Certainly not the ones you frequent.What about? Please do tell us about these reputable sources. Can't wait.
Certainly not the ones you frequent.What about? Please do tell us about these reputable sources. Can't wait.
What about? Please do tell us about these reputable sources. Can't wait.
Certainly not the ones you frequent.
The ones that don’t push conspiracy theories, like Gateway Pundit and the other ones you nut cases post on here.you're answering for him, or that other user is your burner? either way, please tell me about this reputable sources.
Laugh away as you did in 2016.The ones that don’t push conspiracy theories, like Gateway Pundit and the other ones you nut cases post on here.
Whats funny is that clown believes everything Trump says, even repeating the “media hoax“ about the virus when it was the media reporting the truth and it was Trump who was lying. It looks like you fell for it as well.
Don’t get me started laughing again.
I told you the Clinton Foundation was under investigation a couple of years ago. That's another story that will be big in another year or two. Another headsup from me.
The ones that don’t push conspiracy theories, like Gateway Pundit and the other ones you nut cases post on here.
Whats funny is that clown believes everything Trump says, even repeating the “media hoax“ about the virus when it was the media reporting the truth and it was Trump who was lying. It looks like you fell for it as well.
Don’t get me started laughing again.
you're answering for him, or that other user is your burner? either way, please tell me about this reputable sources.
The ones that don’t push conspiracy theories, like Gateway Pundit and the other ones you nut cases post on here.
Here they are
Salon
Huffington post
The Atlantic
Media Matters
Daily Beast
Ny Slims
Washington compost
Forgot the following:
Mother Jones
Boston Globe
Vox
LA Times
New Yorker
The Guardian
Vanity Fair
And Vogue Vogue Vogue magazineForgot the following:
Mother Jones
Boston Globe
Vox
LA Times
New Yorker
The Guardian
Vanity Fair
Huffing-Puffing on a Post?Here they are
Salon
Huffington post
The Atlantic
Media Matters
Daily Beast
Ny Slims
Washington compost
Forgot the following:
Mother Jones
Boston Globe
Vox
LA Times
New Yorker
The Guardian
Vanity Fair
You’ll be waiting a long time. You know who they are. The ones that actually are professionals.still waiting for the list.
You’ll be waiting a long time. You know who they are. The ones that actually are professionals.
What’s funny is you dorks ignore the national Publications and instead listen to some computer nerd in his basement that peddles conspiracy theories, which invariably turn out to be wrong. Then you claim to be woke, but really you just enjoy the echo chamber. It’s truly a bizarro world with you conspiracy nut cases.
You do know. Names you actually recognize.I don't know. Waiting on your list. There must be a reason you don't want to post it. Wonder what it could be?
They’re no Gateway Pundit, that’s for sure.How did I miss these rags ( some of the absolute worst)
VOX
The guardian
New yaaaker
You do know. Names you actually recognize.
Who’s your go to? Give me your list and I’ll show you mine. You’re in my house so you go first.
And this.
Other
In December 2017, The Gateway Pundit published a Reddit post as evidence that Democratic activists were committing voter fraud in the 2017 Alabama Senate special election. The redditor behind the post later said that the post was intended "as an obvious troll." When asked by The Washington Post, the writer of the Gateway Pundit post declined to say whether he had contacted the redditor to verify the information; later the Gateway Pundit story contained an update at the bottom: "Liberals say these are fake Reddit posts(?) Regardless, the posts are still up on Reddit and the posters are still encouraging Democrats to cheat." Also in December 2017, Gateway Pundit published a story falsely saying that Facebook had taken down a previous Gateway Pundit story about the Alabama election, when in fact a Facebook algorithm had made it less prevalent after it had been flagged as fake news.
In April 2018, The Gateway Pundit falsely claimed in a headline that two prominent African-American conservative video bloggers – Diamond and Silk – had been censored by Facebook.
In September 2018, after psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford alleged that U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her in the 1980s when they were teenagers, The Gateway Pundit published an article erroneously claiming that Kavanaugh's mother, a district court judge in Maryland, had once ruled in a foreclosure case against Dr. Ford's parents, creating what The Gateway Pundit called "bad blood" between the two families. In an update, The Gateway Pundit noted, "CBS News reports the case was settled amicably and the Blaseys kept their house."
On October 30, 2018, NBC News and The Atlantic published articles detailing a scheme to falsely accuse Robert Mueller of sexual misconduct in 1974. The articles reported involvement by Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl, the latter a writer for Gateway Pundit. Hours after these reports, Gateway Pundit published on its site "exclusive documents" about a "very credible witness" to support the accusations against Mueller. Each document had in its header the phrase "International Private Intelligence," the business slogan of Surefire Intelligence, a firm created by Wohl. The site removed the documents later that day, stating they were investigating the matter, as well as "serious allegations against Jacob Wohl." The following day, Gateway Pundit's owner Jim Hoft retweeted Wohl's comment suggesting Mueller's office was actually behind the scheme. Mueller's office had days earlier referred the scheme to the FBI. Burkman and Wohl convened a press conference outside Washington on November 1, ostensibly to present a woman who they said signed an affidavit, which Gateway Pundit had published, accusing Mueller of raping her in a New York hotel room in 2010 — on a date he was contemporaneously reported by The Washington Post to be serving jury duty in Washington. The men accused Mueller's office of "leaking" the eight year-old Post story to discredit their allegations. The purported accuser, a Carolyne Cass, did not appear at the press conference, with the men asserting she had panicked in fear of her life and taken a flight to another location. Soon after the press conference, Hoft announced that Gateway Pundit had "suspended our relationship" with Wohl.
you were the one talking about reputable sources, not me. So, let's hear who they are. You brought it up. Said you get your news from reputable sources. You seem hesitant now.
You’ll be waiting a long time. You know who they are. The ones that actually are professionals.
That’s why I didnt post my sources. You guys are so brainwashed, you can’t argue the facts, only the sources that Trump doesn’t approve. It’s lazy and intellectually dishonest. It’s all you have.Are you seriously up in here quoting wikipedia as a source? woooooooweeeeeeee!!!!
I’ll be glad to. As soon as you post yours. But you won’t.you were the one talking about reputable sources, not me. So, let's hear who they are. You brought it up. Said you get your news from reputable sources. You seem hesitant now.
That’s why I didnt post my sources. You guys are so brainwashed, you can’t argue the facts, only the sources that Trump doesn’t approve. It’s lazy and intellectually dishonest. It’s all you have.
I say Trump is unfit to be president, you can say it’s a hollow gripe. If I say Obama says that, you can say, that’s political. If I say, both Bush’s say that the argument gains some validation. If I then say trump’s two former Secretaries of State say that, it gains more. If I say his former national security director says that, even more. Secretary of Defense, intelligence director, FBI Director even more. His lawyer, his sister, his niece even more.
You guys have nothing other than conspiracy sites. You’re brain dead.
Heres WaPo. Go ahead, tell me why the Gateway Pundit is a better source. I can do this all night.Are you seriously up in here quoting wikipedia as a source? woooooooweeeeeeee!!!!
I’ll be glad to. As soon as you post yours. But you won’t.
Here’s another. Please tell me you have something other than durrr, fake news.Are you seriously up in here quoting wikipedia as a source? woooooooweeeeeeee!!!!
Heres WaPo. Go ahead, tell me why the Gateway Pundit is a better source. I can do this all night.
That’s why I didnt post my sources. You guys are so brainwashed, you can’t argue the facts, only the sources that Trump doesn’t approve. It’s lazy and intellectually dishonest. It’s all you have.
I say Trump is unfit to be president, you can say it’s a hollow gripe. If I say Obama says that, you can say, that’s political. If I say, both Bush’s say that the argument gains some validation. If I then say trump’s two former Secretaries of State say that, it gains more. If I say his former national security director says that, even more. Secretary of Defense, intelligence director, FBI Director even more. His lawyer, his sister, his niece even more.
You guys have nothing other than conspiracy sites. You’re brain dead.
How about this. My sources are what you call the MSM. What’s yours?Are you seriously up in here quoting wikipedia as a source? woooooooweeeeeeee!!!!
Wiki is a valid source as general information.Relax Francis...you used Wikipedia as a source and you were appropriately mocked for it.
And as you explain how unfit our guy is for office, your candidate remains Biden. He cannot read a freaking teleprompter FFS. No one, not even the Der Stürmer media, is denying his refusal for a legit question and answer session with people asking unscripted questions. EVERYONE knows that he's half the man he used to be and the original man wasn't that great to begin with.
Before you attempt to lecture us on our vote, consider your own. It's beyond absurd that you will actually vote for that Democratic shill. He's a freaking placeholder that you've been duped into voting for and the left will absolutely pull the rug out from underneath you, steal your vote and then replace him with an entirely unelectable candidate. How can you be so willing to silence yourself and the American electorate? Talk about ridiculous.
Boring. Cant you come up with an original line or are you too old and senile?BS-C911 still = ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz
OANN? LOL. Two can play that game.Minn. police group withdraws support for Democrat candidates, endorse Republicans instead | One America News Network
Breaking News, Latest News and Current News from OANN.com. Breaking news and video. Latest Current News: U.S., World, Entertainment, Health, Business, Technology, Politics, Sports.www.oann.com
Wiki is a valid source as general information.
You call me a shill, but then repeat Trump lines word for word.
Oh, and Q sources.