ADVERTISEMENT

Serbian School Shooting

Well, if you take away all guns there would be no gun violence.

The rational adult response would be to attack both issues....criminal behavior and the flood of guns.

But left wing extremists don't want to go after criminals and right wing extremists don't want to go after guns.

If you stop criminals from being able to own or possess guns, you are in fact reducing the need for guns.

Reduce the demand, the supply is adjusted.

Problem solved...let's move on.
 
1683208639301-png.1270620
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
You may as well resign yourself to the fact that guns aren't going away in the USA. They are protected for a reason. The day they are banned, the Constitution falls and woe is us.
I don't expect or want them to go away.

Total confiscation is nothing but a bogeyman from the gun companies.
 
I don't expect or want them to go away.

Total confiscation is nothing but a bogeyman from the gun companies.
You should understand what incrementalism is by now. Just look at the gay thing. It went from "we just want to live our lives" to "you are a bigot if you don't embrace and join our marches". It's boiled over to trannyism now. What's next, open pedophilia?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
You should understand what incrementalism is by now. Just look at the gay thing. It went from "we just want to live our lives" to "you are a bigot if you don't embrace and join our marches". It's boiled over to trannyism now. What's next, open pedophilia?
I do understand but fearing a 'slippery slope' shouldn't keep us from taking actions that are needed.
 
I do understand but fearing a 'slippery slope' shouldn't keep us from taking actions that are needed.
That's playing right into the hands of the gun confiscators. When they convince the normal people into submission, then they've won the war.
 
Have you ever read a 'study' that shows how safe and wonderful guns are?

Who do you think paid for that 'study'?
I do not need to. I have more knowledge and experience than the people who did the "study". I have CONSTANLY been around and handled MANY types of guns for 6 decades. M1 Garands, Thompson machine guns, Ingrams, 911's, M2 carbines, Ruger Super Redhawks, German Lugers, Remington 700 BDL's, and MANY, MANY more. Funny thing...not ONE of these guns have EVER harmed a soul. Can you explain why? Was your "study" this conclusive?
 
I figured you weren't allowed to acknowledge it.
Was this your answer to my post? Do you understand what inanimate means? I doubt it. Let me assist you...AGAIN.

showing no sign of life; lifeless.
"he was completely inanimate and it was difficult to see if he was breathing"

No since you understand the question, can you explain how something that is lifeless can hurt someone?
 
Should we crack down on criminals and other dangerous people? Absolutely.

Will that immediately end crime? Of course not but it will help the situation over time.

Same thing with killing machines.
If it were not for tat very pesky Constitution of the United States of America! LOL So let me tell YOU what I tell EVERY liberal. UNTIL you change the Constitution...screw off. I will just keep ALL of my guns!
 
You mean if we accidentally totally disarm law-abiding citizens? Did the gun companies tell you that was something to fear?

Did they also tell you that people in favor of common sense gun laws want to eliminate the constitution?

You really need to start taking what the gun companies say with a grain of salt.
Do you have anything to prove ANYONE "talks to gun companies" or are you dumber than a red brick? Just asking for clarification.
 
Well, if you take away all guns there would be no gun violence.

The rational adult response would be to attack both issues....criminal behavior and the flood of guns.

But left wing extremists don't want to go after criminals and right wing extremists don't want to go after guns.
Just another question...if a person dies my a BAD knife, or a vehicle used as a weapon, or a bat, or is choked to death...is the person deader when they get shot?
 
I do understand but fearing a 'slippery slope' shouldn't keep us from taking actions that are needed.
What are you doing concerning this? Trying to talk us to f'ing death?? You are not capable of convincing me to give up my Constitutional rights. In fact, I can pretty much ASSURE you NO ONE that posts here will give them up because of your WEAKER than WHALE pi$$ arguments. So WTF are you trying to accomplish? And to be VERY, VERY honset...even if somehow the laws change...I would refuse to follow them!
 
What are you doing concerning this? Trying to talk us to f'ing death?? You are not capable of convincing me to give up my Constitutional rights. In fact, I can pretty much ASSURE you NO ONE that posts here will give them up because of your WEAKER than WHALE pi$$ arguments. So WTF are you trying to accomplish? And to be VERY, VERY honset...even if somehow the laws change...I would refuse to follow them!
He's rocking on his porch. Just a little faster cause guns make him nervous. But still camped on the porch, as always.
 
I do not need to. I have more knowledge and experience than the people who did the "study". I have CONSTANLY been around and handled MANY types of guns for 6 decades. M1 Garands, Thompson machine guns, Ingrams, 911's, M2 carbines, Ruger Super Redhawks, German Lugers, Remington 700 BDL's, and MANY, MANY more. Funny thing...not ONE of these guns have EVER harmed a soul. Can you explain why? Was your "study" this conclusive?
Wait what?

I assume you mean the specific ones you handled never harmed a soul.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT