ADVERTISEMENT

Huge NIL bomb just dropped if not changed...

Gator Fever

Bull Gator
Feb 13, 2008
27,479
10,512
113


Unless this is changed this just threw a huge wrench into the upcoming NIL plans.

I think the NCAA was going to allow teams to spend up to like 20 million a year out of revenues directly for NIL type payments to players. If this isn't changed that goes out the door probably as female sports not bringing much revenue in - sometimes negative profit will be demanding big payments. Should have known some crap like this would have been on the horizon and attempted.

They would be better off just ditching the plan instead of giving into this virtue signaling. Will hurt the lower big conference teams though competitively.
 


Unless this is changed this just threw a huge wrench into the upcoming NIL plans.

I think the NCAA was going to allow teams to spend up to like 20 million a year out of revenues directly for NIL type payments to players. If this isn't changed that goes out the door probably as female sports not bringing much revenue in - sometimes negative profit will be demanding big payments. Should have known some crap like this would have been on the horizon and attempted.

They would be better off just ditching the plan instead of giving into this virtue signaling. Will hurt the lower big conference teams though competitively.
No part of this is “virtual signaling.” It is guidance on how to comply with what the law requires. Save us the use of dramatic political buzzwords to mischaracterize the intent and purpose of what was issued.

Then take a breath and realize that on Monday this guidance will be rendered completely irrelevant and you will be able to unwad your panties…

Unless the Trump Administration wants to actually comply with what the law requires…lol…
 
No part of this is “virtual signaling.” It is guidance on how to comply with what the law requires. Save us the use of dramatic political buzzwords to mischaracterize the intent and purpose of what was issued.

Then take a breath and realize that on Monday this guidance will be rendered completely irrelevant and you will be able to unwad your panties…

Unless the Trump Administration wants to actually comply with what the law requires…lol…

It is virtue signaling 100% but if it isn't changed I guess one good thing is NIL for players won't get as crazy out of control as it would if the normal plan goes forward. Might as well make them professionals and let the better Canadian football players etc making way less money than many of these players despite being better overall come play as graduate students.
 
If this stands, it will simply accelerate the process of separating sports from schools. It won't be long before all sports programs have their own EIN and board and operate independently from the schools (wink wink), while the schools are leasing their name image and likeness to them. When the schools have no sports, no more title IX sports issues.
 
No part of this is “virtual signaling.” It is guidance on how to comply with what the law requires. Save us the use of dramatic political buzzwords to mischaracterize the intent and purpose of what was issued.

Unless the Trump Administration wants to actually comply with what the law requires…lol…
NIL, as much garbage as it is, is distributed based on revenue sharing that is generated by, and apportioned to the sports that funds it's very existence. 😂

200.gif
 
If the University is doling out $$$, then I think it’s a correct ruling…..but NIL collectives aren’t the University…. And they’ll determine the market demand. Not going to see the third ranked volleyball girl get the marketing demand of a top 10 wide out
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavigatorII
If the University is doling out $$$, then I think it’s a correct ruling…..but NIL collectives aren’t the University…. And they’ll determine the market demand. Not going to see the third ranked volleyball girl get the marketing demand of a top 10 wide out
Are you sure about that? Consider Liv Dunne. Or this volleyball player, Madison Nellman.

ag8bx0fu0ly91.jpg
 
  • Love
Reactions: Countygator1
If the University is doling out $$$, then I think it’s a correct ruling…..but NIL collectives aren’t the University…. And they’ll determine the market demand. Not going to see the third ranked volleyball girl get the marketing demand of a top 10 wide out

To me if it's held up this way it's BS. Giving opportunities to play sports is one thing but forcing how revenue might be given to athletes is another. It will get interesting if it's not scrapped.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT