Not sure exactly what that means but before the Judge intervened I think it was said they could be placed in custody.
Last edited:
Texas SC overrules activist judge and says legislators can be placed into custody for refusing to do their job.
- Thread starter Gator Fever
- Start date
Not sure exactly what that means but before the Judge intervened I think it was said they could be placed in custody.
I remember hearing the stories of those fighting actual racism being hauled away to jail for breaking Democrat state Jim Crow laws. MLK sat in prison for his public peaceful disobedience and refused to leave early when given the opportunities. It was called sacrifice and now those proclaiming to sacrifice for their constituents, being paid while being disobedient and asking for money at the same time are fighting prison time. What a bunch of clowns.
I say execute them at Sunrise. That gives them a whole night to get right with the Lord.
@kalimgoodman told me that there's no such thing as a "liberal judge", that it doesn't matter who appoints them
I'm confused.
Did he really say that? Oh brother!!
This means the Texas SC ruled that a lower court judge cannot block the Governor's ability to enforce the law.
It means the dems who left the state to block the formation of a voting quorum are subject to arrest upon return to the state.
I think it's a bad idea to make martyrs of them though...if you frog march them the MSM is going to make Abbott pay dearly. On the other hand if you don't this is now going to be the strategy anytime the left doesn't get its way (because if the conservatives did it they wouldn't be "celebrated as brave").
I don't make things up.
Gotta love our buddies on the other side of the aisle. Or "independents" as they call themselves.
I disagree. I've got a butane torch and sack of feathers, lead me to the pot of tar.
Test your Google skills. Who appointed him? 🤣 Save yourself the time. What does "activist judge" = 99.9% of the time?
words are hard for "independents"
Classic deflection attempt by @kalimgoodman. he doesn't want to talk about the dems and how they likely will (and should) be jailed, so he tries to drag the board off in the weeds talking about something else.
His party broke the law, again. They should be punished. That's the reality.
