This must be one of those "FRIENDS AND FAMILY" games, because there can't be more than 100 people in the stands.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Allen took the point a bit. I think he was the assist leader. Chioza played well. Hill was Hill.I hope the play at PG has improved.
Bless your little heart. I said Hill was Hill. And he was.Great. I've been waiting all off-season for the return of MJ "Dr. Hoops" Williamson. I eagerly anticipate another season of selective statistical citations in advance of your bizarre and petty grudge against a 20-year-old.
Bless your little heart. I said Hill was Hill. And he was.
He ran the point and had two assists and two turnovers. That is Hill being Hill. In case you were wondering, measuring assists and turnovers for a point guard are not "selective statistics." That is kinda like passing stats for a QB. Oh and Hill was 1-6 shooting and 0-4 from 3 point line. Are those stats relevant for a point guard, or are they too "selective" for you too? To his credit, he seems to have cured his FT problems. He was 4-6 there, compared to a career of being barely over 50%. Are FTs relevant to a PG stats?
But, to your point, as I wrote in the other thread, I should be more critical of White for depending on Hill so much. But White is apparently beginning to see Hill's limitations and is playing him less. For example, Allen ran a lot of PG and his stats read; 5 assists and 4 TO. That is not great, but it is better than 2-2. Especially on the assist side. Chiozza had 2 assist and zero turnovers. I am a big Chiozza fans an wish he played most minutes at PG.
Bless your little heart. I said Hill was Hill. And he was.
He ran the point and had two assists and two turnovers. That is Hill being Hill. In case you were wondering, measuring assists and turnovers for a point guard are not "selective statistics." That is kinda like passing stats for a QB. Oh and Hill was 1-6 shooting and 0-4 from 3 point line. Are those stats relevant for a point guard, or are they too "selective" for you too? To his credit, he seems to have cured his FT problems. He was 4-6 there, compared to a career of being barely over 50%. Are FTs relevant to a PG stats?
But, to your point, as I wrote in the other thread, I should be more critical of White for depending on Hill so much. But White is apparently beginning to see Hill's limitations and is playing him less. For example, Allen ran a lot of PG and his stats read; 5 assists and 4 TO. That is not great, but it is better than 2-2. Especially on the assist side. Chiozza had 2 assist and zero turnovers. I am a big Chiozza fans an wish he played most minutes at PG.
As far as selectivity, I was referring to the fact that you rush to post his poor statistics, but do not post his good ones. For instance, you did not post that he was 5-6 from the field in his first game. Selective, see?
Hill definitely has his limitations.
Whining about every Hill turnover and missed shot, in my opinion reflects a lack of understanding about the team's limitations
Well, you know, that was because I was posting about THIS game. Or did that somehow escape you?
That is exactly what I have been saying. Yet for some reason, when I post that, you give me crap for it.
A PG that goes one for six from the field, zero for four from three point line and only has 2 assists and as many turnovers as assists is not "whining." It is calling bad play.
Like another poster said, I always hope Hill can get better. And he has at the FT line. Good for him. I hope that continues. But he is still a terrible shooter, both at the rim and from the field. And he often has as many turnovers as he has assists. That is not a good combination for a PG.
I'm hoping we see the Hill that showed up during the SECT last year. I will take that Hill all day!
Hill was a heavily recruited 5* PG that has come nowhere close to meeting expectations.
Chiozza was half a rebound better at 2.8 and a full assist better 4.3 to 3.3. Both averaged 2 turnovers. Advanced statistics give Hill a slight advantage, but basically it's a wash. Neither was very good last year, and everyone saying we need better PG play is correct.
Hill is also good at getting to the line, because he attacks the basket, while Chiozza does not.
He was third on the team in FTA, behind Egbunu and DFS. He shot 132 while Chiozza shot 59.
I will take 4.3 assist over 3.3 assists any day from a point guard. Especially when the 2016 assist to TO ratio was well over 2 for Chiozza and well under 2 for Hill.
I will agree he does get to the line better than Chiozza. Yet when he does slash to the basket for an easy lay-up and foul, he often misses the layup. And then he is often no good at the line. At least he was last year. That made him a liability, especially at times when FT shooting is critical. Now, if his improved FT shooting is permanent, then his ability to get to the basket and get fouled can be an asset.
If he can't make them, especially at clutch time, it does not matter how many he shoots. Hell, was was only marginally better than Egbunu at FT shooting last year. Because of that, he often rode the pine in the final minutes of close games, as White could not count on his FT shooting.
Is this reasoned enough for you, or are you still going to whine about my critique?
You just post the same stuff over and over and over.
.
All your nattering about missed layups, etc... continues to ignore the point that Chiozza shot worse than Hill did last year!
We seem to be talking past each other a lot. You prefer Hill at point. I prefer Chiozza at point.
We do not have to agree about it. Let's move on.
Yep. That is probably why I am harder on him.How about both Hill and Chiozza are average PGs? Because that is what they are. I was expecting much more from Hill because of how highly recruited he was.
For me, it's become much more about pointing out all the demonstrable falsehoods and inconsistent reasoning that riddle your posts. I'll try to keep it under control moving forward.
Hill - 56 min.- FG 5/11, 3Pt 0/4, FT 7/10, RB 6, Ast 6, TO 3, Stl 2, Pts 17
FG 45.5%, 3Pt 0%, FT 70%, 3.3 Min per Pt.
Chiozza - 37 min. - FG 3/9, 3Pt 1/4, FT 3/5, RB 3, Ast 6, TO 0, Stl 3, Pts 10
FG 33%, 3Pt 25%, FT 60%, 3.7 Min per Pt
Allen - 55 min - FG 5/20, 3Pt 2/11, FT 7/7, RB 5, Ast 7, TO 5, Stl 4, Blk 2, Pts 19
FG 25%, 3Pt 18.2%, FT 100%, 2.9 Min per Pt
SG KeVaughn Allen and C John Egbunu have been named to the Coaches Preseason All SEC Team.
B-Ball LOI's are in for the 2017 Class:
SF DeAundrae Ballard 6-6 195 **** - Atlanta, Ga - ESPN 65/100
"Ballard is a high major wing that is a versatile scorer who is capable of big numbers and has excellent upside."
SF/PF Chase Johnson 6-8 205 **** - Huntington, WVa
"He's a young and blossoming forward with notable upside because he combines athleticism, a foundation of skills, and a good nose for the ball."
I find it interesting to read prolonged back-forths about this sport.
If anyone in basketball was as good at making field goals as they claim, they'd suit up as a kicker.
What a fraud of a sport.