Judge Delivers Major Blow to Biden Admin in Social Media Censorship Case
This is just an injunction but it’s a major step towards getting the federal gov’t out of the business of telling us what we can say.
Chalk one up for Free Speech
- Thread starter fatman76
- Start date
This is just an injunction but it’s a major step towards getting the federal gov’t out of the business of telling us what we can say.
Judge Delivers Major Blow to Biden Admin in Social Media Censorship Case
www.theepochtimes.com
This is just an injunction but it’s a major step towards getting the federal gov’t out of the business of telling us what we can say.
The Stalinist and Maoist in the regime are going to go postal
This will be HUGE during election time. This may be the way that they get rid of BrandonJudge Delivers Major Blow to Biden Admin in Social Media Censorship Case
This is just an injunction but it’s a major step towards getting the federal gov’t out of the business of telling us what we can say.
1000%
I’m sure they will sneak their way around this, just like Brandon has vowed to sneak around the AA ruling and the bailout ruling, but even a small break in the MSM/Federal Gov’t chain is a win for the country.
Regarding blatant censorship, woke Yahoo censors in comments any mention of Klaus Schwaub and the phrase, "just eat zee bugs". It happens instantly so some nutjob has programmed that into an algorithm. 
Looks like the Fascist have decided they want to fight for their ability to censor free speech. Let that sink in. @Uniformed_ReRe supports an administration that is fighting to censor Americans. Thats his team.
I agree with this ruling by why didn't those states try to stop this when Trump white house was doing that. This partisan stuff is so annoying.Judge Delivers Major Blow to Biden Admin in Social Media Censorship Case
This is just an injunction but it’s a major step towards getting the federal gov’t out of the business of telling us what we can say.
The Trump WH was working with social media companies to censor democrats? 😂
And all you do is post partisan stuff. You can unclutch those pearls.
Did you not hear the twitter files?
Trump WH asked Twitter to censor Chrissy Teigen tweet: ex-employee
Former President Donald Trump’s White House asked Twitter to censor one of Chrissy Teigen’s tweets after she referred to him as a “p—y ass b—h,” an ex-Twitter em…
nypost.com
Examples? (I am genuinely curious and seeking to understand)
The Ackbar Meme is always funny, tho. Not gonna lie....
If you’re trying to make any comparisons between the last two WH’s and how they colluded to censor information with Twitter you’re dumber than I thought you were.Did you not hear the twitter files?
Trump WH asked Twitter to censor Chrissy Teigen tweet: ex-employee
Former President Donald Trump’s White House asked Twitter to censor one of Chrissy Teigen’s tweets after she referred to him as a “p—y ass b—h,” an ex-Twitter em…
I mean this is next level, cork on your fork stuff.
Also the judge said WH communication started ramping up in 2019...who was president?
Our government is our must dangerous enemy!
Because the Trump White House was alerting Twitter to clear violations that any user could see should have been removed, but Twitter wasn't removing them.
What the Biden White House did was actively work with Twitter to censor Americans. Same thing happened when Trump was president, the difference is, they ignored Trump's requests and political activists working for Twitter's Trust and Safety dept worked with James Baker to actively censor all discussion of certain topics from certain users.
The dems worked with Twitter to engage in censorship. That included working together to censor the Trump White House.
All of this was verified in the Twitter Files.
I just gave you the facts. Your troll attempts are painfully easy to spot.
In short, the Trump White House reported tweets that clearly violated Twitter's TOS, and asked "Hey, why is this tweet still up?' Their requests were largely ignored.
What the dems did was embed multiple people including James Baker IN TWITTER and used them as a liaison between governmnent and Twitter. They worked with Twitter to actively censor based on topic, any discussion of a particular topic from a positive or negative angle (based on the topic) was censored. The users participating at first were shadowbanned. If they continued discussing the topic, they were banned outright.
That's the facts. We discussed all this when the Twitter Files were first coming out. @kalimgoodman did not participate in those discussions at all, and is now trying to twist them into being something they were not.
What did I tell @sadgator here years ago?
Fascism is a political construct of the left. He said that was insane, everyone knew fascism came from the right.
We begged the poor sheep to listen to us.
This is fact. Leftist/communist countries are tyrannical enemies of freedom of speech. Don't agree with the narrative and they will disappear you
Because it's gaslighting, and I'm not mad, I'm more astounded at how insanely partisan and biased you are.
Trump may have had his feelings hurt and someone on his team reached out to someone at Twitter and asked that a defamatory post be removed, but that PALES in comparison with the way the Biden administration controlled social media. Nothing in her tweet is anything the public didn't know about TDS patients.
To even insinuate the two are the same is batsh!t crazytown MSNBC stuff...
One of two options - you know the obvious and you're a sad troll, or two, you really believe the Trump administration did the same thing Biden did about the same type of issues...which is so much worse.
And to put a finer point on it, why aren't Trump's lawyers immediately countersuing so they can censor? Oh that's right....it's because they didn't. It's the fascist left that wants to control what you see and what you can say.
He is ignoring the part where TWO Democrat reporters that testified before congress, and Elon have stated that what the Biden administration and the left were doing was far more egregious, much more prevalent, and not even comparable. It’s what he does. It’s what the left does.
Anytime there is a story they try to make it about Trump. It’s disingenuous, and it’s purposeful deflection.
Last edited:
@kalimgoodman show us the examples of the Trump White House working WITH Twitter to censor Americans. This is what you are claiming happened:
Explain to me how the Trump White House worked WITH Twitter to censor Americans.
Do that, then we can say the Trump White House did the same thing the Biden White House did.
Did you not hear the twitter files?
Trump WH asked Twitter to censor Chrissy Teigen tweet: ex-employee
Former President Donald Trump’s White House asked Twitter to censor one of Chrissy Teigen’s tweets after she referred to him as a “p—y ass b—h,” an ex-Twitter em…
Explain to me how the Trump White House worked WITH Twitter to censor Americans.
Do that, then we can say the Trump White House did the same thing the Biden White House did.
And guys, please don't get sidetracked by his gaslighting attempts. Hold his feet to the fire and force him to back up his claims.
He can't, he will start trying to deflect when you have him on the ropes.
Keep him on topic. Make him back up his claims, or make him run from the thread.
He can't, he will start trying to deflect when you have him on the ropes.
Keep him on topic. Make him back up his claims, or make him run from the thread.
Here's an analogy for how the left argues.
Billy wears a red hat. Billy got a ticket for jaywalking last week. The whole town saw and made fun of Billy for not using the crosswalk.
Robby wears a blue hat. Robby brutally murdered his family in their sleep. The whole town was horrified by what Robby did, because they never have murders in that town.
When a red hat starts to talk to a blue hat about what Robby did, the blue hat points out that "red hat people get in trouble with the law too, Billy got a ticket just last week!".
And somehow that makes sense to the blue hat.
It's not gaslighting. It is a practice that has been going on since Obama. That is just factual. You can argue that Biden maybe worse but nothing I said about the Trump administration doing it as well is inaccurate.
All of the Hunter censorship that you guys complained about doing the election was when Trump was president.
Biden is the current president, so his administration will have to defend it.
Gaslighting is your go to, when you can't really discuss the facts.
Unlike you, I don't have a talking point or goal. This is a government problem of monitoring and trying to control us. Remember the Patriotic Act? Multiple Administration's has their hand in this.
Actually, that's a lie. The topic of this thread is about a judge slapping the Hiden White House for working with Twitter to censor Americans.
That didn't happen under Trump.
What you are trying to spin is that Trump asking Twitter to check out violations as being the same thing as the dems working WITH Twitter to censor Americans.
The sad thing is, by taking this stance, you are supporting fascist behavior, and turning your back on your own countrymen.
You have claimed the Trump White House did the same thing.
Where is your proof? Or is this another lie you told?
And that proves your claim is a lie. That proves that Twitter was NOT working with the Trump White House to censor Americans.
That proves the whole point of the lawsuit: That the dems were working WITH Twitter to censor Americans. And Trump's White House was just as much of a victim of the censorship as anyone else.
As you just proved.
Here's a complete list if you care - show me where Trump's administration's censorship reached this level (see my jaywalking analogy above):
The judge specifically found:
- “[V]irtually all of the free speech suppressed was conservative free speech.”
- At least 22 times, the White House engaged in “unrelenting pressure” against tech companies. “White House Defendants engaged in coercion to induce social-media companies to suppress free speech.” “The White House Defendants made it very clear to social-media companies what they wanted suppressed and what they wanted amplified. Faced with unrelenting pressure from the most powerful office in the world, the social-media companies apparently complied.”
- “[T]he Hunter Biden laptop story was real, and not mere Russian disinformation,” and the “FBI’s failure to alert social-media companies” to this fact “is particularly troubling” after the FBI had falsely suggested to social-media companies that the Hunter Biden laptop story was fake. “After the Hunter Biden laptop story broke on October 14, 2020, [FBI agent Laura] Dehmlow refused to comment on the status of the Hunter Biden laptop in response to a direct inquiry from Facebook, although the FBI had the laptop in its possession since December 2019.”
- Facebook suppressed information at the demand of the White House, the FBI, and other federal agents even though the information “did not violate Facebook’s policies” and thus ordinarily would not have been suppressed. “Facebook noted that in response to White House demands, it was censoring, removing, and reducing the virality of content discouraging vaccines ‘that does not contain actionable misinformation.’”
- Former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki issued a “threat of ‘legal consequences’” to social media companies “if they do not censor misinformation more aggressively.”
- After President Biden accused social media companies of “killing people,” Facebook emailed the Surgeon General to say “it’s not great to be accused of killing people” and to say Facebook was “keen to find a way to deescalate.” Social media platforms then met with the Surgeon General. “After the meetings with social-media platforms, the platforms seemingly fell in line with the Office of Surgeon General’s and White House’s requests.”
- The “motivation” of Dr. Anthony Fauci and other defendants was specifically “a ‘take down’ of protected free speech.”
- The Department of Homeland Security “met with social-media companies to both inform and pressure them to censor content protected by the First Amendment.” It then “expanded the word ‘infrastructure’ in its terminology to include ‘cognitive’ infrastructure, so as to create authority to monitor and suppress protected free speech posted on social media.”
- DHS “Defendants believe they had a mandate to control the process of acquiring knowledge.”
- DHS helped create a pseudo-private organization “to get around unclear legal authorities, including very real First Amendment questions.”
- Federal defendants did not just censor speech directly; they also caused social media companies to change their policies. They “used meetings, emails, phone calls, follow-up meetings, and the power of the government to pressure social-media platforms to change their policies and to suppress free speech.”
- Although much of the past suppression involved COVID and elections, federal officials “have also shown a willingness to do it with regard to other issues, such as gas prices, parody speech, calling the President a liar, climate change, gender, and abortion” as well as political criticism about “the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the return of U.S. Support of Ukraine.”
I think he just tried to claim that Billy killed someone by jaywalking.
My analogy didn't go far enough.
It's truly scary the lengths some on the left will go to defend their favorite politicians. It borders on religious zealotry,
The ONLY governments on EARTH that had "ministry of disinformation" is America(Brandon), China(Mao), Russia (Stalin), Germany(Hitler)...and some others just like them. What GREAT company Brandon and his supporters share
- “[T]he Hunter Biden laptop story was real, and not mere Russian disinformation,” and the “FBI’s failure to alert social-media companies” to this fact “is particularly troubling” after the FBI had falsely suggested to social-media companies that the Hunter Biden laptop story was fake. “After the Hunter Biden laptop story broke on October 14, 2020, [FBI agent Laura] Dehmlow refused to comment on the status of the Hunter Biden laptop in response to a direct inquiry from Facebook, although the FBI had the laptop in its possession since December 2019.”
What does "Who was President" have to do with ANYTHING?? The SAME FBI investigate the Russia HOAX even though they KNEW the dossier was invented by the Clinton campaign! THEY ARE CROOKED. Not because of Trump...because they support DEMOCRATS. My Lord...how do some of you find your way home at night?
I guess his ignore button is broken too.
Someone needs to call the ignore button mechanic or something....
