http://www.gatorzone.com/story.php?id=29562&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=wall%20post&utm_term=football&utm_campaign=University%20Athletic%20Association%20Announces%20Plans%20to%20Build%20an%20Indoor%20Practice%20Facility%20for%20Football
Folley is the reason that this is our only good news. Dude shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a top tier football program.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Foley sucks!! Fire him
I think oozie and I have discussed this before. I think IPFs are overrated and just take up a bunch of space and they are often times just eye sores.
I don't know. With lightning and extreme heat there will definitely be many opportunities for the football team to use it.Originally posted by oozie7:
I think these things are highly overrated, but I'm glad we're finally getting one if for nothing else than removing one more thing for our competitors to knock us about and keep us on an even playing field facility wise. Now about the new jerseys...
duhOriginally posted by GSMBrefugee:
You're right Paco, being able to practice during FSU week is overrated.
Yes he has only been the AD for all 3 of UFs national championships in football. Other than that he hasn't done a thing, except also be the AD for the only 2 national championships the state has ever seen in basketball.Originally posted by Michi-Gator:
Folley is the reason that this is our only good news. Dude shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a top tier football program.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Foley sucks!! Fire him
I think oozie and I have discussed this before. I think IPFs are overrated and just take up a bunch of space and they are often times just eye sores.
Football is played in the elements, I hardly think a team having to practice in humidity or some rain is the big deal y'all make it out to be. Where I'm from they call that preparation. Our team won't be able to run into an indoor facility on Saturday's when it's too humid or raining in a September game will they? There's give and take. No one said they aren't necessary, but they are overrated. But like I said I'm glad we're finally getting one if for nothing else than to keep up.Originally posted by Panhandle Slim1:
30 practices were impacted by weather, but IPF's are overrated. Y'all are nuts.
I think the issue is the rule regarding lightening, oozie. I agree football is played in the elements, but if you're unable to play because lightening struck in the next town over, then you need an IPF in order to not be hampered by the "rule", not so much the weather itself.Originally posted by oozie7:
Football is played in the elements, I hardly think a team having to practice in humidity or some rain is the big deal y'all make it out to be. Where I'm from they call that preparation. Our team won't be able to run into an indoor facility on Saturday's when it's too humid or raining in a September game will they? There's give and take. No one said they aren't necessary, but they are overrated. But like I said I'm glad we're finally getting one if for nothing else than to keep up.Originally posted by Panhandle Slim1:
30 practices were impacted by weather, but IPF's are overrated. Y'all are nuts.
Someone explain to me how "practices impacted by weather" adversely affect teams from Florida when FSU, Florida and Miami have dominated the college football world without indoor practice facilities. They are good to attract recruits I suppose, but I agree with the "overrated" part.Originally posted by oozie7:
Football is played in the elements, I hardly think a team having to practice in humidity or some rain is the big deal y'all make it out to be. Where I'm from they call that preparation. Our team won't be able to run into an indoor facility on Saturday's when it's too humid or raining in a September game will they? There's give and take. No one said they aren't necessary, but they are overrated. But like I said I'm glad we're finally getting one if for nothing else than to keep up.Originally posted by Panhandle Slim1:
30 practices were impacted by weather, but IPF's are overrated. Y'all are nuts.
BINGO. Remind me how many games we play every year inside a Dome? I agree an IPF can be useful, but I would be careful not to just use it every time there is a little bit of rain, etc.Originally posted by oozie7:
Football is played in the elements, I hardly think a team having to practice in humidity or some rain is the big deal y'all make it out to be. Where I'm from they call that preparation. Our team won't be able to run into an indoor facility on Saturday's when it's too humid or raining in a September game will they? There's give and take. No one said they aren't necessary, but they are overrated. But like I said I'm glad we're finally getting one if for nothing else than to keep up.Originally posted by Panhandle Slim1:
30 practices were impacted by weather, but IPF's are overrated. Y'all are nuts.
Something was already in the works in regards to the IPF, but it was only going to be 70 yards. McElwain demanded to make it a 120 yards otherwise he wasn't going to use it and told them just don't even bother building one if your not going to make it 120. McElwain has pushed for some other facilty upgrades that are happening. Muschamp just didn't know how to handle everything it takes to run a college football program. There is much much more responsibilities than just X's and O's for a head coach. Muschamp just didn't know how to run a program and how to go about things and getting things that were needed or wanted. It's just one more reason why I believe the coach at UF needs to be a head coach somewhere else before he cuts his teeth at UF. This job just isn't for 1st timers.Originally posted by oozie7:
Question because I don't know. But do you think we finally got upgrades because they believe in McElwain that much or was it something in the works? Because I remember Meyer wanting some, but I don't remember why it stalled. I could see a scenario where they wanted Muschamp to win big before committing, but then that wouldn't really make sense since McElwain is getting the upgrades before proving himself.
Gotcha, that makes some sense. I think UGA's IPF is only like 60 yards or something. I remember looking at the pics and wondering what the point of building something that small was, it looked full when players were just stretching.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Something was already in the works in regards to the IPF, but it was only going to be 70 yards. McElwain demanded to make it a 120 yards otherwise he wasn't going to use it and told them just don't even bother building one if your not going to make it 120. McElwain has pushed for some other facilty upgrades that are happening. Muschamp just didn't know how to handle everything it takes to run a college football program. There is much much more responsibilities than just X's and O's for a head coach. Muschamp just didn't know how to run a program and how to go about things and getting things that were needed or wanted. It's just one more reason why I believe the coach at UF needs to be a head coach somewhere else before he cuts his teeth at UF. This job just isn't for 1st timers.Originally posted by oozie7:
Question because I don't know. But do you think we finally got upgrades because they believe in McElwain that much or was it something in the works? Because I remember Meyer wanting some, but I don't remember why it stalled. I could see a scenario where they wanted Muschamp to win big before committing, but then that wouldn't really make sense since McElwain is getting the upgrades before proving himself.
Have emails here on campus dating back to early September saying they were putting out for bids for the IPF and were estimating to pay 10.5million. I guess that initial plan was to go cheapo just to say we could have one and have our competitors not be able to use that against us in recruiting any further. Coach Mac probably has been instrumental in getting this blown up to full size and spending the extra coins to make it a legitimate field.Originally posted by oozie7:
Gotcha, that makes some sense. I think UGA's IPF is only like 60 yards or something. I remember looking at the pics and wondering what the point of building something that small was, it looked full when players were just stretching.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Something was already in the works in regards to the IPF, but it was only going to be 70 yards. McElwain demanded to make it a 120 yards otherwise he wasn't going to use it and told them just don't even bother building one if your not going to make it 120. McElwain has pushed for some other facilty upgrades that are happening. Muschamp just didn't know how to handle everything it takes to run a college football program. There is much much more responsibilities than just X's and O's for a head coach. Muschamp just didn't know how to run a program and how to go about things and getting things that were needed or wanted. It's just one more reason why I believe the coach at UF needs to be a head coach somewhere else before he cuts his teeth at UF. This job just isn't for 1st timers.Originally posted by oozie7:
Question because I don't know. But do you think we finally got upgrades because they believe in McElwain that much or was it something in the works? Because I remember Meyer wanting some, but I don't remember why it stalled. I could see a scenario where they wanted Muschamp to win big before committing, but then that wouldn't really make sense since McElwain is getting the upgrades before proving himself.
Why not just put a retractable roof on the "Swamp"?Originally posted by grommit:
Have emails here on campus dating back to early September saying they were putting out for bids for the IPF and were estimating to pay 10.5million. I guess that initial plan was to go cheapo just to say we could have one and have our competitors not be able to use that against us in recruiting any further. Coach Mac probably has been instrumental in getting this blown up to full size and spending the extra coins to make it a legitimate field.Originally posted by oozie7:
Gotcha, that makes some sense. I think UGA's IPF is only like 60 yards or something. I remember looking at the pics and wondering what the point of building something that small was, it looked full when players were just stretching.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Something was already in the works in regards to the IPF, but it was only going to be 70 yards. McElwain demanded to make it a 120 yards otherwise he wasn't going to use it and told them just don't even bother building one if your not going to make it 120. McElwain has pushed for some other facilty upgrades that are happening. Muschamp just didn't know how to handle everything it takes to run a college football program. There is much much more responsibilities than just X's and O's for a head coach. Muschamp just didn't know how to run a program and how to go about things and getting things that were needed or wanted. It's just one more reason why I believe the coach at UF needs to be a head coach somewhere else before he cuts his teeth at UF. This job just isn't for 1st timers.Originally posted by oozie7:
Question because I don't know. But do you think we finally got upgrades because they believe in McElwain that much or was it something in the works? Because I remember Meyer wanting some, but I don't remember why it stalled. I could see a scenario where they wanted Muschamp to win big before committing, but then that wouldn't really make sense since McElwain is getting the upgrades before proving himself.
Now if only we could spend properly and get a retractable roof on it and have the surface as real grass, we'd be perfect.
You read some statements and you think "(C)can someone with enough intelligence to turn on a computer actually think that?" After you keep reading, you come to the realization (sadly) that the answer is "yes".Originally posted by Michi-Gator:
Folley is the reason that this is our only good news. Dude shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a top tier football program.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Foley sucks!! Fire him
I think oozie and I have discussed this before. I think IPFs are overrated and just take up a bunch of space and they are often times just eye sores.
Again, please stick to Winston legal threads, your knowledge of anything remotely athletic is limited to your elementary school kickball.Originally posted by gatorjmdz:
You read some statements and you think "(C)can someone with enough intelligence to turn on a computer actually think that?" After you keep reading, you come to the realization (sadly) that the answer is "yes".Originally posted by Michi-Gator:
Folley is the reason that this is our only good news. Dude shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a top tier football program.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Foley sucks!! Fire him
I think oozie and I have discussed this before. I think IPFs are overrated and just take up a bunch of space and they are often times just eye sores.
Foley is one of the very best ADs in the country. It will be a sad for UF when he retires.
Muschamp went public last year stating we did not need a IPF.Originally posted by oozie7:
Question because I don't know. But do you think we finally got upgrades because they believe in McElwain that much or was it something in the works? Because I remember Meyer wanting some, but I don't remember why it stalled. I could see a scenario where they wanted Muschamp to win big before committing, but then that wouldn't really make sense since McElwain is getting the upgrades before proving himself.
UGA's ipf is closer to 20 yards. It's totally worthless. A full sized ipf that saves us one day of practice during a game week is worth every penny we spend on it.Originally posted by oozie7:
Gotcha, that makes some sense. I think UGA's IPF is only like 60 yards or something. I remember looking at the pics and wondering what the point of building something that small was, it looked full when players were just stretching.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Yea I'm not even sure what the purpose of theirs is, there legitimately isn't enough room in there to run any type of scrimmage. Hell they barely have enough room to separate position groups. That's just a case of a school building one just to build one without thinking about how it will help them.Originally posted by Panhandle Slim1:
UGA's ipf is closer to 20 yards. It's totally worthless. A full sized ipf that saves us one day of practice during a game week is worth every penny we spend on it.Originally posted by oozie7:
Gotcha, that makes some sense. I think UGA's IPF is only like 60 yards or something. I remember looking at the pics and wondering what the point of building something that small was, it looked full when players were just stretching.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
In all seriousness, the IPF is going to be one of those prefabricated warehouse structures. Big steel I-beams holding up the metal superstructure. Making a retractable roof on something such as that is relatively easy. I wasn't making a joke. The Swamp on the other hand would be nearly impossible to engineer any kind of structure over without just making it totally ugly.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Why not just put a retractable roof on the "Swamp"?Originally posted by grommit:
Have emails here on campus dating back to early September saying they were putting out for bids for the IPF and were estimating to pay 10.5million. I guess that initial plan was to go cheapo just to say we could have one and have our competitors not be able to use that against us in recruiting any further. Coach Mac probably has been instrumental in getting this blown up to full size and spending the extra coins to make it a legitimate field.Originally posted by oozie7:
Gotcha, that makes some sense. I think UGA's IPF is only like 60 yards or something. I remember looking at the pics and wondering what the point of building something that small was, it looked full when players were just stretching.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Something was already in the works in regards to the IPF, but it was only going to be 70 yards. McElwain demanded to make it a 120 yards otherwise he wasn't going to use it and told them just don't even bother building one if your not going to make it 120. McElwain has pushed for some other facilty upgrades that are happening. Muschamp just didn't know how to handle everything it takes to run a college football program. There is much much more responsibilities than just X's and O's for a head coach. Muschamp just didn't know how to run a program and how to go about things and getting things that were needed or wanted. It's just one more reason why I believe the coach at UF needs to be a head coach somewhere else before he cuts his teeth at UF. This job just isn't for 1st timers.Originally posted by oozie7:
Question because I don't know. But do you think we finally got upgrades because they believe in McElwain that much or was it something in the works? Because I remember Meyer wanting some, but I don't remember why it stalled. I could see a scenario where they wanted Muschamp to win big before committing, but then that wouldn't really make sense since McElwain is getting the upgrades before proving himself.
Now if only we could spend properly and get a retractable roof on it and have the surface as real grass, we'd be perfect.
I take offense at your suggestion that Muschamp's offense ever practiced. You're treading a fine line here buddy before a nice vacation...Originally posted by SeaPA:
Georgia's looks like an indoor racquetball court.
Foley did the right thing with you guys in waiting to build it. In 'champs offense, you didn't need a dedicated facility - the offense could practice by using the width of any standard hallway of any building in Gainesville.
With one of those clocks on the wall that you see in schools so Muss could monitor TOP.Originally posted by SeaPA:
Georgia's looks like an indoor racquetball court.
Foley did the right thing with you guys in waiting to build it. In 'champs offense, you didn't need a dedicated facility - the offense could practice by using the width of any standard hallway of any building in Gainesville.