...a very important player about to be suspended for a long time. Steve Russell is reporting it on the radio. No need to name the player or reason until more is known.
Yea, if true, that seems problematicThey knew Saturday and he still played?
Its a school-by-school patchwork of policies and penalties: A first-time steroid infraction would bench a Florida player for half the season but cost a Texas A&M player only a single game. Private schools such as Vanderbilt, meanwhile, arent required to share their drug-testing policies with anyone, not even the NCAA.
http://www.wsj.com/a...blem-1426792929
Life can be a bitch.The NCAA is out of control. Losing 12 months and the lossyear of eligibility! Smoke crack, lose a few games. Take a supplement.. Just not right.
Yeah and this is a 19 year old kid that didn't do anything criminal. But yet he's being dealt with in a harsher fashion than many who have committed criminal acts. The NCAA operates with impunity, where's their watchdog? It's an affront to common human decency that a kid's future could be this irreparably damaged for an OTC medicine or supplement. If any kid that's on any college roster can walk in a store and buy this stuff then where is the competitive advantage?Life can be a bitch.
The NCAA is out of control. Losing 12 months and the lossyear of eligibility! Smoke crack, lose a few games. Take a supplement.. Just not right.
I get that. But we're not talking about a controlled substance that's illegal to possess. We're not talking about something that requires a prescription. We're talking about an OTC product that legally and morally is no different than the Flintstones vitamins I give my kids.It is because it goes to the integrity of the game. It is pretty standard across all sports that PEDs are punished more harshly than other drugs.
I mean technically, by the ncaa's line of reasoning, wouldn't the Flintstones be considered a PED?
I know. And I agree that Grier made a mistake.If NCAA rules prohibit Flintstone vitamins and they will turn up in a drug test, don't take them.
It does not matter. There are a lot of shit laws and shit rules. But they are the laws and they are the rules. Work to change them. But do not violate themI know. And I agree that Grier made a mistake.
I'm questioning the policy on its own merit. Should the ncaa be declaring legal supplements and medications illegal? How is an athlete gaining a competitive advantage by taking something that's legal and readily available to every other athlete in the country?
I'm not trying to excuse or condone rule breaking or stupid choices. I'm just trying to point out that the NCAA is not automatically right just because nobody can challenge them or their arbitrary rulings
I get that. But we're not talking about a controlled substance that's illegal to possess. We're not talking about something that requires a prescription. We're talking about an OTC product that legally and morally is no different than the Flintstones vitamins I give my kids.
I'm not questioning whether the substance was banned. I'm not condoning cheating. I'm not trying to excuse Grier's boneheaded decision.You say 'I get that' and then go on to contradict it. Again, legal/moral/OTCvs prescription isn't the standard. It is that it goes directly to the integrity of the game. And PEDs are VERY different than vitamins. The most significant difference is the fact that, what ever the substance is, it was on a list published by the NCAA as banned'. It is not something that they just pulled out of their arse all of the sudden.