So they allowed a forensic audit of ballots? Please post the link. I will standby.
Scary part is, people are uneducated just like you on this topic.
Media is fake
- Thread starter jfegaly
- Start date
So they allowed a forensic audit of ballots? Please post the link. I will standby.
Scary part is, people are uneducated just like you on this topic.
It's all okay. Remember back when Michelle Obama said, "Our biggest problem is white people."
So to review:
1 - Republicans find evidence dems cheated in elections in 2020.
2 - @fsu939913 says ignore this, let's focus on winning elections in 2024
Does anyone (or everyone) with a room temperature IQ see the gaping hole in this strategy?
Remember, @fsu939913 thinks rabid Trump supporter Viking QAnon Man led the assault on the Capitol on Jan 6th.
@fsu939913 @Nolec @SoProudNole LMAO!
Even Bernie Sanders is against it.
www.newsmax.com
Sen. Bernie Sanders Not 'Particularly Comfortable' With Trump Twitter Ban
Sen. Bernie Sanders is by no means a fan of former President Donald Trump, but that doesn't mean he feels "particularly comfortable" with Twitter's decision to permanently ban him from the social media platform. "Look, you have a former president...
He's trolling. He does this every few months, he gets bored and starts lying to draw attention to himself.
Every time he does it I wonder why I don't just block him as he brings nothing to the board but this.
Come on numbers, tell us the truth... 🤓
Are you being paid or threatened to say this dumb no voter fraud chit???
You had never heard of CDA 230 till I mentioned it.
And you still suck at trolling. Bigly.
Weird considering he’s a commie. You’d think that he’d be all for silencing the opposition.Even Bernie Sanders is against it.
Sen. Bernie Sanders Not 'Particularly Comfortable' With Trump Twitter Ban
Sen. Bernie Sanders is by no means a fan of former President Donald Trump, but that doesn't mean he feels "particularly comfortable" with Twitter's decision to permanently ban him from the social media platform. "Look, you have a former president...
I'll tell you the same thing @fsu939913's high school counselor told him when he said he was going to apply to FSU: "You're wasting your time".
Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
Please point to where I mentioned arrests.
Let’s slow this down for you:
What is the definition of a publisher?
What is the definition of a platform?
Publisher - a person or company that prepares and issues books, journals, music, or other works for sale.
Example: New York Times, CNN, Fox News, Washington Post
Platform - interactive digitally-mediated technologies that facilitate the creation or sharing/exchange of information, ideas, career interests, and other forms of expression via virtual communities and networks.
Example: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Gab, Parler
Example: New York Times, CNN, Fox News, Washington Post
Platform - interactive digitally-mediated technologies that facilitate the creation or sharing/exchange of information, ideas, career interests, and other forms of expression via virtual communities and networks.
Example: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Gab, Parler
Publishers are not protected by section 230
See Nicholas Sandman lawsuit
Platforms are protected by section 230
See Nicholas Sandman lawsuit
Platforms are protected by section 230
What is section 230?
Section 230, as passed, has two primary parts both listed under §230(c) as the "Good Samaritan" portion of the law. Section 230(c)(1), as identified above, defines that an information service provider shall not be treated as a "publisher or speaker" of information from another provider. Section 230(c)(2) provides immunity from civil liabilities for information service providers that remove or restrict content from their services they deem "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected", as long as they act "in good faith" in this action.
Section 230, as passed, has two primary parts both listed under §230(c) as the "Good Samaritan" portion of the law. Section 230(c)(1), as identified above, defines that an information service provider shall not be treated as a "publisher or speaker" of information from another provider. Section 230(c)(2) provides immunity from civil liabilities for information service providers that remove or restrict content from their services they deem "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected", as long as they act "in good faith" in this action.
Lets recap:
Publishers can be sued for slander against an individual, platforms cannot be sued for slander as they are giving a space to exercise free speech.
Publishers can be sued for slander against an individual, platforms cannot be sued for slander as they are giving a space to exercise free speech.
When a platform edits a user’s post by slapping a disclaimer or any type of warning on the post, they are altering the message of the user. Because they are changing or altering a post, the argument to de-platform the technology comes into play.
There are millions of examples of warnings or disclaimers being used on posts. Would you like an example @fsu939913 or do you understand the differences?
There are millions of examples of warnings or disclaimers being used on posts. Would you like an example @fsu939913 or do you understand the differences?
Let me answer it for you, thousands of accounts get banned daily, its perfectly legal.
This has been an argument well before i even knew you..... The self centeredness and dementia continues.... Im not sure if your just a butt hurt civilian or a russian trying to stir the pot. Say hi to Vladdy
Point to where I mentioned banning of accounts
You’re embarrassing yourself
Holy shit this is an all-time beatdown. @fsu939913's lack of mental acuity being exposed in real time.
Please continue.
after a year of fake news:
justthenews.com
The Truth about Trump's Pandemic Response
Joanna Miller, who worked for the Trump White House as a senior policy analyst with Peter Navarro, discusses what the Trump administration did with American trade policy and shifting manufacturing to the U.S. when other nations stopped sending ventilators and PPE at the start of the COVID-19...
justthenews.com
You say that like it means anything>???
Hell, the freakin' corrupt Rat controlled FBI has had Hunters lap top for over a year and they ain't done chit with all of that FACTUAL information.... rolleyes
Putin is riding his horse barechested in Siberia. And still openly weeping for the asskicking that @BillCutting4585 gave you in this thread.
The fact that you still think Trump had anything to do with Putin is laughable.
How laughable? Three years of investigations and you still have nothing.
Three years of the same people who investigated Trump would go on all the liberal news sites and shows and lie their asses off about what they knew.
What did they know? They knew behind sworn testimony that every single one of those traitors said they had nothing.
But by all means, please continue. Any other lies you’d like to spew? I can bust you up all night.
Similar threads
