Demonstrating the thought process they teach in Lexington?
You apparently never took any southern history classes.
Things end badly for Antifa thug
- Thread starter nail1988
- Start date
You apparently never took any southern history classes.
The Klan isn't and never was "an organization." There have been thousands of Klans. They're not identical, at all.
In my home area the Klan type group was the blue-bills. They had been Union Soldiers during the war, but opposed the carpet baggers.
The south was plubdered after the war. Klan type groups stopped it.
You're an idiot if you think they were all bad. In fact, I'd say the original version was the good guys.
But that's just my opinion. But they weren't what you've been told they are.
Idk if you're white or black, it doesn't matter.
The Klan was always there to go after people who were violent and caused problems. There is an abundance of contemporary source material, from black Americans in the South at this time, who worked with the Klan to keep their community safe.
Anyone who was abusing their wife, and things like this, got a visit. If it didn't stop, there was another visit, and never a third.
You've got to stop believing everything you see on TV.
There was no winner in our civil war, except the Hamiltonians.
Our republic died in the hands of the Radical Republicans of 1865.
The 14th amendment only became ratified because they voted the people who didn't agree out of Congress to obtain a majority.
It ended our republic. The states are now just administrative divisions of the federal gov, with no power.
You'll have to explain to me why it's bad for a native population to band together to resist a hostile, foreign occupation.
Because that's what the Klan was.
And it went away when the circumstances that required its presence went away.
Then Woodrow Wilson watched a movie.
The problem in America today, is for 50 years or so we have collectively pretended like the worst examples were commonplace. There is a reason Emmett Till is still draged from his grave every few months and goes on tour. If it was as bad as we've been led to believe, they would have more people than Emmet Till to parade around as ultimate victim.
The problem for your spin is that most of us either lived in the South in the 60s and 70s, or our parents did. We know what happened because we were there as it was happening.
Not sure what your aim here is, but you're now on Ignore.
That isn't inconsistent wirh anything I said.
As I said, after the original incarnation of the Klan, they ranged from silly to sinister.
But what you're talking about that happened, much, if not all of it was carried out by agents. provocateur.
If you go back to the 50 and 60s.... The most respected members of our society were in the Klan. Sen. Robert Byrd, for instance.
They opposed the civil Rights initiatives, as did most people in the states where more enforcement was sought.
The Klan organizations were infiltrated and subverted. They were encouraged to do dumb, violent and horrible things.
My goal here? I don't really have one. We all know the victors write the history. I prefer the truth.
I'd rather my neighbor was a klansman than a Democrat. That's for sure.
Nobody bombs a church because they were “encouraged.”
Thankfully people like you are dying off. Although it seems that people like you and your ilk have resurfaced and united under Trump. It won’t last.
God Bless America.
I can't stand Trump. He's nothing but a blow hard who doesn't mean a word he's said.
I'm a Sanders voter, ffs.
And yeah, when 120+ IQ FBI agents get their hooks into the 95 IQ good ole boy, they can and have made this stuff happen.
They do it all the time..
Google "co-intel pro"
They did this with borderline restarted Arab Americans in the early 00s. Encouraging them to act out to protect Allah.
I'm a left wing capitalist, in the model of Warren Buffet. So guess were on opposite sides.
I think Hitler was also a right wing socialist.
Absolutely he was.
So was Charles Lindbergh, true American hero, who tried to keep us from the most destructive brother war in the history of the world.
You capitalists got us into that mess.
Really? What does that tell you?
Because the KKK was instrumental in pushing the US towards war with Germany in WWII.
* My point being that you can accuse someone of being one or the other, but Nazis and Klan types don't like each other.
The modern version of the Klan are these 3% groups. They've abandoned the open racial prejudice, at least in public, and they call themselves things like "oath keepers" or "Civic Nationalist." I'm not saying they're like the Klan, but they're the people who would have been two generations ago. They seem to believe what they say, mostly. But most of it is just a cope. They're a defeated people who play within the lines the political left establishes for them.
Today's Nazis still go by the name. They don't hide it. They may call themselves "wignat" because it's a new term. Wig is short for the W version of the N word.
They will also use variations on traditional workers parties. And or Catholic/Orthodox traditionalism.
These two groups of people hate each other.
The alt right was a movement to unite these two factions, and it was beginning to happen, and then a huge amount of infighting began over the fact that Trump became an obvious fraud to one group, and to the other a sort of Devine being.
Last edited:
My good conservative brother Charlie does't get called "white boy" down on 11th Street anymore. The brothers might be catching on.
Sleepy Creepy Lazy Crazy Uncle Joe Biden.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...confederate-group-as-having-many-fine-people/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...confederate-group-as-having-many-fine-people/
Buffet is the guy that says he wants the government to tax rich people like him, and yet he could write a check to the government at any time, and never does. Sheep like @BSC911 lap it up.
Both of you want to take other people's money from them. Only difference is Buffet could afford to give his own, you can't.
These never get old. Got nailed by what looked like a big cone.
Do you mean corporatist elected dems like Pelosi and Schumer? Or just like some regular American, CNN-watching, votes-every-four-years type dem?
If either, that's ef'ed man. Killers and attempted killers not good people no matter how you shake it.
All of us can be traced back to dark skinned modern humans in southeastern Africa. I believe all of you to be a bit further removed than I. None of us are native to the Americas.
White people are native/indigenous to N America for two reasons.
We defeated and vanquished the only other competitor.
And clovis, which means Europeans were likely in N America first.
That isn't true necessarily.
Neanderthal doesn't fit into that nor do the Dinisovians. And we're discovering more and more all the time that really challenges the "out of Africa" theory.
Don't get sidetracked with arguments based on genetics. We don't know near enough about genetics to say. We're good at identifying genes, not determining qualitative information about them.
In other words, you can take a brilliant man and a dumb man and no one can tell you, based on the genetics, why one is smart and one is dumb.
I take it you're one of my black brothers?
If you descend from the former slaves in the US, you are indigenous here, just like my white butt is.
I'm a tri-racial isolate of the Melungeon group. I'm Congolese-Cherokee-Caucasian. My DNA analysis was done at Genelex Labs in Seattle in 2008 and 23andme in Dec., 2018.
I am of Neanderthal descent.
I am of Neanderthal descent.
Last edited:
Speaking of 23andMe, @bradleygator has begun researching information discussed here, and I want to encourage that.
Bradley, research the founders of Google and 23andMe, as well as the current CEO of YouTube. You will discover some interestingly curious connections.
No evidence Clovis civ was euro-peeps, where you getting that?
Also, if this is your reasoning, then the North "defeated and vanquished" their opponents: the rebels who thought Lincoln wasn't serious or a strong enough leader to defeat them.
The south was wrong.
They fought the North over states' rights. Again, the North only decided to push to end slavery when they discovered that it was a potential economic boon to the South that the North couldn't leverage as well. There was no moral outrage, it was all about the North wanting to keep the power in the country and they saw that the South was an emerging economic powerhouse.
Matchless, your revisionist history isn't going to work with educated folks.
"History is written by the victors" - Winston Churchill
Want an eye-opening experience? Find the oldest world and US history textbooks that you can. Ones from at least the 70s are preferable.
Then find some from the 80s. Then the 90s, then the 00s, then today.
Note how the explanation and 'framing' of major wars such as The Civil War, World War 1 and 2, changes dramatically.
Being educated doesn't count for much if you were taught from bad, biased material.
Really. Then you will explain to me why the Emancipation Proclamation only applied to Southern slaves.
The Clovis points only have one counterpart in the would, Solutrians in SW Europe.
They could have easily followed the ice shelf to north America.
And yeah, the Confederacy doesn't exist anymore, incase you didn't know.
Similar threads
