ADVERTISEMENT

Fauci is a Liar

instaGATOR said:
Because he's your look-alike / act-alike hero?
Click to expand...
We do share a bit of a resemblance -LOL. We both looked at footage of the extreme right-wing of the Republican party attacking America and went, "OH, NO, OH, NO"!!

Remember, you can't spin it!! OH, NO, OH, NO, said Insta. You're kinda like Mr. Bill too. -LOL.
 
Sen. Tom Cotton: Fauci should be investigated for lying to congress.
lauraingraham.com

Home

Most-listened-to woman in political TV and Radio
lauraingraham.com lauraingraham.com

fb.watch

Cotton: Fauci has devolved into a liberal TV pundit | Sen. Tom Cotton: Fauci should be investigated for lying to congress. https://lauraingraham.com | By Laura Ingraham | Facebook

172K views, 4K likes, 73 loves, 420 comments, 742 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from Laura Ingraham: Sen. Tom Cotton: Fauci should be investigated for lying to congress. https://lauraingraham.com
fb.watch fb.watch
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: instaGATOR, gatordad3 and NavigatorII
nail1988 said:
Sen. Tom Cotton: Fauci should be investigated for lying to congress.
lauraingraham.com

Home

Most-listened-to woman in political TV and Radio
lauraingraham.com lauraingraham.com

fb.watch

Cotton: Fauci has devolved into a liberal TV pundit | Sen. Tom Cotton: Fauci should be investigated for lying to congress. https://lauraingraham.com | By Laura Ingraham | Facebook

172K views, 4K likes, 73 loves, 420 comments, 742 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from Laura Ingraham: Sen. Tom Cotton: Fauci should be investigated for lying to congress. https://lauraingraham.com
fb.watch fb.watch
Click to expand...
Pubs wouldn’t know the truth if it hit them in the head.

They excused Trump lying to America for 4 years, and counting.
 
nail1988 said:
Sen. Tom Cotton: Fauci should be investigated for lying to congress.
lauraingraham.com

Home

Most-listened-to woman in political TV and Radio
lauraingraham.com lauraingraham.com

fb.watch

Cotton: Fauci has devolved into a liberal TV pundit | Sen. Tom Cotton: Fauci should be investigated for lying to congress. https://lauraingraham.com | By Laura Ingraham | Facebook

172K views, 4K likes, 73 loves, 420 comments, 742 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from Laura Ingraham: Sen. Tom Cotton: Fauci should be investigated for lying to congress. https://lauraingraham.com
fb.watch fb.watch
Click to expand...
What about jail time?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: fatman76, NavigatorII and nail1988
Mr.Eko said:
We do share a bit of a resemblance -LOL. We both looked at footage of the extreme right-wing of the Republican party attacking America and went, "OH, NO, OH, NO"!!

Remember, you can't spin it!! OH, NO, OH, NO, said Insta. You're kinda like Mr. Bill too. -LOL.
Click to expand...
Just remember, what you say is fact even without any proof.

Fantasy land at its finest
 
  • Haha
Reactions: instaGATOR, fatman76 and gatordad3
Mr.Eko said:
Dude: I just googled Roy Epps What do you think is up with Roy Epps?? It looks like the Feds are deciding if they are going to prosecute him in the Trump Riot. They are doing due diligence to see if they actually have a winnable case.

As for Merrett Garland not answering the Congressman or Senator, Garland is absolutely right to not answer. The Department of Justice does not comment on ongoing cases. They clearly didn't want to divulge any information to aid any of the defendants. I guess he will find out when all the cases are resolved.

You had your panties in such wad I thought this was something big the way you hounded me to look at this.
Click to expand...
The feds won’t recognize they even know who Epps is. He was on the most wanted list and once asked about it took him off.
 
fatman76 said:
Mr Eko is a character from Lost. We’re all falling for the troll.
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nail1988 and fatman76
fatman76 said:
I want to be like you when I grow up.
Click to expand...
It's easy to be like him. Don't listen to another person's point of view (unless it is your own), only read Conspiracy Theory news, don't believe reliable data, believe your fellow Americans are your real enemies (I assumed you learned that from Putin or Fox News), and name call when you don't have anything really valuable to say. There's more, but that's a good start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
fatman76 said:
The feds won’t recognize they even know who Epps is. He was on the most wanted list and once asked about it took him off.
Click to expand...
The Feds won't recognize (?) they know who Epp's is, but he was on the Most Wanted List. It seems if he was on the Most Wanted List, they know d@mn well who he is. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
BillCutting4585 said:
Just remember, what you say is fact even without any proof.

Fantasy land at its finest
Click to expand...
Hey, I gave you Data, Actual facts, or pointed you in the right direction to get them. If you didn't bother to follow the pointers I gave you, it means you were lazy or just don't care about facts that don't support your arguments.

I do remember what I say is fact, but I generally DO have proof.
 
Mr.Eko said:
Hey, I gave you Data, Actual facts, or pointed you in the right direction to get them. If you didn't bother to follow the pointers I gave you, it means you were lazy or just don't care about facts that don't support your arguments.

I do remember what I say is fact, but I generally DO have proof.
Click to expand...
The laziness is making a claim without sources. We’ve been through this already, no need to rehash. This is no different than siting sources while writing a paper. I’m sure at some point you tried to twist reality/history with your opinion while writing said paper only to fail. You’ve failed here miserably, now it’s time to site your sources.

Or you can continue to dance circles and make claims. At some point, the cat (me) will tire of playing with the mouse (you) as you’ve offered nothing of substance. That time is vastly approaching.

The ball is in your court my big eared, pointed nose friend, hopefully you can keep my attention.

Good luck
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988 and gatordad3
BillCutting4585 said:
The laziness is making a claim without sources. We’ve been through this already, no need to rehash. This is no different than siting sources while writing a paper. I’m sure at some point you tried to twist reality/history with your opinion while writing said paper only to fail. You’ve failed here miserably, now it’s time to site your sources.

Or you can continue to dance circles and make claims. At some point, the cat (me) will tire of playing with the mouse (you) as you’ve offered nothing of substance. That time is vastly approaching.

The ball is in your court my big eared, pointed nose friend, hopefully you can keep my attention.

Good luck
Click to expand...
I don't agree with your claims. But don't your claims pertain to you too? Rarely do I see any reliable news sources or data posted by you all (some have, and I truly respect them).

I think before you make claims about others, you should examine your own sources and sit out a dance or two yourself.

I realize you like to write to puff out your chest a little for the boys and name call. But as I posted earlier, it's just a sign of weakness because you have no real argument.
 
Mr.Eko said:
The Feds won't recognize (?) they know who Epp's is, but he was on the Most Wanted List. It seems if he was on the Most Wanted List, they know d@mn well who he is. LOL
Click to expand...

He was removed, after he was added. He’s no longer a suspect. He led the first charge into the perimeter, 20 minutes before the speech was over.

www.revolver.news

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News

Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach.
www.revolver.news www.revolver.news
 
fatman76 said:
He was removed, after he was added. He’s no longer a suspect. He led the first charge into the perimeter, 20 minutes before the speech was over.

www.revolver.news

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News

Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach.
www.revolver.news www.revolver.news
Click to expand...
That's good. I read the assessment of the possible charges elsewhere and as I understand it, he ran up and stopped and just mouthed off some. I guess he helped lead the charge and then just let all the other players pass him and just watched. It looks like that was a smart move. -LOL

They could have charged him with a couple of counts of trespassing and possibly inciting a riot, but the inciting charge wouldn't be all that winnable, in my opinion, with him just stopping and mouthing off.

I think the Justice Department wants to concentrate on the other rioters that really tried to overthrow the government of the United States.
 
Mr.Eko said:
That's good. I read the assessment of the possible charges elsewhere and as I understand it, he ran up and stopped and just mouthed off some. I guess he helped lead the charge and then just let all the other players pass him and just watched. It looks like that was a smart move. -LOL

They could have charged him with a couple of counts of trespassing and possibly inciting a riot, but the inciting charge wouldn't be all that winnable, in my opinion, with him just stopping and mouthing off.

I think the Justice Department wants to concentrate on the other rioters that really tried to overthrow the government of the United States.
Click to expand...
Oh, I just read the article on the link you sent me. There isn't any data or facts stated on their part, just guesses. It could be true, I suppose. But this is generally the stuff that the 'Fake-News' right-wing media spews out to you all to keep you in line and riled up. Hey, 'riled up' is Rupert Murdoch words not mine.

When, I researched the Epp's story, he actually seemed nice in an interview with a local newspaper. He told the reporter he was not supposed to talk to the press, but a gave a very short interview anyway-LOL. He did not regurgitate all the regular right-wing rhetoric.

All I did was google Roy Epps till I found the REAL Roy Epps and read the many articles.

This reminds me of the article published by 'The Federalist' someone on the board posted about Adam Schiff a few days ago. They believed the article and indeed, it turned out to be completely false. Why do you all fall for these obvious untruths. They just want to RILE YOU UP!
 
Mr.Eko said:
Hey: you little Nazis are trolling me!!
Click to expand...
My first impulse was to put him on ignore and pray for his quick banning.

But quickly thereafter, I realized that he's another of those unexpected good things for the Constitution and the MAGA platform, because he is an excellent example of what a Socialist traitor to America looks and sounds like. He get's an A+ on his Rat card from me....

Now I hope that he stays here and posts regularly to keep the village idiot / sheepel section happy....

And before one of them asks:
Top definition. sheepel. unknown. <noun>
People who stand in line at a store while the receipt checker marks your receipt.
People who do not stand up for their rights.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nail1988
GhostOfMatchesMalone said:
We've already got a guy working on that.

View embedded media
Click to expand...
That's old news. I read that last week while researching John Durham. He wants to see if the Russian guy just charged had direct contact with Secretary Clinton. He is VERY Conservative but appears at this time to be a principled man.

I owe a rebuttal to a post that was sent to me about John Durham. However, I have to wrap 30 more presents for our Christmas Family a bunch of my friends and I donate to. So that is the priority.
 
But we're all sure that you intend to the usual Rat 'CRICLE BACK' and give your usual full answer responses to the critical questions presented here.... ROTF LMFAO.... 🤣
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
instaGATOR said:
My first impulse was to put him on ignore and pray for his quick banning.

But quickly thereafter, I realized that he's another of those unexpected good things for the Constitution and the MAGA platform, because he is an excellent example of what a Socialist traitor to America looks and sounds like. He get's an A+ on his Rat card from me....

Now I hope that he stays here and posts regularly to keep the village idiot / sheepel section happy....

And before one of them asks:
Top definition. sheepel. unknown. <noun>
People who stand in line at a store while the receipt checker marks your receipt.
People who do not stand up for their rights.
Click to expand...
Insta, I was wondering where you were. I guess me loving Babylon 5 like you has exhausted all your Goodwill (?) towards me. -LOL

As I explained 2 other times already, My three affectionate terms for you guys:
1. Little Monsters
2. Little Maniacs (that is stolen from the movie, 'Weird Science'.)
3. little Nazis
These are truly for affection.

For your reference:

1. I am NOT a communist. Communism is against human nature. It wouldn't work and it DIDN'T work. Actually, are there any communist countries left? Viet Nam, maybe. China is Capitalistic, but they are a totalitarian regime. You know they are not communists when they have a gazillion billionaires.

North Korera is dead broke. 1/2 of their GNP is internet theft. (true)! Totalitarian.

Venezuela said they were socialist, but they ended up being just another totalitarian regime. Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands are Socialistic Democracies. In fact, most of Europe and Canada are kinda socialistic as well because they have free healthcare.

I do like that the Nordic countries get a lot more bang for their tax dollars. As I have said before, Americans pay more for healthcare of any Western country and we get the least. That is just unacceptable

2. I LOVE America. Most folks can see that is true through my posts. I don't think calling someone a traitor because they disagree with you puts you, Insta, in a very good light. I don't think wanting healthcare and more rights for all Americans lands me a traitor label.

But you, Sir, get an F grade and are on Santa's VERY naughty list!

Back to wrapping presents!!!
 
GhostOfMatchesMalone said:
So you're claiming you've known all along that the 2016 clinton campaign was under CRIMINAL investigation?

Good for you! I just found out today, and by golly I couldn't be happier!!!
Click to expand...
No. I knew Barr tapped John Durham to do this. I did not know the extent of it or if it was still going on. I thought the FBI agent was a good catch. Got to dot your i's and cross your t's.

The Russian might be a good catch, who knows yet. The 3rd guy might have his charges withdrawn from what I read.

That's not much in 3 years, but who knows. It gives the Conservatives something to hope for, though.
 
Mr.Eko said:
No. I knew Barr tapped John Durham to do this. I did not know the extent of it or if it was still going on. I thought the FBI agent was a good catch. Got to dot your i's and cross your t's.

The Russian might be a good catch, who knows yet. The 3rd guy might have his charges withdrawn from what I read.

That's not much in 3 years, but who knows. It gives the Conservatives something to hope for, though.
Click to expand...
Oh, and the 2016 Clinton Administration is NOT deemed under investigation. Durham was charged to look for ANY 2016 Election Fraud/ misconduct. Basically, look into the Democrats. So, he is. That's what Barr assigned him to do. Of, course he looked to link the Clinton Administration with something.

If the Russian doesn't pan out with a link to Secretary Clinton, I think the Investigation is over. However, he will keep digging just to annoy the Democrats. That's how it goes sometimes.
 
Fox news tells Lord Fauci to $#&#-OFF

Fox News Issues Strong Response After Lord Fauci Calls For Jesse Watters To Be Fired​




www.dailywire.com

Fox News Issues Strong Response After Fauci Calls For Jesse Watters To Be Fired

Fox News on Tuesday issued a statement standing behind network host Jesse Watters, after unelected bureaucrat Dr. Anthony Fauci called for Watters’ immediate firing over comments the host made at a Turning Point USA political conference this week. Watters implored conservatives to engage in...
www.dailywire.com www.dailywire.com
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: NavigatorII and DCandtheUTBand
Mr.Eko said:
Insta, I was wondering where you were. I guess me loving Babylon 5 like you has exhausted all your Goodwill (?) towards me. -LOL

As I explained 2 other times already, My three affectionate terms for you guys:
1. Little Monsters
2. Little Maniacs (that is stolen from the movie, 'Weird Science'.)
3. little Nazis
These are truly for affection.

For your reference:

1. I am NOT a communist. Communism is against human nature. It wouldn't work and it DIDN'T work. Actually, are there any communist countries left? Viet Nam, maybe. China is Capitalistic, but they are a totalitarian regime. You know they are not communists when they have a gazillion billionaires.

North Korera is dead broke. 1/2 of their GNP is internet theft. (true)! Totalitarian.

Venezuela said they were socialist, but they ended up being just another totalitarian regime. Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands are Socialistic Democracies. In fact, most of Europe and Canada are kinda socialistic as well because they have free healthcare.

I do like that the Nordic countries get a lot more bang for their tax dollars. As I have said before, Americans pay more for healthcare of any Western country and we get the least. That is just unacceptable

2. I LOVE America. Most folks can see that is true through my posts. I don't think calling someone a traitor because they disagree with you puts you, Insta, in a very good light. I don't think wanting healthcare and more rights for all Americans lands me a traitor label.

But you, Sir, get an F grade and are on Santa's VERY naughty list!

Back to wrapping presents!!!
Click to expand...

Well then, going with your own ideas on affection, calling your a traitorous Socialist based on what and how you post is,,, TRULY FOR CORRECTLY DESCRIBING YOUR AFFLICTION WITH MY AFFECTION....

Only in someone's twisted partisan dreams, could anyone with a working brain not understand what a traitor that the Socialist Rats have become.
Read Denesh D'Sousa's 'The Big Lie' to understand why that's provably true.

Anyone voting for Joe/Hunter after their Ukraine crime spree, or voting for the Beijing Biden and his Border Ho in 2020, is a traitor to America by that action, or they are certifiably village idiot stupid.

And here's an FU back at ya, and I hope you just taped your hand to the box....
 
instaGATOR said:
Well then, going with your own ideas on affection, calling your a traitorous Socialist based on what and how you post is,,, TRULY FOR CORRECTLY DESCRIBING YOUR AFFLICTION WITH MY AFFECTION....

Only in someone's twisted partisan dreams, could anyone with a working brain not understand what a traitor that the Socialist Rats have become.
Read Denesh D'Sousa's 'The Big Lie' to understand why that's provably true.

Anyone voting for Joe/Hunter after their Ukraine crime spree, or voting for the Beijing Biden and his Border Ho in 2020, is a traitor to America by that action, or they are certifiably village idiot stupid.

And here's an FU back at ya, and I hope you just taped your hand to the box....
Click to expand...
Or perhaps none of that is true.
 
Mr.Eko said:
I don't agree with your claims. But don't your claims pertain to you too? Rarely do I see any reliable news sources or data posted by you all (some have, and I truly respect them).

I think before you make claims about others, you should examine your own sources and sit out a dance or two yourself.

I realize you like to write to puff out your chest a little for the boys and name call. But as I posted earlier, it's just a sign of weakness because you have no real argument.
Click to expand...
Calling you a mouse when using you as a metaphor is calling you names? Looking for clarification.
 
Mr.Eko said:
Oh, and the 2016 Clinton Administration is NOT deemed under investigation. Durham was charged to look for ANY 2016 Election Fraud/ misconduct. Basically, look into the Democrats. So, he is. That's what Barr assigned him to do. Of, course he looked to link the Clinton Administration with something.

If the Russian doesn't pan out with a link to Secretary Clinton, I think the Investigation is over. However, he will keep digging just to annoy the Democrats. That's how it goes sometimes.
Click to expand...
Another lie

Durham was tapped to look into the origins of the fake Russian collusion story as well as any wrong doings. This has nothing to do with the 2016 election as of yet but the investigation could grow into looking at the Clinton campaign for paying for a dossier that has not been corroborated to this day and ultimately launched 3.5 years of investigations and a waste of tax payer dollars.

i.e. interference into the 2016 election and the Donald Trump presidency.

It will be real interesting on your take about why Biden unmasked general Flynn and how certain news organizations were privy to this information. Which is a felony by the leaker.

We will wait for your spin tactics

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: NavigatorII and gatordad3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BillCutting4585

Fauci’s boss throwing shade for Fauci

Replies
1
Views
410
The Parking Lot
BillCutting4585
BillCutting4585
Capt Ron 1

Just a reminder.......

Replies
121
Views
8K
The Parking Lot
Capt Ron 1
Capt Ron 1
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back