This time it's Gorsuch and Roberts siding with the left.

[Orangeclad]

A 6-3 majority my a**


Gorsuch, Roberts side with left-leaning Supreme Court justices in immigration ruling

Gorsuch, Roberts side with left-leaning Supreme Court justices in immigration ruling

In an immigration appeals case, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s liberal justices Tuesday in a 5-4 ruling.

www.foxnews.com

 

[LordofallSocks]

Roberts has never been reliable.

 

[Orangeclad]

Roberts has never been reliable.

I think Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Barrett just rotate that 5th vote. The Dems have 3 reliables. The repubs only have two, Thomas and Alito.

 

[BCSpell]

A 6-3 majority my a**


Gorsuch, Roberts side with left-leaning Supreme Court justices in immigration ruling

Gorsuch, Roberts side with left-leaning Supreme Court justices in immigration ruling

In an immigration appeals case, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s liberal justices Tuesday in a 5-4 ruling.

www.foxnews.com

This is stupid and a waste of tax dollars. If the 60 day ends on a Sunday or Holiday, they time limit is extended by a day. This shouldn't be an issue. That is the way the Court system works. Yeah, I know that you could argue that they should have left earlier, but for Court deadlines, if it falls on the weekend or Holiday, its extended. Not a big deal.

 

[IrishPokerDog]

A 6-3 majority my a**


Gorsuch, Roberts side with left-leaning Supreme Court justices in immigration ruling

Gorsuch, Roberts side with left-leaning Supreme Court justices in immigration ruling

In an immigration appeals case, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s liberal justices Tuesday in a 5-4 ruling.

www.foxnews.com

Meh…. I see both sides of a purely administrative issue. Not thinking this indicates anything about Gorsuch moving to being a squishy moderate…… Robert’s however lives in that neighborhood

 

[kalimgoodman]

A 6-3 majority my a**


Gorsuch, Roberts side with left-leaning Supreme Court justices in immigration ruling

Gorsuch, Roberts side with left-leaning Supreme Court justices in immigration ruling

In an immigration appeals case, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s liberal justices Tuesday in a 5-4 ruling.

www.foxnews.com

You guys so politicized the courts, its sad.

 

[kalimgoodman]

Roberts has never been reliable.

Or he is the most impartial person? And you guys want puppets?

 

[IrishPokerDog]

Or he is the most impartial person? And you guys want puppets?

That he is not….. he’s vain and has sometimes taken a position as a jab to certain politicos. The most moderate in terms of stance

The most impartial is Gorsuch who looks at issues almost entirely from aspect of law, and is probably the most talented legal mind on the bench

 

[LordofallSocks]

Or he is the most impartial person? And you guys want puppets?

Thats not how SCOTUS works, bud.

You're not supposed to be impartial. You're supposed to make sure the laws coincide with the founder's intent whether you agree with them or not.

 

[Orangeclad]

It never ceases to amaze me in how little or zero self awareness that KalimGoodman has in his own stupid arguments. For example, he argues that the right just wants to politicize the court and have "puppets", his word. He makes this argument in the context of ONLY ONE PARTY wanting to "pack" the court, and that party is HIS party. Now anyone with half a brain (which would be his excuse) knows that the desire to "pack the court" is PURELY for POLITICAL reasons. But he either cannot understand that or cannot admit it. I'll go 50% on both.

 

[nail1988]

Or he is the most impartial person? And you guys want puppets?

Impartial my backside ( compromised )

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

That he is not….. he’s vain and has sometimes taken a position as a jab to certain politicos. The most moderate in terms of stance

The most impartial is Gorsuch who looks at issues almost entirely from aspect of law, and is probably the most talented legal mind on the bench

Most people forget that the true job of the SC isn't to rule on existing laws, it's to rule on the CASES brought before them. It's just that the left likes to rule on the law and use the cases they are hearing as an excuse to do that.

Gorsuch typically is pretty good about sticking to the case at hand and ruling based on its merits. That can sometimes come off as if he is supporting a particular law because he didn't side with a case that was challenging that law. It could be (and often is) that the case before him didn't make an adequate case to challenge an established law.

 

[nail1988]

Hey Roberts

 

[goldmom]

You guys so politicized the courts, its sad.

You must be very young.

 

[grandhavendiddy]

Or he is the most impartial person? And you guys want puppets?

A few thoughts:

1. I agree with Homan - the left wanted zero due process with 11M illegal immigrants coming in and now want it a full jury trail for every one going out? Come on.

2. The left and MSM is very critical of right leaning judgements, but when a Roberts or Gorsuch is "fair"..."crickets".

3. On this one, the federal government should have the right to deport people who are here illegally, hard stop.

Continues to be my #1 issue. And on the whole, Trump has done a brilliant job.

 

[kalimgoodman]

Thats not how SCOTUS works, bud.

You're not supposed to be impartial. You're supposed to make sure the laws coincide with the founder's intent whether you agree with them or not.

I agree but that is not what you guys want at all. You want the judges to agree with your view/politics of the law.

Now ill be fair and say that you have called out some republican laws as being unconstitutional but overall you guys want them to tell you that your laws are fine and when they don't, something is wrong with them.

 

[kalimgoodman]

A few thoughts:

1. I agree with Homan - the left wanted zero due process with 11M illegal immigrants coming in and now want it a full jury trail for every one going out? Come on.

2. The left and MSM is very critical of right leaning judgements, but when a Roberts or Gorsuch is "fair"..."crickets".

3. On this one, the federal government should have the right to deport people who are here illegally, hard stop.

Continues to be my #1 issue. And on the whole, Trump has done a brilliant job.

Well to address a few things.

2, the left always gives Roberts and Neil credit, they are just critical of Alito and Thomas for how corrupt and biased they are.

3, yes the federal government should and historically they are allowed but they still must give due process. It's really not that difficult.

 

[kalimgoodman]

It never ceases to amaze me in how little or zero self awareness that KalimGoodman has in his own stupid arguments. For example, he argues that the right just wants to politicize the court and have "puppets", his word. He makes this argument in the context of ONLY ONE PARTY wanting to "pack" the court, and that party is HIS party. Now anyone with half a brain (which would be his excuse) knows that the desire to "pack the court" is PURELY for POLITICAL reasons. But he either cannot understand that or cannot admit it. I'll go 50% on both.

Well you are not smart enough to understand the concept of pack the court. The democrats were robbed of a seat for political reasons. The dems should've been given the Scalia seat. Pack the court is a responses to the Republicans being political.

Now I still think the courts should expand to 12, even under Trump. We have 12 districts and historically it's been 1 judge per district.

 

[nail1988]

Well you are not smart enough to understand the concept of pack the court. The democrats were robbed of a seat for political reasons. The dems should've been given the Scalia seat. Pack the court is a responses to the Republicans being political.

Now I still think the courts should expand to 12, even under Trump. We have 12 districts and historically it's been 1 judge per district.

Kal

Good grief.

That would be like the old Soviet polit bureau.

 

[nail1988]

Well to address a few things.

2, the left always gives Roberts and Neil credit, they are just critical of Alito and Thomas for how corrupt and biased they are.

3, yes the federal government should and historically they are allowed but they still must give due process. It's really not that difficult.

Alito and Thomas are orginalist who interpret the constituion on the original meaning and text. . They don't try to get out of their lane like Hollywood John and Neil G making law.

SCOTUS and courts have the least amount of power in our constitution because they're not elected by the people.

The framers would have never ratified the constitution allowing judges power interfering in the other branches of our government.

Sorry Kal

 

[kalimgoodman]

Alito and Thomas are orginalist who interpret the constituion on the original meaning and text. . They don't try to get out of their lane like Hollywood John and Neil G making law.

SCOTUS and courts have the least amount of power in our constitution because they're not elected by the people.

The framers would have never ratified the constitution allowing judges power interfering in the other branches of our government.

Sorry Kal

Brother, I 100000% agree that we allowed the courts to become more powerful than originally intended.

But Alito and Thomas are NOT originalist. They just say that when it benefits them. Like where in the constitution does it says "official acts"?

 

[IrishPokerDog]

Well you are not smart enough to understand the concept of pack the court. The democrats were robbed of a seat for political reasons. The dems should've been given the Scalia seat. Pack the court is a responses to the Republicans being political.

Now I still think the courts should expand to 12, even under Trump. We have 12 districts and historically it's been 1 judge per district.

Hahahahaha…. Twelve is a stupid number as there would be ties.

And you just make crap up that is just wrong - there have never been a time “historically” for there to be 1 SCOTUS justice for each district court of appeals. In fact, the court of appeals didn’t exist until 1910 when we got rid of the many circuit districts and consolidated into CoA. And there aren’t 12 court of appeals districts either, there are 13, as DC is its own

So quit getting your info from crap sources trying to justify packing the court, OR making it up, because your “facts” are shite

 

[kalimgoodman]

Hahahahaha…. Twelve is a stupid number as there would be ties.

And you just make crap up that is just wrong - there have never been a time “historically” for there to be 1 SCOTUS justice for each district court of appeals. In fact, the court of appeals didn’t exist until 1910 when we got rid of the many circuit districts and consolidated into CoA. And there aren’t 12 court of appeals districts either, there are 13, as DC is its own

So quit getting your info from crap sources trying to justify packing the court, OR making it up, because your “facts” are shite

I definitely meant 13, I posted that number before. My mistake. But that was why they went to 9, then we expanded in population. So now let's go to 13.