No fraud

[jfegaly]

GTFO you tools. There is plenty of evidence to demand forensic audits and anyone who disagrees is either scared shatless what the results would be, or Is cool with illegal votes like @LizardGrad89

In 2020, Vote Fraud Claims Were Not 'Baseless'

Despite mainstream media's constant claims to the contrary, vote fraud claims in 2020 were not "baseless," Michael Dorstewitz writes for Newsmax.

www.newsmax.com

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

GTFO you tools. There is plenty of evidence to demand forensic audits and anyone who disagrees is either scared shatless what the results would be, or Is cool with illegal votes like @LizardGrad89

In 2020, Vote Fraud Claims Were Not 'Baseless'

Despite mainstream media's constant claims to the contrary, vote fraud claims in 2020 were not "baseless," Michael Dorstewitz writes for Newsmax.

www.newsmax.com

Same posters saying there's no fraud will be the first ones to claim Trump is a dictator who stole the election.

 

[gator1776]

 

[LizardGrad89]

View embedded media

More twitter. You guys kill me.

So all this "evidence" is available, why not give it to the DOJ? People who actually had the authority to do something about it? But sure, you held it to show to State legislators, way after any of them could do anything about it. And hey, you would think a joint meeting of 500 legislators from 6 states, which to my knowledge has never happened ever, would be newsworthy, wouldn't you? Yet there is no mention of this historic event anywhere except, you guessed it, Twitter. And after this, of course, all 500 legislators agreed not to say anything until Monday, because legislators are shy people who hate being in front of a camera.

You guys KILL ME. Is there any stupid twitter you won't believe? Seems like the stupider it is, the better you like it.

Yeah, let's see what Monday brings. Here's a tip on what it brings: NOTHING.

 

[jfegaly]

More twitter. You guys kill me.

So all this "evidence" is available, why not give it to the DOJ? People who actually had the authority to do something about it? But sure, you held it to show to State legislators, way after any of them could do anything about it. And hey, you would think a joint meeting of 500 legislators from 6 states, which to my knowledge has never happened ever, would be newsworthy, wouldn't you? Yet there is no mention of this historic event anywhere except, you guessed it, Twitter. And after this, of course, all 500 legislators agreed not to say anything until Monday, because legislators are shy people who hate being in front of a camera.

You guys KILL ME. Is there any stupid twitter you won't believe? Seems like the stupider it is, the better you like it.

Yeah, let's see what Monday brings. Here's a tip on what it brings: NOTHING.

Not saying it’s true but, yes This would be the first time the media hid something. Hunter Bidens laptop says hello. Oh wait, not only did they hide that, they lied. Russua disinformation, right?

then again, you’re irrelevant

 

[LizardGrad89]

GTFO you tools. There is plenty of evidence to demand forensic audits and anyone who disagrees is either scared shatless what the results would be, or Is cool with illegal votes like @LizardGrad89

In 2020, Vote Fraud Claims Were Not 'Baseless'

Despite mainstream media's constant claims to the contrary, vote fraud claims in 2020 were not "baseless," Michael Dorstewitz writes for Newsmax.

www.newsmax.com

I see the word "claimed" quite often in this article. Claimed is not evidence of anything. But keep trying. It's amusing to watch.

 

[LizardGrad89]

Not saying it’s true but, yes This would be the first time the media hid something. Hunter Bidens laptop says hello. Oh wait, not only did they hide that, they lied. Russua disinformation, right?

then again, you’re irrelevant

The media could not "hide" a meeting of 500 legislators. Even if they wanted to, the legislators themselves would have been all over social media talking about it. So where are all these legislators? Why isn't Trump himself writing about it? Because, if it were true, it would be a HUGE story.

I love how you guys think the entire country is Republican, but the Democrats hold all the power. How does that work again?

 

[jfegaly]

The media could not "hide" a meeting of 500 legislators. Even if they wanted to, the legislators themselves would have been all over social media talking about it. So where are all these legislators? Why isn't Trump himself writing about it? Because, if it were true, it would be a HUGE story.

I love how you guys think the entire country is Republican, but the Democrats hold all the power. How does that work again?

The media couldn’t hide a story about Hunter Bidens laptop, especially if it contained bribes of millions in payouts to his dad, wait.....

 

[jfegaly]

I see the word "claimed" quite often in this article. Claimed is not evidence of anything. But keep trying. It's amusing to watch.

yes. Enough evidence to warrant forensic investigations. I mean you are after true, honest and fair elections right? Nevermind, I almost forgot who I was responding to.

#counteveryillegalvote
#yesornoquestionhasyoustuck

 

[LizardGrad89]

yes. Enough evidence to warrant forensic investigations. I mean you are after true, honest and fair elections right? Nevermind, I almost forgot who I was responding to.

#counteveryillegalvote
#yesornoquestionhasyoustuck

Every state with a close vote had a paper recount, and every state that was recounted that had dominion machines had paper backup of the dominion machines counts and the paper ballots matched the machine counts. Because this proves beyond doubt or question that the machines were accurate, it is self evident that there is no need to review the machines, the most thorough review possible has already been done. Anyone with a lick of sense could see that. Never mind, I almost forgot to whom I was responding.

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

The media couldn’t hide a story about Hunter Bidens laptop, especially if it contained bribes of millions in payouts to his dad, wait.....

They didn’t hide it. They just didn’t give it wall-to-wall coverage like the crackpot outlets. They treated it with the caution warranted for content of uncertain provenance being publicized by an interested party.

 

[LizardGrad89]

yes. Enough evidence to warrant forensic investigations. I mean you are after true, honest and fair elections right? Nevermind, I almost forgot who I was responding to.

#counteveryillegalvote
#yesornoquestionhasyoustuck

Count every vote. When you understand what this means, get back to me.

 

[jfegaly]

They didn’t hide it. They just didn’t give it wall-to-wall coverage like the crackpot outlets. They treated it with the caution warranted for content of uncertain provenance being publicized by an interested party.

you are correct. They discredited and lied about it. Said it was russian disinformation. Wonder why they didn’t treat the donald trump and russia collusion that was proven to be based on a fake dossier paid for by hillary, the same caution.
To summarize....you had fakenews which was an attempt to damage djt, that the media ran crazy with for three years, and on the other hand, you had legitimate news that was damaging to beijing biden that the media lied about and attempted to delegitimize. Sound about right?

 

[jfegaly]

Count every vote. When you understand what this means, get back to me.

WE, meaning many on the board have understood what you meant from the day you chose between the two options you were given. Count every vote, or count every legal vote. You chose count every vote. That means you are choosing to accept illegal votes. It’s why you are irrelevant

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

you are correct. They discredited and lied about it. Said it was russian disinformation. Wonder why they didn’t treat the donald trump and russia collusion that was proven to be based on a fake dossier paid for by hillary, the same caution.
To summarize....you had fakenews which was an attempt to damage djt, that the media ran crazy with for three years, and on the other hand, you had legitimate news that was damaging to beijing biden that the media lied about and attempted to delegitimize on the other hand. Sound about right?

You have it backwards. They correctly treated it as something of uncertain provenance being publicized by an interested party.

The crackpot sites embraced it as gospel and ran non-stop coverage of it for days, along with reductive commentary from hack pundits, hoping that it would sink Biden’s election chances.

 

[LizardGrad89]

WE, meaning many on the board have understood what you meant from the day you chose between the two options you were given. Count every vote, or count every legal vote. You chose count every vote. That means you are choosing to accept illegal votes. It’s why you are irrelevant

What it means is you don't understand how elections work. But if you want to continue to cherish your ignorance, well, you do you.

 

[jfegaly]

What it means is you don't understand how elections work. But if you want to continue to cherish your ignorance, well, you do you.

I understand exactly how they work in Lizards world. You on the other hand, won’t answer simple yes or no questions

#counteveryillegalvote
#corneredbyyesorno

 

[gator1776]

You know pretty soon there will simply be two types of people. Americans and traitors.

Which one you are called will be interesting question on many levels.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

More twitter. You guys kill me.

So all this "evidence" is available, why not give it to the DOJ? People who actually had the authority to do something about it? But sure, you held it to show to State legislators, way after any of them could do anything about it.

They could still do something about it TODAY. Goodness have you sheep even heard of the US Constitution?

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Count every vote. When you understand what this means, get back to me.

It means you endorse cheating, you pinko commie.

Law-abiding citizens want to count every LEGAL vote. That's the difference, Captain By-Any-Means-Necessary.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

They didn’t hide it. They just didn’t give it wall-to-wall coverage like the crackpot outlets. They treated it with the caution warranted for content of uncertain provenance being publicized by an interested party.

You are insane. MSM still to this day references an infamous tape of Trump hiring hookers to pee on a bed in a Moscow hotel.

Even after we know it was all a lie.

Concocted by a UK spy, using Russian sources.

Coordinated and paid for by HILLARY CLINTON. Yep, Hillary colluded with the Russians....to invent a narrative that Trump colluded with the Russians.

MSM sites, the ones you and @LizardGrad89 call 'credible', ran with it for years. Some still mention it.

Tell us more about crackpot outlets.

 

[BamaFan1137]

They didn’t hide it. They just didn’t give it wall-to-wall coverage like the crackpot outlets. They treated it with the caution warranted for content of uncertain provenance being publicized by an interested party.

LMAO...no dude. Try again.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Count every vote. When you understand what this means, get back to me.

I'm pretty certain we all know what it means.

 

[BamaFan1137]

What it means is you don't understand how elections work. But if you want to continue to cherish your ignorance, well, you do you.

You were given two very clear choices:

-Count every vote

-Count every legal vote

You purposely chose count every vote. Own it and stop backtracking.

 

[martycat1]

Lets just hope the wicked witch of the west replaced.

 

[BamaFan1137]

You have it backwards. They correctly treated it as something of uncertain provenance being publicized by an interested party.

The crackpot sites embraced it as gospel and ran non-stop coverage of it for days, along with reductive commentary from hack pundits, hoping that it would sink Biden’s election chances.

The crackpot sites?

The freaking MSM ran with a hit piece funded hy Hillary and the DNC for 3 years. The freaking Main Stream Media.

Well established newspapers ran stories on impeachment the day Trump was inaugurated. Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.

Unless and until there is ever any semblance of a balanced media in this country again, there will be "crack pot" sites reporting another POV. If anyone is to blame for the actual BS crack pot sites, it's the "legit" MSM.

 

[BamaFan1137]

What it means is you don't understand how elections work. But if you want to continue to cherish your ignorance, well, you do you.

You aren't necessarily ignorant, I will grant you that. You are purposefully dishonest instead. I would have more respect for you if we could blame ignorance.

 

[martycat1]

You aren't necessarily ignorant, I will grant you that. You are purposefully dishonest instead. I would have more respect for you if we could blame ignorance.

More like Jimbo.

 

[jfegaly]

The media could not "hide" a meeting of 500 legislators. Even if they wanted to, the legislators themselves would have been all over social media talking about it. So where are all these legislators? Why isn't Trump himself writing about it? Because, if it were true, it would be a HUGE story.

I love how you guys think the entire country is Republican, but the Democrats hold all the power. How does that work again?

wait. I thought this didn’t happen. Looks like mr irrelevant was wrong again

Trump Speaks to State Legislators on Call About Decertifying Election

President Trump told 300 state legislators from the battleground states of Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, that...

www.breitbart.com

 

[fatman76]

They didn’t hide it. They just didn’t give it wall-to-wall coverage like the crackpot outlets. They treated it with the caution warranted for content of uncertain provenance being publicized by an interested party.

Like the pee pee story?

 

[LizardGrad89]

wait. I thought this didn’t happen. Looks like mr irrelevant was wrong again

Trump Speaks to State Legislators on Call About Decertifying Election

President Trump told 300 state legislators from the battleground states of Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, that...

www.breitbart.com

It kills me that you denounce real actual sources then come back with OANN and now Breitbart. Oh, the irony.

 

[LizardGrad89]

yes. Enough evidence to warrant forensic investigations. I mean you are after true, honest and fair elections right? Nevermind, I almost forgot who I was responding to.

#counteveryillegalvote
#yesornoquestionhasyoustuck

Great news! They finally found the fraud! 2:20 is the mark, but it's all gold. GOLD, JERRY, GOLD! I think this requires a criminal investigation. You and your buddies, you just want the truth, right? You just want the perpetrators brought to justice, right? So listen to 2:20. Criminal fraud. Let's get those investigators moving!

 

[jfegaly]

It kills me that you denounce real actual sources then come back with OANN and now Breitbart. Oh, the irony.

What are these “real actual sources” you speak of? I hope it’s better than the ones you mentioned previously. You know, the ones that ran with a fake russia narrative for 3 years, fed and paid for by the clintons? Or the ones that intentionally downplayed beijing bidens sons laptop story as being russian disinformation? Those real sources?
Once again, no need to disparage your character, you do it yourself.

#counteveryillegalvote
#trappedbyayesornoquestion

 

[jfegaly]

Great news! They finally found the fraud! 2:20 is the mark, but it's all gold. GOLD, JERRY, GOLD! I think this requires a criminal investigation. You and your buddies, you just want the truth, right? You just want the perpetrators brought to justice, right? So listen to 2:20. Criminal fraud. Let's get those investigators moving!

View embedded media

haha. Oh the outrage.
This is a nothing burger. Nice try

 

[LinksGator]

There is nothing to see here just move on..........OJ Simpson

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

It kills me that you denounce real actual sources then come back with OANN and now Breitbart. Oh, the irony.

Dude, you were dead wrong. Again. Be a man and take the L.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Great news! They finally found the fraud! 2:20 is the mark, but it's all gold. GOLD, JERRY, GOLD! I think this requires a criminal investigation. You and your buddies, you just want the truth, right? You just want the perpetrators brought to justice, right? So listen to 2:20. Criminal fraud. Let's get those investigators moving!

View embedded media

You're actually right for once. But since you get your information from shit sources like The Washington Post, you are right about the wrong things.

WaPo cut off the beginning of the call where it was stated that sharing this call is a federal crime.

This is why I beg you to stop getting your information from shit sources. The call was about resolution of pending litigation that the President has against the Ga SoS. WaPo didn't tell you that either.

That's why you never learn anything. And you were still dead ass wrong about Trump talking to the state legislators.

Rough 2-3 weeks ahead for you. Hang in there, big guy.

 

[LizardGrad89]

haha. Oh the outrage.
This is a nothing burger. Nice try

Yeah. Telling the top election official in Georgia to "create over 11,000 ballots so Trump is ahead". That's nothing at all.

Keep telling yourself that. It's just one more thing he will be prosecuted for after he's walked out of the White House by US Marshals.

 

[LizardGrad89]

There is nothing to see here just move on..........OJ Simpson

Schultz is the right avatar for you , Mr I See Nothing.

 

[LizardGrad89]

What are these “real actual sources” you speak of? I hope it’s better than the ones you mentioned previously. You know, the ones that ran with a fake russia narrative for 3 years, fed and paid for by the clintons? Or the ones that intentionally downplayed beijing bidens sons laptop story as being russian disinformation? Those real sources?
Once again, no need to disparage your character, you do it yourself.

#counteveryillegalvote
#trappedbyayesornoquestion

The world is so simple for the stupid. We smart people understand the complexities, but for you, it's all black and white.