ADVERTISEMENT

Did anybody see Kamala Harris speak (lie) this afternoon?

Got it. So what exactly did Trump accomplish that other Republicans failed to that makes you feel he better represents the party?

The fact that you are this totally clueless makes you marked as another that has been deluded by the 'Fake News' of the Lame Stream Media. Go here and learn a little bit, before you make an even bigger ass out of yourself than you already have....

 
Well @dale63 I am a Gen X er who grew up in the 80s. I am Reaganite and he is the measuring stick I use to determine who is conservative. I did not vote for Trump in 16. I wrote in Cruz. Cruz still is the closest thing to Reagan since Reagan.

Trump however has exceeded my wildest dreams in his actions. I supported and still do Gulf War II but I am no Neo-Con.

I believe in Pax Americana and felt Reagan had it mostly right. Build a big military and be prepared to crush your enemy if necessary but its not for nation building. And if it were we half-@ssed that .

I believe Reagan was an America first kind of guy. I am a free trader like Reagan but even he used tariffs on the Japanese when they got out of line.

China isn't even a free country like Japan. I dont know why we dont give them the Soviet treatment and cut them off from the world.

But Nixon and Clinton gave Trump that bag of crap along with the North Korea problem.

I see a SCOTUS ripe for the picking.

I see a Prez committed to tax cuts with Kudlow in the drivers seat.

I see a Prez working on deregulation.

I see a Prez working to get rid of the unconstitutional zer0care program.

I see a Prez wanting to end illegal immigration and the abuses of the H1b visa program.

While his mouth overrides his @ss frequently , his actions IMHO regarding policy more than make up for his @sshattery.

God willing I will be there for him in November and I will not be holding my nose like I did when I voted for McShame.
 
LBJ gave black America the "War on Poverty" and "The Great Society." Devastating for black America.

Remember when all those black households had a father? LBJ's "Great Society" ended that. Remember when all those black households were in poverty? They still are. LBJ's "War on Poverty" changed nothing.

LBJ was nothing more than the classic Dimm plantation cracker.

50 years of Dems throwing money at the problem and failing. 50 years of Dems controlling the big city corporations of the north and beltway. 50 years of the Dept. of Housing and Urban Detention Centers creating places to shelve the black inner city populations while cratering the soul of inner city communities.

We are now reaping what the corrupt Democrats have done to the poorest of inner city communities - failure to break up the massive municipal corporations will be the downfall of this country
 
Too easy. Have at it.

Trump said Joe Biden is ‘talking about taking down the border wall.’ Biden has specifically, explicitly rejected that idea. He just said he’ll stop further additional construction.”


“Trump claimed, as always, that he is the one who passed the veterans’ choice law. Barack Obama signed that into law in 2014. Trump signed a 2018 law to modify it.”


“Trump said, ‘I have done more for the African American community than any president since Abraham Lincoln.’ That is ludicrous. Lyndon Johnson, for one, signed the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act.”


“Trump again touted a ‘record 9 million job gain over the past three months.’ He didn’t mention, as usual, that that gain follows a record 22 million job loss over the previous two months.”


“He said he’ll ‘continue to lower drug prices.’ They’ve increased during his presidency.”


“He said they opened a Jerusalem embassy for less than $500,000. Early documents show it was at least $21 million.”


“He claimed NATO member spending has increased for the first time in about 20 years. Spending, in fact, rose in 2015 and in 2016, before he took office.”


“He said he will always, and Republicans will always, strongly protect people with preexisting conditions. That pledge has already been broken. He and they have repeatedly tried to weaken those protections in Obamacare.”


“He claimed again that he banned travel from China and Europe. No, he imposed partial restrictions with many exemptions. Tens of thousands of people continued traveling over.”


“He boasted about the Covid testing system and about his general response. Look, experts nearly universally say the US was fatally slow in its response, especially slow in setting up adequate testing.”


“He said he ended what he called ‘a NAFTA nightmare’ and he signed a brand new US-Mexico-Canada agreement — the USMCA. That agreement preserves, maintains most of NAFTA.”


“He boasted about building about 300 miles of border wall. What he didn’t say is that most of that is replacement barrier. As of August 7, according to official data, just 5 miles had been built where none existed before.”


“He suggested Joe Biden would confiscate guns. That’s baseless. Biden is running on a non-mandatory buyback of so-called assault weapons.”


“He said Democrats want to defund the police. Biden, again, doesn’t, has rejected that.”


“He said he has ‘very good information’ that China wants Biden to win because Biden is soft on China or cheerleads for China. The US intelligence community says China wants Biden to win because it sees Trump as unpredictable.”


“He said Biden vowed to close down charter schools. Biden’s plan is skeptical on charters, but would not abolish them entirely.”


“He denounced Biden for voting for the Iraq War. Biden did indeed vote for the Iraq War. But what Trump doesn’t mention is that he also supported that invasion.”


“He said Democrats twice removed the word ‘God’ from the Pledge of Allegiance at their convention. Two individual caucus meetings outside the main primetime programming did leave it out, but it was uttered in every primetime event.”


“Trump denounced so-called cancel culture as an insidious, left-wing thing. He, Donald J. Trump, has tried to get dozens of people and entities canceled, fired, boycotted, including literally, last week, Goodyear.”


“He said he imposed an order to give 10 years in prison to rioters. That’s a maximum discretionary sentence up to judges, in existing laws. His order just asked the government to fully enforce.”


“He said Biden’s plan would eliminate America’s borders. No. Just no. It’s wrong.
Never heard back from @BlueEyedGator17
 
Pretty much correct, and that's why I love the "non-politician" named Trump. Oh, sure he has to play politics some because he's in the arena, but he isn't a politician.
Yeah, he’s a huckster. Even better at lying than a politician.
 
50 years of Dems throwing money at the problem and failing. 50 years of Dems controlling the big city corporations of the north and beltway. 50 years of the Dept. of Housing and Urban Detention Centers creating places to shelve the black inner city populations while cratering the soul of inner city communities.

We are now reaping what the corrupt Democrats have done to the poorest of inner city communities - failure to break up the massive municipal corporations will be the downfall of this country
What are these massive municipal corporations of which you speak?
 
Never heard back from @BlueEyedGator17
Gator
Well, here the info is! Enjoy!
I Agree but can’t find where pence and Kelly stats what u said.

Trump improved on Obama’s bill by a long mile which is what is talked about.

  • actually trump has improved minorities lives more. Yes voting is a great achievement in the day but to support ones family supersedes that.
  • The job gain verses the loses. Funny how that works when most of the states ran by democrats are still closed. Pt being, trump created the best economy ever. That’s EVER!

  • He has lowered drug prices. What was insulin priced at before Trump? Lol
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...8-a6d4-ca1d035642ce_story.html?outputType=amp

Hey has always supported covering preexisting. Obama care is his bs! Trump is working to get rid of it since it helps no one! The democrats are the ones keeping it around.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/3326123001
  • he did ban travel. What ur trying to claim is he didn’t keep US citizens from returning home and that didn’t happen overnight. Guess who fought him on the travel ban n called him racist for doing it??? Your party!
he wasn’t slow in his response. See above. Example 1! Also, he gathered big businesses together to work on building supplies we didn’t have cause of the Obama party left us empty. U can’t pull a test out of ur ass when it’s never been around. Lol


  • He did end NAFTA! Where the hell have u been? Mexico n Canada both tried to talk down trump but what happened ? They both came back and the US got what we deserved in a deal that benefits the US.


https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/along-us-borders/border-wall-system

He’s off 25miles currently. lol
He is running on taking guns. He’s just not saying it bluntly cause he’s a career politician. He is stating new laws to make guns illegal. It’s why he also wants Beto Rourke


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa.../16/biden-gun-control-poverty/?outputType=amp



  • Biden does wish to defund the police. Taking their money and moving it to another area is defunding them. Lol.


  • China does want biden! Lol. That’s a no brainer. They can move Biden in any direction. It’s not that trump is unpredictable. He will work for Americans unlike Biden.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost...-joe-biden-to-win-2020-presidential-race/amp/



  • Biden does want to get rid of school choice where the $$ stays with the kid and where they wish to go. He wants government $ for the kid to stay with the public school instead of it staying with the kid as it should. That’s the real issue. Conclusion: Biden is trying to end school choice and not allowing charter schools to survive.


  • So ur saying trump who wasn’t even in politics supported the invasion ? Lol. Trump is a businessman. What goes up with wars ? I will wait for ur answer.


  • Trump has supported all Americans in their freedoms regardless. As for boycotting Goodyear, they didn’t support freedom of choice for all and only allowed a liberal agenda to be supported at their company which wasn’t fair.
  • Approved - Blm, lgbt, Not approved- Maga, blue lives matter, all lives matter. So that’s wrong which is why he spoke up. Democrats try and cancel anyone who doesn’t agree with them. BIG DIFFERENCE!!


  • Biden did say he wouldn’t build another foot which is the same as eliminating it. It’s ridiculous to think if u don’t complete it that it is a secure wall.
 
Yeah, he’s a huckster. Even better at lying than a politician.
Okay, you keep saying that and you provided proofs of which were debunked. Even if he lies constantly, are you suggesting that Biden/Harris/Pelosi and Chuck don't? So, why do you keep bringing that up? I really haven't EVER seen a president say what he is going to do on his campaign stumping and actually either do it or attempt to actually do it but gets stopped by the democratic congress and the RINO turncoat Ryan.
 
Okay, you keep saying that and you provided proofs of which were debunked. Even if he lies constantly, are you suggesting that Biden/Harris/Pelosi and Chuck don't? So, why do you keep bringing that up? I really haven't EVER seen a president say what he is going to do on his campaign stumping and actually either do it or attempt to actually do it but gets stopped by the democratic congress and the RINO turncoat Ryan.
I’m saying no one lies as much as Trump. He says whatever is convenient. and no, the lies I listed above have not been debunked.
 
I’m saying no one lies as much as Trump. He says whatever is convenient. and no, the lies I listed above have not been debunked.
@BlueEyedGator17 did a pretty fine job in defending Trump. And to just say Trump lies more than anyone else is so childish and biased. It's the stupidest remarks to make, because it's so stupid and childish, I want to play that game also: No one lies more than Pelosi. No one lies more than Obama. No one lies more than pencil neck....

My question is still this concept of you being a Catholic and still voting for the destruction of human life in the womb? Have you asked your priest if it's okay to knowingly vote for a president that approves of the killing of the innocence? To me, all these other "moral" issues weigh heavily upon that one issue. It's the greatest of issues that needs to be addressed. I understand other issues are important. I dislike some concepts from the Republican base, but their bottom line is pro-life, so I vote for pro-life. It doesn't mean we don't stop addressing these other issues, but think about it, how can you provide for one if the most terrible of sinful acts - the playing of God with life - is swept under the rug?
 
What are these massive municipal corporations of which you speak?

New York
Chicago
Philadelphia
Newark
Baltimore
Portland
San Fran
Seattle
Et al.

The failure of these corporate entities have failed the poor communities. They have sluffed off responsibilities to the Feds and State for their problems in the degradation of their communities and it gets worse. They pay lip service to the depressed areas ... but that’s all

These communities need to be able to secede from their corporate municipality, and only pay the user fees for sewer and sanitation, overseen by the PSC

Any Federal or State subsidies need to go direct to an elected government of that community, with federal or state appointed financial advisors

They need to be able to imminent domain within their own boundary all abandoned commercial property and cut their own development deals

There is no way a top down approach is ever going to solve the inner city problems, especially with the municipality sponging more than their fair share.... the people in those communities must be empowered
 


The fact that you are this totally clueless makes you marked as another that has been deluded by the 'Fake News' of the Lame Stream Media. Go here and learn a little bit, before you make an even bigger ass out of yourself than you already have....
First of all...easy with the name calling tough guy. Do you always answer with an conservative small paper...no fake news on both sides? If he accomplished so much more than other Republicans....why so many lies? I never said I was for Biden.
Win a Presidential election

Unite the base and party under a last seen 91% rate

Appoint real conservatives to SCOTUS and not moderates in pretend “constructionalist robing” ie our current Chief Justice
Hillary united the base. McCann and Turtle (his whole political life's work) elected the supreme court.
 
@BlueEyedGator17 did a pretty fine job in defending Trump. And to just say Trump lies more than anyone else is so childish and biased. It's the stupidest remarks to make, because it's so stupid and childish, I want to play that game also: No one lies more than Pelosi. No one lies more than Obama. No one lies more than pencil neck....

My question is still this concept of you being a Catholic and still voting for the destruction of human life in the womb? Have you asked your priest if it's okay to knowingly vote for a president that approves of the killing of the innocence? To me, all these other "moral" issues weigh heavily upon that one issue. It's the greatest of issues that needs to be addressed. I understand other issues are important. I dislike some concepts from the Republican base, but their bottom line is pro-life, so I vote for pro-life. It doesn't mean we don't stop addressing these other issues, but think about it, how can you provide for one if the most terrible of sinful acts - the playing of God with life - is swept under the rug?
It's called separation of Church and State.
 
I’m saying no one lies as much as Trump. He says whatever is convenient. and no, the lies I listed above have not been debunked.

Yeah they were all debunked the first 10 times you posted them here.

And notice what he does....he can't call out his liars UNLESS he claims Trump lies even more.

No democrat here has EVER called out ANY dem for ANYTHING....without bashing Trump in the process. They simply cannot do it. We finally got @bradleygator to admit that Cuomo and DeBlasio should be fired for sending seniors with covid to nursing homes, but he said if they got fired, you had to fire Trump too.

SMDH. All Biden supporters.
 
Well @dale63 I am a Gen X er who grew up in the 80s. I am Reaganite and he is the measuring stick I use to determine who is conservative. I did not vote for Trump in 16. I wrote in Cruz. Cruz still is the closest thing to Reagan since Reagan.

Trump however has exceeded my wildest dreams in his actions. I supported and still do Gulf War II but I am no Neo-Con.

I believe in Pax Americana and felt Reagan had it mostly right. Build a big military and be prepared to crush your enemy if necessary but its not for nation building. And if it were we half-@ssed that .

I believe Reagan was an America first kind of guy. I am a free trader like Reagan but even he used tariffs on the Japanese when they got out of line.

China isn't even a free country like Japan. I dont know why we dont give them the Soviet treatment and cut them off from the world.

But Nixon and Clinton gave Trump that bag of crap along with the North Korea problem.

I see a SCOTUS ripe for the picking.

I see a Prez committed to tax cuts with Kudlow in the drivers seat.

I see a Prez working on deregulation.

I see a Prez working to get rid of the unconstitutional zer0care program.

I see a Prez wanting to end illegal immigration and the abuses of the H1b visa program.

While his mouth overrides his @ss frequently , his actions IMHO regarding policy more than make up for his @sshattery.

God willing I will be there for him in November and I will not be holding my nose like I did when I voted for McShame.
I get the policy argument. He is no Reagan. I am not sure his policies or execution are better than most past republicans. But then there is the Russian agent, profiting off the office, kids getting highest security clearance, trying to move the British open, 4 Inspector generals, tax returns, hookers with campaign money, No smart people left in the room, ect.
Are the policies worth it? I think Pence could get more of that done without all that.
 
@BlueEyedGator17 did a pretty fine job in defending Trump. And to just say Trump lies more than anyone else is so childish and biased. It's the stupidest remarks to make, because it's so stupid and childish, I want to play that game also: No one lies more than Pelosi. No one lies more than Obama. No one lies more than pencil neck....

My question is still this concept of you being a Catholic and still voting for the destruction of human life in the womb? Have you asked your priest if it's okay to knowingly vote for a president that approves of the killing of the innocence? To me, all these other "moral" issues weigh heavily upon that one issue. It's the greatest of issues that needs to be addressed. I understand other issues are important. I dislike some concepts from the Republican base, but their bottom line is pro-life, so I vote for pro-life. It doesn't mean we don't stop addressing these other issues, but think about it, how can you provide for one if the most terrible of sinful acts - the playing of God with life - is swept under the rug?

Ok, let's tackle this one.

Roe v. Wade took away the states' right to criminalize abortion. It did not invent abortion. Abortion has been going on for as long as women have known that it wasn't just fat, there was a baby growing in there.

But criminalizing the act, all that does it make the procedure dangerous for the woman, it doesn't stop her from doing it. Have you never heard of the term "back alley abortions"? Women died regularly from abortions, and many who survived ended up sterile. Legalizing the process just allowed it to be done in safe and sanitary conditions.

Look, if overturning Roe v Wade actually ended abortions entirely, I'd be in favor of it. Nobody likes it. But some of us understand that it's never going to go away, and there is no valid reason or purpose to having women crippled or dead because of it.
 
New York
Chicago
Philadelphia
Newark
Baltimore
Portland
San Fran
Seattle
Et al.

The failure of these corporate entities have failed the poor communities. They have sluffed off responsibilities to the Feds and State for their problems in the degradation of their communities and it gets worse. They pay lip service to the depressed areas ... but that’s all

These communities need to be able to secede from their corporate municipality, and only pay the user fees for sewer and sanitation, overseen by the PSC

Any Federal or State subsidies need to go direct to an elected government of that community, with federal or state appointed financial advisors

They need to be able to imminent domain within their own boundary all abandoned commercial property and cut their own development deals

There is no way a top down approach is ever going to solve the inner city problems, especially with the municipality sponging more than their fair share.... the people in those communities must be empowered

I don't understand the thought process here. So, having, say, Baltimore run by a city council is terrible, but having it run by 5 or 6 city councils is a great idea? Because you are saying they should form their own mini governments, so sub-city councils would be the logical choice. And, this would mean each area would have to have it's own bureaucracy as well. Plus, if these low income areas split off, those are the lowest market value areas, so their taxable revenue would be very low. Unless they raise taxes, of course. Is that what you are proposing, that they make more government and raise taxes?

And I don't see the value in using EMINENT domain to take business property off of the tax rolls; even if a building is abandoned, someone is paying the property tax, otherwise the city could condemn it and take it over. You can only use eminent domain if there is an overarching need for the government to have that property, and that reason has to hold up in court if it's challenged, PLUS, you don't get that property for free, you have to buy it. So why in the world would a poor sub-city want to buy commercial property for which it has no use? To resell? But that property is most likely already up for sale, with no buyers. So the city would buy it, and then sell it at a loss? Or give it away?

This really does not seem like a good idea.
 
So I guess you are not going to answer. Just keep attacking and labeling. I respect your opinion but It doesn't represent the party. You could make up a new name?
That's the problem... it should be about representing the people and the country, not the party. It seems the Republicans have been hijacked by the American people and the Democrats have been hijacked by the socialists.
 
Ok, let's tackle this one.

Roe v. Wade took away the states' right to criminalize abortion. It did not invent abortion. Abortion has been going on for as long as women have known that it wasn't just fat, there was a baby growing in there.

But criminalizing the act, all that does it make the procedure dangerous for the woman, it doesn't stop her from doing it. Have younever heard of the term "back alley abortions"? Women died regularly from abortions, and many who survived ended up sterile. Legalizing the process just allowed it to be done in safe and sanitary conditions.

Look, if overturning Roe v Wade actually ended abortions entirely, I'd be in favor of it. Nobody likes it. But some of us understand that it's never going to go away, and there is no valid reason or purpose to having women crippled or dead because of it.

Yes abortion has been going on forever but Roe vs Wade was based on a lie. I've met Norma. I actually got to pick her up at our airport and drive her to her speaking engagement. Roe vs Wade made it possible to increase the number of abortions. Of course the spiritual side of it isn't how to stop abortion. It should be but it isn't. Having an identity in Jesus Christ would allow that couple to not jump in the back seat of a car and have sex. That's just an example of having your identity in Jesus Christ. It represents who you are and as such the moral responsibility and decisions one makes are affected. God can do anything. For us as a nation, we say we're under God but we aren't acting like it. But we can still pray for God to solve this crisis. In the meantime, here is how we can work at stopping abortion:
  • Allow men and women to have access to affordable, effective contraceptives but try promoting abstinence.
  • Make childcare more affordable and accessible for women everywhere.
  • Promote a culture that does not tolerate rape or sexual assault in any way.
  • Uplift and fix the current adoption and foster care industry.
  • Speak to kids at a young age about the importance of abstinence and if they do have sex make it safe sex.
  • Giving women access to life-saving healthcare.
And the list goes on. Many of these things, if they were followed through with, could have monumental effects on the abortion rates in the United States. Many of the reasons women seek out abortions are because of these reasons. Although these ways would be the best for putting an end to abortion in the country, there are millions of Americans who fail to see or acknowledge this.

Contrasting with the above list, here are a few ways that are ineffective in stopping abortions:
  • Shaming women for getting abortions. They need to be ministered to, not chastised.
  • Sharing false information regarding abortions without doing research.
  • Making birth control inaccessible to women and not teaching abstinence.
  • Taking away a woman’s means of receiving quality, affordable healthcare.
  • Stripping women of their right to a safe, clean abortion in a medical facility when medically necessary.
The issue is not how to make abortion illegal (yet it may be an option), but how to reduce them from happening. This involves identifying the various reasons that women seek out abortions and pinpointing the ways that these areas can be altered. This systematic process isn't prevalent because it's contrary to a woman's right to choose and that's what we have today.
 
I get the policy argument. He is no Reagan. I am not sure his policies or execution are better than most past republicans. But then there is the Russian agent, profiting off the office, kids getting highest security clearance, trying to move the British open, 4 Inspector generals, tax returns, hookers with campaign money, No smart people left in the room, ect.
Are the policies worth it? I think Pence could get more of that done without all that.
Nonsense all spin!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
Yes abortion has been going on forever but Roe vs Wade was based on a lie. I've met Norma. I actually got to pick her up at our airport and drive her to her speaking engagement. Roe vs Wade made it possible to increase the number of abortions. Of course the spiritual side of it isn't how to stop abortion. It should be but it isn't. Having an identity in Jesus Christ would allow that couple to not jump in the back seat of a car and have sex. That's just an example of having your identity in Jesus Christ. It represents who you are and as such the moral responsibility and decisions one makes are affected. God can do anything. For us as a nation, we say we're under God but we aren't acting like it. But we can still pray for God to solve this crisis. In the meantime, here is how we can work at stopping abortion:
  • Allow men and women to have access to affordable, effective contraceptives but try promoting abstinence.
  • Make childcare more affordable and accessible for women everywhere.
  • Promote a culture that does not tolerate rape or sexual assault in any way.
  • Uplift and fix the current adoption and foster care industry.
  • Speak to kids at a young age about the importance of abstinence and if they do have sex make it safe sex.
  • Giving women access to life-saving healthcare.
And the list goes on. Many of these things, if they were followed through with, could have monumental effects on the abortion rates in the United States. Many of the reasons women seek out abortions are because of these reasons. Although these ways would be the best for putting an end to abortion in the country, there are millions of Americans who fail to see or acknowledge this.

Contrasting with the above list, here are a few ways that are ineffective in stopping abortions:
  • Shaming women for getting abortions. They need to be ministered to, not chastised.
  • Sharing false information regarding abortions without doing research.
  • Making birth control inaccessible to women and not teaching abstinence.
  • Taking away a woman’s means of receiving quality, affordable healthcare.
  • Stripping women of their right to a safe, clean abortion in a medical facility when medically necessary.
The issue is not how to make abortion illegal (yet it may be an option), but how to reduce them from happening. This involves identifying the various reasons that women seek out abortions and pinpointing the ways that these areas can be altered. This systematic process isn't prevalent because it's contrary to a woman's right to choose and that's what we have today.

I agree with 100% with this. Education, support, and affordable, available contraception are the keys to minimizing abortion.
 
I don't understand the thought process here. So, having, say, Baltimore run by a city council is terrible, but having it run by 5 or 6 city councils is a great idea? Because you are saying they should form their own mini governments, so sub-city councils would be the logical choice. And, this would mean each area would have to have it's own bureaucracy as well. Plus, if these low income areas split off, those are the lowest market value areas, so their taxable revenue would be very low. Unless they raise taxes, of course. Is that what you are proposing, that they make more government and raise taxes?

And I don't see the value in using EMINENT domain to take business property off of the tax rolls; even if a building is abandoned, someone is paying the property tax, otherwise the city could condemn it and take it over. You can only use eminent domain if there is an overarching need for the government to have that property, and that reason has to hold up in court if it's challenged, PLUS, you don't get that property for free, you have to buy it. So why in the world would a poor sub-city want to buy commercial property for which it has no use? To resell? But that property is most likely already up for sale, with no buyers. So the city would buy it, and then sell it at a loss? Or give it away?

This really does not seem like a good idea.

Im sorry you don’t understand the thought process, so I’ll explain it. A large bloated city government makes decisions based upon needs it assesses over its entire incorporated area, and generally focusing money on areas generating money base, not on the depressed areas.... because people with money repay politicians with donations

Depressed areas can’t change things from within their city as they still are just a proportionate voting block AND have little money amongst their peeps

I’m not talking about breaking the entire city into sub groups, but the worst areas must be able to divorce their city due to neglect.... this should be a right

In another way, the more control and response you apply locally, the greater control and improvement is obtained, because the feedback loop is tighter.... this is fundamental engineering control theory, and is true on any level and any system, and the “system” is failing these communities

What’s it matter about taxable income right now for these communities? We are throwing schitpots of money at the poor, TRILLIONS of effing dollars! And getting what exactly??? More violence, generational poverty and they remain cesspools.... we need to target that money to the worst communities a handful at a time and fix them for good with them being able to build that tax base by them taking ownership of abandoned properties, tax furloughs corporate Hub zones that the community shares... not the bloated cities

You don’t understand eminent domain, the Supreme Court has already ruled that if it benifits the city or “governmental” entity, then they can grab that property.... and put up a shopping mall if that revenue is beneficial... your idea of overarching is quaint and old, but isn’t true any longer ....

But bottom line.... these communities being under the larger corporate umbrella of these massive municipalities isn’t working - that’s an unassailable fact. The response to the needs of these communities is not working - fact. People work and strive in their own self interest - fact. Throwing incredible amounts of tax money at from long distance for 50 years hasn’t worked - fact. Government provided homes gives no eventual equity to the community- fact.

Until we remove these communities from
Under the failed corporate municipal structures through which any public investment must pass, these problems won’t get solved. Period.
 
@BlueEyedGator17 did a pretty fine job in defending Trump. And to just say Trump lies more than anyone else is so childish and biased. It's the stupidest remarks to make, because it's so stupid and childish, I want to play that game also: No one lies more than Pelosi. No one lies more than Obama. No one lies more than pencil neck....

My question is still this concept of you being a Catholic and still voting for the destruction of human life in the womb? Have you asked your priest if it's okay to knowingly vote for a president that approves of the killing of the innocence? To me, all these other "moral" issues weigh heavily upon that one issue. It's the greatest of issues that needs to be addressed. I understand other issues are important. I dislike some concepts from the Republican base, but their bottom line is pro-life, so I vote for pro-life. It doesn't mean we don't stop addressing these other issues, but think about it, how can you provide for one if the most terrible of sinful acts - the playing of God with life - is swept under the rug?
I didn’t realize abortion was on the ballot. You are so FOS. All the Pubs do is talk about it, but can do nothing about it. And then take away money from those who need it most. If you people cared as much about life after birth as you do before birth, you’d be more convincing.
 
I didn’t realize abortion was on the ballot. You are so FOS. All the Pubs do is talk about it, but can do nothing about it. And then take away money from those who need it most. If you people cared as much about life after birth as you do before birth, you’d be more convincing.
You're just showing your true colors. I mean, you are actually promoting abortion for the sake of "saving face."
"Come on man."
That's pathetic.
 
You're just showing your true colors. I mean, you are actually promoting abortion for the sake of "saving face."
"Come on man."
That's pathetic.
Lies. Bearing false witness is a mortal sin.

I have never promoted abortion. In fact, I’ve been very clear about my position from the beginning. Your love for the lying, adulterous Trump is clouding your reasoning ability. Your support for Trump must mean you are promoting adultery, sexual abuse, nailing porn stars while your wife is pregnant, cheating on your taxes, separating kids from their parents, and spreading division and hatred against your fellow man.

No wonder you get banned from other message boards. You’re a very hateful person.
 
Last edited:
I get the policy argument. He is no Reagan. I am not sure his policies or execution are better than most past republicans. But then there is the Russian agent, profiting off the office, kids getting highest security clearance, trying to move the British open, 4 Inspector generals, tax returns, hookers with campaign money, No smart people left in the room, ect.
Are the policies worth it? I think Pence could get more of that done without all that.

What Russian agent? That sounds like something a CNN viewer would say.

Profiting off his office? How is that happening? I thought you dems were boycotting all things Trump?

His 'kids' are busy advising him and brokering Middle East peace for the first time in decades. Again, thought you 'conservatives' liked that?

Hookers with campaign money? What the blue hell are yo.....nevermind. The less we talk about the alt-left's insane conspiracy theories the better.

We have Trump because we tried backing the george bushes and john mccains and mitt romneys. If your Never Trumpers had done their job, there would be no Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
I agree with 100% with this. Education, support, and affordable, available contraception are the keys to minimizing abortion.

IOW give teens free condoms and don't judge them for having sex? How about you teach them that having babies before they are ready is the biggest obstacle to having a successful life?

But that gets dangerously close to teaching teens to have morals. Libs generally oppose that as they feel it pushes them toward voting republican.
 
Im sorry you don’t understand the thought process, so I’ll explain it. A large bloated city government makes decisions based upon needs it assesses over its entire incorporated area, and generally focusing money on areas generating money base, not on the depressed areas.... because people with money repay politicians with donations

Depressed areas can’t change things from within their city as they still are just a proportionate voting block AND have little money amongst their peeps

I’m not talking about breaking the entire city into sub groups, but the worst areas must be able to divorce their city due to neglect.... this should be a right

In another way, the more control and response you apply locally, the greater control and improvement is obtained, because the feedback loop is tighter.... this is fundamental engineering control theory, and is true on any level and any system, and the “system” is failing these communities

What’s it matter about taxable income right now for these communities? We are throwing schitpots of money at the poor, TRILLIONS of effing dollars! And getting what exactly??? More violence, generational poverty and they remain cesspools.... we need to target that money to the worst communities a handful at a time and fix them for good with them being able to build that tax base by them taking ownership of abandoned properties, tax furloughs corporate Hub zones that the community shares... not the bloated cities

You don’t understand eminent domain, the Supreme Court has already ruled that if it benifits the city or “governmental” entity, then they can grab that property.... and put up a shopping mall if that revenue is beneficial... your idea of overarching is quaint and old, but isn’t true any longer ....

But bottom line.... these communities being under the larger corporate umbrella of these massive municipalities isn’t working - that’s an unassailable fact. The response to the needs of these communities is not working - fact. People work and strive in their own self interest - fact. Throwing incredible amounts of tax money at from long distance for 50 years hasn’t worked - fact. Government provided homes gives no eventual equity to the community- fact.

Until we remove these communities from
Under the failed corporate municipal structures through which any public investment must pass, these problems won’t get solved. Period.

I understand eminent domain perfectly well, thank you. You are correct, eminent domain can be used for the benefit of the city, but it still isn't FREE. You have to BUY the property. And see, here's a thing I don't think you understand, even though I said it once already. If you eminent domain a property, it takes it off the tax rolls. These commercial property owners pay their taxes. So eminent domain is a revenue reduction for the sub-city, and then you want the sub city to develop the property? Where will that money come from?

What else, what else...oh, yeah, only GOVERNMENTS can eminent domain. So you would have no choice but to incorporate these sub city governments. You seem to think you can separate these communities, give them the powers of government, but not actually have a government. That is not realistic. Honestly, nothing you have written is anywhere near realistic.

So what we have is an idealistic, but not realistic, idea to save poor communities that involves creating more government and spending a lot of money that these places don't have. Are you SURE you aren't a Democrat? Sure sounds like Democrat thinking to me.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT