ghost how much he likes me, lol. He very likely will ignore your question. You and i agree sometimes too. Sometimes we don't. The same is true for Ghost and I....obviously...and obviously you already know that but you're choosing to move the goalposts while being dishonest again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Wiki is a valid source as general information.

All of their information is referenced, so feel free to clink the link to their references, and then argue the facts. But you won’t.

You call me a shill, but then repeat Trump lines word for word. An admitted liar. Oh, and Q sources.

Nice deflection. Admit Trump is a liar and a clown and I’ll be glad to discuss Biden. But this is a Trump thread. I don’t suck off Biden like you idiots do Trump . I’m embarrassed for you. You can’t think for yourself.

You mean the wikipedia that can and IS edited by ANYONE with internet and a web browser? good grief, you have ZERO credibility at this point. Wiki....SMDH. No need to go any further.
 
Can you be more specific? Again, YOU are the one that says you use CREDIBLE sources. Give me an example of MSM you find credible. Again, YOU are the one that says you use them, so ONLY YOU can answer the question. I didn't say it, YOU did.

It's stunning how easily @BSC911 gets outsmarted. I bet he thinks Jennifer Rubin is really a conservative.
 
He’s at least as coherent as Trump.

That is simply not true. Trump has his faults and ive listed them several times on this board but in no way is Biden as coherent as Trump.

Trump can take unscripted questions for example. Your boy hasn't done that in a LONG time. That's not an accident..."and you know this, man." ($1 to smokey)

Trump is a HUGE narcissist but Biden is senile and becoming more so every day. It's a problem and you know it.
 
I have spelled it out multiple times. I NEVER said anything about ANY sources. YOU did. I guess you are afraid to list these CREDIBLE sources for some strange reason. I want credible news, so please lead me to water kind sir, so that maybe I can drink.

All the libbies and progressives swear the NYT is credible..... without regard to the many times they’ve been proven wrong eventually, or the proven fact they are so one sided and guilty of rampant omission ..... they truly can’t see that the NYT, WaPo, CNN, NBC, et.al. have been one-sided participants and not observers/journalists since Trump was sworn in
 
Except that you ARE voting for a narcissistic lying POS..... had you ever heard of Joe Biden before??

And Trump is a lying narcissist as well....most politicians at this level are

So NOW whatcha got?
Ok, sure. But in the lying POS political scale Trump is off the charts.
 
Can you be more specific? Again, YOU are the one that says you use CREDIBLE sources. Give me an example of MSM you find credible. Again, YOU are the one that says you use them, so ONLY YOU can answer the question. I didn't say it, YOU did.
All of them. I love the entire MSM.

Who you got?
 
Ok, sure. But in the lying POS political scale Trump is off the charts.

According to the WaPo. Which I destroyed last night as being a garbage source.

Can you reference a single claim made by OANN that was later disproven? Because I can do that all day with your go-to source, WaPo.

Reminder: Just because a source publishes facts that hurt your feelings doesn't discredit them.
 
All the libbies and progressives swear the NYT is credible..... without regard to the many times they’ve been proven wrong eventually, or the proven fact they are so one sided and guilty of rampant omission ..... they truly can’t see that the NYT, WaPo, CNN, NBC, et.al. have been one-sided participants and not observers/journalists since Trump was sworn in

Because again, dems don't watch/read these sources for accurate information, they watch/read them to be lied to.

The rest of America wants the truth, the dems want the lies they want to hear. And MSM is happy to oblige.
 
An OAN source would go down better for you than Wikipedia dumbass. Even with a lib professor. You aren't this dumb so why are you pretending to be? Own your gaffe...you used Wikipedia as a source. You'll look like a better man if you do.

Ahhh...ive used those words in the past? Haha...so have you now, genius. Stop being so lazy and intellectually dishonest.

Ask Ghost how much he likes me, lol. He very likely will ignore your question. You and i agree sometimes too. Sometimes we don't. The same is true for Ghost and I....obviously...and obviously you already know that but you're choosing to move the goalposts while being dishonest again.
Are you really comparing writing an academic paper with a message board. wiki is fine for this, just like encyclopedias have always been for general information. As an MBA, Ive written many research papers. I know the difference. Typical message board deflection. When you can’t argue the facts, argue the source. Hell, even check out the founders webpage. He’s a nobody, but just spots conservative views. He’s also gay.

Im still curious as to where you and Ghost disagree. He never responds to me and wouldn’t want to read his dumb response anyway. The guy is seriously delusional.
 
Last edited:
Are you really comparing writing an academic paper with a message board. wiki is fine for this, just like encyclopedias have always been for general information. As an MBA, Ive written many research papers. I know the difference.

Not sure what online program you got your MBA from, but the university that awarded me my MBA would have failed me on principle if I had cited wikipedia as a source.

Do you even know what the 'wiki' in wikipedia stands for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
Let’s see. You don’t believe Stormey, or Cohen, or the dozen of women who allege sexual abuse, or his niece, or Bolton, or the multitude of other people that have inside knowledge of what goes on.

That's because we have a working brain. Another of your heroes goes down...



....while Trump keeps rising. Burns that sheepish ass of yours, doesn't it?
 
That's because we have a working brain. Another of your heroes goes down...



....while Trump keeps rising. Burns that sheepish ass of yours, doesn't it?


Anger is coming forth because there is a realization that he has been getting played his entire life by those he trusted. The MSM, politicians etc. Pride comes before the fall.
 
Anger is coming forth because there is a realization that he has been getting played his entire life by those he trusted. The MSM, politicians etc. Pride comes before the fall.

If he's upset now for being played then he has no idea what's coming.

And he never does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kjfreeze
If he's upset now for being played then he has no idea what's coming.

And he never does.
It's almost like, "We're playing hide-and-seek Joe. Come play with us."
"Okay," Joe says. "One Mississippi, two Mississippi...ten Mississippi. Ready or not here I come."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT