ADVERTISEMENT

Is there anybody on here left to dispute this fraud claim video?

I'm not a mathematician. But I can smell a rat and have two eyes and understand logical progression. Two many statisticians have laid out their theories supported by facts and conclude it was impossible for the tabulations to swing to Biden in the wee hours of the night. Vote counting halts, sudden swings of votes mysteriously defying normal distributions even for a Dimtard precinct..... boxes of ballots dragged out from hidden places after the poll watchers stopped........trucks delivering boxes of ballots at 4am in the morning.

Nah..........all legit. 😂 😂 😂 😂 :mad:
 
The biggest deal was 5 or more states setting aside state election laws due to COVID. Article II of our constitution says only state legislatures can adjust or change state election laws. None did. Secretaries of State, Attorneys General nor Governors can change or adjust state election laws for any reason. Some did.
 
Sounds really interesting, I am not a professional in this field but some friends told me that this type of frauds can be avoided if using different KYC softs. Today there are a lot of different Anti Money Laundering companies on the internet that can provide you with assistance in this field. You only have to search for them on the internet. Check out on the internet for more, you won't be disappointed.
 
Last edited:
The biggest deal was 5 or more states setting aside state election laws due to COVID. Article II of our constitution says only state legislatures can adjust or change state election laws. None did. Secretaries of State, Attorneys General nor Governors can change or adjust state election laws for any reason. Some did.
Agree.

This argument required no Edison data, no statistical analysis or any witnesses. It was clear.
 
I'm not a mathematician. But I can smell a rat and have two eyes and understand logical progression. Two many statisticians have laid out their theories supported by facts and conclude it was impossible for the tabulations to swing to Biden in the wee hours of the night. Vote counting halts, sudden swings of votes mysteriously defying normal distributions even for a Dimtard precinct..... boxes of ballots dragged out from hidden places after the poll watchers stopped........trucks delivering boxes of ballots at 4am in the morning.

Nah..........all legit. 😂 😂 😂 😂 :mad:

Again, none of that is true, and REAL statisticians have debunked those theories. But you just keep being you. Keep pissing into the wind.
 
The biggest deal was 5 or more states setting aside state election laws due to COVID. Article II of our constitution says only state legislatures can adjust or change state election laws. None did. Secretaries of State, Attorneys General nor Governors can change or adjust state election laws for any reason. Some did.

And again, you are wrong about this, but every time I show you you are wrong, you ignore me, wait a couple weeks, and espouse this same incorrect position.

Again I ask you, if the state legislature has 100% control over voting processes, with no check and balance, why don't supermajority Republican legislators simply pass a law that only Republican candidates can be elected? Since there is no check on what they can do, why has that never happened?

Could it be because the State Supreme Court would strike down the law, proving that State Legislatures do not have supreme and total control over elections as you keep stating? Could it be that?

I await you ignoring this question yet again so that you can come back with the same tired LIE you love so much.
 
And again, you are wrong about this, but every time I show you you are wrong, you ignore me, wait a couple weeks, and espouse this same incorrect position.

Again I ask you, if the state legislature has 100% control over voting processes, with no check and balance, why don't supermajority Republican legislators simply pass a law that only Republican candidates can be elected? Since there is no check on what they can do, why has that never happened?

Could it be because the State Supreme Court would strike down the law, proving that State Legislatures do not have supreme and total control over elections as you keep stating? Could it be that?

I await you ignoring this question yet again so that you can come back with the same tired LIE you love so much.
Remember that time when you said that millions of signatures couldn’t be verified on election night and all it took was a 5 second google search to show you otherwise? Then you ignored it all?
 
As has been demonstrated here time and time again, getting through to the slow is completely beyond our reach.
I agree but it's an honest request. I am 100% for real, fact-based statistical proof that the spikes seen in the Edison data feeds showing Saddam Hussein level results for one candidate are fake.

Honestly, if it were valid I'd feel better about the entire election. To date I've not seen anything of the sort though. It's either the narrative in the video or a liberal saying it's all been debunked with zero evidence.
 
I agree but it's an honest request. I am 100% for real, fact-based statistical proof that the spikes seen in the Edison data feeds showing Saddam Hussein level results for one candidate are fake.

Honestly, if it were valid I'd feel better about the entire election. To date I've not seen anything of the sort though. It's either the narrative in the video or a liberal saying it's all been debunked with zero evidence.
Do the liberals really have an IQ of a brick or are they pretending?

Beijing Biden can't draw 5 cars to a Wendy's drive thru. He promises economic stagnation, and he receives an all time 80 million legal votes? Are you kidding?

Biden promises economic stagnation. Trump receives 75 million votes, an all time record for an incumbent.

A huge majority who slept through recess at an elementary school knows the election was stolen. Anyone who slept through a course in classical mechanics knows the election was stolen.
 
I agree but it's an honest request. I am 100% for real, fact-based statistical proof that the spikes seen in the Edison data feeds showing Saddam Hussein level results for one candidate are fake.

Honestly, if it were valid I'd feel better about the entire election. To date I've not seen anything of the sort though. It's either the narrative in the video or a liberal saying it's all been debunked with zero evidence.

correct. Everything I have seen reads like a snopes fact check. Partly false, yet everything stated looks factually correct
 
Again, none of that is true, and REAL statisticians have debunked those theories. But you just keep being you. Keep pissing into the wind.
Again, u are wrong. I know u hate to hear that but it’s the truth. Laid out there for u yet u say it’s false. Haha Do us a favor.. post the proof from these real statisticians. We will wait.
 
Again, u are wrong. I know u hate to hear that but it’s the truth. Laid out there for u yet u say it’s false. Haha Do us a favor.. post the proof from these real statisticians. We will wait.
There isn’t proof of real statisticians debunking it. This claim is coming from a guy who said signatures can’t be verified in real time, a 5 second search result said otherwise, no follow up to being wrong. Don’t hold your breath waiting on a response from bean counter.
 
There isn’t proof of real statisticians debunking it. This claim is coming from a guy who said signatures can’t be verified in real time, a 5 second search result said otherwise, no follow up to being wrong. Don’t hold your breath waiting on a response from bean counter.

I think it’s beginning to sink in that he should stick to math.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kjfreeze
You don’t a statistician to debunk theories that are based on flawed premises.
The statistician takes the current claims by the left on what they are currently reporting and they have debunked them since no way what they claimed happened. I do agree. Those numbers are bs and Trump was the real winner of the election
 
Remember that time when you said that millions of signatures couldn’t be verified on election night and all it took was a 5 second google search to show you otherwise? Then you ignored it all?

Any unverified signature would have to be REVIEWED BY HAND. Since nobody signs exactly the same way every time, there would be a ton of false negatives. So yes it would take a long time to verify. Sorry if the real world isn't as simple as your little fantasyland.
 
Any unverified signature would have to be REVIEWED BY HAND. Since nobody signs exactly the same way every time, there would be a ton of false negatives. So yes it would take a long time to verify. Sorry if the real world isn't as simple as your little fantasyland.
One more time. Haul your sorry ass to the voting precinct WITH ID. Worked for years, Europe still requires it. (oh the horror, even the socialists agree). Problem solved!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillCutting4585
Any unverified signature would have to be REVIEWED BY HAND. Since nobody signs exactly the same way every time, there would be a ton of false negatives. So yes it would take a long time to verify. Sorry if the real world isn't as simple as your little fantasyland.
Oh so you’re talking adjudicating votes.

Definition of adjudication- The five-syllable word actually describes the simple process of reviewing a ballot that may have been flagged.

So if a signature can’t be verified by what the voter signed when registering to vote, the ballot gets adjudicated.

Once manually looked at, it can be determined if the ballot counts and who the vote goes to. Can you guess who watches over the adjudication process?

Why would there be an astronomical amount of adjudicated votes in key counties in 2020 when the average is 1% or less?

Think hard on this one lizard

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT