ADVERTISEMENT

Did anybody see Kamala Harris speak (lie) this afternoon?

Lies. Bearing false witness is a mortal sin.

I have never promoted abortion. In fact, I’ve been very clear about my position from the beginning. Your love for the lying, adulterous Trump is clouding your reasoning ability. Your support for Trump must mean you are promoting adultery, sexual abuse, nailing porn stars while your wife is pregnant, cheating on your taxes, separating kids from their parents, and spreading division and hatred against your fellow man.

No wonder you get banned from other message boards. You’re a very hateful person.
Have you got an explanation of a particular adulterous, murderous Old Testament King named David?
 
Have you got an explanation of a particular adulterous, murderous Old Testament King named David?
Nice. Using the Bible to justify sinful behavior. A new low. You Trumpers really are in a cult.
 
Lies. Bearing false witness is a mortal sin.

I have never promoted abortion. In fact, I’ve been very clear about my position from the beginning. Your love for the lying, adulterous Trump is clouding your reasoning ability. Your support for Trump must mean you are promoting adultery, sexual abuse, nailing porn stars while your wife is pregnant, cheating on your taxes, separating kids from their parents, and spreading division and hatred against your fellow man.

No wonder you get banned from other message boards. You’re a very hateful person.
And so bearing false witness is a grave offense? I have to challenge your concept of mortal vs venial sins, but that's for another time. But since you're throwing out these mortal sin condemnations, how do you justify not holding others accountable with the actual mortal sin of abortion and how might that affect your soul? Here is a write-up from EWTN concerning voting and abortion:

If I think that a pro-abortion candidate will, on balance, do much more for the culture of life than a pro-life candidate, why may I not vote for the pro-abortion candidate? If a political candidate supported abortion, or any other moral evil, such as assisted suicide and euthanasia, for that matter, it would not be morally permissible for you to vote for that person. This is because, in voting for such a person, you would become an accomplice in the moral evil at issue. For this reason, moral evils such as abortion, euthanasia and assisted suicide are examples of a "disqualifying issue." A disqualifying issue is one which is of such gravity and importance that it allows for no political maneuvering. It is an issue that strikes at the heart of the human person and is non-negotiable. A disqualifying issue is one of such enormity that by itself renders a candidate for office unacceptable regardless of his position on other matters. You must sacrifice your feelings on other issues because you know that you cannot participate in any way in an approval of a violent and evil violation of basic human rights. A candidate for office who supports abortion rights or any other moral evil has disqualified himself as a person that you can vote for.

If Trump is too much for you to vote for, then I'd encourage you to not vote at all. But then when do you cross the line of not voting if in fact the one committing the grave sin gets elected. How much responsibility do you have in that regard?

And I'm not hateful. Would you prefer me to not challenge you in your understanding on LIFE within you own Church? I was banned because of COVID posts that led to politics. Their zero tolerance attitude got me banned.
 
Nice. Using the Bible to justify sinful behavior. A new low. You Trumpers really are in a cult.
Actually, the reverse is true. You were accusing a sitting President and his lifestyle and I was acknowledging the fact that God knew of David's sins and he ended up being a man after God's own heart and was a great President in spite of his human failings. We are all sinners. It isn't a justification, only a way that I wanted you to see how you are casting stones to justify your decisions.
 
And so bearing false witness is a grave offense? I have to challenge your concept of mortal vs venial sins, but that's for another time. But since you're throwing out these mortal sin condemnations, how do you justify not holding others accountable with the actual mortal sin of abortion and how might that affect your soul? Here is a write-up from EWTN concerning voting and abortion:

If I think that a pro-abortion candidate will, on balance, do much more for the culture of life than a pro-life candidate, why may I not vote for the pro-abortion candidate? If a political candidate supported abortion, or any other moral evil, such as assisted suicide and euthanasia, for that matter, it would not be morally permissible for you to vote for that person. This is because, in voting for such a person, you would become an accomplice in the moral evil at issue. For this reason, moral evils such as abortion, euthanasia and assisted suicide are examples of a "disqualifying issue." A disqualifying issue is one which is of such gravity and importance that it allows for no political maneuvering. It is an issue that strikes at the heart of the human person and is non-negotiable. A disqualifying issue is one of such enormity that by itself renders a candidate for office unacceptable regardless of his position on other matters. You must sacrifice your feelings on other issues because you know that you cannot participate in any way in an approval of a violent and evil violation of basic human rights. A candidate for office who supports abortion rights or any other moral evil has disqualified himself as a person that you can vote for.

If Trump is too much for you to vote for, then I'd encourage you to not vote at all. But then when do you cross the line of not voting if in fact the one committing the grave sin gets elected. How much responsibility do you have in that regard?

And I'm not hateful. Would you prefer me to not challenge you in your understanding on LIFE within you own Church? I was banned because of COVID posts that led to politics. Their zero tolerance attitude got me banned.
EWTN is not the official spokesperson for the Catholic Church. But please also post what they say about adultery.

I have no problem being challenged. In fact, I enjoy it. That should be obvious.

But you aren’t challenging me. . You are just being disingenuous by stating I support abortion. Thats a lie. You also call me a fake Christian, merely for voting for Biden. Wrong again. Then finally, you question my immortal soul, which is not your place. So bring all you got. I’ll do the same. You‘re a hypocritical partisan that loves the most immoral president in our history. You are hardly one to judge.
 
Last edited:
Actually, the reverse is true. You were accusing a sitting President and his lifestyle and I was acknowledging the fact that God knew of David's sins and he ended up being a man after God's own heart and was a great President in spite of his human failings. We are all sinners. It isn't a justification, only a way that I wanted you to see how you are casting stones to justify your decisions.
Ah, the ole “we are all sinners” BS. Lame. Amazing how you only use that when discussing Trump.

Cultist.
 
EWTN is not the official spokesperson for the Catholic Church. But please also post what they say about adultery.

I have no problem being challenged. In fact, I enjoy it. That should be obvious.

But you aren’t challenging me. . You are just being disingenuous by stating I support abortion. Thats a lie. You also call me a fake Christian, merely for voting for Biden. Wrong again. Then finally, you question my immortal soul, which is not your place. So bring all you got. I’ll do the same. You‘re a hypocritical partisan that loves the most immoral president in our history. You are hardly one to judge.
Oh okay, EWTN is off base. Got it. This television station that spreads Catholic truth around the globe is not spreading truth. Give me a break. Admit it you are a stooge and you cannot accept the fact that you have issues in morality. I'm through with you and your fakeness of life concerning life.
 
upload_2020-9-1_16-5-35-jpeg.24949
 
What Russian agent? That sounds like something a CNN viewer would say.

Profiting off his office? How is that happening? I thought you dems were boycotting all things Trump?

His 'kids' are busy advising him and brokering Middle East peace for the first time in decades. Again, thought you 'conservatives' liked that?

Hookers with campaign money? What the blue hell are yo.....nevermind. The less we talk about the alt-left's insane conspiracy theories the better.

We have Trump because we tried backing the george bushes and john mccains and mitt romneys. If your Never Trumpers had done their job, there would be no Trump.
[/Quote
Ha Ha....you can love Trump but that bs isn't flying. Man up if you love Putin. Also:
Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state."
Look it up next time...don't be so soft.
 

Look it up? Kid you are the one that has no idea what you are talking about.

Let me take you to school:

1 - obama's CIA director did indeed find that the Russians wanted someone to win in 2016. It was HILLARY. Putin said Trump was a wildcard and he didn't know how he would react. But he wanted Hillary to win because he said she was MALLEABLE. For you CNN viewers, Putin just admitted that Hildabeast can be bought.

brennan had this information, but BURIED IT. Then told the media that Russia really wanted Trump to win. You got hoodwinked.

2 - Facebook testified before congress that it did indeed find evidence that Russia was using its platform to attempt to meddle in the 2016 election. Russia was organizing rallies to HURT TRUMP during the transition period. Michael Moore got duped into attending one of them, the ***** hat rallies. LOL

3- The Mueller Investigation confirmed there was NO EVIDENCE THAT RUSSIA COLLUDED WITH TRUMP.


The only campaign that we know worked with Russia, was Hillary's. Are you ok with hillary working with teh commies?

Be careful how you answer that.....russia isn't the only communist nation out there.
 
Oh okay, EWTN is off base. Got it. This television station that spreads Catholic truth around the globe is not spreading truth. Give me a break. Admit it you are a stooge and you cannot accept the fact that you have issues in morality. I'm through with you and your fakeness of life concerning life.
Good. I don’t need some Trump loving fallen Catholic trying to teach me morality. You’re the biggest hypocrite OTB.

Comparing Trump to King David. Have fun in the bubble.
 
Look it up? Kid you are the one that has no idea what you are talking about.

Let me take you to school:

1 - obama's CIA director did indeed find that the Russians wanted someone to win in 2016. It was HILLARY. Putin said Trump was a wildcard and he didn't know how he would react. But he wanted Hillary to win because he said she was MALLEABLE. For you CNN viewers, Putin just admitted that Hildabeast can be bought.

brennan had this information, but BURIED IT. Then told the media that Russia really wanted Trump to win. You got hoodwinked.

2 - Facebook testified before congress that it did indeed find evidence that Russia was using its platform to attempt to meddle in the 2016 election. Russia was organizing rallies to HURT TRUMP during the transition period. Michael Moore got duped into attending one of them, the ***** hat rallies. LOL

3- The Mueller Investigation confirmed there was NO EVIDENCE THAT RUSSIA COLLUDED WITH TRUMP.


The only campaign that we know worked with Russia, was Hillary's. Are you ok with hillary working with teh commies?

Be careful how you answer that.....russia isn't the only communist nation out there.
You forgot the part about Rosenstein never letting Mullen go after Russia: Mr. Rosenstein concluded the F.B.I. lacked sufficient reason to conduct an investigation into the president’s links to a foreign adversary. Mr. Rosenstein determined that the investigators were acting too hastily in response to the firing days earlier of James B. Comey as F.B.I. director, and he suspected that the acting bureau director who approved the opening of the inquiry, Andrew G. McCabe, had conflicts of interest.

Mr. Rosenstein never told Mr. McCabe about his decision, leaving the F.B.I. with the impression that the special counsel would take on the investigation into the president as part of his broader duties. Mr. McCabe said in an interview that had he known Mr. Mueller would not continue the inquiry, he would have had the F.B.I. perform it.

“We opened this case in May 2017 because we had information that indicated a national security threat might exist, specifically a counterintelligence threat involving the president and Russia,” Mr. McCabe said. “I expected that issue and issues related to it would be fully examined by the special counsel team. If a decision was made not to investigate those issues, I am surprised and disappointed. I was not aware of that.”
 
You forgot the part about Rosenstein never letting

No no no......you lefties always do this. Whenever you are presented with FACTS you don't like, you ignore them.

It is a FACT that obama's CIA director had intelligence that Putin wanted HILLARY to win. He buried that information, and told the press and Harry Reid that Russia wanted TRUMP to win. The press then wrote an article to this effect, Reid then used that article to push for an investigation into Trump working with Russia.

All fabricated by Brennan. All designed to keep anyone from investigating Russia's ties with HILLARY.

It is a FACT that Rosenstein stated that there was NO evidence that a SINGLE American vote was altered in the 2016 election.

It is a FACT that Hillary paid Christopher Steele to create his fake dossier. It is a FACT that Steele worked with THE RUSSIANS to make that dossier for Hillary.

We have no evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians. We have ample evidence that Hillary did.

And McCabe has repeatedly lied to Congress, as has James Comey. And Brennan and Clapper.

McCabe, Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Hillary. What a merry band of criminals you've decided to set yourself up with.

I think John Durham is getting to know them all very well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DCandtheUTBand
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT