ADVERTISEMENT

My Pillow Guy

$150k in facebook ads is all that's been proven. It had no effect. Mueller spent millions of dollars, used hundreds of investigators and spent months only to come back with "no evidence of collusion". Since then we've learned the basis for the FISA warrants was a lie, the Dossier was literally a piece of fiction meant to deflect from the email scandal and Russia had no influence on the election. For 3 years we were told Trump was an "illegitimate president" and "Putin's puppet". It was all propaganda. It was all a lie.

I'm sorry but you don't get to rewrite history and ignorance of the facts doesn't make you right.

Yawn. I’m over it. Plus you have your facts wrong but I don’t care to correct them. Read the report for yourself.
 
Pretty well, so far. NewsMax has at least stopped spreading that lie. We’re you expecting a verdict already?
Not really snowflake. Also, newsmax hasn’t don’t anything different than typical media. Were u expecting any different? Lol.
 
You're normally not on target but you're outdoing yourself with this one.

I think the "party line" is Dominion would be dumb to sue b/c it puts the 'anus' on them to prove that the system worked w/o any of the vote shifting, decimal counting or offshore activity Powell has accused them of. Basically that the discovery phase would not be something they'd want to go through.

They did sue Powell (for $1.3B), she hired Wood and their message was "bring it". To date it hasn't been brought, so it looks like Dominion has backed down...but we will see.

Her case against them is still pending a trial date, it hasn't been withdrawn.

And this case is different - the NewsMax model is very poorly monetized. Unlike how RightSide operates they provide everything for free and rely on ad revenue. There's no way they could afford to defend themselves if Dominion really came after them.
You think news organizations back down every time they get sued? Nope. Not if they’ve done nothing wrong. In fact, they confirmed they have no independent verification of that lie. That’s why they backed down. Reputable news organizations don’t report things without verifying them first.
 
Not really snowflake. Also, newsmax hasn’t don’t anything different than typical media. Were u expecting any different? Lol.
They apologized and stopped reporting the lie, as they should. I’ve gained some respect for them.
 
They apologized and stopped reporting the lie, as they should. I’ve gained some respect for them.
Haha. Cause they don’t want to get blk balled like Parler has been. Lol. I’m not surprised u can’t when ur freedoms are being taken from u. So cause a news media station hasn’t seen the proof it means another who has can’t speak on it ? Sounds much like suppression to me. Wonder why this didn’t apply to say RussiaGate? Please educate me of wise snowflake
 
Haha. Cause they don’t want to get blk balled like Parler has been. Lol. I’m not surprised u can’t when ur freedoms are being taken from u. So cause a news media station hasn’t seen the proof it means another who has can’t speak on it ? Sounds much like suppression to me. Wonder why this didn’t apply to say RussiaGate? Please educate me of wise snowflake
If they aren’t man enough to report a story that they can support, they don’t belong in the business. I repeat, they said they haven’t verified the story. That’s why they pulled it. Try to get that through your thick skull.
 
You think news organizations back down every time they get sued? Nope. Not if they’ve done nothing wrong. In fact, they confirmed they have no independent verification of that lie. That’s why they backed down. Reputable news organizations don’t report things without verifying them first.
I cannot believe you just wrote that, you truly are a moron.

Sincerely Nicholas Sandman
 
Obviously there are isolated exceptions, which prove the rule.

Sorry, funny guy, that doesn’t disprove anything.
Oh no bud, spot light is on you

“Reputable news organizations don’t report things without verifying them first.”

giphy.gif
 
If they aren’t man enough to report a story that they can support, they don’t belong in the business. I repeat, they said they haven’t verified the story. That’s why they pulled it. Try to get that through your thick skull.
Do u really read what u are writing? Lol
A news organization doesn’t need to verify a story and person is there to speak on. The person being interviewed has done the research and is fine speaking on it. Again I say... RussiaGate. Explain! Try and explain it dumbass! Funny how that one sided media works isn’t it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
You think news organizations back down every time they get sued? Nope. Not if they’ve done nothing wrong. In fact, they confirmed they have no independent verification of that lie. That’s why they backed down. Reputable news organizations don’t report things without verifying them first.

ummmm. This last sentence is the dumbest comment you have ever made, and thats saying something. Not only that, it’s yet another blatant lie on your part.....yet again.
 
Yawn. I’m over it. Plus you have your facts wrong but I don’t care to correct them. Read the report for yourself.
It's what has come after the report that's most impactful.

And of course you're over it, the "clocks been run out".

The end justifies the means.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
If they aren’t man enough to report a story that they can support, they don’t belong in the business. I repeat, they said they haven’t verified the story. That’s why they pulled it. Try to get that through your thick skull.
Croomer has sued both NewsMax and OAN.

OAN did not back down.

Seems like NewsMax might just want to avoid the legal fees...no?
 
Croomer has sued both NewsMax and OAN.

OAN did not back down.

Seems like NewsMax might just want to avoid the legal fees...no?
Maybe. But that’s part of being a news organization l. You can get insurance for that.

Or maybe they realized there’s nothing to the story. What do you think? Was Dominion controlled by Chavez and changed votes from Trump to Biden?
 
Huh? It’s been proven that Russia interfered in our election in 2016. Whether it would have made a difference? Who knows. Probably not IMO. Hillary was very dislikeable.

But why are you rehashing old stuff? Time to move on and support our new president.
Not MY president. Learn what RESIST really means. Your old fossil, shitting his pants dementia patient isn't MY president. Eff you and the nag you rode in on. All hat, no cattle Texass that you are. I'll bet your neighbors think you are a sad sack Jeofrerrry..........or however you spell that nonsense. There will be no supporting of your geriatric place mat for Heels up Harris. Sorry for your luck.
 
Really? Well then.

What got your panties in a wad? Was it the graph with Trump overseeing the worst economy since the 1940s? Or the post about 140 police officers getting injured in a riot he instigated? Or maybe the fact that he couldn’t even beat an 80 year old senile old goat?

You must be a big fan of the My Pillow guy. That’s it, isn’t it?

Gives him something to bite down on.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Uniformed_ReRe
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT