You're both mentally and morally compromised. It has nothing to do with your profession. Neither of you can see it.
So tell me
- Thread starter DCandtheUTBand
- Start date
You're both mentally and morally compromised. It has nothing to do with your profession. Neither of you can see it.
Thats the deal. The media and pols want to paint a narrative that trump incited what happened today. Thats just a game they are playing to try and point the finger at the wrong person. Its a shell game. Folks are mad because what happened on election night just didn’t feel right, and the way the media, pols, and courts handled the following few weeks is what caused the blowup. Folks just want answers, folks want to know that their credit card statement (voting process) doesn’t have charges on there that they didn’t buy. They want to know why we can’t investigate. And quite frankly, the fact we can’t should infuriate every American.
You mean to tell America, that I have better technology, security, and confidence in my transaction at 7/11 than what is supposed to be one of our most sacred rights? GTFO
You mean to tell America, that I have better technology, security, and confidence in my transaction at 7/11 than what is supposed to be one of our most sacred rights? GTFO
Well to be fair, another CPA (me) told you that you are full of shit, so there's that. 😂
heres your sign..,.reading comprehension is important
Alito/Thomas statement — which Starnes (but not the justices themselves) described as a “dissent” — said the court should have permitted Paxton to actually file his case because it fell within the court’s original jurisdiction to hear lawsuits between states.
@GADAWGinIraq
Last edited:
The media is just downright disgusting. They pull this shit on America and Trump for 4 full years, all while they have been the ones perpetrating, aiding, and abetting the fraud and crimes.
I have no faith in the outcome, but I hope the special prosecutor Barr hired (Durham) has the balls to send Clinton, Brennon, Clapper, Comey and company to the iron bar motel. I know it's a long shot, we have a two tiered justice system. Oh, for one ounce of what Julian Assange knows about the crooks that run our government. I'd love to have a few beers with Snowden.
We live in a country full of sheep, pajama boys, and downright communists. One day I hope the good guys rule. None of the current ones have a D next to their party designation.
"Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins:
In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a
bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original
jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___
(Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore
grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not
grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue."
You may want to reread this LG89.
YOU may want to reread it.
All he's saying is that A bill of complaint can be filed there. And guess what?
THIS CASE WAS FILED THERE. They ruled on the filed case, said it had no standing.
Alito was just explicitly stating that this was a proper filing. Nowhere in there did he say the case had standing. In fact, he clearly states he expresses no other view on any other issue. The reason he made the point was because, as I said, there was discussion on whether this case should have been filed first with SCOTUS rather than a lower court.
Are you going to accept your defeat with good grace or are you going to go all Trump on me?
you were wrong man. Not all 9 justices slapped it down. 2 of them believed.....
said the court should have permitted Paxton to actually file his case because it fell within the court’s original jurisdiction to hear lawsuits between states.
I bolded the important part for you
What part of compromised Roberts being overheard screaming, "We can't have riots, and I'll tell you how to vote" did you miss?
I think Epstein knows (knew).
As I said, filing before hearing.
Here, a little tutorial for you. I'm posting the first bit.
A lawsuit begins when the plaintiff goes to court and files a complaint against the defendant, and the complaint along with a summons is served on the defendant.
https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/research/steps-in-a-lawsuit.html
you have no clue what your talking about here
more for you
Justice Samuel Alito issued a statement with the dismissal that was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, arguing that the Supreme Court should take up the case.
“In my view, we do not have the discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction,” Alito wrote, arguing that he would grant the motion to file the bill of complaint.
I'm accepting the fact that you guys stole one. Now if your socialists get out of hand in the next 2 years I'm going 3%er.
we are laughing at you. You are trying so hard, and yet you’re still wrong. Hope you’re better with numbers.
What part of compromised Roberts being overheard screaming, "We can't have riots, and I'll tell you how to vote" did you miss?
I think Epstein knows (knew).
What part of "The Supreme Court hasn't met in person for months because of COVID" don't you understand? They aren't going to the courthouse any more, they are on Zoom or Teams or something FROM HOME. So tell me, WHO HEARD THIS OUTBURST?
This is the problem with you. You believe the lies. Stop believing the lies.
Pelosi just called a covid positive patient to the House chambers to vote for her to be speaker.
Are you a real person?
They are going to go "Full Retard". Did you read about this?
House introduces gender-neutral language in new rules for Congress
In addition to permanently establishing an Office of Diversity and Inclusion and other diversity measures, the proposed package would "honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender neutral." Previously, Congress operated under a binary rule that “words importing one gender include the other as well.”
House introduces gender-neutral language in new rules for Congress
New reforms promote inclusion and diversity.
thehill.com
Sorry bub, as always, I am correct. As always, you are clueless. I would have thought you would be trying to avoid these spankings, but you seem to be a glutton for punishment.
Damn dude. You've got the arrogance of Notre Dame, and the tradition of Vandy here. Really? 😂
It's a lie.
I know you don't believe any sources that don't lie to you, but I'm going to try anyway. Interestingly, this video is a big part of the lie.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/supreme-court-erupt-shouting-match/
As far as you all are concerned, I am the US Navy and you are a collection of fishing boats.
i just pointed you to what their verbage was. I Noticed you don’t want to quote that one. You were PROVEN wrong by multiple people with multiple sources. Again, you trash your own character. No one needs to do anything. You have the absolute worst content of character on this board
@LizardGrad89 in case you need it again. Maybe you need it in an audio file As reading comprehension doesn’t seem to be your thing
Justice Samuel Alito issued a statement with the dismissal that was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, arguing that the Supreme Court should take up the case.
“In my view, we do not have the discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction,” Alito wrote, arguing that he would grant the motion to file the bill of complaint.
again, I hope you’re better with numbers than you are with reading
Justice Samuel Alito issued a statement with the dismissal that was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, arguing that the Supreme Court should take up the case.
“In my view, we do not have the discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction,” Alito wrote, arguing that he would grant the motion to file the bill of complaint.
again, I hope you’re better with numbers than you are with reading
LOL..........you know you have "sunk your boat" when you rely on Snopes for your confirmation bias. 😂
Yeah buddy............I'll believe a bunch of left wing geeky nerds from la la land over someone testifying on C-Span in front of god and country. Snopes is desperate AF. The Sacramento Bee and National Inquirer have more street cred. 😂
Malpractice insurance and Errors and Omissions coverage has a premium for a reason.😂
Really? You thought Sarbanes-Oxley was SOXX. Color me not impressed with your acumen.
What in the hell do you think SOX is? 😂 I was laughing so hard, I hit an extra X.
If I had time to fix all of your errrors (mostly content) , I expect to be paid for proof reading your drivel. 😂
Nothing wrong with my content, and my writing, in general, is far superior to yours.
LMAO..........your content is a good source of board humor, enjoyed by many. Your legal briefs are really amusing. Just take the L and be "bester" in future. 😂
