ADVERTISEMENT

Hey sheep, can we hear more about how Trump is bad for America?

wait, its a tweet, @LizardGrad89 says we shouldn’t believe tweets, but it’s linked to an actual article from yahoo. Damnit. What do I do now?
Here are the rules, and I'm embarrassed I have to type them out for you.

Rule 1 - MSM is good.
Rule 2 - FoxNews isn't MSM yet, unless they bash Trump then extra good b/c it means NO ONE likes Trump.
Rule 3 - Twitter is bad. Unless it links to someone in Rule 1, then good. Unless that article is bad for Dems, then ignore.

I've seen these rules applied many, many times on this board.
 
Here are the rules, and I'm embarrassed I have to type them out for you.

Rule 1 - MSM is good.
Rule 2 - FoxNews isn't MSM yet, unless they bash Trump then extra good b/c it means NO ONE likes Trump.
Rule 3 - Twitter is bad. Unless it links to someone in Rule 1, then good. Unless that article is bad for Dems, then ignore.

I've seen these rules applied many, many times on this board.
This is as hard to follow as the genders created everyday
 
I think this is old news. And for what it’s worth, I’ve always been opposed to supplying arms to unsavory groups with the justification of “the other guys are even worse.”

It always backfires. It backfired with the Mujahadeen. It It backfired with the School of America. It backfired with Iraq, etc. I guess you could argue that it worked with the USSR in World War II, but that was a legitimately desperate situation.
 
I think this is old news. And for what it’s worth, I’ve always been opposed to supplying arms to unsavory groups with the justification of “the other guys are even worse.”

It always backfires. It backfired with the Mujahadeen. It It backfired with the School of America. It backfired with Iraq, etc. I guess you could argue that it worked with the USSR in World War II, but that was a legitimately desperate situation.

I think it can go either way...if you make a sane decision on the front end.
 
I think this is old news. And for what it’s worth, I’ve always been opposed to supplying arms to unsavory groups with the justification of “the other guys are even worse.”

It always backfires. It backfired with the Mujahadeen. It It backfired with the School of America. It backfired with Iraq, etc. I guess you could argue that it worked with the USSR in World War II, but that was a legitimately desperate situation.

looks to me like they just released the results of the investigation. Let the outrage begin
 
I think this is old news. And for what it’s worth, I’ve always been opposed to supplying arms to unsavory groups with the justification of “the other guys are even worse.”

It always backfires. It backfired with the Mujahadeen. It It backfired with the School of America. It backfired with Iraq, etc. I guess you could argue that it worked with the USSR in World War II, but that was a legitimately desperate situation.
Regardless of this being old news, if this is truly what happened then this is treason by definition. You’re selling weapons to the very people who kill our soldiers.

This is conspiring with a foreign government/group to hurt the US.
 
Regardless of this being old news, if this is truly what happened then this is treason by definition. You’re selling weapons to the very people who kill our soldiers.

This is conspiring with a foreign government/group to hurt the US.

That was my first thought as well. The fact that this is going nowhere tells you how corrupt DC really is.

None of us have any true idea just what Trump is fighting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillCutting4585
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT