Sounds like you guys are working harder for the same results--3 titles.
Conclusion--FSU is more efficient.
Naw, the criminoles were and are just plain-ole chicken-chits....
And the funny/sad part is when they try to bring up UF's SoS... /
Sounds like you guys are working harder for the same results--3 titles.
Conclusion--FSU is more efficient.
My response whenever I think about some twit that's school chose to be in an Almost Competitive Conference telling me anything about SoS's.
UF lost to GaSo in the 6th game of a 7 game losing streak, while suffering an NCAA all time worst 72 lost starts to injury. Sorry, but that doesn't embarrass me nearly as much as if my Undefeated and #1 Ranked team had lost a mNC game by 32 pts....
btw, UF's SOS in 1996 wasn't #1...it was #8.
You had injuries, we had the flu.
Naw, the criminoles were and are just plain-ole chicken-chits....
And the funny/sad part is when they try to bring up UF's SoS... /
[QUOTE="instaGATOR, post: 306735, member: 10875"
UF lost to GaSo in the 6th game of a 7 game losing streak, while suffering an NCAA all time worst 72 lost starts to injury.
Interesting...I don't recall the monikers, "Road Warriors", "Anytime, Anywhere", or "King of the Road" ever being bestowed on UF before. Bowden built FSU on the the premise of playing anyone, anywhere and he did (win or lose) and that's a fact.
Lol insta, you need to stop bringing up Georgia Southern as evidence of your tough schedule. Number one, you lost to them. Number two, they were a decent 1aa team, nothing more.
But really, don't bring up injuries. Don't bring up how good they are. Just don't.
After thinking about this some more It would be kind of cool to drop UF. We could potentially move Miami to the Thanksgiving Saturday spot and arrange a new head to head series with one of Bama, LSU, Texas, Oklahoma, ATM, Nebraska, etc. for earlier in the season. Nationally televised game after Thanksgiving with the best recruits in the country from south Florida watching. Add to that a more national audience if we add a Texas, ATM, etc. Cha Ching. I guess there could be the concern that the SEC would block this like they did on our entrance to the SEC so many years ago but in today's arms race I think the thought of more money wins out.
And my God, Georgia Southern didn't complete a pass..
Now that I'm cool with. Move Miami and beef up our schedule with various home-home P5 teams and let UF replace us with continuous home games of Idaho, New Mexico State, etc. and just tout their SEC schedule while their OOC is a total stinker. As the parody continues and the SEC does a little more "losing" like they did in 2014, then they can enjoy their "influx of cash flow" due to there extra "home game."
Not when half the stadium doesn't show up.
Translation. I am incapable of just having a conversation about football. You are the one bringing insults to the topic (I assure you my math skills are up to UF's standards). You are the one making this more than what it is.
This ISN'T about FSU/UF, MJ. It's about the premise of your statement that UF would be better off removing a home-home with a P5 (FSU happens to be that school) school and replacing it with a lower-tier team. I disagree whole-hardheartedly that it's not in UF's favor.
OK sure. But consecutive yearly home games is much better for those folks too, rather than home and homeTell that to the bars and restaurants.
False;btw, UF's SOS in 1996 wasn't #1...it was #8.
Oh just stop it. I never said I was in favor of the proposal. (Have you learned to read yet?). I just noted that Florida does not need a home and home FSU from either a financial perspective or a SOS perspective. I proved the former point and I don't think I need to prove the later point. You are the one trying to make this a P5 thing.
As I mentioned to another FSU fan, you guys seem to have an incredible need to oversell your importance to us and the college football world.
So if UF doesn't "need" FSU, then why the heck play the game?
The irony....Do you know how to read? I mean seriously? I articulated why I thought the game was and should be played. To wit;
"The game is important. But not from a financial standpoint. Or a SOS standpoint. In fact, if it wasn't such a long standing rivalry, we might do well to look elsewhere."
Good grief. You and your brethren are such whiny little shits.
False;
1996 National Championship Recap
Behind arguably the finest offensive unit in SEC history, a solid defense that registered a school record six touchdowns, and some good fortune late in the year, the Florida Gators capped off the greatest season in school history with a rousing 52-20 victory over number one ranked Florida State in the Nokia Sugar Bowl in New Orleans on January 2, 1997 to claim the consensus 1996 national championship.
Florida became one of just three teams in NCAA history to be named the national champions in the same season in which it faced a schedule that the NCAA deemed the nation's toughest. Penn State (1984 champion), Colorado (1990 co-champion) and Florida (1996 champion) were the only teams in NCAA history to accomplish that feat.
I guess it just depends on the source. I've stuck to a single source, so as not to appear to be moving the goal posts. My reason for choosing this source (the one I've used all along) was simply based on access.
UF #8: http://www.phys.utk.edu/sorensen/cfr/cfr/output/1996/CF_1996_Ranking_Schedule.html
Actually, UF is #2 in your list. Look at it closely.
After thinking about this some more It would be kind of cool to drop UF. We could potentially move Miami to the Thanksgiving Saturday spot and arrange a new head to head series with one of Bama, LSU, Texas, Oklahoma, ATM, Nebraska, etc. for earlier in the season. Nationally televised game after Thanksgiving with the best recruits in the country from south Florida watching. Add to that a more national audience if we add a Texas, ATM, etc. Cha Ching. I guess there could be the concern that the SEC would block this like they did on our entrance to the SEC so many years ago but in today's arms race I think the thought of more money wins out.
Oh for wyatt's sake. That "source" 1-AA several schools as having tougher schedules than Florida that year.I guess it just depends on the source. I've stuck to a single source, so as not to appear to be moving the goal posts. My reason for choosing this source (the one I've used all along) was simply based on access.
UF #8: http://www.phys.utk.edu/sorensen/cfr/cfr/output/1996/CF_1996_Ranking_Schedule.html
?
1 20908 Georgia Southern 1 0 - 1 1 20908
2 12437 Indiana State 1 0 - 1 2 12437
3 12215 Citadel 1 0 - 1 3 12215
4 9976 Lafayette College 1 0 - 1 4 9976
5 9976 Yale 1 0 - 1 5 9976
6 9645 Purdue 11 3 - 8 6 9645
7 9596 East Tennessee State 1 0 - 1 7 9596
8 9449 Florida 13 12 - 1 8 9449