We beat Tennessee early in the season, they would no longer be in the CFP discussion. I still think OSU would still win without Jeremiah Smith.How in the hell did the commitee let TN in the playoff when their best win was over a mediocre Bama team that lost to Vandy? It's clear a 10-2 Big 10 team is superior to a 10-2 SEC team.
Felipe Franks would have completed that 4th and 6 play.Nico Iamaleava is about as dumb and worse than Felipe Franks. $137.00 legs with a 10 cent brain.
Nico Iamaleava is about as dumb and worse than Felipe Franks. $137.00 legs with a 10 cent brain.
Another team in first round getting ran off the field that had NO business in the top 12
Those idiots are talking about stealing Lagway.We will BEAT Ohio St and it could be a BLOWOUT
Feel free to bump this thread when it happens. Big 10 Football is a joke compared to SEC and we’ll probably have the most fans for an away game that they’ve ever seen. They’ll be shook. We will beat their asswww.volnation.com
Those idiots are talking about stealing Lagway.
Look at this schedule and just because you beat Alabama by 7 doesnt mean you deserve to be in the playoffs. The other 2 teams they played that were ranked at the time they played them ended up 6-6 each. Tenn dodged Texas, Ole Miss, LSU, South Carolina this year. And the Vols got that A$$ run ruled tonightYep 10-2 SEC teams that don't win the SECCG should be kept out of the playoff if possible.
So funny…
Lol…what more do you want brutha?!?!?Another team in first round getting ran off the field that had NO business in the top 12
I like his other post as well.We will BEAT Ohio St and it could be a BLOWOUT
Feel free to bump this thread when it happens. Big 10 Football is a joke compared to SEC and we’ll probably have the most fans for an away game that they’ve ever seen. They’ll be shook. We will beat their asswww.volnation.com
Reminds me of their photo shoot when kiffin was the HC......of the shirtless pics and heavy chains.So funny…
I want competition brutha, Love the Hulk Hogan analogy.Lol…what more do you want brutha?!?!?
The home teams kicked ass with home field in round 1, but it doesn’t mean that the teams that made it didn’t deserve to be there…
Wait for round 2.I want competition brutha, Love the Hulk Hogan analogy.
So much complaining, but I just like the expanded playoffs. FCS and lower divisions have been doing this for a long time and it's great. Just enjoy the ride and the fact that there's more football being played with 12 teams actually getting an opportuniity to win it all. Does the system now need to be tweaked? Of course. But at least they've gone this far and to me it's way overdue.
I expected this. Not UT-OSU per se, but a bunch of blowouts overall. I said this a while ago: there are always blowouts in these CFP games, better to have them in the first two rounds and get a competitive final four than to only pick 4 teams and have two of them be posers so you get the blowouts at that level. If we suffer through blowouts the first two rounds but get a compelling final four, I'm ok with that.Yep the odds alone are that one of the 4 games should have been competitive. Not really sure if tweaking can improve it much but if they go to 14 teams it gives them a chance to only give 2 byes to the top 2 conference winners. Also if AZ St and Boise don't compete well there is the argument to keep the 3rd and 4th conference winners out of guaranteed high seeds. Not sure what else they can really do. They have to have at least one spot from the group of 5 and power 4 conference winners have to be guaranteed spots. I still don't see too many situations they put a 9-3 power 4 team in over an 11-1 power 4 team. I doubt most years you have two 11-1 teams like Indiana and SMU though.
I expected this. Not UT-OSU per se, but a bunch of blowouts overall. I said this a while ago: there are always blowouts in these CFP games, better to have them in the first two rounds and get a competitive final four than to only pick 4 teams and have two of them be posers so you get the blowouts at that level. If we suffer through blowouts the first two rounds but get a compelling final four, I'm ok with that.
Yes, the committee can tweak it a bit, I think only guaranteeing a home game, but not a bye, is enough of an incentive to win your conference. So only guaranteeing a top 8 seed would let better teams be seeded in the top 4. A formula that rewards tough schedules more than penalizes losses would also be good. But adding more teams is not the answer right now. When these games are all competitive, and lower seeds start winning regularly, so that we know we have reached a level of parity, we can consider adding more teams.
They came out shirtless and went home pantless.
This times a quadrillion.So much complaining, but I just like the expanded playoffs. FCS and lower divisions have been doing this for a long time and it's great. Just enjoy the ride and the fact that there's more football being played with 12 teams actually getting an opportuniity to win it all. Does the system now need to be tweaked? Of course. But at least they've gone this far and to me it's way overdue.