I agree with what you are saying, but Durham is a Special Investigator. Garland can't touch him, but that won't save him from Hillary's henchmen.
Durham does it again
- Thread starter GhostOfMatchesMalone
- Start date
I agree with what you are saying, but Durham is a Special Investigator. Garland can't touch him, but that won't save him from Hillary's henchmen.
The AG can shut anything he wants to do down. That has been the case since the statutes were changed years ago.
Yes and no. He technically could stop it, but that's basically admitting that Durham was about to blow the lid off the entire dem party. Especially since Garland has made countless public statements saying the investigation would continue without obstruction AND since Durham is issuing indictments left and right.
So it's a move that would likely backfire. Which is why Garland won't do it.
In fact, he just re-upped funding for the Durham investigation back in October. It's funny, it's almost like we know what we are talking about here.
Bingo. And I saw a terribly interesting comment made on social media the other day. Someone mentioned that the statute of limitations has expired for almost all of the stuff that Durham would be investigating.
Someone made the point that IF we are talking conspiracy, then the window starts when the LAST act tied to the conspiracy has been committed.
No idea if that's legally true, but it makes total sense. That could conceivably mean the last act was committed in 2020. Maybe even 2021.
Popcorn? We'll tie @Gator Fever in a corner and make him hold the bowl.
The corruption of The Obama Administration, DNC & Clinton Campaign is obvious. The corruption of the “Three Letter Agency’s” worse - if that’s possible. RINO’s like John McCain, Paul Ryan, Brian Kemp plus too many to name are complicit as enablers.
Durham is making progress very slowly. I’m not sure where it all goes. I do know we need MAGA now more than ever. The divide between our corrupt, greedy, lying Political & Media Elite is destroying America. We can’t take more of their generated lies like Russian Collusion, UkraineGate, Jan. 6th Fake Insurrection,… while suppressing free speech like Laptop From Hell, Chinese COVID-19 Origin, Hydroxicoaquin/Monacromial Antibodies,…
The Durham Investigation is about far, far more than political corruption & campaign malfeasance…. This is a RICO Case if there ever was one.
I remain skeptically hopefully!
God Bless America!
Durham is making progress very slowly. I’m not sure where it all goes. I do know we need MAGA now more than ever. The divide between our corrupt, greedy, lying Political & Media Elite is destroying America. We can’t take more of their generated lies like Russian Collusion, UkraineGate, Jan. 6th Fake Insurrection,… while suppressing free speech like Laptop From Hell, Chinese COVID-19 Origin, Hydroxicoaquin/Monacromial Antibodies,…
The Durham Investigation is about far, far more than political corruption & campaign malfeasance…. This is a RICO Case if there ever was one.
I remain skeptically hopefully!
God Bless America!
Got your feelers hurt?Maybe you should get yourself informed in the area of him harassing me, before calling it weird....
UFO's / UAP / AATIP
That interview is from a story in september 2021, yet webre, 67 years old, says he was born during ww2? 🚩 Thank you for actually reading what he posts LOL I'm sure I'm missing more gems like this, but the wading through to find them is too much.florida.forums.rivals.com
I don't fully trust Durham himself and think he is already operating with the thought those head FBI crooks are not to be charged even though they did the worst things in this scandal abusing their powers for political reasons.
I guess it would all depend on what the statute of limitations would be for each charge. I’d imagine once indictments are filed and sealed, statute goes out the door but I am not a lawyer and do not know the answer, just a guess.
Why would you think he thinks that?
I think Durham can be trusted. If he were Deep State then he would have ended the investigation a long time ago and said there was nothing there. He definitely wouldn't have indicted Sussman and the russian. Sussman sent a BILL to hillary for spreading the fake dossier to the media. So that alone is enough to charge her campaign with election interference, it seems.
And the reality is, with each new indictment of members of the clinton campaign, it becomes HARDER to NOT charge hillary. If you charge several members of hillary's campaign then don't charge her, you are essentially saying that hillary's staff all conspired to commit crimes with no knowledge or direction from hillary.
If anything, I think it's pretty obvious that Durham is calling his shot. Arrest the team first, then get the coach. John Solomon seems to think he's going to do the same thing with the FBI. We'll see.
Well if it's a conspiracy, the conspiracy itself IS the charge, at least the way I understand it.
Guy commits a crime in Jan 2016. Statute of Limitations is out the window to charge if 5-year.
But if same guy was part of a conspiracy and committed the same or similar crimes from Jan 2016-Jan 2021, then the window runs till Jan 2026 to charge. At least that's how it seems.
It makes sense. It takes years to successfully prosecute the average conspiracy case, so if you only have a 5-year window from the first crime, that makes it hard if not impossible to prosecute. So extending the window to cover all the crimes associated with the conspiracy makes sense.
Because of the lack of action over years when the evidence is right there in everyone's face. If this was Obama instead of Trump Comey and his crooks would have been locked up a long time ago for what they did.
Report: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Just Became John Durham’s “Official” Focus
Could the US finally repeal it's 2 tier justice system?
Report: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Just Became John Durham’s “Official” Focus
Nothing is going to happen to her. We may get a few joke charges with sweetheart deals but that is about it imo. Part of the issue is the UK intelligence was in on this crap also. Its pretty clear from Schiff's memo that Mifsud character was used in those illegal warrants.
Correct, they used the Five Eyes to justify spying on Americans.
If Durham digs into that, it goes about 2-3 rungs above hildabeast.
From my understanding, it is not illegal for a member of Five Eyes to “look” into citizens of another country. It is however illegal for the citizen of said country’s intelligence agency to tell a member of the Five Eyes to look into certain individuals and carry out the request, then share intelligence with said citizen’s intelligence agency. The agency or employees within that agency could be charged with spying on a US Citizen which is only legal when the FBI is involved. Hence, FISA court warrants.
I could be wrong on that though
However, the fact that the FBI, i.e. Comey is not in an orange jumpsuit for willfully lying to a FISA court about the validity of a certain dossier that led to the surveillance of the incoming 45 presidency is flat out astonishing. Especially since Comey, McCabe, Page, Strozyk, and Brennan all testified in front of a grand jury that they had nothing and no basis for the investigation. Yet, every single one of them lied on national television repeatedly that Donald colluded with Russia. Meanwhile, Hillary laughs her ass off as she paid for the dossier and had the traitor McCain peddle the same shit before his “cancer” got the best of him.
We sat here and argued the validity of the 2020 presidential election for over a year and some still think this country is free and ruled by its citizens.
And I believe brennan even briefed obama and comey in the summer of 2016 that hildabeast was creating the dossier.
All the pieces are there. We just need someone to connect them and present them in a legal-proof package that can be handed to a grand jury.
That will be the hardest part, getting them to turn on each other when all they have to do is hold strong and not flip. In order for any of them to flip, there has to be a smoking gun, iron clad, proof. Unfortunately, as it stands right now, there isn’t or that we know of.
Durham may be looking into who leaked the unmasking of Gen. Flynn. That In itself is a felony when leaked to the press. Comey has come out himself saying he leaked info, I wouldn’t put it past him if he leaked the unmasking. Reporters are squeelers.
The other issue is they can’t even get hildabeast because buying candidate opo research, whether true or not, is not a crime. Durham would need a Seth Rich type to come forward with first hand knowledge and proof. That proof would need to be in the form of an audio recording or some text that can be validated. Maybe Clinton’s emails that were miraculously destroyed. Another option would be Berry’s blackberry but presidential privilege would come into play or the device is wiped and destroyed.
I pray that Durham gets a big fish. Not because I despise the players but to prove that the justice system does work.
We shall see…
Logically, you have to think Durham has found something. He's been at this for 4 years now. By now he's either found something, or he's found something that tells him the 'something' is out there.
Every new indictment of anyone associated with the clinton campaign gives him more leverage against everyone else involved.
It's a process. And unfortunately it's gonna take a lot of time to get it right.
I definitely want to have faith but many rugs have been pulled from under our feet due to swamp politics.
I do pray you’re right however
I'm from Missouri on the Durham Investigation, show me.
Cheers brotha, same boat
Correction, I’m not from Missouri, I feel the same way you do
bruthuh is correct. I'm fluent in Ebonics.
We shall see what Durham has or doesn’t have eventually, but I think he’s keeping it alive with rock solid cases on low hanging fruit…. If the ‘Pubs flip the House and Senate in a year, as expected, then I think the cage opens up
The 'problem' is that Durham can't send anyone to jail. All he does is issue indictments.
Once the case goes to court, then we have to count on judges upholding the law. I think we can all agree that's a risky proposition at best.
That's why it's imperative that Durham builds a rock-solid case that an activist/compromised judge can't easily dismiss.
I think he's doing that. But again, it takes time.
