ADVERTISEMENT

Minorities Continue To Leave the Demo-Comm Party In Droves

As usual for this traitorous stooge, the BS-C911 has again missed the 'thread of the conversation,' and is instead throwing out his usual chit in the hopes that some of it might stick to the clueless ignorant of the world's wall.

Nobody on his list is an elected public SERVANT to any party.
He left out BLM, Antifa, ACLU, Lincoln Project, PETA, ALF, ELF, John Brown Gun Club, Communist Party of USA, Youth Liberation Front. BSC is a tool of all of these. 🤣
 
Don't bother. I can tell he's just another simpleton.

Libtard
Comme
Etc

No thought. Just buzz words.
Oh I'm aware that they use talking points and as you said buzz words. They don't realize how much they are puppets.
 
Wasting time on the ignorant morons, or the knowing traitor.

'The Big Lie' - Dinesh DSousa (he's a long ago legal immigrant from India)
CRT by a non-Euro-white immigrant.


'Black Out' - Candice Owens (African-American, African-Virgin Islander )
IF you're to lazy to read, let this spoon feed you.

 
Wasting time on the ignorant morons, or the knowing traitor.

'The Big Lie' - Dinesh DSousa (he's a long ago legal immigrant from India)
CRT by a non-Euro-white immigrant.


'Black Out' - Candice Owens (African-American, African-Virgin Islander )
IF you're to lazy to read, let this spoon feed you.

I learned at a very early age I'm 1/4 house boy, token, "white boy", traitor and Uncle Tom. I didn't learn it from a white supremacist. I learned it from the left.
 
AOC and Bernie are the far left of the party and they admit that. How does that make the Democratic party Communist?

By your own standards that would mean the Republican party is the party of white supremacy because white supremacy openly supports the Republican party.
That's a brazened lie right there! If you know American history (which you don't), the origins of the Republican Party started with the old Negro Republican Party which was created to abolish slavery. Obviously, you think there was "the switch" between parties and that's another lie. Southern Democrats of the 1940s - 1960s became Dixiecrats and migrated to the Republican side to demonize the true party itself in the eyes of African-Americans as racists. In doing so, the racist Dems kept the black vote on their side as black people believed what they were seeing out of the Dixiecrats posing as Republicans, Lyndon B. Johnson summed it all up by saying, "I'll make sure these negroes vote Democrat from now on," and it's worked for decades until nowadays. That's why Candace Owens is spearheading the #BLEXIT movement. It educates our black people about these things and how the Dems have sodomized, demoralized, and attempt to sympathize with us. You need to do tons more research.
 
That's a brazened lie right there! If you know American history (which you don't), the origins of the Republican Party started with the old Negro Republican Party which was created to abolish slavery. Obviously, you think there was "the switch" between parties and that's another lie. Southern Democrats of the 1940s - 1960s became Dixiecrats and migrated to the Republican side to demonize the true party itself in the eyes of African-Americans as racists. In doing so, the racist Dems kept the black vote on their side as black people believed what they were seeing out of the Dixiecrats posing as Republicans, Lyndon B. Johnson summed it all up by saying, "I'll make sure these negroes vote Democrat from now on," and it's worked for decades until nowadays. That's why Candace Owens is spearheading the #BLEXIT movement. It educates our black people about these things and how the Dems have sodomized, demoralized, and attempt to sympathize with us. You need to do tons more research.
I don’t deny the history of the democratic party but what's the relevance to my question?

America also wanted blacks to be slaves and women to have no rights. How things are now is what is important AND now white supremacist align with the Republican party. Them just the facts 😉.

It's clear that Owens radicalized you 😬.
 
That's a brazened lie right there! If you know American history (which you don't), the origins of the Republican Party started with the old Negro Republican Party which was created to abolish slavery. Obviously, you think there was "the switch" between parties and that's another lie. Southern Democrats of the 1940s - 1960s became Dixiecrats and migrated to the Republican side to demonize the true party itself in the eyes of African-Americans as racists. In doing so, the racist Dems kept the black vote on their side as black people believed what they were seeing out of the Dixiecrats posing as Republicans, Lyndon B. Johnson summed it all up by saying, "I'll make sure these negroes vote Democrat from now on," and it's worked for decades until nowadays. That's why Candace Owens is spearheading the #BLEXIT movement. It educates our black people about these things and how the Dems have sodomized, demoralized, and attempt to sympathize with us. You need to do tons more research.
Somewhat true. The Dixiecrat leader that came over was Strom Thurmond. Thurmond repented, secretly had a black child and hired Armstrong Williams as an adviser. Petty much all the southern dem leaders stayed on as dems and towed the party line.

Once the battle over integration was lost by the southern dems many found they had little in common with the center-left dems. Slowly over time many rank and file southern dems migrated to the center right Republicans.

Were there racist among some of these people? Sure but dems have their share too. But the fight was really over southern governments and the national government and the rights of black citizens. That has been legally settled since the 60s. The vehicle for that however was unconstitutional and is wrecking us today. There were constitutional alternatives that would have eventually achieved the same results without the problems we have today and with less acrimony between the races.

The dems who were always center left nationally ( at least since the racist Woodrow Wilson) moved even further left and are the radicals we see today. This has accelerated the shift where it isn't even a geographical thing anymore.
 
I don’t deny the history of the democratic party but what's the relevance to my question?

America also wanted blacks to be slaves and women to have no rights. How things are now is what is important AND now white supremacist align with the Republican party. Them just the facts 😉.

It's clear that Owens radicalized you 😬
I don’t deny the history of the democratic party but what's the relevance to my question?

America also wanted blacks to be slaves and women to have no rights. How things are now is what is important AND now white supremacist align with the Republican party. Them just the facts 😉.

It's clear that Owens radicalized you 😬.
The Democrats wanted blacks to be and stay slaves and for women to have no rights. Surely if the Republican Party wee aligned with the white supremacy boogey-man you believe exist, then it's obvious the Democratic Party would've been more powerful than ever. Republicans were never white supremacists, that would be Albert Pike and the Democrat-laden KKK. You have the political version of fumble-itis. You drop the ball everytime you post something.
 
The Democrats wanted blacks to be and stay slaves and for women to have no rights. Surely if the Republican Party wee aligned with the white supremacy boogey-man you believe exist, then it's obvious the Democratic Party would've been more powerful than ever. Republicans were never white supremacists, that would be Albert Pike and the Democrat-laden KKK. You have the political version of fumble-itis. You drop the ball everytime you post something.
Once again I'm living in 2021 and what's going on NOW. It does exist, seems you're ignoring it because it hurts your narrative.
 
Somewhat true. The Dixiecrat leader that came over was Strom Thurmond. Thurmond repented, secretly had a black child and hired Armstrong Williams as an adviser. Petty much all the southern dem leaders stayed on as dems and towed the party line.

Once the battle over integration was lost by the southern dems many found they had little in common with the center-left dems. Slowly over time many rank and file southern dems migrated to the center right Republicans.

Were there racist among some of these people? Sure but dems have their share too. But the fight was really over southern governments and the national government and the rights of black citizens. That has been legally settled since the 60s. The vehicle for that however was unconstitutional and is wrecking us today. There were constitutional alternatives that would have eventually achieved the same results without the problems we have today and with less acrimony between the races.

The dems who were always center left nationally ( at least since the racist Woodrow Wilson) moved even further left and are the radicals we see today. This has accelerated the shift where it isn't even a geographical thing anymore.
Not sure why people try to limit racism to one party. They both have a racist history. Glad you pointed that out and you're definitely not a democrat or liberal.
 
Once again I'm living in 2021 and what's going on NOW. It does exist, seems you're ignoring it because it hurts your narrative.
What's going on NOW is that the new-age Republican Party is ripe and full of African-Americans holding positions of power as Senators, Congressmen, and Reps like;

Burgess Owens - State Representative (Utah)
Mark Robinson - Lt. Gov (North Carolina)
Winsome Sears - Lt. Gov (Virginia)
Byron Donalds - State Representative (Florida)
Tim Scott - State Representative (South Carolina)

And that's just a few of them. There's no evidence of white supremacy boogeymen running around in the Repub Party like you foolishly believe. Today's political landscape is more diverse than ever before on both sides. And once again, the real "white supremacists are on the Blue side of the isle as old Dixiecrat dawgs like Joe Biden himself and Hillary Clinton (both schooled by Robert Byrd, KKK Grand Dragon and State Senator) continue to wield the deception of victimhood in front of minorities' faces. Dems are the ones oppressing women and continually manipulate blacks to no end. That's why the title of this thread states as such. People are seeing the Dems for the age-old scumbags they've always been. My narrative is quite accurate as the many people on here clearly approve and attest to it. Maybe you need to take off those BLM shades and see what's really happening.
 
Not sure why people try to limit racism to one party. They both have a racist history. Glad you pointed that out and you're definitely not a democrat or liberal.
Once again I'm living in 2021 and what's going on NOW.
It does exist, seems you're ignoring it because it hurts your narrative.


Racism is worldwide and it exists in every race and culture. Those that attempt to paint just the south as racist are clueless. The Rat politicians were often put in place by the moneyed Rat racists (just like racist Soros does today), but the general Southern population was not by and large racist. I'm white (mostly I think), and I grew up in Tampa, Fl in the 50's-60's. My parents were racist Rats, but converted to Reagan Pubs for $$$ reasons in their old/retired age. Oldest brother and me not racist, other older brother and sister were mildly racist but none of them were violent, just in attitudes and voting patterns. The racists also happened to be Masons, don't know if that's a factor or not as there are black Masons?

Only 18% of those in the old Confederate south ever owned even a single slave. but the other 82% get painted with the same racist slave owner brush. Nobody in my family, as far back as we can trace it, every owned anyone of any race, or was willing to work for anyone that did. However, every Confederate state in 1860 had black slave owners, so get any reparations from them.

But how about the non-racist (supposedly) North? Known for excluding Black people and other minorities, sundown towns are historically all-white communities in the United States with extremely troubling pasts. The Chicago suburb of Cicero was one of the most infamous sundown towns to ever exist in Illinois. For those that only want to talk about current info, how about we see some current info on the racist south....

The current 10 most racist towns in America going by hate crimes:

10. St. Paul Minn.

9. Las Vegas, NV

8. Indianapolis, ILL

7. Kansas City, KS

6. Phoenix, AZ

5. Los Angeles, CA

4. NY, NY

3. Seattle, WA

2. Boston, MA

1. Columbus, OH

It's mostly the Rat controlled cities/states, instead of geography....
And not a single one of them is in the old South.
 
What's going on NOW is that the new-age Republican Party is ripe and full of African-Americans holding positions of power as Senators, Congressmen, and Reps like;

Burgess Owens - State Representative (Utah)
Mark Robinson - Lt. Gov (North Carolina)
Winsome Sears - Lt. Gov (Virginia)
Byron Donalds - State Representative (Florida)
Tim Scott - State Representative (South Carolina)

And that's just a few of them. There's no evidence of white supremacy boogeymen running around in the Repub Party like you foolishly believe. Today's political landscape is more diverse than ever before on both sides. And once again, the real "white supremacists are on the Blue side of the isle as old Dixiecrat dawgs like Joe Biden himself and Hillary Clinton (both schooled by Robert Byrd, KKK Grand Dragon and State Senator) continue to wield the deception of victimhood in front of minorities' faces. Dems are the ones oppressing women and continually manipulate blacks to no end. That's why the title of this thread states as such. People are seeing the Dems for the age-old scumbags they've always been. My narrative is quite accurate as the many people on here clearly approve and attest to it. Maybe you need to take off those BLM shades and see what's really happening.
You clearly don't know me or my views. You're talking to what you think I believe because I called you a crazy right. I don't believe in BLM, AOC, Bernie or Hilary. See how stereotyping can make you look stupid? I also respect Owens when it comes to race.

I never said white supremacy runs the Republican party. You're answering without actually reading. I said and I hope you read this slowly, that if define a party by its fringe or minority supporters then you would have to define the Republican party by the white supremacy that supports the party. So be careful with that.

Black people should be Republicans and open to voting for either party. I always said never support a party, support the BEST candidate. There are shitty democrats and shitty Republicans. Love Tim Scott and wish he goes far. Once again, see how stereotyping make you look stupid?
 
Once again I'm living in 2021 and what's going on NOW.
It does exist, seems you're ignoring it because it hurts your narrative.


Racism is worldwide and it exists in every race and culture. Those that attempt to paint just the south as racist are clueless. The Rat politicians were often put in place by the moneyed Rat racists (just like racist Soros does today), but the general Southern population was not by and large racist. I'm white (mostly I think), and I grew up in Tampa, Fl in the 50's-60's. My parents were racist Rats, but converted to Reagan Pubs for $$$ reasons in their old/retired age. Oldest brother and me not racist, other older brother and sister were mildly racist but none of them were violent, just in attitudes and voting patterns. The racists also happened to be Masons, don't know if that's a factor or not as there are black Masons?

Only 18% of those in the old Confederate south ever owned even a single slave. but the other 82% get painted with the same racist slave owner brush. Nobody in my family, as far back as we can trace it, every owned anyone of any race, or was willing to work for anyone that did. However, every Confederate state in 1860 had black slave owners, so get any reparations from them.

But how about the non-racist (supposedly) North? Known for excluding Black people and other minorities, sundown towns are historically all-white communities in the United States with extremely troubling pasts. The Chicago suburb of Cicero was one of the most infamous sundown towns to ever exist in Illinois. For those that only want to talk about current info, how about we see some current info on the racist south....

The current 10 most racist towns in America going by hate crimes:

10. St. Paul Minn.

9. Las Vegas, NV

8. Indianapolis, ILL

7. Kansas City, KS

6. Phoenix, AZ

5. Los Angeles, CA

4. NY, NY

3. Seattle, WA

2. Boston, MA

1. Columbus, OH

It's mostly the Rat controlled cities/states, instead of geography....
And not a single one of them is in the old South.
I never know what you're saying. You use weird fonts and have a weird delivery...

But of course racism is world wide. Never said it's limited to America. Slaves are still in Africa. I'm not debating that.

Also, in order to have hate crimes, you would need black people. So wouldn't you expect places with high black population to have more hate crimes because of opportunity? And where are the highest black populations? In the cities! Like duh...
 
That's a brazened lie right there! If you know American history (which you don't), the origins of the Republican Party started with the old Negro Republican Party which was created to abolish slavery. Obviously, you think there was "the switch" between parties and that's another lie. Southern Democrats of the 1940s - 1960s became Dixiecrats and migrated to the Republican side to demonize the true party itself in the eyes of African-Americans as racists. In doing so, the racist Dems kept the black vote on their side as black people believed what they were seeing out of the Dixiecrats posing as Republicans, Lyndon B. Johnson summed it all up by saying, "I'll make sure these negroes vote Democrat from now on," and it's worked for decades until nowadays. That's why Candace Owens is spearheading the #BLEXIT movement. It educates our black people about these things and how the Dems have sodomized, demoralized, and attempt to sympathize with us. You need to do tons more research.
LBJ actually said after the "Great Society, "I'll have n*****s voting Democratic for the next 200 years."

I used to sit with the original Whitney Houston on her porch swing in South Lawton. AT 5:30 we greeted her father coming home from work. Fathers all up and down the block came home from work. Today the fathers are all gone. LBJ fixed all that with his "War on Poverty."
 
That's a brazened lie right there! If you know American history (which you don't), the origins of the Republican Party started with the old Negro Republican Party which was created to abolish slavery. Obviously, you think there was "the switch" between parties and that's another lie. Southern Democrats of the 1940s - 1960s became Dixiecrats and migrated to the Republican side to demonize the true party itself in the eyes of African-Americans as racists. In doing so, the racist Dems kept the black vote on their side as black people believed what they were seeing out of the Dixiecrats posing as Republicans, Lyndon B. Johnson summed it all up by saying, "I'll make sure these negroes vote Democrat from now on," and it's worked for decades until nowadays. That's why Candace Owens is spearheading the #BLEXIT movement. It educates our black people about these things and how the Dems have sodomized, demoralized, and attempt to sympathize with us. You need to do tons more research.
Insert @Uniformed_ReRe

Now’s you’re chance to prove yourself 😂😂😂
 
What's going on NOW is that the new-age Republican Party is ripe and full of African-Americans holding positions of power as Senators, Congressmen, and Reps like;

Burgess Owens - State Representative (Utah)
Mark Robinson - Lt. Gov (North Carolina)
Winsome Sears - Lt. Gov (Virginia)
Byron Donalds - State Representative (Florida)
Tim Scott - State Representative (South Carolina)

And that's just a few of them. There's no evidence of white supremacy boogeymen running around in the Repub Party like you foolishly believe. Today's political landscape is more diverse than ever before on both sides. And once again, the real "white supremacists are on the Blue side of the isle as old Dixiecrat dawgs like Joe Biden himself and Hillary Clinton (both schooled by Robert Byrd, KKK Grand Dragon and State Senator) continue to wield the deception of victimhood in front of minorities' faces. Dems are the ones oppressing women and continually manipulate blacks to no end. That's why the title of this thread states as such. People are seeing the Dems for the age-old scumbags they've always been. My narrative is quite accurate as the many people on here clearly approve and attest to it. Maybe you need to take off those BLM shades and see what's really happening.
And this is precisely why black conservatives who have any power are SMEARED, PERSONALLY ATTACKED AND VILLIFIED by the left and their media minions. Their ideas are not so much attacked as their personal character is. And why? Because they DARED to leave the reservation and to think for themselves and the smearing and personal attacks are messages to other blacks that this is what will happen to you if you DARE go to that other party. It's really just a modern day version of slavery practiced by the dems who are really telling blacks that we own you as exemplified by the head dem Joe Biden telling a black man that if you don't vote for me, "you ain't black". How can the attitude of dems toward blacks be any clearer than that? So most blacks are still slaves as they are still being owned. Dare leave, pay the price.
 
America also wanted blacks to be slaves and women to have no rights. How things are now is what is important AND now white supremacist align with the Republican party. Them just the facts 😉.
Why would white supremacists align with Republicans? We freed blacks and gave them the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That's why they hate us.

Dems are the ones that think the white race is better than the black race. That's why they loved slavery and fought against the Civil RIghts Act of 1964.

Dems are racists, white supremacists are racists. Perfect fit. This is just another example of a dem trying to spin that the republicans are really guilty of the thing they are doing.

The Ku Klux Klan were dems. Amazing how you don't know that.
 
Insert @Uniformed_ReRe

Now’s you’re chance to prove yourself 😂😂😂
Still waiting on @Uniformed_ReRe to give us his list of Republicans that voted for the Civil Rights Act in 1964, then were so mad that their party passed it, that they went to be a democrat.

Did he ever realize that's saying his party is racist? LOL

Guess they were white supremacists and wanted to be with their kind in the democratic party. @kalimgoodman is that what they taught you in school?
 
I didn't ask you IF communism exist in America. I asked how does it relate to the Dems. Maybe you miss understood me.
It's their policies Kalim, it's that simple and it's right in front of you. And what I see is push toward Socialism, not Communism. But those are different exits on the same highway.

The $3.5T spending bill is actually the $5T+ bill Bernie Sanders asked for (and Bernie will tell you he's a Marxist, he honeymooned in Moscow, he doesn't even try to hide it and he got WAY too close to the WH). They built in 2 year sunset clauses in most of the spending - meaning all they have to do is vote to re-authorize it and it keeps going. When is the last time Congress voted to spend less?

The point of the bill isn't to build anything back better - it's a to drive hyper inflation and tank the economy through massive stimulus and printing to cover the debt. One of the central tenets of Socialism (which is a key step on the path to Communism) is for the gov't to control the means of production. Well they can't do that if a Capitalist economy is thriving. So they need it to break so the gov't stops working. As productivity decreases and the amount of cash in the economy increases the value of the dollar plummets - this is an effective tax that makes even achieving middle class status much more difficult. It's why people are so freaked about the insane inflation we're seeing.

The Green New Deal is built into that bill - the use of Climate Change as a lever to get us all to accept we have no other choice is obvious - regardless of your position of climate change this should be clear. We cannot spend our way out of Carbon emissions.

Obamacare did the same thing - it cornered insurance companies by telling them what they had to cover (their expenses) and what they could charge (income). When you do that to a free market company you effectively control their fate. The plan was to force them into folding leaving the only choice a single payer option. It didn't work because the dems got crushed in the mid terms and lost Congress. Healthcare is 1/5th of the total economy BTW...it had nothing to do with Healthcare.

The Democrats hate Capitalism, they hate free markets and they hate individual liberty and responsibility. They want to spend us into a situation where those central forces no longer work so there's no other choice but letting them take over. And it makes sense if you're in the ruling class - look at every Socialist and Communist country - almost all of the wealth lies with the ruling class. The further left the economy, the more polarized the wealth structure becomes.
 
Why would white supremacists align with Republicans? We freed blacks and gave them the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That's why they hate us.

Dems are the ones that think the white race is better than the black race. That's why they loved slavery and fought against the Civil RIghts Act of 1964.

Dems are racists, white supremacists are racists. Perfect fit. This is just another example of a dem trying to spin that the republicans are really guilty of the thing they are doing.

The Ku Klux Klan were dems. Amazing how you don't know that.
 
The title of the thread is why dems need the border open. As blacks, hispanics, women and other "groups" of voters who check "typical dem voter boxes" become more knowledgeable, prosperous and successful, they no longer fall for Dem BS. Therefore dems need a consistent and growing # of potential voters who are illiterate, low IQ, lacking in English or a combination of the three. They get them hooked on Government Crack and own their souls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavigatorII
The title of the thread is why dems need the border open. As blacks, hispanics, women and other "groups" of voters who check "typical dem voter boxes" become more knowledgeable, prosperous and successful, they no longer fall for Dem BS. Therefore dems need a consistent and growing # of potential voters who are illiterate, low IQ, lacking in English or a combination of the three. They get them hooked on Government Crack and own their souls.
 
5xzfkv.jpg
 
You clearly don't know me or my views. You're talking to what you think I believe because I called you a crazy right. I don't believe in BLM, AOC, Bernie or Hilary. See how stereotyping can make you look stupid? I also respect Owens when it comes to race.

I never said white supremacy runs the Republican party. You're answering without actually reading. I said and I hope you read this slowly, that if define a party by its fringe or minority supporters then you would have to define the Republican party by the white supremacy that supports the party. So be careful with that.

Black people should be Republicans and open to voting for either party. I always said never support a party, support the BEST candidate. There are shitty democrats and shitty Republicans. Love Tim Scott and wish he goes far. Once again, see how stereotyping make you look stupid?
You've been hinting strongly at that statement eversince I ran into you on these boards. And having read your senseless drivel, the other guys were right about you. I don't have to know you, I just know your kind. You Lib-tards ALWAYS move the goal-posts when being "TRUMPED" with irrefuttable facts and sound reasoning. You believe white supremacy runs the Repubs when it doesn't and never did. You say you don't believe in the aforementoned Democrat stalwarts, yet like all the other Lib-tards, you echo their talking points eventually. Either directly or indirectly. If it's any consolation to you, you are quite slick at running the double-reverse (LMAO!).
 
You've been hinting strongly at that statement eversince I ran into you on these boards. And having read your senseless drivel, the other guys were right about you. I don't have to know you, I just know your kind. You Lib-tards ALWAYS move the goal-posts when being "TRUMPED" with irrefuttable facts and sound reasoning. You believe white supremacy runs the Repubs when it doesn't and never did. You say you don't believe in the aforementoned Democrat stalwarts, yet like all the other Lib-tards, you echo their talking points eventually. Either directly or indirectly. If it's any consolation to you, you are quite slick at running the double-reverse (LMAO!).
I asked you a question that you never answered. I never gave my views or thoughts. Everyone on here knows that I don't like the people you mentioned. It's in my historical data. I just wanted to see were you a free thinker or a puppet.

It's clear you're a puppet.
 
It's their policies Kalim, it's that simple and it's right in front of you. And what I see is push toward Socialism, not Communism. But those are different exits on the same highway.

The $3.5T spending bill is actually the $5T+ bill Bernie Sanders asked for (and Bernie will tell you he's a Marxist, he honeymooned in Moscow, he doesn't even try to hide it and he got WAY too close to the WH). They built in 2 year sunset clauses in most of the spending - meaning all they have to do is vote to re-authorize it and it keeps going. When is the last time Congress voted to spend less?

The point of the bill isn't to build anything back better - it's a to drive hyper inflation and tank the economy through massive stimulus and printing to cover the debt. One of the central tenets of Socialism (which is a key step on the path to Communism) is for the gov't to control the means of production. Well they can't do that if a Capitalist economy is thriving. So they need it to break so the gov't stops working. As productivity decreases and the amount of cash in the economy increases the value of the dollar plummets - this is an effective tax that makes even achieving middle class status much more difficult. It's why people are so freaked about the insane inflation we're seeing.

The Green New Deal is built into that bill - the use of Climate Change as a lever to get us all to accept we have no other choice is obvious - regardless of your position of climate change this should be clear. We cannot spend our way out of Carbon emissions.

Obamacare did the same thing - it cornered insurance companies by telling them what they had to cover (their expenses) and what they could charge (income). When you do that to a free market company you effectively control their fate. The plan was to force them into folding leaving the only choice a single payer option. It didn't work because the dems got crushed in the mid terms and lost Congress. Healthcare is 1/5th of the total economy BTW...it had nothing to do with Healthcare.

The Democrats hate Capitalism, they hate free markets and they hate individual liberty and responsibility. They want to spend us into a situation where those central forces no longer work so there's no other choice but letting them take over. And it makes sense if you're in the ruling class - look at every Socialist and Communist country - almost all of the wealth lies with the ruling class. The further left the economy, the more polarized the wealth structure becomes.
Giving tax breaks is a form of socialism. Socialism isn't only about helping the poor. Did you consider Trump a socialism when he was driving up the debt and spending money we didn't have?

I'm not a fan of all of the money the democrats are spending but I wasn't a fan when Trump did it neither.

My issue with you is always the "fake" anger. You're only upset when dems do things but ok when Republicans do it. The only guy on this board who criticized both sides is BillCutting4585. That's why I can't respect your opinion on these matters because it's not authentic.

This plans doesn't impact inflation. Inflation is an global issue caused by Covid. I couldn't let you slip that nonsense in there.
 
Giving tax breaks is a form of socialism. Socialism isn't only about helping the poor. Did you consider Trump a socialism when he was driving up the debt and spending money we didn't have?

I'm not a fan of all of the money the democrats are spending but I wasn't a fan when Trump did it neither.

My issue with you is always the "fake" anger. You're only upset when dems do things but ok when Republicans do it. The only guy on this board who criticized both sides is BillCutting4585. That's why I can't respect your opinion on these matters because it's not authentic.

This plans doesn't impact inflation. Inflation is an global issue caused by Covid. I couldn't let you slip that nonsense in there.
I've said many times on this board that the leadership in this country has done us a disservice by not paying any attention to the national debt. I though Bush was acting like a democrat when he pushed a stimulus through right before leaving office and I wasn't happy with Trump's $1.2T bill as he left - although that one made more sense given the state of the economy after the shutdowns. But Trump was certainly not a fiscally responsible President.

But comparing what either did to $3T-$5T in unnecessary spending (right after two $1T+ bills) is like comparing a Ferrari to a Yugo. Both get you from A to B, but one is insanely faster. The highest inflation in 40 years is proof, and the big bill hasn't even passed yet. Trust me, you don't understand what this bill - what an extra $3T in printed cash compounded by more gov't assistance to support people who aren't willing to work - will do to all of our lifestyles.

So if you sense I'm more mad about one than the other it's because they aren't the same.
 
I asked you a question that you never answered. I never gave my views or thoughts. Everyone on here knows that I don't like the people you mentioned. It's in my historical data. I just wanted to see were you a free thinker or a puppet.

It's clear you're a puppet.
You OBVIOUSLY do not read worth a lick, don't you? My posts clearly tell what and how I think. Whereas you have nothing but libtard/chameleon garbage spewing out on your posts. Let me break it down to you in layman's terms. Racism is everywhere, no matter what or how it presents itself. HOWEVER, one must be able to disseminate the tell-tale signs of such through the deeds and logic of a person or party or organization. And based on accurate historical reference and current events, it's CRYSTAL CLEAR to 98% of the people on these boards that Lib-Tards like yourself and even independent centrists are being duped into believing the mass propaganda and fallacious ideologies of the Left's elitist power structure. If a Ron DeSantis bans the vaccine mandates that a Kamala Harris wants to implement, does that make DeSantis a racist? Or does it confirm the constitutional rights of an American's freedom of choice over totalatarianism under the guise of "protecting you and your family?" Especially if the inefficacy of the deadly poison-shots prove to be more of a risk than a benefit? You Lib-Tard logic is why you get owned on these boards. Just stop posting altogether. You look god-awful ignorant as the day is long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
I've said many times on this board that the leadership in this country has done us a disservice by not paying any attention to the national debt. I though Bush was acting like a democrat when he pushed a stimulus through right before leaving office and I wasn't happy with Trump's $1.2T bill as he left - although that one made more sense given the state of the economy after the shutdowns. But Trump was certainly not a fiscally responsible President.

But comparing what either did to $3T-$5T in unnecessary spending (right after two $1T+ bills) is like comparing a Ferrari to a Yugo. Both get you from A to B, but one is insanely faster. The highest inflation in 40 years is proof, and the big bill hasn't even passed yet. Trust me, you don't understand what this bill - what an extra $3T in printed cash compounded by more gov't assistance to support people who aren't willing to work - will do to all of our lifestyles.

So if you sense I'm more mad about one than the other it's because they aren't the same.
See I don't do that. I don't justify why one is worse. You do that for like I said "fake" anger. Yes the Dems spend more but the Reps spend money unwisely too. If it TRULY bothers you, then it should bother you at 1T or 3T, because i am sure that if the BBB bill got to 1T, you wont be out here defending it. That's my opinion on that.

Inflation is an global issue caused by Covid. I know you have to blame the Dems but this isn't it.
 
Giving tax breaks is a form of socialism. Socialism isn't only about helping the poor. Did you consider Trump a socialism when he was driving up the debt and spending money we didn't have?

I'm not a fan of all of the money the democrats are spending but I wasn't a fan when Trump did it neither.

My issue with you is always the "fake" anger. You're only upset when dems do things but ok when Republicans do it. The only guy on this board who criticized both sides is BillCutting4585. That's why I can't respect your opinion on these matters because it's not authentic.

This plans doesn't impact inflation. Inflation is an global issue caused by Covid. I couldn't let you slip that nonsense in there.
So many fallacies here it's hard to know where to begin. The tax code is and always has been the governments way of encouraging certain behaviors and rewarding for achieving policy goals. Trump's tax cut was to benefit the middle class which gets shit on 99% of the time. The poor do not contribute jack diddly. Economic prosperity for the middle class drives more net .Gov revenues There's plenty of documentation out there to prove that point, knock yourself out, it's not my job to educate.

Secondly, Trump did NOT want to lock down the country, he closed it for all of two weeks. It was Dimtard blue states who did so into perpetuity. Trump did not want massive covid relief spending. Originally he agreed to half a trillion, but the retards in Congress (ie, Boxtox Nan) said oh hell no, we need TRILLIONS to flow. Do some historical research.

Covid didn't cause inflation. Massive closures disrupting the supply chain indefinitely while the government kept pouring money to the public did. When the money supply outstrips production, rampant inflation is the obvious result. It's basic Economics 101.
 
You OBVIOUSLY do not read worth a lick, don't you? My posts clearly tell what and how I think. Whereas you have nothing but libtard/chameleon garbage spewing out on your posts. Let me break it down to you in layman's terms. Racism is everywhere, no matter what or how it presents itself. HOWEVER, one must be able to disseminate the tell-tale signs of such through the deeds and logic of a person or party or organization. And based on accurate historical reference and current events, it's CRYSTAL CLEAR to 98% of the people on these boards that Lib-Tards like yourself and even independent centrists are being duped into believing the mass propaganda and fallacious ideologies of the Left's elitist power structure. If a Ron DeSantis bans the vaccine mandates that a Kamala Harris wants to implement, does that make DeSantis a racist? Or does it confirm the constitutional rights of an American's freedom of choice over totalatarianism under the guise of "protecting you and your family?" Especially if the inefficacy of the deadly poison-shots prove to be more of a risk than a benefit? You Lib-Tard logic is why you get owned on these boards. Just stop posting altogether. You look god-awful ignorant as the day is long.
No it wouldn't make him racist and nobody implied that. What are you talking about?

Also, the SCOTUS ruled on vaccine mandates in 1905 BUT as we know these political parties ignore the courts and keep fighting until they get their way. SMH
 
So many fallacies here it's hard to know where to begin. The tax code is and always has been the governments way of encouraging certain behaviors and rewarding for achieving policy goals. Trump's tax cut was to benefit the middle class which gets shit on 99% of the time. The poor do not contribute jack diddly. Economic prosperity for the middle class drives more net .Gov revenues There's plenty of documentation out there to prove that point, knock yourself out, it's not my job to educate.

Secondly, Trump did NOT want to lock down the country, he closed it for all of two weeks. It was Dimtard blue states who did so into perpetuity. Trump did not want massive covid relief spending. Originally he agreed to half a trillion, but the retards in Congress (ie, Boxtox Nan) said oh hell no, we need TRILLIONS to flow. Do some historical research.

Covid didn't cause inflation. Massive closures disrupting the supply chain indefinitely while the government kept pouring money to the public did. When the money supply outstrips production, rampant inflation is the obvious result. It's basic Economics 101.
That 2 weeks did great damage.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT