ADVERTISEMENT

More info on the steal

Newsmax pays $40M for their coverage of the 'steal'.


"Cable outlet Newsmax Media has paid $40 million to settle allegations it defamed Smartmatic by reporting false claims that the voting machine company helped rig the 2020 U.S. election for Joe Biden over Donald Trump, according to a regulatory filing.

The companies settled privately last year, but the amount was disclosed in a Newsmax investor document dated March 7.

A Smartmatic representative said in a statement the company could not discuss details of the deal but that it is looking forward to taking Fox News to trial over similar claims about its election coverage."


https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/13/new...efamation-suit-over-2020-election-claims.html
 
Newsmax pays $40M for their coverage of the 'steal'.


"Cable outlet Newsmax Media has paid $40 million to settle allegations it defamed Smartmatic by reporting false claims that the voting machine company helped rig the 2020 U.S. election for Joe Biden over Donald Trump, according to a regulatory filing.

The companies settled privately last year, but the amount was disclosed in a Newsmax investor document dated March 7.

A Smartmatic representative said in a statement the company could not discuss details of the deal but that it is looking forward to taking Fox News to trial over similar claims about its election coverage."


https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/13/new...efamation-suit-over-2020-election-claims.html
This makes all of you lefties happy!
 
Newsmax pays $40M for their coverage of the 'steal'.


"Cable outlet Newsmax Media has paid $40 million to settle allegations it defamed Smartmatic by reporting false claims that the voting machine company helped rig the 2020 U.S. election for Joe Biden over Donald Trump, according to a regulatory filing.

The companies settled privately last year, but the amount was disclosed in a Newsmax investor document dated March 7.

A Smartmatic representative said in a statement the company could not discuss details of the deal but that it is looking forward to taking Fox News to trial over similar claims about its election coverage."


https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/13/new...efamation-suit-over-2020-election-claims.html
It's a good racket. Media needs evidence to back up fraud claims. Activist judges refuse to hear cases where evidence is presented. So companies then sue cause media can't back up claims. Same judges then sign off on settlements.

It's a good racket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
It's a good racket. Media needs evidence to back up fraud claims. Activist judges refuse to hear cases where evidence is presented. So companies then sue cause media can't back up claims. Same judges then sign off on settlements.

It's a good racket.
What about non-activist judges? Do they refuse to hear cases where evidence is presented?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT