GA Election Update

[fatman76]

The legal team fighting to unseal the ballots and pave the way for a forensic audit is now 5-0 in court. There's another 30 day response window for the defendants, but it's getting closer to another AZ with this ruling. Ruby and her daughter have to be sweating bullets.

Exclusive: IT Specialist Garland Favorito Responds to Judge Amero’s Ruling - A Big Win for Us

Exclusive: Garland Favorito Responds to Judge Amero’s Ruling - A Big Win for Us

rumble.com

“We are pleased that the court has ruled in our favor again for the fifth time. The ruling substitutes Defendants by replacing currently named government organizations with individual board members we named as defendants originally in our lawsuit. It also moots the Don Samuels’ attempt to dismiss our case. This continues the string of victories we have had in obtaining the original protective order, conditional approval to inspect ballots, access to ballot images, and the order to unseal the ballots.”

 

[jfegaly]

The legal team fighting to unseal the ballots and pave the way for a forensic audit is now 5-0 in court. There's another 30 day response window for the defendants, but it's getting closer to another AZ with this ruling. Ruby and her daughter have to be sweating bullets.

Exclusive: IT Specialist Garland Favorito Responds to Judge Amero’s Ruling - A Big Win for Us

Exclusive: Garland Favorito Responds to Judge Amero’s Ruling - A Big Win for Us

rumble.com

“We are pleased that the court has ruled in our favor again for the fifth time. The ruling substitutes Defendants by replacing currently named government organizations with individual board members we named as defendants originally in our lawsuit. It also moots the Don Samuels’ attempt to dismiss our case. This continues the string of victories we have had in obtaining the original protective order, conditional approval to inspect ballots, access to ballot images, and the order to unseal the ballots.”

But @sadgator told us the forensic audit was done. Maybe libbys need to find some new sources for news

 

[NavigatorII]

And most of us will ask this question again...........what are Georgia election officials afraid of and fighting an audit tooth and nail?

 

[fatman76]

But @sadgator told us the forensic audit was done. Maybe libbys need to find some new sources for news

We've also been told that those litigating against election fraud are 0-60.

So far cases heard on the merits are tracking at about 70% for the plaintiff.

 

[fatman76]

And most of us will ask this question again...........what are Georgia election officials afraid of and fighting an audit tooth and nail?

It’s also happening in MI

Wow! President Trump Rips Michigan RINOs Shirkey and McBroom for Preventing Audit and Going After Patriots Who Challenged Results | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

On Thursday 100 Percent Fed Up reported on the recent election developments in Michigan — In a ridiculous report released on Wednesday, two leading Republicans say they found no evidence of fraud in the 2020 election even though a forensic audit has not been done and is the only way to prove...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[instaGATOR]

Ruby and her daughter have to be sweating bullets.

Corrupt Stacey Abrams and her crooked Judge sister, should join Ruby and her daughter in a Georgia Prison.
=====

Talk about a conflict of interest.

On Monday, a U.S. District Court Judge (Leslie Abrams Gardner) blocked 2 Georgia counties from removing roughly 4,000 “targeted voters” from the rolls in the upcoming U.S. Senate runoff election.

The voters allegedly had moved out of the county, therefore making their votes illegal.

Election boards in each county had approved to remove the contested voters from the rolls.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

We've also been told that those litigating against election fraud are 0-60.

So far cases heard on the merits are tracking at about 70% for the plaintiff.

That was @Uniformed_ReRe, who ran with misinformation from the dem lead counsel. We tried to tell him that he was being hoodwinked, but he would hear none of it. @Nolec got conned as well.

If I recall correctly, both of them claimed that losses meant the cases had no merit. By that logic, the fact that these cases keep winning means these cases DO have merit.

Sorry boys, the audits go forward. If your party didn't cheat, then you have nothing to worry about.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

But @sadgator told us the forensic audit was done. Maybe libbys need to find some new sources for news

Yes, and @sadgator told us there as 'clearly no evidence' of cheating.

Did I mention sad is the most ignorant poster here?

Keep watching...

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

And most of us will ask this question again...........what are Georgia election officials afraid of and fighting an audit tooth and nail?

Is this how someone innocent acts?

'count every vote' has become 'audit every vote'.

@LizardGrad89 getting run over every day by the karma train is a beautiful thing to see.

 

[sadgator]

If you think the GA case was a “big win,” then you don’t understand what the ruling from the court was…dismissed most of the case…allowed P to substitute parties which may lead to an inspection/examination right, but no audit as you are proclaiming…no substantive ruling on any “cheating” at all. Congratulations. Clarence Darrows, you guys ain’t….

 

[sadgator]

Here you can read the proper summary of why you’re completely wrong…and about the prior audits and hand recount there…you’ll attack the source, of course, but it’s a dead on summary of the ruling…

remember when ya’ll were completely off-base and incorrect thinking the Supreme Court was about to render a decision on the Trump campaign case that was gonna be “something…”. Yeah…kinda like that….

Have at it boys….

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ed-fraudulent-absentee-ballots-fulton-county/

 

[BlueEyedGator17]

Here you can read the proper summary of why you’re completely wrong…and about the prior audits and hand recount there…you’ll attack the source, of course, but it’s a dead on summary of the ruling…

remember when ya’ll were completely off-base and incorrect thinking the Supreme Court was about to render a decision on the Trump campaign case that was gonna be “something…”. Yeah…kinda like that….

Have at it boys….

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ed-fraudulent-absentee-ballots-fulton-county/

Omg. Someone is really using the Washington post as a reference!!! Lololo

 

[fatman76]

Here you can read the proper summary of why you’re completely wrong…and about the prior audits and hand recount there…you’ll attack the source, of course, but it’s a dead on summary of the ruling…

remember when ya’ll were completely off-base and incorrect thinking the Supreme Court was about to render a decision on the Trump campaign case that was gonna be “something…”. Yeah…kinda like that….

Have at it boys….

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ed-fraudulent-absentee-ballots-fulton-county/

The article says Favorito couldn’t be reached Thursday for comment. Link I posted is his comment...on Thursday. 😆

Am I a better investigative journalist than Amy Wang at the WaPo?

The other thing she got wrong is that the door being closed to high resolution reviews of unsealed ballots...that ruling (ability to unseal ballots) was already made by the judge and the defendants weren't even challenging that. They were filing a motion to dismiss and that motion was dismissed yesterday. They also solidified the right to review ballot images.

Quick recap of how this case has progressed in favor of the Plaintiffs:
- Protective order on the sealed ballots (which Raffensberger may have violated)
- Conditional approval to review ballots
- Approval to review ballot images
- Approval to unseal ballots for an audit
And yesterday, a ruling on the technicality surrounding sovereign immunity (in other words, the suit now names specific board members that were originally named by the plaintiffs - instead of gov't entities) and a refusal to dismiss the overall case

I don't know exactly the "7 of 9" elements WaPo is referring to as being thrown out, but the most important elements related to a digital forensic audit like in AZ are all intact and taking place, and the judge seems pretty favorable to the plaintiffs claims to this point. Favorito even mentioned they are starting the planning phase of the audit using AZ as a template based on this victory.

So you can read the WaPo article and feel really good about what you want to happen here, or you can do your own research and seek out facts and try to get the real story. It's 100% your call.

 

[fatman76]

Omg. Someone is really using the Washington post as a reference!!! Lololo

Dude that paper lost all credibility so long ago...even before Bezos. I knew the second I saw the link I'd be able to dismantle it in a few minutes.

It's pretty but it's not "news".

 

[sadgator]

Knew it. Did…cited it as a proper summary. We’ll see…again…

 

[fatman76]

Knew it. Did…cited it as a proper summary. We’ll see…again…

But it was neither proper nor a summary?

She didn't mention the previous rulings in any detail. The little she did say about the previous rulings by the judge was 100% factually incorrect.

She didn't even say anywhere in the article that the defendant's motion to dismiss the entire case was denied.

It's just lazy, biased, shit journalism.

 

[BillCutting4585]

But it was neither proper nor a summary?

She didn't mention the previous rulings in any detail. The little she did say about the previous rulings by the judge was 100% factually incorrect.

She didn't even say anywhere in the article that the defendant's motion to dismiss the entire case was denied.

It's just lazy, biased, shit journalism.

Is there any other kind these days? 😂😂😂

 

[jfegaly]

Here you can read the proper summary of why you’re completely wrong…and about the prior audits and hand recount there…you’ll attack the source, of course, but it’s a dead on summary of the ruling…

remember when ya’ll were completely off-base and incorrect thinking the Supreme Court was about to render a decision on the Trump campaign case that was gonna be “something…”. Yeah…kinda like that….

Have at it boys….

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ed-fraudulent-absentee-ballots-fulton-county/

There was NO forensic audit of ballots. I repeat, NO forensic audit of ballots. Agreed?

 

[BCSpell]

Dude that paper lost all credibility so long ago...even before Bezos. I knew the second I saw the link I'd be able to dismantle it in a few minutes.

It's pretty but it's not "news".

The Washington Post is still claiming Trump/Russia colussion.

 

[sadgator]

There was NO forensic audit of ballots. I repeat, NO forensic audit of ballots. Agreed?

sadgator’s guessing you don’t even know that a “forensic” audit would entail…but given GA’s voting laws and system, a “forensic” audit is not even possible…even if the Plaintiff’s were to be granted the ballot access they are seeking in this case…

carry on…

3.5 years…

 

[fatman76]

sadgator’s guessing you don’t even know that a “forensic” audit would entail…but given GA’s voting laws and system, a “forensic” audit is not even possible…even if the Plaintiff’s were to be granted the ballot access they are seeking in this case…

carry on…

3.5 years…

I tried to explain to you what a forensic audit looks like. It’s very possible and it is not complicated at all (perhaps the software/hardware review of the machines is, but the ballots are very simple).

And the judge has authorized unsealing of the ballots in GA.

We have a 30 day response period and after that, depending upon the defendant’s response, we could see what it looks like in GA too.

 

[NavigatorII]

sadgator’s guessing you don’t even know that a “forensic” audit would entail…but given GA’s voting laws and system, a “forensic” audit is not even possible…even if the Plaintiff’s were to be granted the ballot access they are seeking in this case…

carry on…

3.5 years…

We're not even close to Mueller-esque time length inquiries. Buckle up pilgrim.......it's only just begun.

 

[jfegaly]

sadgator’s guessing you don’t even know that a “forensic” audit would entail…but given GA’s voting laws and system, a “forensic” audit is not even possible…even if the Plaintiff’s were to be granted the ballot access they are seeking in this case…

carry on…

3.5 years…

Good grief. It’s very possible and has been explained numerous times.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Here you can read the proper summary of why you’re completely wrong…and about the prior audits and hand recount there…you’ll attack the source, of course, but it’s a dead on summary of the ruling…

remember when ya’ll were completely off-base and incorrect thinking the Supreme Court was about to render a decision on the Trump campaign case that was gonna be “something…”. Yeah…kinda like that….

Have at it boys….

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ed-fraudulent-absentee-ballots-fulton-county/

The Washington Post. Sheep live to be hoodwinked.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

The article says Favorito couldn’t be reached Thursday for comment. Link I posted is his comment...on Thursday. 😆

Am I a better investigative journalist than Amy Wang at the WaPo?

The other thing she got wrong is that the door being closed to high resolution reviews of unsealed ballots...that ruling (ability to unseal ballots) was already made by the judge and the defendants weren't even challenging that. They were filing a motion to dismiss and that motion was dismissed yesterday. They also solidified the right to review ballot images.

Quick recap of how this case has progressed in favor of the Plaintiffs:
- Protective order on the sealed ballots (which Raffensberger may have violated)
- Conditional approval to review ballots
- Approval to review ballot images
- Approval to unseal ballots for an audit
And yesterday, a ruling on the technicality surrounding sovereign immunity (in other words, the suit now names specific board members that were originally named by the plaintiffs - instead of gov't entities) and a refusal to dismiss the overall case

I don't know exactly the "7 of 9" elements WaPo is referring to as being thrown out, but the most important elements related to a digital forensic audit like in AZ are all intact and taking place, and the judge seems pretty favorable to the plaintiffs claims to this point. Favorito even mentioned they are starting the planning phase of the audit using AZ as a template based on this victory.

So you can read the WaPo article and feel really good about what you want to happen here, or you can do your own research and seek out facts and try to get the real story. It's 100% your call.

@sadgator read it cause it told him what he wanted to hear. Took you 30 seconds to destroy the entire premise of the article.

The fact that he was proud of it as if it was a gotcha article is beyond sad. Pun intended.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

But it was neither proper nor a summary?

She didn't mention the previous rulings in any detail. The little she did say about the previous rulings by the judge was 100% factually incorrect.

She didn't even say anywhere in the article that the defendant's motion to dismiss the entire case was denied.

It's just lazy, biased, shit journalism.

But it completely fooled @sadgator. Let that sink in.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

The Washington Post is still claiming Trump/Russia colussion.

So is @sadgator.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I tried to explain to you what a forensic audit looks like. It’s very possible and it is not complicated at all (perhaps the software/hardware review of the machines is, but the ballots are very simple).

And the judge has authorized unsealing of the ballots in GA.

We have a 30 day response period and after that, depending upon the defendant’s response, we could see what it looks like in GA too.

Plus if the machines were connected to the internet, that is another smoking gun for the audit.

@sadgator is gonna need a LOT of consoling from The Washington Post to get him through this.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Good grief. It’s very possible and has been explained numerous times.

@sadgator saying it's not possible makes the dems who are so desperately trying to stop it look guilty as hell. Is he not smart enough to follow his own spin?

 

[sadgator]

How’d the Supreme Court and inauguration thing work out for you Ghost?…sadgator’s like 3-0 on this Board on legal case predictions, so you might wanna be a little more cautious in your criticism…in any event…good luck with the audits…sadgator is sure Trump will be reinstated any moment now…

3.5…

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

How’d the Supreme Court and inauguration thing work out for you Ghost?…sadgator’s like 3-0 on this Board on legal case predictions, so you might wanna be a little more cautious in your criticism…in any event…good luck with the audits…sadgator is sure Trump will be reinstated any moment now…

3.5…

Supreme Court, you said that ended this, right?

Inauguration, you said that ended this, right?

Remind us, what were you supposed to have gotten right? You said this was all over half a year ago and your guy had cheated his way into the WH.

Done deal, remember that?

6 months later, we're just getting started.

Keep watching...

 

[grandhavendiddy]

That was @Uniformed_ReRe, who ran with misinformation from the dem lead counsel. We tried to tell him that he was being hoodwinked, but he would hear none of it. @Nolec got conned as well.

If I recall correctly, both of them claimed that losses meant the cases had no merit. By that logic, the fact that these cases keep winning means these cases DO have merit.

Sorry boys, the audits go forward. If your party didn't cheat, then you have nothing to worry about.

As they should. Lets get data on whether mail in voting and other create systematic fraud.

 

[sadgator]

Done deal, remember that?

“Big One” remember that?

https://florida.forums.rivals.com/threads/baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-boob-errr-boom.96930/

 

[jfegaly]

Dims are scared to death of an audit. Why?

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

As they should. Lets get data on whether mail in voting and other create systematic fraud.

Nah, let's do a forensic audit of the machines and ballots,

You know, cause the goal is to tell if there was actual cheating. Legit forensic audits of the machine and ballots can clear it up immediately.

Likely why the dems are fighting it tooth and nail.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

“Big One” remember that?

https://florida.forums.rivals.com/threads/baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-boob-errr-boom.96930/

Oops, you're right. So you were saying this was over 7 months ago.

Seven months later, we are just getting started.

Love seeing you nervous LOL

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Dims are scared to death of an audit. Why?

It seems the 'let's let it play out' crowd has gone home.

 

[fatman76]

As they should. Lets get data on whether mail in voting and other create systematic fraud.

Anyone who thinks otherwise either doesn’t care about election integrity or is scared what the audits will find…or maybe both

 

[fatman76]

Dims are scared to death of an audit. Why?

I wouldn’t be concerned at all if the IRS audited me. I pay a former IRS agent more than I probably should and I have all of my returns on file.

I wonder if this concept even makes sense to some on this board.

 

[NavigatorII]

I wouldn’t be concerned at all if the IRS audited me. I pay a former IRS agent more than I probably should and I have all of my returns on file.

I wonder if this concept even makes sense to some on this board.

Funny you mention this. My college roommate did a stint with the IRS, now is making a killing doing forensic accounting in concert with legal firms. Maybe we should get him to audit Georgia. 😎