I'm not a mathematician. But I can smell a rat and have two eyes and understand logical progression. Two many statisticians have laid out their theories supported by facts and conclude it was impossible for the tabulations to swing to Biden in the wee hours of the night. Vote counting halts, sudden swings of votes mysteriously defying normal distributions even for a Dimtard precinct..... boxes of ballots dragged out from hidden places after the poll watchers stopped........trucks delivering boxes of ballots at 4am in the morning.
Agree.The biggest deal was 5 or more states setting aside state election laws due to COVID. Article II of our constitution says only state legislatures can adjust or change state election laws. None did. Secretaries of State, Attorneys General nor Governors can change or adjust state election laws for any reason. Some did.
I'm not a mathematician. But I can smell a rat and have two eyes and understand logical progression. Two many statisticians have laid out their theories supported by facts and conclude it was impossible for the tabulations to swing to Biden in the wee hours of the night. Vote counting halts, sudden swings of votes mysteriously defying normal distributions even for a Dimtard precinct..... boxes of ballots dragged out from hidden places after the poll watchers stopped........trucks delivering boxes of ballots at 4am in the morning.
Nah..........all legit. 😂 😂 😂 😂![]()
Again, none of that is true, and REAL statisticians have debunked those theories. But you just keep being you. Keep pissing into the wind.
The biggest deal was 5 or more states setting aside state election laws due to COVID. Article II of our constitution says only state legislatures can adjust or change state election laws. None did. Secretaries of State, Attorneys General nor Governors can change or adjust state election laws for any reason. Some did.
Lol you libs are so blind to reality
Agree.
This argument required no Edison data, no statistical analysis or any witnesses. It was clear.
Not us baby. If you look in the mirror you will see a sheep ready to be shorn. Again.
Sorry I’m not interested sweetie. Keep watching CNN and letting Cuomo and Fat Stelter tell you how to think
LOL I don't watch CNN. Unlike you I have a brain and know how to think.
Remember that time when you said that millions of signatures couldn’t be verified on election night and all it took was a 5 second google search to show you otherwise? Then you ignored it all?And again, you are wrong about this, but every time I show you you are wrong, you ignore me, wait a couple weeks, and espouse this same incorrect position.
Again I ask you, if the state legislature has 100% control over voting processes, with no check and balance, why don't supermajority Republican legislators simply pass a law that only Republican candidates can be elected? Since there is no check on what they can do, why has that never happened?
Could it be because the State Supreme Court would strike down the law, proving that State Legislatures do not have supreme and total control over elections as you keep stating? Could it be that?
I await you ignoring this question yet again so that you can come back with the same tired LIE you love so much.
they were listed as one of your “credible” news organizations in a prior post, but hey integrity has never been your cup of tea.
Feel free to post those. I’d love to review.Again, none of that is true, and REAL statisticians have debunked those theories. But you just keep being you. Keep pissing into the wind.
As has been demonstrated here time and time again, getting through to the slow is completely beyond our reach.Feel free to post those. I’d love to review.
I agree but it's an honest request. I am 100% for real, fact-based statistical proof that the spikes seen in the Edison data feeds showing Saddam Hussein level results for one candidate are fake.As has been demonstrated here time and time again, getting through to the slow is completely beyond our reach.
Do the liberals really have an IQ of a brick or are they pretending?I agree but it's an honest request. I am 100% for real, fact-based statistical proof that the spikes seen in the Edison data feeds showing Saddam Hussein level results for one candidate are fake.
Honestly, if it were valid I'd feel better about the entire election. To date I've not seen anything of the sort though. It's either the narrative in the video or a liberal saying it's all been debunked with zero evidence.
I agree but it's an honest request. I am 100% for real, fact-based statistical proof that the spikes seen in the Edison data feeds showing Saddam Hussein level results for one candidate are fake.
Honestly, if it were valid I'd feel better about the entire election. To date I've not seen anything of the sort though. It's either the narrative in the video or a liberal saying it's all been debunked with zero evidence.
Again, u are wrong. I know u hate to hear that but it’s the truth. Laid out there for u yet u say it’s false. Haha Do us a favor.. post the proof from these real statisticians. We will wait.Again, none of that is true, and REAL statisticians have debunked those theories. But you just keep being you. Keep pissing into the wind.
There isn’t proof of real statisticians debunking it. This claim is coming from a guy who said signatures can’t be verified in real time, a 5 second search result said otherwise, no follow up to being wrong. Don’t hold your breath waiting on a response from bean counter.Again, u are wrong. I know u hate to hear that but it’s the truth. Laid out there for u yet u say it’s false. Haha Do us a favor.. post the proof from these real statisticians. We will wait.
There isn’t proof of real statisticians debunking it. This claim is coming from a guy who said signatures can’t be verified in real time, a 5 second search result said otherwise, no follow up to being wrong. Don’t hold your breath waiting on a response from bean counter.
Doubtful, he’ll continue to chime in and make himself look badI think it’s beginning to sink in that he should stick to math.
The only thing flawed here is judicial process, which clearly refused to look at the known facts.You don’t a statistician to debunk theories that are based on flawed premises.
And the REAL scientist have debunked climate change theories, but you DEMS/LIBS keep on being you.Again, none of that is true, and REAL statisticians have debunked those theories. But you just keep being you. Keep pissing into the wind.
The statistician takes the current claims by the left on what they are currently reporting and they have debunked them since no way what they claimed happened. I do agree. Those numbers are bs and Trump was the real winner of the electionYou don’t a statistician to debunk theories that are based on flawed premises.
So what premises are flawed and specifically how?You don’t a statistician to debunk theories that are based on flawed premises.
Since there were probably a dozen or so different ways showing how cheating occurred. Can you explain that "flawed premises" concept?You don’t a statistician to debunk theories that are based on flawed premises.
He heard from a friend who, heard it from a friend who, binge watches CNN and MSNBC. 😂So what premises are flawed and specifically how?
We had the same thought.So what premises are flawed and specifically how?
Remember that time when you said that millions of signatures couldn’t be verified on election night and all it took was a 5 second google search to show you otherwise? Then you ignored it all?
One more time. Haul your sorry ass to the voting precinct WITH ID. Worked for years, Europe still requires it. (oh the horror, even the socialists agree). Problem solved!Any unverified signature would have to be REVIEWED BY HAND. Since nobody signs exactly the same way every time, there would be a ton of false negatives. So yes it would take a long time to verify. Sorry if the real world isn't as simple as your little fantasyland.
Oh so you’re talking adjudicating votes.Any unverified signature would have to be REVIEWED BY HAND. Since nobody signs exactly the same way every time, there would be a ton of false negatives. So yes it would take a long time to verify. Sorry if the real world isn't as simple as your little fantasyland.
Most countries required some type of ID to vote.One more time. Haul your sorry ass to the voting precinct WITH ID. Worked for years, Europe still requires it. (oh the horror, even the socialists agree). Problem solved!