I don't have a clue about Bradley personally, but I know that if you EVER disagree with a liberal you are in for it lol... The problem with lib crybabies is they have no idea how they are in every way the type of people that they hate the most, the irony is epic reaching levels... And have no idea how hypocritical they are being about every topic, for a group of people that preach equality and sensitivity so much and so often, they are the exact opposite and argumentative and condemning labeling babies of all
To gain and maintain control of a population, you set up 2 sides against each other, and then you control them both from the outside by manipulating their feelings, (love, hate, fear, suspicion, anger, etc)
Just a few quick examples:
Rich vs Poor
Royalty vs Peasants
Catholics vs Protestants
North vs South
Race vs Any other race
It's the US vs THEM, in it's many permutations.
How to get around it?
"What if they gave a WAR, and nobody (us) showed up?"
Yawl might want to read 'The Prince' by Niccolo Machiavelli.
BTW, it just happens to be what the Clinton's call their favorite book. I wonder why that would be?![]()
I haven't voted since Bush, who I voted for twice.
I'd love to meet a conservative with an original thought, but the two are mutually exclusive.
You did not have to vote for the left nut or the right nut. You could have voted for the Johnson.
It is guys like you that don't vote that are part of the problem. Vote third party, vote independent, vote for a write in. Hell, vote for bradleygator if you must.
But vote.
In my life, I have voted Write-in once, Democrat twice, Third Party twice and Republican six times
Straight out of the Rush Limbaugh (and friends) cant.
I'd love to meet a conservative with an original thought, but the two are mutually exclusive.
You did not have to vote for the left nut or the right nut. You could have voted for the Johnson.
He was and is. But he was a much better choice than the other two deplorable candidates
btttArent you libs just elated with what you have created for this country.
Do you assert that Liberals have original thoughts?
Arent you libs just elated with what you have created for this country.
You did not have to vote for the left nut or the right nut. You could have voted for the Johnson.
It is guys like you that don't vote that are part of the problem. Vote third party, vote independent, vote for a write in. Hell, vote for bradleygator if you must.
But vote.
In my life, I have voted Write-in once, Democrat twice, Third Party twice and Republican six times
This is some bumper sticker thinking right here. Look at the concentration of wealth in this country over the last 40 years. Regardless of Republicans or Democrats in the White House, the rich get richer. It's a false choice. No matter who you vote for, the government will continue printing money to prop up the stock market and real estate, to the detriment of everybody else's savings, will continue to back automation, offshoring and any other means of wiping out our labor markets, so long as it saves stockholders a buck, and will continue expanding government surveillance and the criminalization of dissent.
When you've got some third world banana republic dictator running a sham election, what does the opposition do? Boycott. Same deal here. I would vote if I ever saw a candidate that I thought would create meaningful change. Still waiting.
@bradleygator i must ask u. Do u think trump is a racist or sexist?
After 6 years of the Republicans having no agenda other than keeping the Dems from accomplishing ANYTHING, and you have the GALL to post that?
Bite me.
But I bet when the DEMS drag their feet for the next four years, and try to impeach Trump every five minutes. they'll be saving the country.
Piss off.
I think he's a bullshitter who is not smart or committed enough to follow through on his plans, which is probably largely a good thing. I don't think he's a racist, but he panders very effectively to racists. He's obviously sexist, but as far as crippling faults, that's probably not in his top 100.
This is an example of original thinking, no doubt.After 6 years of the Republicans having no agenda other than keeping the Dems from accomplishing ANYTHING, and you have the GALL to post that?
Bite me.
As well as every level of government. Federal state and local. All under Obama's watch.Republicans control both chambers lol
what is the democratic agenda? For the all the people who work to support the people who dontAfter 6 years of the Republicans having no agenda other than keeping the Dems from accomplishing ANYTHING, and you have the GALL to post that?
Bite me.
As well as every level of government. Federal state and local. All under Obama's watch.
Bizarre tangent. Stay on topic?
I understand. Had Johnson taken the same tact, I would not have voted for him. A VP? meH.And I would have voted for Johnson, if he hadn't lost his damn mind and picked a virulently anti-gun VP. That motherf*cker never saw a gun control bill he didn't like.
Are you new around here?Bizarre tangent. Stay on topic?
This is some bumper sticker thinking right here. Look at the concentration of wealth in this country over the last 40 years. Regardless of Republicans or Democrats in the White House, the rich get richer.
It's a false choice.
No matter who you vote for, the government will continue printing money to prop up the stock market and real estate, to the detriment of everybody else's savings, will continue to back automation, offshoring and any other means of wiping out our labor markets, so long as it saves stockholders a buck, and will continue expanding government surveillance and the decriminalization of dissent.
When you've got some third world banana republic dictator running a sham election, what does the opposition do? Boycott. Same deal here. I would vote if I ever saw a candidate that I thought would create meaningful change. Still waiting.
Agree with all of this.I think he's a bullshitter who is not smart or committed enough to follow through on his plans, which is probably largely a good thing. I don't think he's a racist, but he panders very effectively to racists. He's obviously sexist, but as far as crippling faults, that's probably not in his top 100.
Bless your little heart. Your original observation is not relevant to the original purpose of this thread either.Why is that relevant?
Bless your little heart. Your original observation is not relevant to the original purpose of this thread either.
Bless your little heart. Your original observation is not relevant to the original purpose of this thread either.
So I just wanted to introduce another tangent. I grew weary of sines and cosinesYeah, it was relevant to a tangential discussion that started before my participation.
Not my fault it went off the rails.
I'd love to meet a conservative with an original thought, but the two are mutually exclusive.
So I just wanted to introduce another tangent. I grew weary of sines and cosines