ADVERTISEMENT

Durham bombshell: President Trump was right, he was spied on!

jfegaly said:
What’s disgusting is that we impeached a sitting President over something that was a hoax. Fraudulent information, that was concocted by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, in COLLUSION with foreign entities. And it can be proven, yet here we are.

Which is what they Accused Trump of doing. You just cannot make this shit up.

Yet you got @kalimgoodman sitting here like…..what crime?
Click to expand...
Derp. Don’t like right leaning sources? Well here ya go. If you don’t think the Russian hoax is what really gassed everyone up, then you really do need to stick with counting pills. The DNC and Party spent 3 years and millions of dollars invested in the Russia Hoax taking Donald down. After that, it was….we will find something…..even if it’s a NOTHINBURGER (Ukraine)

www.politico.com

How a Russian disinfo op got Trump impeached

The Kremlin may have been laying the groundwork for blaming Ukraine for 2016 as early as 2015.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell, dezyDeco, GhostOfMatchesMalone and 1 other person
I have to admit that I find it hard to believe that a “tech executive” would provide logs of requests, especially from the EOP, to a private party without a warrant or some kind of legal compulsion that they can hide behind. At first, I suspected Verizon. But no serious executive would be naive enough to do that. Maybe this was a small contractor?

Additionally, in this age of SSL encryption, this data would have included domains without complete URLs--which would be of limited value.

[Correction: DNS requests include hostnames, not just domains.]

For real packet inspection, they would need to decrypt the requests, which would only be possible if they had a gateway proxying traffic from the EOP.

I must be missing something here.
 
Last edited:
jfegaly said:
Ok….back on track. @kalimgoodman likes to take things off the track. Back on track…..

How many years should Hillary and operatives in the DNC get for obvious criminal activity?

This is about the REAL criminals…..not Trump. Americas savior!!!!!
Click to expand...
This is easy:

@BSC911 @LizardGrad89 @CFAGator @kalimgoodman if we discovered that Trump was using the Office of the President to spy on incoming president* Hiden, how many years would you like to see him go to jail for?

Then hillary gets at least that much. See how easy this is when you apply the same standard to everyone?!??
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76 and jfegaly
NavigatorII said:
So this is a right wing media outlet? 🤣

View embedded media


220px-Gene_Wilder_as_Willy_Wonka.jpeg
Click to expand...
If that is your "admissions" then I was wrong about you. Then you are a naive extreme right wing nut job. You should do more research on that video.
 
Uniformed_ReRe said:
I have to admit that I find it hard to believe that a “tech executive” would provide logs of requests, especially from the EOP, to a private party without a warrant or some kind of legal compulsion that they can hide behind. At first, I suspected Verizon. But no serious executive would be naive enough to do that. Maybe this was a small contractor?

Additionally, in this age of SSL encryption, this data would have included domains without complete URLs--which would be of limited value.

[Correction: DNS requests include hostnames, not just domains.]

For real packet inspection, they would need to decrypt the requests, which would only be possible if they had a gateway proxying traffic from the EOP.

I must be missing something here.
Click to expand...
Anyone remember hillary's server?

Then the DNC 'hack'?

Now this?

There's some potential common threads running through all. Keep watching...
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
jb1215 said:
1. jfegaly said nothing about Russia.
2. Trump was impeached based on accusations of threatening to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine so they would investigate hunter biden.
3. hunter biden was given a board position at Burisma while his father was Vice President and paid millions even though he doesn't speak Ukrainian, has never been to Ukraine and knows nothing about the energy industry. Why?
4. Two countries "the foreign policy expert" biden was responsible for affairs during his VP years were China and Ukraine. Coincidence? No.
5. Using wikipedia for a source of information is like asking bill clinton if he had sex with monica lewinsky.
Click to expand...
I'm not going down a right wing rabbit hole ever again. He was alluding to Russia, when he said hoax. That's him. Wikipedia is irrelevant to the conversation.
 
kalimgoodman said:
I'm not going down a right wing rabbit hole ever again. He was alluding to Russia, when he said hoax. That's him. Wikipedia is irrelevant to the conversation.
Click to expand...
Right. All we need to hear from you is an apology to President Trump for ever doubting him when he told us that obama spied on him.

Trump was right, obama lied. Until you can apologize to Pres Trump, you have no business posting here again.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: DCandtheUTBand, jfegaly, fatman76 and 3 others
jfegaly said:
What’s disgusting is that we impeached a sitting President over something that was a hoax. Fraudulent information, that was concocted by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, in COLLUSION with foreign entities. And it can be proven, yet here we are.

Which is what they Accused Trump of doing. You just cannot make this shit up.

Yet you got @kalimgoodman sitting here like…..what crime?
Click to expand...

I think Trump was actually impeached over another hoax - that Ukraine call joke mess. If Barr (as much of a joke as he really turned out to be) hadn't taken over as AG crooked Rod Rosenstein would have made a referral to Congress and they would have impeached Trump over some joke obstruction claim because he sent a few mean tweets out over the Russian collusion hoax. They also were damn sure hoping to charge Trump with some crime with all the illegal snooping they did and threatening people he knew to make up crap about him. That is what it was all about mostly once he won the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
jfegaly said:
Ok….back on track. @kalimgoodman likes to take things off the track. Back on track…..

How many years should Hillary and operatives in the DNC get for obvious criminal activity?

This is about the REAL criminals…..not Trump. Americas savior!!!!!
Click to expand...
BTW, which crime are you talking about here?

Spying on President Trump, or committing election interference?
 
In Trump's statement, why did he mention that 'in a stronger period of time, these crimes could be punishable by death'.

Where is this going?

@kalimgoodman still think no crime was committed? Meltdowns incoming?

Keep watching...
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
GhostOfMatchesMalone said:
In Trump's statement, why did he mention that 'in a stronger period of time, these crimes could be punishable by death'.

Where is this going?

@kalimgoodman still think no crime was committed? Meltdowns incoming?

Keep watching...
Click to expand...

He is talking about them committing sedition basically. Sadly Hillary will not be getting arrested or any of the top FBI crooks that pulled this off.
 
fatman76 said:
So “left wing” rabbit holes are fine, but you’ve sworn off “right wing” rabbit holes…and you’re an “independent”.

Got it.
Click to expand...
100000% not true. Please bring up some left wing rabbit holes and I'll strike that down too.
 
kalimgoodman said:
If that is your "admissions" then I was wrong about you. Then you are a naive extreme right wing nut job. You should do more research on that video.
Click to expand...
There's nothing to discern from that other than Brandon extorted political favors from the Ukraine leadership in exchange for aid from the USA. Comply or suffer consequences. How effing clear does it need to be? Brandon bragging about withholding US dollars from Ukraine unless they turned a blind eye towards his crackhead son's activity? Perhaps you'll use this forum to explain this to us? I'm sure @Sunburnt Indian is on the edge of his seat awaiting your explanation. 🤣
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: dezyDeco, BCSpell, DCandtheUTBand and 1 other person
NavigatorII said:
There's nothing to discern from that other than Brandon extorted political favors from the Ukraine leadership in exchange for aid from the USA. Comply or suffer consequences. How effing clear does it need to be? Brandon bragging about withholding US dollars from Ukraine unless they turned a blind eye towards his crackhead son's activity? Perhaps you'll use this forum to explain this to us? I'm sure @Sunburnt Indian is on the edge of his seat awaiting your explanation. 🤣
Click to expand...
Do more research because that's inaccurate.
 
Gator Fever said:
I think Trump was actually impeached over another hoax - that Ukraine call joke mess. If Barr (as much of a joke as he really turned out to be) hadn't taken over as AG crooked Rod Rosenstein would have made a referral to Congress and they would have impeached Trump over some joke obstruction claim because he sent a few mean tweets out over the Russian collusion hoax. They also were damn sure hoping to charge Trump with some crime with all the illegal snooping they did and threatening people he knew to make up crap about him. That is what it was all about mostly once he won the election.
Click to expand...
You aren’t wrong, but the 3 year Russia stuff is what lit the fire. Period. Dems were going to keep grinding away to erode support. So, you’re damn right Russia was part of the plan to get to impeachment. That was the plan from the beginning. Dems said as much.

Dems were livid that they got busted with Russia being a hoax.

That being said. The Ukraine thing was another hoax as well. It was a nothing burger.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dezyDeco, tb8232 and Gator Fever
kalimgoodman said:
I'm not going down a right wing rabbit hole ever again. He was alluding to Russia, when he said hoax. That's him. Wikipedia is irrelevant to the conversation.
Click to expand...
You can't be this arrogant and flippant. You used wikipissia as a source of information. It is relevant to the conversation. And you are assuming someone is alluding to something for a basis of your argument. You are truly an entertaining, but ignorant individual. I hope whatever you do for a living does not impact others well being.
 
jb1215 said:
You can't be this arrogant and flippant. You used wikipissia as a source of information. It is relevant to the conversation. And you are assuming someone is alluding to something for a basis of your argument. You are truly an entertaining, but ignorant individual. I hope whatever you do for a living does not impact others well being.
Click to expand...
I didn't use it as a source. The source was myself because I witnessed the hearing. I just provided a link, for you guys.
 
Uniformed_ReRe said:
I have to admit that I find it hard to believe that a “tech executive” would provide logs of requests, especially from the EOP, to a private party without a warrant or some kind of legal compulsion that they can hide behind. At first, I suspected Verizon. But no serious executive would be naive enough to do that. Maybe this was a small contractor?

Additionally, in this age of SSL encryption, this data would have included domains without complete URLs--which would be of limited value.

[Correction: DNS requests include hostnames, not just domains.]

For real packet inspection, they would need to decrypt the requests, which would only be possible if they had a gateway proxying traffic from the EOP.

I must be missing something here.
Click to expand...

Will see if I can find who this likely is but it's probably one of these dirty tech companies the govt subcontracted with and they were doing searches on private citizens illegally also. Of course the govt never charged anyone and the court just wrote a report saying to clean things up.
 
GhostOfMatchesMalone said:
Anyone remember hillary's server?

Then the DNC 'hack'?

Now this?

There's some potential common threads running through all. Keep watching...
Click to expand...
Serious question.... what are the next steps? Does anyone seriously expect the Dem-controlled Congress to hold hearings? I'm not even sure a GOP-controlled Congress would do much more than waste time and hot air to pontificate and then do nothing.... No way will Merrick Garland and the DOJ take a serious look at these developments. I agree heads should roll (metaphorically of course), but I just don't know what if anything will be done to hold these people accountable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly, BamaFan1137 and Gator Fever
It sounds like the tech executive is Rodney Joffe and the dirty tech company is called Neustar. The complaint says in addition to the office of the President and Trump tower stuff they also we're snooping in a health care provider database. Hoping to find something medical to use against Trump if they could I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137 and Uniformed_ReRe
Any wonder why Trump thinks he was cheated in the 2020 election? Hillary and others should be in jail right now. I don't want Trump running again but I sure do want Trump policies after the nitwits we have now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dezyDeco
  • Like
Reactions: Gator Fever, dezyDeco, fatman76 and 4 others
Leftists, RINO's, MSM and BigTech (aka The Deep State) all colluded. All three pillars of our government.

This is WAY, WAY bigger than Watergate. The way the IRS, DOJ and CIA are out of control is by far the biggest threat to our freedom!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nothergator, dezyDeco, fatman76 and 3 others
ghost_of_ukalum1988 said:
Serious question.... what are the next steps? Does anyone seriously expect the Dem-controlled Congress to hold hearings? I'm not even sure a GOP-controlled Congress would do much more than waste time and hot air to pontificate and then do nothing.... No way will Merrick Garland and the DOJ take a serious look at these developments. I agree heads should roll (metaphorically of course), but I just don't know what if anything will be done to hold these people accountable.
Click to expand...

Durham is treating this like it is a mob conspiracy case, because that's what it is. You go after the guys at the bottom of the totem pole, tell them they are going to jail for X number of years.....unless they give them evidence against the guys one rung above them. They do that, then Durham goes up the next rung, and continues the climb.

Kash Patel was on Maria Bartiromo's show a few months ago and said in his experience as a prosecutor, that conspiracy cases typically take 3-5 years to prosecute. He said Durham's case is far more complex than the average conspiracy case, and Durham was just starting Year Three at the time.

So we are likely a little past the halfway point.

I am fine with waiting on justice. But anyone thinking it will happen anytime soon is deluding themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76 and ghost_of_ukalum1988

Trump Responds To Bombshell Report Claiming Clinton Campaign Paid To ‘Infiltrate’ White House Servers​




www.dailywire.com

Trump Responds To Bombshell Report Claiming Clinton-Linked Operatives Exploited Access To Trump Linked Internet Data

Correction: A previous version of this article, based on an incorrect report, stated that Special Counsel John Durham used the word “infiltrate” to describe the actions. The filing used the word “exploited.” The headline has been changed. Former President Donald Trump responded over the weekend...
www.dailywire.com www.dailywire.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

grandhavendiddy

Capt'n was right

Replies
20
Views
555
The Parking Lot
FresnoGator
FresnoGator
GhostOfMatchesMalone

Trump lied, he's going after social security

Replies
10
Views
234
The Parking Lot
Capt Ron 1
Capt Ron 1
GhostOfMatchesMalone

Overturning Roe v Wade saved America

Replies
6
Views
308
The Parking Lot
GhostOfMatchesMalone
GhostOfMatchesMalone
RussellCasse

God Bless President Trump!!!

Replies
24
Views
6K
The Parking Lot
jb1215
jb1215
instaGATOR

Presidential Pardons

Replies
26
Views
560
The Parking Lot
instaGATOR
instaGATOR
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back