Hey sheep, how outraged were yall when the cops pushed down that innocent 75 year old Buffalo man?

[Nolec]

There have been violence and assaults against LEO all across the country, as you well know. Again, why do dems always apologize for criminals?

And the video of the BLACK protestor telling slip n fall man to go away does speak to slip n fall man's motivations for being there.

Arrested over 300 times, 82 for inciting. But yeah. let's blame the LEOs LMAO!

Find me the Buffalo ordinance that states " due to violence and assaults against LEO all across the country" our officers may physically assault and hospitalize an elderly man, IF he has prior arrests for protesting and/or unpaid parking fines" Sadly how your overgeneralizations are your entire cognitive basis for argument. Funny old quote... Overgeneralizations are never accurate.

Please , mind reader, tell us what MG motivations for being there that you ascertain from a tape you can't produce.

Your last sentence still remains unproven by any credible source. Use OAN reporter Rouz, the Putin puppet maybe.

 

[goldmom]

Find me the Buffalo ordinance that states " due to violence and assaults against LEO all across the country" our officers may physically assault and hospitalize an elderly man, IF he has prior arrests for protesting and/or unpaid parking fines" Sadly how your overgeneralizations are your entire cognitive basis for argument. Funny old quote... Overgeneralizations are never accurate.

Please , mind reader, tell us what MG motivations for being there that you ascertain from a tape you can't produce.

Your last sentence still remains unproven by any credible source. Use OAN reporter Rouz, the Putin puppet maybe.

And the first sentence of your "retort" is silly.
You're either still pretty young, or you've not ever grown up. Over generalizations could be your middle name.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Find me the Buffalo ordinance that states " due to violence and assaults against LEO all across the country" our officers may physically assault and hospitalize an elderly man, IF he has prior arrests for protesting and/or unpaid parking fines" Sadly how your overgeneralizations are your entire cognitive basis for argument. Funny old quote... Overgeneralizations are never accurate.

Please , mind reader, tell us what MG motivations for being there that you ascertain from a tape you can't produce.

Your last sentence still remains unproven by any credible source. Use OAN reporter Rouz, the Putin puppet maybe.

My goodness you are bending over backwards to defend slip n fall criminal!

Let's see, over 300 arrests, 82 for inciting, caught on video attempting to incite, BLACK protestor tells him to GTFO, he then walks up to cops and starts waving something metal in their faces, and THEY are at fault for shoving him back?

Slip n fall man got what he wanted. Publicity and sheep to run with it and mischaracterize the incident as 'defenseless elderly man walks up to LEOs asking for help and they try to kill him'.

Again, why defend the criminal and demonize the LEOs? Is this just bad parenting? Most adults know that if you walk up to an adult and start waving a metal device in their faces (ie trying to incite) that there are CONSEQUENCES for doing so.

Were you one of these kids that screamed in Walmart for a star wars figure, and instead of spanking that bottom, your mommy tried to reason with you? "Oh please be quiet Bobby...people are watching....please don't cry!', so you screamed louder till mommy bought you the star wars doll to shut you up?

Is that what happened? Is that why you have no respect for LEOs?

 

[Nolec]

And the first sentence of your "retort" is silly.
You're either still pretty young, or you've not ever grown up. Over generalizations could be your middle name.

Of course, it was meant to be as silly as Ghost's position that a "criminal" like Gugino "had it coming"
Where did I make an overgeneralization?

 

[Nolec]

My goodness you are bending over backwards to defend slip n fall criminal!

Let's see, over 300 arrests, 82 for inciting, caught on video attempting to incite, BLACK protestor tells him to GTFO, he then walks up to cops and starts waving something metal in their faces, and THEY are at fault for shoving him back?

Slip n fall man got what he wanted. Publicity and sheep to run with it and mischaracterize the incident as 'defenseless elderly man walks up to LEOs asking for help and they try to kill him'.

Again, why defend the criminal and demonize the LEOs? Is this just bad parenting? Most adults know that if you walk up to an adult and start waving a metal device in their faces (ie trying to incite) that there are CONSEQUENCES for doing so.

Were you one of these kids that screamed in Walmart for a star wars figure, and instead of spanking that bottom, your mommy tried to reason with you? "Oh please be quiet Bobby...people are watching....please don't cry!', so you screamed louder till mommy bought you the star wars doll to shut you up?

Is that what happened? Is that why you have no respect for LEOs?

Please give a link to prove the 300 arrests or STFU on it. You contend that waving a cell phone at LEO in riot gear is asking to be put in the hospital, those two cops have been charged - proof that is is not acceptable.

Your last part is just drivel.

And the having no respect for LEO is not a valid conclusion from my concerns with LEO's that are not professional.

 

[instaGATOR]

The Nol-lic is a village idiot total waste of time.... ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Please give a link to prove the 300 arrests or STFU on it. You contend that waving a cell phone at LEO in riot gear is asking to be put in the hospital, those two cops have been charged - proof that is is not acceptable.

Your last part is just drivel.

And the having no respect for LEO is not a valid conclusion from my concerns with LEO's that are not professional.

I will not STFU about anything. You liberals want anyone that speaks the truth to STFU, scared to death that a few sheep might break away and educate themselves and find out you are FOS.

Check the pic in the OP. See your boy slip n fall man in orange suit? See him getting hauled off to jail?

There's your receipt. You defended a criminal and attacked the cops. Shame on you.

 

[Nolec]

I will not STFU about anything. You liberals want anyone that speaks the truth to STFU, scared to death that a few sheep might break away and educate themselves and find out you are FOS.

Check the pic in the OP. See your boy slip n fall man in orange suit? See him getting hauled off to jail?

There's your receipt. You defended a criminal and attacked the cops. Shame on you.

So Politifact has totally debunked your "supposed" source ( a random FB smear) about those 300 arrests. Turns out there were 4 arrests and.... ZERO convictions. So Gugino was not a criminal after all. So the two cops that assaulted him are now charged with crimes and he's not. Now you really want to claim that he "attacked" the line of 20+ LEO's in full tactical gear with his deadly android device? LMAO. Seems like you are ..... well the one FOS as you say. Perhaps a more erudite news source, better than FB, Twitter, OAN would place you in a more educated position.

 

[instaGATOR]

Nol-lic Village idiot confirmed yet again.... ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz

 

[BamaFan1137]

So Politifact has totally debunked your "supposed" source ( a random FB smear) about those 300 arrests. Turns out there were 4 arrests and.... ZERO convictions. So Gugino was not a criminal after all. So the two cops that assaulted him are now charged with crimes and he's not. Now you really want to claim that he "attacked" the line of 20+ LEO's in full tactical gear with his deadly android device? LMAO. Seems like you are ..... well the one FOS as you say. Perhaps a more erudite news source, better than FB, Twitter, OAN would place you in a more educated position.

The attacks on OAN are hilarious. You complain about its conservative slant but the opposite doesn't seem to bother you from CNN, MSNBC, ect. Does all news have to repeat your echo chamber bullshit to be legit? This makes you a hypocrite. You see that, don't you?

 

[Nolec]

Nol-lic Village idiot confirmed yet again.... ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz

Did you forget you made essentially the same juvenile post yesterday alien anal probe boy? No facts, no pertinent commentary, but the expected mindless post from the uninspired.
ZZZZZZZ .... I'm told that's alien for "Sir may I have another"

 

[BamaFan1137]

So Politifact has totally debunked your "supposed" source ( a random FB smear) about those 300 arrests. Turns out there were 4 arrests and.... ZERO convictions. So Gugino was not a criminal after all. So the two cops that assaulted him are now charged with crimes and he's not. Now you really want to claim that he "attacked" the line of 20+ LEO's in full tactical gear with his deadly android device? LMAO. Seems like you are ..... well the one FOS as you say. Perhaps a more erudite news source, better than FB, Twitter, OAN would place you in a more educated position.

Attack the police and defend people like Gugino to your hearts content. I've stated that I wouldn't have pushed him. Mind you I had time to consider what I would have done instead of reacting in the moment.

That said, he was ignoring a lawful order by law enforcement so he would have followed my command or he would have been moved. You don't get to debate lawful orders. If you wish to fight those orders, you do so in court or by lodging a complaint. We don't hold court on sidewalks in the middle of protests or riots. That's not how it works nor should it.

 

[Nolec]

The attacks on OAN are hilarious. You complain about its conservative slant but the opposite doesn't seem to bother you from CNN, MSNBC, ect. Does all news have to repeat your echo chamber bullshit to be legit? This makes you a hypocrite. You see that, don't you?

Interesting... my attacks on OAN, what were they? I pointed out the ex Putin propaganda reporters' work for OAN, but that was an easily made point of fact. Now I know impeachedpotus and Putin are real snuggle buddies so I did not think you'd find that to be an attack . So where's this attack BS about a conservative slant I posted? I prefer not to listen to Russian propaganda and you think that makes me a hypocrite? Do you only watch OAN? You enjoy the traitorous lies from them? The only other news source I've mentioned was the BBC, so your own closed mind jumped to the CNN, MSNBC stuff. So who was the hypocrite again?

 

[instaGATOR]

Did you forget you made essentially the same juvenile post yesterday alien anal probe boy? No facts, no pertinent commentary, but the expected mindless post from the uninspired.
ZZZZZZZ .... I'm told that's alien for "Sir may I have another"

You're just another stupid annoyance that I try to ignore, unless I'm just bored and feel like slappin' a twit village idiot. (like now)

Had I been that LEO, I'd have grabbed his arm, spun him around, and cuffed his ass before stuffing him in a vehicle headed for a jail cell. I wouldn't have given the life long inciter an opportunity to take a fake-flop from a slight push, which is what he was waiting for to do his flop.

PS
Liar, no OAN reporter was ever employed by Sputnik. They only published an economics article that was written by an OAN reporter.
Get your head outta your ass chump, Hillbillery has the Russian links, not Trump.

 

[Nolec]

Attack the police and defend people like Gugino to your hearts content. I've stated that I wouldn't have pushed him. Mind you I had time to consider what I would have done instead of reacting in the moment.

That said, he was ignoring a lawful order by law enforcement so he would have followed my command or he would have been moved. You don't get to debate lawful orders. If you wish to fight those orders, you do so in court or by lodging a complaint. We don't hold court on sidewalks in the middle of protests or riots. That's not how it works nor should it.

I agree, he could easily have been detained, even arrested, placed in a car and taken downtown.... all possibilities depending on the actual orders, and protocols at that scene.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Interesting... my attacks on OAN, what were they?

Ghost, according to you, needs to better educate himself with news sources other than OAN in your opinion. Stop being a shit....you were calling him stupid for watching OAN. So yea, that was the attack that I was referring to.

Do you only watch OAN?

I've stated on this board several times that I very rarely watch OAN. Hell I didn't even have access to it until May. Interestingly, one of the reasons that I checked it out was to see what all the outrage was about from you and your fellow libs.

I found it straightforward, monotone and a little boring....because they were essentially reading the news. Not sure that's a bad thing. It certainly felt less sensationalized than CNN, MSNBC and Fox.

 

[BamaFan1137]

I prefer not to listen to Russian propaganda and you think that makes me a hypocrite?

If you think OAN is Russian propaganda then maybe you should give it another look.

But let's be honest, you're never going to like OAN because you hate conservatism and prefer an echo chamber instead. Somehow you're more fulfilled by the sound of one hand clapping. I read and watch news from multiple sources and then I form my own opinion....hence educating myself. You should venture out and give that a try. Or not...your call.

 

[BamaFan1137]

I agree, he could easily have been detained, even arrested, placed in a car and taken downtown.... all possibilities depending on the actual orders, and protocols at that scene.

Agree. But that is very easily Monday morning quarterbacked from the comfy confines of our respective recliners. It's not as easy on scene in the heat of the moment...x100 if people are spitting on you, throwing shit at you or worse.

When you go to put "hands on" someone, you never know how they will react. If you're too forceful, well....you see what can happen. If you're not forceful enough, you can lose initiative and get your ass whipped. Or worse, you get your partner(s) hurt.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Interesting... my attacks on OAN, what were they? I pointed out the ex Putin propaganda reporters' work for OAN, but that was an easily made point of fact. Now I know impeachedpotus and Putin are real snuggle buddies so I did not think you'd find that to be an attack . So where's this attack BS about a conservative slant I posted? I prefer not to listen to Russian propaganda and you think that makes me a hypocrite? Do you only watch OAN? You enjoy the traitorous lies from them? The only other news source I've mentioned was the BBC, so your own closed mind jumped to the CNN, MSNBC stuff. So who was the hypocrite again?

The scary part is your think the BBC is fair and balanced. They are as loony left as CNN and MNSBC.

 

[BamaFan1137]

It certainly felt less sensationalized than CNN, MSNBC and Fox.

Add the BBC to that list.

You enjoy the traitorous lies from them?

Can you give me an example of a traitorous lie from OAN? Serious question...because I'd like to know.

I believe I can give you examples of traitorous lies from the left....but not the BBC. Not sure it would be fair to call the British Broadcasting Corporation traitorous....since it's British, haha.

 

[Nolec]

The scary part is your think the BBC is fair and balanced. They are as loony left as CNN and MNSBC.

What is scary is your allergy to known facts. Google any media bias chart. I'll wait

 

[Nolec]

Add the BBC to that list.



Can you give me an example of a traitorous lie from OAN? Serious question...because I'd like to know.

I believe I can give you examples of traitorous lies from the left....but not the BBC. Not sure it would be fair to call the British Broadcasting Corporation traitorous....since it's British, haha.

See post # 28. Google K. Rouz. And done.

 

[Nolec]

If you think OAN is Russian propaganda then maybe you should give it another look.

But let's be honest, you're never going to like OAN because you hate conservatism and prefer an echo chamber instead. Somehow you're more fulfilled by the sound of one hand clapping. I read and watch news from multiple sources and then I form my own opinion....hence educating myself. You should venture out and give that a try. Or not...your call.

Why claim "let's be honest", then proceed to dishonestly state I "hate conservatism and prefer" ? Since I am the poster this thread that has discussed multiple news sources, trying to get Ghost to disclose his, where do you see I don't do exactly as you claim you do?

 

[BamaFan1137]

See post # 28. Google K. Rouz. And done.

Post #28?

Here's an idea....why not just say what you're referring to or link it.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Why claim "let's be honest", then proceed to dishonestly state I "hate conservatism and prefer" ? Since I am the poster this thread that has discussed multiple news sources, trying to get Ghost to disclose his, where do you see I don't do exactly as you claim you do?

Pretty sure I hit the nail on the head.

If you think OAN is Russian propaganda, as you've stated, how could anyone assume otherwise? As little as I've watched OAN, even I have seen reports from them that were critical of Putin and Russia. Maybe they just suck at propaganda.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Can you give me an example of a traitorous lie from OAN? Serious question...because I'd like to know.

Bump

 

[Nolec]

Bump

Kristian Rouz . See post # 28. Try Politifact on his OAN report.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

What is scary is your allergy to known facts. Google any media bias chart. I'll wait

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bbc/

"LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation."

Was that quick enough for you?

 

[BamaFan1137]

Kristian Rouz . See post # 28. Try Politifact on his OAN report.

Popular cable news networks are having a helluva day in court against libel suits. On Friday, hours after CNN scored a victory in Virginia, MSNBC took home its own triumph in California.

The suit came from Herring Networks, the owner of One America News Network (OAN), the subject of a Daily Beast story headlined "Trump’s New Favorite Channel Employs Kremlin-Paid Journalist.” The article reported that OAN's Kristian Rouz was writing for Sputnik, a Kremlin-owned news wire.

On her show that night, Rachel Maddow commented, "We literally learned today that that outlet the President is promoting shares staff with the Kremlin. I mean, what?... 'n this case, the most obsequiously pro-Trump right wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda. Their on-air U.S. politics reporter is paid by the Russian government to produce propaganda for that government."

The characterization of "Russian propaganda" landed Maddow, MSNBC and Comcast in court to face a $10 million libel action, but on Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Cynthia Bashant exercises California's SLAPP law and rejects Herring's suit as a frivolous one impinging First Amendment activity.

Bashant sees the threshold question as whether the objectionable statement is opinion or fact.

Here, the judge first notes the broad context.

"Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news," states the opinion. "The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news. Therefore, the Court finds that the medium of the alleged defamatory statement makes it more likely that a reasonable viewer would not conclude that the contested statement implies an assertion of objective fact."

Next, the judge looks at the specific context from Maddow's use of the word "literally" — "use of the word can be hyperbolic," according to opinion — to the news host's presentation of the Daily Beast article and failure to mention that Rouz lacked decision-making authority at OAN and was merely a freelancer for Sputnik. Bashant says it doesn't matter. Not all facts must be presented.

More from the opinion:

"Here, Maddow had inserted her own colorful commentary into and throughout the segment, laughing, expressing her dismay (i.e., saying 'I mean, what?') and calling the segment a 'sparkly story' and one we must 'take in stride.' For her to exaggerate the facts and call OAN Russian propaganda was consistent with her tone up to that point, and the Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context. The context of Maddow’s statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be her opinion. A reasonable viewer would not actually think OAN is paid Russian propaganda, instead, he or she would follow the facts of the Daily Beast article; that OAN and Sputnik share a reporter and both pay this reporter to write articles. Anything beyond this is Maddow’s opinion or her exaggeration of the facts."



So, in other words, Maddow won her suit because everyone knows her show is all about opinion and nothing to do with facts. LMAO, I couldn't have said it better myself.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Kristian Rouz . See post # 28. Try Politifact on his OAN report.

Ok, I tried. No idea what post #28 refers to and there's no way I'm going to reference Politifact to determine whether or not to trust OAN. Similarly, I'm assuming that you don't use Breitbart to determine if BBC is newsworthy.

 

[gatordad3]

Ok, I tried. No idea what post #28 refers to and there's no way I'm going to reference Politifact to determine whether or not to trust OAN. Similarly, I'm assuming that you don't use Breitbart to determine if BBC is newsworthy.

My beef with Breitbart is seeing one too many articles about celebrities with TDS.

 

[Nolec]

Popular cable news networks are having a helluva day in court against libel suits. On Friday, hours after CNN scored a victory in Virginia, MSNBC took home its own triumph in California.

The suit came from Herring Networks, the owner of One America News Network (OAN), the subject of a Daily Beast story headlined "Trump’s New Favorite Channel Employs Kremlin-Paid Journalist.” The article reported that OAN's Kristian Rouz was writing for Sputnik, a Kremlin-owned news wire.

On her show that night, Rachel Maddow commented, "We literally learned today that that outlet the President is promoting shares staff with the Kremlin. I mean, what?... 'n this case, the most obsequiously pro-Trump right wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda. Their on-air U.S. politics reporter is paid by the Russian government to produce propaganda for that government."

The characterization of "Russian propaganda" landed Maddow, MSNBC and Comcast in court to face a $10 million libel action, but on Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Cynthia Bashant exercises California's SLAPP law and rejects Herring's suit as a frivolous one impinging First Amendment activity.

Bashant sees the threshold question as whether the objectionable statement is opinion or fact.

Here, the judge first notes the broad context.

"Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news," states the opinion. "The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news. Therefore, the Court finds that the medium of the alleged defamatory statement makes it more likely that a reasonable viewer would not conclude that the contested statement implies an assertion of objective fact."

Next, the judge looks at the specific context from Maddow's use of the word "literally" — "use of the word can be hyperbolic," according to opinion — to the news host's presentation of the Daily Beast article and failure to mention that Rouz lacked decision-making authority at OAN and was merely a freelancer for Sputnik. Bashant says it doesn't matter. Not all facts must be presented.

More from the opinion:

"Here, Maddow had inserted her own colorful commentary into and throughout the segment, laughing, expressing her dismay (i.e., saying 'I mean, what?') and calling the segment a 'sparkly story' and one we must 'take in stride.' For her to exaggerate the facts and call OAN Russian propaganda was consistent with her tone up to that point, and the Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context. The context of Maddow’s statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be her opinion. A reasonable viewer would not actually think OAN is paid Russian propaganda, instead, he or she would follow the facts of the Daily Beast article; that OAN and Sputnik share a reporter and both pay this reporter to write articles. Anything beyond this is Maddow’s opinion or her exaggeration of the facts."



So, in other words, Maddow won her suit because everyone knows her show is all about opinion and nothing to do with facts. LMAO, I couldn't have said it better myself.

Thanks, so when I stated that OAN and Sputknik news share that reporter.... you proved me correct.

 

[Nolec]

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bbc/

"LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation."

Was that quick enough for you?

Using your link: states BBC is HIGHLY FACTUAL. Is accused of leaning right and left because is close to center. So you just proved yourself wrong when you posted " They are as loony left as CNN and MSNBC"
Your own link states that's not correct. lol

 

[BamaFan1137]

Thanks, so when I stated that OAN and Sputknik news share that reporter.... you proved me correct.

I never said otherwise. So congrats on winning the argument that we never had.

Of course you missed the point of my post...on purpose.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Using your link: states BBC is HIGHLY FACTUAL. Is accused of leaning right and left because is close to center. So you just proved yourself wrong when you posted " They are as loony left as CNN and MSNBC"
Your own link states that's not correct. lol

I do watch BBC sometimes, more often than OAN btw, and there's no way in hell that I would refer to them as right leaning....ever. Calling them centrist is a stretch but they are less ridiculous than most MSM.

The British press reporting on British news is beyond offensive. Every time BLM clashes with "right wing extremists" they fully place the blame on the right and refer to BLM as peaceful protesters...even if their own story confirms the opposite.

One of the stories I read today about the black man who carried the white man to safety (kudos to him) referred to BLM as peaceful protesters in the same paragraph where the hero of this story admitted that BLM protesters continued to beat the guy on his shoulder as he carried him to safety. So yea....super peaceful.

 

[IrishPokerDog]

I do watch BBC sometimes, more often than OAN btw, and there's no way in hell that I would refer to them as right leaning....ever. Calling them centrist is a stretch but they are less ridiculous than most MSM.

The British press reporting on British news is beyond offensive. Every time BLM clashes with "right wing extremists" they fully place the blame on the right and refer to BLM as peaceful protesters...even if their own story confirms the opposite.

One of the stories I read today about the black man who carried the white man to safety (kudos to him) referred to BLM as peaceful protesters in the same paragraph where the hero of this story admitted that BLM protesters continued to beat the guy on his shoulder as he carried him to safety. So yea....super peaceful.

Protesters must be taking notes from Islam, the religion of peace, for their peacefulness

 

[instaGATOR]

What is scary is your allergy to known facts. Google any media bias chart. I'll wait

And this is only the very tip of the ICEBERG you ignorant twit....

Google’s “left-wing bias has alienated its own workers” - Ave ...
avemariaradio.net/googles-left-wing-bias...
Internet giant Google has been accused by one of its own employees of ‘alienating conservatives’ with its politically correct left-wing bias. A senior software engineer at the company claimed in a document that was distributed to colleagues that right-wing employees were forced to keep their views ‘in the closet’ to avoid hostility….

Google Fires Republican Engineer Who Exposed Alleged Bias ...
www.westernjournal.com/google-fires-republican...
The lawsuit claims that Google is biased against conservatives, men, white people and Asian people. Wacker began his salvos against Google on May 21 with a post on Medium. “Google has become a company where outrage mobs and witch hunts dominate its culture,” he wrote.

Google denies Left-wing bias after leaked clip of co-founder ...
www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/09/13/google...
Google has denied that a leaked video showing its co-founder expressing his disappointment that Donald Trump had been elected as US president suggested that there was any political bias built into ...

Google under fire for dubbing 'Unplanned' film ... - Fox News
www.foxnews.com/tech/google-slammed-labeling-pro...
Google is the latest tech giant to be accused of bias against the newly released pro-life film “Unplanned,” with the search engine listing the movie as “propaganda.”

Google's Leftist Goggles Leave Googlers Agog - Townhall
townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/2017/08/09/...
But Google isn't just liberal; it's leftist. It's so leftist that its vice president of Diversity, Integrity & Governance, Danielle Brown, participated in a public scourging of an unnamed Google ...

Google under fire for listing 'Nazism' as the ideology of the ...
www.foxnews.com/tech/google-under-fire-for...
Google results show Republican ideology as ‘Nazism’ Google came under fire after listing ‘Nazism’ as the ideology of the California Republican Party.

Facebook, Google, YouTube All Discriminate ... - National Review
www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/social-media...
Twitter head Jack Dorsey is an ardent leftist who has campaigned with radicals like DeRay Mckesson, and whose company relies on the input of an Orwellian Trust and Safety Council staffed ...

I Confronted Google About Its Liberal Groupthink At A ...
www.investors.com/politics/commentary/i...
In the name of diversity, Google just killed diversity. While that may sound like a sentence out of a Lewis Carroll novel, it's the stark reality of the modern-day liberal groupthink that pervades ...

Why is Google so liberal? Are you? - Quora
www.quora.com/Why-is-Google-so-liberal-Are-you
Google also owns YouTube, which has recently come under fire for censoring and demonetizing conservatives at a far greater rate than it does liberals. Even a respectful conservative YouTuber runs the very real risk of being demonetized for voicing their beliefs.

So,,, I've got your GOOGLE swingin' nol-lic....

=====

Under siege, the 'biased’ BBC fights for its life - Telegraph
www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/11273925/...
Under siege, the 'biased’ BBC fights for its life The corporation is under fire for over-generous salaries and its soft-Left sympathies Neil Midgley, graphic by Tom Shiel

 

[Nolec]

And this is only the very tip of the ICEBERG you ignorant twit....

Google’s “left-wing bias has alienated its own workers” - Ave ...
avemariaradio.net/googles-left-wing-bias...
Internet giant Google has been accused by one of its own employees of ‘alienating conservatives’ with its politically correct left-wing bias. A senior software engineer at the company claimed in a document that was distributed to colleagues that right-wing employees were forced to keep their views ‘in the closet’ to avoid hostility….

Google Fires Republican Engineer Who Exposed Alleged Bias ...
www.westernjournal.com/google-fires-republican...
The lawsuit claims that Google is biased against conservatives, men, white people and Asian people. Wacker began his salvos against Google on May 21 with a post on Medium. “Google has become a company where outrage mobs and witch hunts dominate its culture,” he wrote.

Google denies Left-wing bias after leaked clip of co-founder ...
www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/09/13/google...
Google has denied that a leaked video showing its co-founder expressing his disappointment that Donald Trump had been elected as US president suggested that there was any political bias built into ...

Google under fire for dubbing 'Unplanned' film ... - Fox News
www.foxnews.com/tech/google-slammed-labeling-pro...
Google is the latest tech giant to be accused of bias against the newly released pro-life film “Unplanned,” with the search engine listing the movie as “propaganda.”

Google's Leftist Goggles Leave Googlers Agog - Townhall
townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/2017/08/09/...
But Google isn't just liberal; it's leftist. It's so leftist that its vice president of Diversity, Integrity & Governance, Danielle Brown, participated in a public scourging of an unnamed Google ...

Google under fire for listing 'Nazism' as the ideology of the ...
www.foxnews.com/tech/google-under-fire-for...
Google results show Republican ideology as ‘Nazism’ Google came under fire after listing ‘Nazism’ as the ideology of the California Republican Party.

Facebook, Google, YouTube All Discriminate ... - National Review
www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/social-media...
Twitter head Jack Dorsey is an ardent leftist who has campaigned with radicals like DeRay Mckesson, and whose company relies on the input of an Orwellian Trust and Safety Council staffed ...

I Confronted Google About Its Liberal Groupthink At A ...
www.investors.com/politics/commentary/i...
In the name of diversity, Google just killed diversity. While that may sound like a sentence out of a Lewis Carroll novel, it's the stark reality of the modern-day liberal groupthink that pervades ...

Why is Google so liberal? Are you? - Quora
www.quora.com/Why-is-Google-so-liberal-Are-you
Google also owns YouTube, which has recently come under fire for censoring and demonetizing conservatives at a far greater rate than it does liberals. Even a respectful conservative YouTuber runs the very real risk of being demonetized for voicing their beliefs.

So,,, I've got your GOOGLE swingin' nol-lic....

=====

Under siege, the 'biased’ BBC fights for its life - Telegraph
www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/11273925/...
Under siege, the 'biased’ BBC fights for its life The corporation is under fire for over-generous salaries and its soft-Left sympathies Neil Midgley, graphic by Tom Shiel

You soft -witted senile , alien anal probe boy.... get someone with at least a little bit of reading comp. to explain that the OP and I were discussing his statement claiming the BBC was on the "loony left with CNN and MSNBC". Then have them show you the last sentence of your rant where you prove MY POINT with "soft-left sympathies" OMG you're hilarious!

 

[BamaFan1137]

Then have them show you the last sentence of your rant where you prove MY POINT with "soft-left sympathies" OMG you're hilarious

Wait....what do you think "soft left" means in regards to British politics?

 

[instaGATOR]

You soft -witted senile , alien anal probe boy.... get someone with at least a little bit of reading comp. to explain that the OP and I were discussing his statement claiming the BBC was on the "loony left with CNN and MSNBC". Then have them show you the last sentence of your rant where you prove MY POINT with "soft-left sympathies" OMG you're hilarious!

While you're just inept and boring as always.
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz