Here's some advice - as soon as
@kalimgoodman projects a statement onto someone that they never said it's time to just exit stage right.
I never said Trump was successful, my point was he fought like hell to slow them down as much as possible and made life difficult for Iran. I, as you pointed out and I agree, conceded that boots on the ground and missiles were the only way to truly stop them. Trump was not a warmonger and probably would have never done that.
None of that excuses Biden de facto honoring the agreement despite Iran ignoring their part by relieving sanctions. That's the whole deal - you (Iran) adhere to these limits and we (the US and allies) will ease sanctions.
Again - his original assertion was that Trump wasn't worried about nuclear weapons (post #10), which is on it's face absurd. I blew that out of the water and now he's got us arguing about what president was most successful at stopping Iran, which is a totally different conversation. The point is Obama and Biden have rolled out the red carpet for Iran to have nuclear warhead(s). This could spell the end of the world. A nuke turns Jerusalem to glass and it's going to get really ugly.
It's the debate equivalent of asking "when did you stop beating your wife?" every time you get exposed as ignorant.