ADVERTISEMENT

No more Ukraine $$

This topic would be open and shut if people used logic. Instead, too many people do what's best for their politics instead of their country.

Want to help other countries? Let's solve all our problems first. Or at least enough of the major ones so that it makes sense to divert our precious resources to other countries. And when we do, let's give to countries who have aided us as well.

This idea of throwing blank checks at other nations that never lift a fingernail to help the US doesn't help the citizens there or here. It hurts both countries and enriches the politicians running both countries.
Making sure I am fully grasping your point. You believe other countries should commit resources to help America resolve some of their domestic issues?
 
We agree that these issues are 100% factual. Can we also agree both of these problems existed before the current Ukraine/Russia War? Is there empirical evidence of cause and effect here?
There is empirical evidence you could have housed those vets, and children with the money we have spent. Or at a minimum, put a massive dent in it.

But I think you’re helping make my point. It has been a problem for far too long. So why are we spending money elsewhere and not on this?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
There is empirical evidence you could have housed those vets, and children with the money we have spent. Or at a minimum, put a massive dent in it.
I agree to the extent that it can still be done irrespective of giving Ukraine. I would argue we can easily fund both of those problems instead of giving tax cuts to the rich.
 
I agree to the extent that it can still be done irrespective of giving Ukraine. I would argue we can easily fund both of those problems instead of giving tax cuts to the rich.
Don’t want to veer too far off course, but taxing the rich is maybe the biggest hoodwinking we let the media snd politicians play.

The rich don’t GAF when you raise the rates. Hell, many of them support it because they understand it’s just a game. A game they can use to manipulate those that don’t understand the game.

If a Billionaire pays 13 percent in Federal income taxes when the rate is 20 percent, then he doesn’t care if you raise it to 50 percent As long as you don’t touch his loopholes. 13 percent is still his rate. The quicker everyone understands the game, the sooner we can discuss real issues instead of being pawns in the game.
 
Making sure I am fully grasping your point. You believe other countries should commit resources to help America resolve some of their domestic issues?
I think you have fully grasped my point.

How many times has Ukraine sent us money to help us deal with our issues?

How much have they sent?
 
  • Love
Reactions: RussellCasse
I agree to the extent that it can still be done irrespective of giving Ukraine. I would argue we can easily fund both of those problems instead of giving tax cuts to the rich.
Even if that were the case, why do we need to fund Ukraine? Why would we do that before taking care of our own problems?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
Don’t want to veer too far off course, but taxing the rich is maybe the biggest hoodwinking we let the media snd politicians play.

The rich don’t GAF when you raise the rates. Hell, many of them support it because they understand it’s just a game. A game they can use to manipulate those that don’t understand the gsme.

If a Billionaire pays 13 percent in Federal income taxes when the rate is 20 percent, then he doesn’t care if you raise it to 50 percent As long as you don’t touch his loopholes. 13 percent is still his rate. The quicker everyone understands the game, the sooner we can discuss real issues instead of being pawns in the gsme.
As soon as all working class folks stop buying the "rich create jobs" and " trickle down" garbage.
 
We agree that these issues are 100% factual. Can we also agree both of these problems existed before the current Ukraine/Russia War? Is there empirical evidence of cause and effect here?
Sure after you explain to me why I give a rats ass about Ukraine in the first place.
 
Even if that were the case, why do we need to fund Ukraine? Why would we do that before taking care of our own problems?
We don't "need to". We have done so voluntarily. We don't "need to" fund Israel, et al, but we choose to do so for the betterment of world peace.
 
As soon as all working class folks stop buying the "rich create jobs" and " trickle down" garbage.
So basically you want to be able to take money from the people you define as 'rich' and give it to other countries?

Why don't you just make more money yourself, then send it to them? Problem solved.
 
  • Love
Reactions: RussellCasse
We don't "need to". We have done so voluntarily. We don't "need to" fund Israel, et al, but we choose to do so for the betterment of world peace.
And Israel works with us on national security issues, they trade with us, they act like an ally.

What does Zelensky do other then come here every 3 months in a sweater demanding more money?
 
And Israel works with us on national security issues, they trade with us, they act like an ally.

What does Zelensky do other then come here every 3 months in a sweater demanding more money?
Agree, as to Israel.

I don't know the extent of US/Ukrainian diplomacy enough to answer your question.
 
As soon as all working class folks stop buying the "rich create jobs" and " trickle down" garbage.
Been a member of both. The “rich”, which is laughable, and the working class.

As a member of the former, I can tell you that a damn big portion of money went back into the business. Not only through paying my employees and hiring new ones, but buying and investing in other things (thus growing other businesses) to grow a business.

As a member of the latter (middle class worker), I hated the former, until I worked my way up and introduced myself to the former. 😉

And no, I personally am not rich, but I owned a business and our numbers would make one think we were.
 
Been a member of both. The “rich”, which is laughable, and the working class.

As a member of the former, I can tell you that a damn big portion of money went back into the business. Not only through paying my employees and hiring new ones, but buying and investing in other things (thus growing other businesses) to grow a business.

As a member of the latter (middle class worker), I hated the former, until I worked my way up and introduced myself to the former. 😉

And no, I personally am not rich, but I owned a business and our numbers would make one think we were.
That's good stuff!! You have lived what you speak of. Kudos, man!
 
  • Love
Reactions: RussellCasse
The republicans will never take care of our vets and now they want Russia to win a war they had no business starting. keep funding the Ukraine, tax the rich..**** whoever thinks otherwise
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EvilWayz
The republicans will never take care of our vets and now they want Russia to win a war they had no business starting. keep funding the Ukraine, tax the rich..**** whoever thinks otherwise
I could easily confuse this for team
Desantis.


The rest is so ignorant it doesn’t deserve a response.

 
There is no reason why we can’t continue to prevent Putin from conquering Eastern Europe while also improving funding and services to veterans. This is a false choice that was designed to incite outrage.
Very true.

It's a lose/lose. Send money people complain, then if Russia takes over more and more countries/land people complain.
 
How many countries has Russia taken over? I missed all this.
@kalimgoodman care to answer? What are these countries that you claim Russia has been taking over? And so many that we have to step in and stop them? And the only way to do that is by giving $100 billion to the crisis actor?

I know I don't do the exhaustive research that you do, but I wasn't aware that Putin was taking over the world. What countries has he conquered so far? @Uniformed_ReRe can you help him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
Let me ask you a question.

If Texas seceded, and Russia began funding Biolabs in Texas (considering we just came out of a Pandemic). And Russia and it’s allies were discussing expansion into Texas. And it was found out that Russia had been funding experimental work in other labs that lead to said Pandemic, do you think the US would just be like….No worries, we all good here Texas/Russia. Or, do you think the warmongering elected officials would try to take Texas back?

Lastly, as a veteran, you’re damn right I am pissed that we are spending Billions in Ukraine while our VA is completely broken.
It's an interesting question, RC. We think about it in our lens, not theirs.

It may not drive a different answer but it is worth going through that framework.
 
Quick update. Joe Bidens America. Veterans suffer, but yeah…keep shelling out that cash for the Ukrainian Huckster.

Who was the guy here wanting to know what domestic problems we had that weren't being addressed cause we sent $100B to the crisis actor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
Who was the guy here wanting to know what domestic problems we had that weren't being addressed cause we sent $100B to the crisis actor?
It’s very strange, that we essentially went to war with Russia after Biden took office. I wonder, Does PEDO Peter and his son Hunter have any financial ties to Ukraine?

Be a shame if anyone looked into that. Oh wait….
 
It’s very strange, that we essentially went to war with Russia after Biden took office. I wonder, Does PEDO Peter and his son Hunter have any financial ties to Ukraine?

Be a shame if anyone looked into that. Oh wait….
Wow. Russia is currently fighting two wars? There is no way they can sustain or survive. I feel sorry for their civilians.
 
Wow. Russia is currently fighting two wars? There is no way they can sustain or survive. I feel sorry for their civilians.
One war, multiple countries. But, I don’t expect you to understand things that are slightly above a 3rd grade level. I feel sorry for your employer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capt Ron 1
I don't know who @Uniformed_ReRe is so I have no response to his alleged statement.
It's all about making emotional statements so you aren't required to think.

Such as....positioning Russia and Putin as the villain, while positioning Zelensky and Ukraine as the heroes. So the takeaway is.....we must support the 'hero' and must fight the 'villain'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
It's all about making emotional statements so you aren't required to think.

Such as....positioning Russia and Putin as the villain, while positioning Zelensky and Ukraine as the heroes. So the takeaway is.....we must support the 'hero' and must fight the 'villain'.
It was always my understanding from when I was a kid that we love hero's and dislike villains.
 
It was always my understanding from when I was a kid that we love hero's and dislike villains.

In this case, we have villains vs villains. Yes, I put more of the blame on Russia and Putin but that fact alone doesn't make Zelensky and Ukraine heroes.

I do feel a great deal of sympathy for most of the civilians and even many in the Ukrainian military...but certainly not all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT